Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Stormwater Quality Malabe Manuscript
Stormwater Quality Malabe Manuscript
B. Study Area The parameters mentioned above were only measured as the
facilities in the laboratory was not sufficient and it would
The sample locations were chosen covering the two incur a great cost to carry out other parameters like oil and
impervious surfaces and a pervious surface covering a grease which is another quality affecting parameter. (Barlow,
significant area of Malabe. The following are the sites chosen et al., 2006).
to take the runoff water for measure the quality.
1. Impervious Pavement Surface in SLIIT Malabe campus
(Location A)
2. Impervious Road Surface Malabe Town (Location B)
3. Impervious Pavement Surface in Malabe Town
(Location C)
III. RESULTS processing. It can harm fish and other aquatic life by reducing
food supplies, degrading spawning beds, and affecting gill
Variation of measured parameters with different Impervious
function. Elevated turbidity will also raise water temperature,
Surfaces lower dissolved oxygen, prevent light from reaching aquatic
A) pH plants. This will reduces their ability to photosynthesize, and
harm fish gills and eggs. The desired level of turbidity should
be less as 10 (mainly for drinking purposes). The overall
variation of turbidity of the impervious surfaces, range from
371NTU to 16.2NTU.
The abnormal increment in the level of turbidity in the runoff
water collected at location A (Pavement in SLIIT car park)
can be due to the heavy dust accumulation in the interlock
pavement. Furthermore as there is a construction site nearby,
frequent exposure to dust is commonly seen in the parking
area.
IV. CONCLUSIONS
Due to rapid urbanization level in the area, the generation of
impervious layers increase day by day which will result in
more and more generation of runoff. The collected runoff
Nitrite is also have a similar effect as Nitrates. But it is far sample parameters clearly shows that some of the parameters
worse if exceed the desired values. The measured run off are on or above the desired maximum range. Solids
contains more nitrite levels than the permissible limit. This concentration and turbidity levels in the runoff generated in
will pollute the water and the water bodies which these runoff the area are mostly above the desired values. This indicated
will lead to creating more adverse effect to the environment. that there are particles and other waste matter in the
The increment of Nitrite in location D can be as the area is impervious surfaces which accumulate in the runoff. The
subjected to agricultural development. Therefore fertilization impacts of this polluted runoff is severe even though the
is a commonly seen. This can affect the amount of Nitrites in general public do not know the depth.
the runoff. From the analyzed parameters, Nitrite, Turbidity and total
It is highly unlikely to have such levels of nitrites as nitrite solids are significantly higher than the accepted standard
is highly unstable and it will convert to nitrates with time. It values specified by the Central Environmental authority.
can be mostly an instrumental error or a methodical error that (CEA, 2008). Due to the increase in these parameters, runoff
resulted in the high values of nitrite obtained in the samples. water entering the streams and lakes will pollute the water
bodies hence result in loss of aquatic life. The runoff
generated in Malabe area will flow directly or indirectly to Indicator. Journal of the American Planning Association,
river Kalani and the Thalangama canal which is a habitat to a 62(2), pp. 243-258.
wide range of species and has diverse range of eco systems 13. Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment,
and aquatic life. 1992. Colorado Discharge Permit System General Permit for
Furthermore polluted runoff with high level of impurities Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction
helps to spread of diseases which will affect the human Activities, s.l.: Water Quality Control Division.
lifestyle as well. Most of the diseases are water born. 14. Environmental Protection Agency, 1992. Stormwater
Infiltration of these runoff water will also pollute the Water Management for Construction Activities, EPA 832-R-
groundwater and causes to a change in the water in the ground 92-005, s.l.: Environmental Protection Agency.
in an adverse way. 15. Federal Highway Administration, 1984. Sources and
The major reasons for this increase of desired parameters Migration of Highway Runoff Pollutants, FHWA/RD84/001,
specially Nitrite, turbidity and Solids concentrations are the 002, 003, 004, s.l.: Federal Highway Administration.
rapid development of the area. The urbanization results in 16. Federal Highway Administration, 1985. Effects of
generation of impervious surfaces which acts as a pollutant Highway Runoff on Receiving Waters, FHWA/RD84/062,
accumulator. The resulting runoff from these impervious 063, 064, 065, 066, s.l.: Federal Highway Administration.
surfaces are also there by polluted creating above mentioned 17. Federal Highway Administration, 1989. Retention
negative effects to the surrounding. Detention and Overland Flow for Pollutant Removal from
Analyzing the quality parameters of the runoff water, it can be Highway Stormwater Runoff, FHWA/RD89/202, 203, s.l.:
concluded that the stormwater quality is not the best in the Federal Highway Administration.
region and this is due to the increased impervious surfaces 18. Geelhoed, J., Hiemstra, T. & VanRiemsdijk, W., 1997.
created which are pollutant accumulators. Phosphate and sulfate adsorption on goethite: Single anion and
competitive adsorption. Geochimica Et Cosmochimica Acta,
V. REFERENCES Volume 61, pp. 2389-2396.
1. THE NORWECO LABORATORY, 1997. 2540 SOLIDS, 19. Goonetillekea, A., Thomasb, E., Ginnc, S. & Gilbertc, D.,
Ohio: NORWECO LABORATORY. 2005. Understanding the role of land use in urban stormwater
2. Administration Federal Highway, 1981. Constituents of quality management. Journal of Environmental Management,
Highway Runoff, FHWA/RD81/042, 043, 044, 045, 046. s.l.: 74(1), pp. 31 - 42.
Federal Highway Administration. 20. Hanrahan, G., Gledhill, M., House, W. & Worsfold, P.,
3. Assistant, H. t., 1999. How to measure dissolved, suspended 2003. Evaluation of phosphorus concentrations in relation to
& total solids, New Delhi: World Bank & Government of The annual and seasonal physico-chemical water quality
Netherlands. parameters in a UK chalk stream. A journal of the
4. Barbosa, A. E., Fernandes, J. N. & David, L. M., 2012. Key International Water Association, 37(15), pp. 3579 - 3589.
issues for sustainable urban stormwater management. Laboratory of Dr. Zhongqi He, U. S. D. o. A., 2016. Using a
SciVerse ScienceDirect, 46(2012 May 26), pp. 6787-6789. pH Meter. Journal of Visualized Experiments, Volume 10, pp.
5. Barco, O. J., Ciaponi, C. & Papiri, S., 2005. Quantitative 3791 - 5500.
and qualitative analysis of strom water runoff in an urban 21. Lammers, W., 1966. Natural Water Fractionation: Theory
experimental catchment. and Practice. Verh. International Verein. Limnology, Volume
6. Barlow, K., b, J. F., c, D. N. & Grayson, R., 2006. 16, pp. 452-458.
Modelling phosphorus transport in a surface irrigation drain. 22. Maharjan, B., Pachel, K. & Loigu, E., 2013. URBAN
7. Advances in Water Resources, Volume 29, pp. 1383 -1398. STORMWATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY IN THE
Barrios, A., 2000. Urbanization and water quality. CAE CITY OF TALLINN. 1st Annual International
working paper series. Interdisciplinary Conference, Issue 2013.
8. Beecham, S. & Razzaghmanesh, M., 2014. Water quality 23. Makepeace, D. K., Smith, D. W. & Stanley, S. J., 2016.
and quantity investigation of green roofs in a dry climate. Urban stormwater quality: Summary of contaminant data.
School of Natural and Built Environments, 70(1), pp. 370 - Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology,
384. 46(17).
9. Bowes, M., House, W. & Hodgkinson, R., 2003. 24. Maryland Department of Natural Resources, 1984.
Phosphorus dynamics along a river continuum. Science of the Maryland Standards and Specifications for Stormwater
Total Environment, Volume 313, pp. 199-212. Management Infiltration Practices, s.l.: Stormwater
10. Burns, D. et al., 2005. Effects of suburban development on Management Division.
runoff generation in the Croton River basin, New York, USA. 25. Maryland, C. o. T. p., 2016. Stormwater management
Journal of Hydrology, Volume 311, pp. 266-281. program. [Online]
11. CEA, N. M. o. E. a., 2008. NATIONAL 26. May, C., E.B.Welch, R.R.Horner & karr, J., 1977. Quality
ENVIRONMENTAL ACT, No. 47 OF 1980, Colombo: indices for urbanization effects in Puget sounds in lowland
Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources. streams.
12. Chester, L., Jr, A. & Gibbons, C. J., 2007. Impervious
Surface Coverage: The Emergence of a Key Environmental