Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Evaluation and Management of Elevated Intracranial Pressure in Adults - UpToDate
Evaluation and Management of Elevated Intracranial Pressure in Adults - UpToDate
Evaluation and Management of Elevated Intracranial Pressure in Adults - UpToDate
www.uptodate.com
© 2021 UpToDate, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.
All topics are updated as new evidence becomes available and our peer review process is complete.
Literature review current through: Jul 2021. | This topic last updated: Apr 26, 2019.
INTRODUCTION
The evaluation and management of adult patients with elevated ICP will be reviewed here.
Elevated ICP in children and specific causes and complications of elevated ICP (eg, ischemic
stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, traumatic brain injury) are discussed separately. (See
"Elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) in children: Clinical manifestations and diagnosis" and
"Management of acute moderate and severe traumatic brain injury", section on 'Intracranial
pressure management' and "Initial assessment and management of acute stroke" and
"Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: Treatment and prognosis", section on 'Early
complications' and "Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: Acute treatment and prognosis",
section on 'Intracranial pressure management'.)
PHYSIOLOGY
ICP is normally ≤15 mmHg in adults, and pathologic intracranial hypertension (ICH) is present at
pressures ≥20 mmHg. ICP is normally lower in children than adults, and may be
subatmospheric in newborns [2]. Homeostatic mechanisms stabilize ICP, with occasional
transient elevations associated with physiologic events, including sneezing, coughing, or
Valsalva maneuvers.
Pathologic structures, including mass lesions, abscesses, and hematomas, also may be present
within the intracranial compartment. Since the overall volume of the cranial vault cannot
change, an increase in the volume of one component, or the presence of pathologic
components, necessitates the displacement of other structures, an increase in ICP, or both.
Thus, ICP is a function of the volume and compliance of each component of the intracranial
compartment, an interrelationship known as the Monro-Kellie doctrine [4,5].
The volume of brain parenchyma is relatively constant in adults, although it can be altered by
mass lesions or in the setting of cerebral edema ( figure 1). The volumes of CSF and blood in
the intracranial space vary to a greater degree. Abnormal increases in the volume of any
component may lead to elevations in ICP.
CSF is produced by the choroid plexus and elsewhere in the central nervous system (CNS) at a
rate of approximately 20 mL/hour (500 mL/day) [6]. CSF is normally resorbed via the arachnoid
granulations into the venous system. Problems with CSF regulation generally result from
impaired outflow caused by ventricular obstruction or venous congestion; the latter can occur
in patients with sagittal (or other) venous sinus thrombosis. Much less frequently, CSF
production can become pathologically increased; this may be seen in the setting of choroid
plexus papilloma. (See "Cerebrospinal fluid: Physiology and utility of an examination in disease
states".)
Cerebral blood flow (CBF) determines the volume of blood in the intracranial space. CBF
increases with hypercapnia and hypoxia. Other determinants of CBF are discussed below.
Autoregulation of CBF may be impaired in the setting of neurologic injury, and may result in
rapid and severe brain swelling, especially in children [7-9].
In summary, the major causes of increased ICP include:
● Decreased CSF absorption (eg, arachnoid granulation adhesions after bacterial meningitis)
● Obstructive hydrocephalus
● Obstruction of venous outflow (eg, venous sinus thrombosis, jugular vein compression,
neck surgery)
The compliance relationship is nonlinear, and compliance decreases as the combined volume of
the intracranial contents increases. Initially, compensatory mechanisms allow volume to
increase with minimal elevation in ICP. These mechanisms include:
However, when these compensatory mechanisms have been exhausted, significant increases in
pressure develop with small increases in volume, leading to abnormally elevated ICP (
figure 2).
Thus, the magnitude of the change in volume of an individual structure determines its effect on
ICP. In addition, the rate of change in the volume of the intracranial contents influences ICP.
Changes that occur slowly produce less of an effect than those that are rapid. This can be
recognized clinically in some patients who present with large meningiomas and minimally
elevated or normal ICP. Conversely, other patients may experience symptomatic elevations in
ICP from small hematomas that develop acutely.
Cerebral blood flow — Following a significant increase in ICP, brain injury can result from
brainstem compression and/or a reduction in CBF. CBF is a function of the pressure drop across
the cerebral circulation divided by the cerebrovascular resistance, as predicted by Ohm's law
[10]:
where CAP is carotid arterial pressure, JVP is jugular venous pressure, and CVR is
cerebrovascular resistance.
Cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) is a clinical surrogate for the adequacy of cerebral perfusion.
CPP is defined as mean arterial pressure (MAP) minus ICP.
CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS
Global symptoms of elevated ICP include headache, which is probably mediated via the pain
fibers of cranial nerve (CN) V in the dura and blood vessels, depressed global consciousness due
to either the local effect of mass lesions or pressure on the midbrain reticular formation, and
vomiting.
Focal symptoms of elevated ICP may be caused by local effects in patients with mass lesions or
by herniation syndromes. Herniation results when pressure gradients develop between two
regions of the cranial vault. The most common anatomic locations affected by herniation
syndromes include subfalcine, central transtentorial, uncal transtentorial, upward cerebellar,
cerebellar tonsillar/foramen magnum, and transcalvarial ( figure 4) [3,17]. (See "Stupor and
coma in adults", section on 'Neurologic examination' and "Stupor and coma in adults", section
on 'Coma syndromes'.)
One notable false localizing syndrome seen following neurologic injury, referred to as
Kernohan's notch phenomenon, consists of the combination of contralateral pupillary dilatation
and ipsilateral weakness [18,19]. Because the diagnostic accuracy of signs and symptoms is
limited, the findings described above may be inconstant or unreliable in any given case. Use of
radiologic studies may support the diagnosis; however, the most reliable method of diagnosing
elevated ICP is to measure it directly.
ICP MONITORING
Empiric therapy for presumed elevated ICP is unsatisfactory because cerebral perfusion
pressure (CPP) cannot be monitored reliably without measurement of ICP. Furthermore, most
therapies directed at lowering ICP are effective for limited and variable periods of time. In
addition, these treatments may have serious side effects. Therefore, while initial steps to
control ICP may, by necessity, be performed without the benefit of ICP monitoring, an
important early goal in management of the patient with presumed elevated ICP is placement of
an ICP monitoring device.
The purpose of monitoring ICP is to improve the clinician's ability to maintain adequate CPP and
oxygenation. The only way to reliably determine CPP (defined as the difference between mean
arterial pressure [MAP] and ICP) is to continuously monitor both ICP and blood pressure (BP). In
general, these patients are managed in intensive care units (ICUs) with an ICP monitor and
arterial line. The combination of ICP monitoring and concomitant management of CPP may
improve patient outcomes, particularly in patients with closed head trauma [20-23]. The specific
therapeutic targets for CPP in patients with traumatic brain injury are discussed separately. (See
"Management of acute moderate and severe traumatic brain injury", section on 'Hemodynamic
management'.)
Since ICP monitoring is associated with a small risk of serious complications, including central
nervous system (CNS) infection and intracranial hemorrhage, it is reasonable to try to limit its
use to patients most at risk of elevated ICP [25]. In general, invasive monitoring of ICP is
indicated in patients who are [26]:
Although computed tomography (CT) scans may suggest elevated ICP based on the presence of
mass lesions, midline shift, or effacement of the basilar cisterns ( image 1), patients without
these findings on initial CT may have elevated ICP. This was demonstrated in a prospective
study of 753 patients treated at four major head injury research centers in the United States,
which found patients whose initial CT scan did not show a mass lesion, midline shift, or
abnormal cisterns had a 10 to 15 percent chance of developing elevated ICP during their
hospitalization [27].
Other studies have shown that up to one-third of patients with initially normal scans developed
CT scan abnormalities within the first few days after closed head injury [28,29]. Together, these
findings demonstrate that ICP can be elevated even in the setting of a normal initial CT,
demonstrating the importance of invasive monitoring in high-risk patients and the role of
follow-up imaging in patients who develop clinical evidence of increased ICP during
hospitalization.
Types of monitors — There are four main anatomic sites used in the clinical measurement of
ICP: intraventricular, intraparenchymal, subarachnoid, and epidural ( figure 5) [30].
Noninvasive and metabolic monitoring of ICP has also been studied, but the clinical value of
these methods is unclear at present. Each technique requires a unique monitoring system, and
has associated advantages and disadvantages.
The primary disadvantage is infection, which may occur in up to 20 percent of patients. This risk
increases the longer a device is in place [31,32]. Prophylactic catheter changes did not appear to
reduce the risk of infection [32]. (See "Infections of cerebrospinal fluid shunts and other
devices".)
Disadvantages include the inability to drain CSF for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes and the
potential to lose accuracy (or "drift") over several days, since the transducer cannot be
recalibrated following initial placement [30]. In addition, there is a greater risk of mechanical
failure due to the complex design of these monitors. The reliability of intraparenchymal devices
has been debated. One group found only a small (1 mmHg) drift in a group of 163 patients [37];
however, a second report found that readings varied by >3 mmHg in more than half of the 50
patients studied [38].
Epidural — Epidural monitors contain optical transducers that rest against the dura after
passing through the skull. They often are inaccurate, as the dura damps the pressure
transmitted to the epidural space, and thus are of limited clinical utility [30,39]. They are used in
the management of coagulopathic patients with hepatic encephalopathy complicated by
cerebral edema. In this setting, use of these catheters is associated with a significantly lower
risk of intracerebral hemorrhage (4 versus 20 and 22 percent for intraparenchymal and
intraventricular devices, respectively) and fatal hemorrhage (1 versus 5 and 4 percent,
respectively) [40]. (See "Acute liver failure in adults: Management and prognosis".)
Waveform analysis — ICP is not a static value; it exhibits cyclic variation based on the
superimposed effects of cardiac contraction, respiration, and intracranial compliance. Under
normal physiologic conditions, the amplitude of the waveform is often small, with B waves
related to respiration and smaller C waves (or Traube-Hering-Mayer waves) related to the
cardiac cycle [10].
Pathological A waves (also called plateau waves) are abrupt, marked elevations in ICP of 50 to
100 mmHg, which usually last for minutes to hours ( waveform 1). The presence of A waves
signifies a loss of intracranial compliance and heralds imminent decompensation of
autoregulatory mechanisms [10,41,42]. Thus, the presence of A waves should suggest the need
for urgent intervention to help control ICP.
Noninvasive systems — A number of devices designed to record ICP noninvasively have been
studied, but most have not demonstrated reproducible clinical success or have not been
studied in large clinical trials. We do not use these in clinical practice.
● Transcranial Doppler (TCD) measures the velocity of blood flow in the proximal cerebral
circulation. TCD can be used to estimate ICP based on characteristic changes in waveforms
that occur in response to increased resistance to cerebral blood flow (CBF) [43,44].
Generally, TCD is a poor predictor of ICP, although in trauma patients TCD findings may
correlate with outcome at six months [45-48].
● Tissue resonance analysis (TRA), an ultrasound-based method, has shown some promise. In
one trial 40 patients underwent both invasive and TRA ICP monitoring, with good
correlation between concomitant invasive and TRA measurements [49].
● Ocular sonography can provide a noninvasive measure of optic nerve sheath diameter,
which has been found to correlate with ICP. A number of studies have found that diameters
of 5 to 6 mm have the ability to discriminate between normal and elevated ICP in patients
with intracranial hemorrhage and traumatic brain injury [50-56].
GENERAL MANAGEMENT
The best therapy for intracranial hypertension (ICH) is resolution of the proximate cause of
elevated ICP. Examples include evacuation of a blood clot, resection of a tumor, cerebrospinal
fluid (CSF) diversion in the setting of hydrocephalus, or treatment of an underlying metabolic
disorder.
Regardless of the cause, ICH is a medical emergency, and treatment should be undertaken as
expeditiously as possible. In addition to definitive therapy, there are maneuvers that can be
employed to reduce ICP acutely. Some of these techniques are generally applicable to all
patients with suspected ICH; others (particularly glucocorticoids) are reserved for specific
causes of ICH.
Resuscitation — The urgent assessment and support of oxygenation, blood pressure (BP), and
end-organ perfusion are particularly important in trauma, but applicable to all patients [63-65].
If elevated ICP is suspected, care should be taken to minimize further elevations in ICP during
intubation through careful positioning, appropriate choice of paralytic agents (if required), and
adequate sedation. Pretreatment with lidocaine has been suggested as a useful intervention to
decrease the rise in ICP associated with intubation; however, good clinical evidence supporting
this approach is limited [66]. (See "Overview of inpatient management of the adult trauma
patient" and "Advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) in adults" and "Adult basic life support (BLS)
for health care providers".)
Large shifts in BP should be minimized, with particular care taken to avoid hypotension.
Although it might seem that lower BP would result in lower ICP, this is not the case.
Hypotension, especially in conjunction with hypoxemia, can induce reactive vasodilation and
elevations in ICP. As noted above, pressors have been shown to be safe for use in most patients
with ICH, and may be required to maintain cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) >60 mmHg [20].
(See "Use of vasopressors and inotropes".)
● A history that suggests elevated ICP (eg, head trauma, sudden severe headache typical of
subarachnoid hemorrhage)
● An examination that suggests elevated ICP (unilateral or bilaterally fixed and dilated
pupil[s], decorticate or decerebrate posturing, bradycardia, hypertension and/or
respiratory depression)
In such patients, osmotic diuretics may be used urgently. (See 'Mannitol' below.)
In addition, standard resuscitation techniques should be instituted as soon as possible:
● Head elevation
● Hyperventilation to a PCO2 of 26 to 30 mmHg
● Intravenous mannitol (1 to 1.5 g/kg)
Concomitant with these measures should be aggressive evaluation of the underlying diagnosis,
including neuroimaging, detailed neurologic examination, and history gathering.
Hyperventilation may be contraindicated in the setting of traumatic brain injury and acute
stroke, and is discussed separately (see 'Hyperventilation' below). If appropriate,
ventriculostomy is a rapid means of simultaneously diagnosing and treating elevated ICP.
Monitoring and the decision to treat — If a diagnosis of elevated ICP is suspected and an
immediately treatable proximate cause is not present, then ICP monitoring should be
instituted. The use of ICP monitoring is associated with decreased mortality in patients with
traumatic brain injury [21]. (See "Management of acute moderate and severe traumatic brain
injury", section on 'Intracranial pressure management'.)
The type of monitoring device employed should be based on an assessment of the advantages
and disadvantages discussed previously ( figure 5). (See 'ICP monitoring' above.)
The goal of ICP monitoring and treatment should be to keep ICP <20 mmHg [69]. Interventions
should be utilized only when ICP is elevated above 20 mmHg for >5 to 10 minutes. As discussed
above, brief physiologic elevations in ICP may occur in the setting of coughing, movement,
suctioning, or ventilator asynchrony.
Fluid management — In general, patients with elevated ICP do not need to be severely fluid
restricted [70]. Patients should be kept euvolemic and normo- to hyperosmolar. This can be
achieved by avoiding all free water (including D5W, 0.45 percent [half normal] saline, and
enteral free water) and employing only isotonic fluids (such as 0.9 percent [normal] saline).
Serum osmolality should be kept >280 mOsm/L, and often is kept in the 295 to 305 mOsm/L
range. Hyponatremia is common in the setting of elevated ICP, particularly in conjunction with
subarachnoid hemorrhage. (See "Causes of hypotonic hyponatremia in adults" and "Treatment
of hyponatremia: Syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH) and reset
osmostat", section on 'Subarachnoid hemorrhage'.)
Similarly, the value of colloid compared with crystalloid fluid resuscitation in patients with
elevated ICP has been studied, but findings have been inconclusive with respect to the superior
approach [71]. A subgroup analysis in one large study, however, suggested that in patients with
traumatic brain injury, fluid resuscitation with albumin was associated with a higher mortality
as compared with normal saline [72]. (See "Management of acute moderate and severe
traumatic brain injury".)
Hypertonic saline in bolus doses may acutely lower ICP, but further investigations are required
to define a role, if any, for this approach in the management of elevated ICP. (See 'Hypertonic
saline bolus' below.)
Propofol has been utilized to good effect in this setting, as it is easily titrated and has a short
half-life, thus permitting frequent neurologic reassessment. (See "Sedative-analgesic
medications in critically ill adults: Selection, initiation, maintenance, and withdrawal".)
Blood pressure control — In general, BP should be sufficient to maintain CPP >60 mmHg. As
discussed above, pressors can be used safely without further increasing ICP. This is particularly
relevant in the setting of sedation, when iatrogenic hypotension can occur. Hypertension
should generally only be treated when CPP >120 mmHg and ICP >20 mmHg.
Caution should be taken to avoid CPP <50 mmHg or, as noted above, normalization of BP in
patients with chronic hypertension in whom the autoregulatory curve has shifted to the right
(see 'Autoregulation' above). General issues regarding BP management following stroke are
presented elsewhere. (See "Antihypertensive therapy for secondary stroke prevention".)
Position — Patients with elevated ICP should be positioned to maximize venous outflow from
the head. Important maneuvers include reducing excessive flexion or rotation of the neck,
avoiding restrictive neck taping, and minimizing stimuli that could induce Valsalva responses,
such as endotracheal suctioning.
Patients with elevated ICP have historically been positioned with the head elevated above the
heart (usually 30 degrees) to increase venous outflow. It should be noted that head elevation
may lower CPP [20,74]; however, given the proven efficacy of head elevation in lowering ICP,
most experts recommend raising the patient's head as long as the CPP remains at an
appropriate level [75].
Fever — Elevated metabolic demand in the brain results in increased cerebral blood flow (CBF)
and can elevate ICP by increasing the volume of blood in the cranial vault. Conversely,
decreasing metabolic demand can lower ICP by reducing blood flow.
Fever increases brain metabolism and has been demonstrated to increase brain injury in animal
models [76]. Therefore, aggressive treatment of fever, including acetaminophen and
mechanical cooling, is recommended in patients with increased ICP. ICH is a recognized
indication for neuromuscular paralysis in selected patients [77]. (See "Neuromuscular blocking
agents in critically ill patients: Use, agent selection, administration, and adverse effects".)
Antiseizure therapy — Seizures can both complicate and contribute to elevated ICP [78,79].
Anticonvulsant therapy should be instituted if seizures are suspected; prophylactic treatment
may be warranted in some cases. There are no clear guidelines for the latter, but examples
include high-risk mass lesions, such as those within supratentorial cortical locations, or lesions
adjacent to the cortex, such as subdural hematomas or subarachnoid hemorrhage.
SPECIFIC THERAPIES
As mentioned previously, the best treatment of elevated ICP is to address its underlying cause.
If this is not possible, a series of steps should be instituted to reduce ICP in an attempt to
improve outcome. In all cases, the clinician should bear in mind the themes of resuscitation,
reduction of intracranial volume, and frequent reevaluation discussed above.
Osmotic therapy and diuresis — With growing familiarity of use, hypertonic saline has
increasingly been employed as a first-line agent, supplanting mannitol at numerous
institutions.
Hypertonic saline bolus — Hypertonic saline in bolus doses can acutely lower ICP; however,
the effect of this early intervention on long-term clinical outcomes remains unclear [80-88]. The
volume and tonicity of saline (7.2 to 23.4 percent) used in these reports have varied widely. As
an example, one controlled trial randomly assigned 226 patients with traumatic brain injury to
prehospital resuscitation with 250 mL hypertonic saline (7.5 percent) or the same volume of
Ringer's lactate [80]. Survival until hospital discharge, six-month survival, and neurologic
function six months after injury were similar in both groups. In a retrospective review of
patients treated at a single study, the safety and efficacy of 14.6 and 23.4 percent saline boluses
appeared to be similar [89].
Mannitol and hypertonic saline have been compared in at least eight randomized trials of
patients with elevated ICP from a variety of causes (traumatic brain injury, stroke, tumors)
[87,90-93]. Meta-analyses of these trials have found that hypertonic saline appears to have
greater efficacy in managing elevated ICP, but clinical outcomes have not been systematically
examined [94,95]. Further clinical trials are required to clarify the appropriate role of hypertonic
saline infusion versus mannitol in the management of elevated ICP [96,97].
The role of hypertonic saline in the management of elevated ICP in traumatic brain injury is
discussed separately. (See "Management of acute moderate and severe traumatic brain injury",
section on 'Osmotic therapy'.)
Mannitol — Osmotic diuretics reduce brain volume by drawing free water out of the tissue
and into the circulation, where it is excreted by the kidneys, thus dehydrating brain parenchyma
[98-101]. The most commonly used agent is mannitol. It is prepared as a 20 percent solution,
and given as a bolus of 1 g/kg. Repeat dosing can be given at 0.25 to 0.5 g/kg as needed,
generally every six to eight hours. Use of any osmotic agent should be carefully evaluated in
patients with renal insufficiency.
The effects are usually present within minutes, peak at approximately one hour, and last 4 to 24
hours [26,102]. Some have reported a "rebound" increase in ICP; this probably occurs when
mannitol, after repeated use, enters the brain though a damaged blood-brain barrier and
reverses the osmotic gradient [103,104]. Useful parameters to monitor in the setting of
mannitol therapy include serum sodium, serum osmolality, and renal function.
Concerning findings associated with the use of mannitol include serum sodium >150 mEq,
serum osmolality >320 mOsm, or evidence of evolving acute tubular necrosis (ATN). In addition,
mannitol can lower systemic blood pressure (BP), necessitating careful use if associated with a
fall in cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP). Patients with known renal disease may be poor
candidates for osmotic diuresis. (See "Complications of mannitol therapy".)
Other agents — Furosemide, 0.5 to 1.0 mg/kg intravenously, may be given with mannitol to
potentiate its effect. However, this effect can also exacerbate dehydration and hypokalemia
[105-107].
Glycerol and urea were used historically to control ICP via osmoregulation; however, use of
these agents has decreased because equilibration between brain and plasma levels occurs
more quickly than with mannitol. Furthermore, glycerol has been shown to have a significant
rebound effect and to be less effective in ICP control [108,109].
By contrast, glucocorticoids may have a role in the setting of intracranial hypertension (ICH)
caused by brain tumors and central nervous system (CNS) infections. (See "Management of
vasogenic edema in patients with primary and metastatic brain tumors" and "Treatment and
prognosis of bacterial brain abscess" and "Dexamethasone to prevent neurologic complications
of bacterial meningitis in adults".)
Hyperventilation should be minimized in patients with traumatic brain injury or acute stroke. In
these settings, vasoconstriction may cause a critical decrease in local cerebral perfusion and
worsen neurologic injury, particularly in the first 24 to 48 hours [24,113,115,117-120]. Thus, the
need for hyperventilation should be carefully considered, and prophylactic hyperventilation in
the absence of elevated ICP should be avoided. (See "Management of acute moderate and
severe traumatic brain injury", section on 'Ventilation'.)
Hypothermia decreases cerebral metabolism and may reduce CBF and ICP. Initial studies of
hypothermia were limited by systemic side effects, including cardiac arrhythmias and severe
coagulopathy. However, later work suggested that hypothermia can lower ICP and may improve
patient outcomes [132]. Hypothermia also appeared to be effective in lowering ICP after other
therapies have failed [133,134].
Hypothermia can be achieved using whole-body cooling, including lavage and cooling blankets,
to a goal core temperature of 32 to 34ºC. The best method of cooling (local versus systemic), the
optimal target core temperature, and the appropriate duration of treatment are not known
[135]. It appears that rewarming should be accomplished over a period of less than 24 hours
[136].
The value of therapeutic hypothermia has been best assessed in patients after traumatic brain
injury, but its role has not been well established in that setting. (See "Management of acute
moderate and severe traumatic brain injury", section on 'Hypothermia' and "Elevated
intracranial pressure (ICP) in children: Management", section on 'Temperature control'.)
Given the uncertainties surrounding the appropriate use of therapeutic hypothermia in patients
with elevated ICP, this treatment should be limited to clinical trials, or to patients with ICH
refractory to other therapies.
Observational data suggest that rapid and sustained control of ICP, including the use of
decompressive craniectomy, improves outcomes in trauma, stroke, and subarachnoid
hemorrhage in carefully selected cases [149-156]. The indications for decompressive
craniectomy in these settings are discussed separately (see "Malignant cerebral hemispheric
infarction with swelling and risk of herniation" and "Management of acute moderate and severe
traumatic brain injury", section on 'Decompressive craniectomy'). Obvious mass lesions
associated with an elevated ICP should be removed, if possible.
Potential complications of surgery include herniation through the skull defect, spinal fluid leak,
wound infection, and epidural and subdural hematoma [157].
SUMMARY
The best therapy for intracranial hypertension (ICH) is resolution of the proximate cause of
elevated ICP. Regardless of the cause, treatment should be undertaken as expeditiously as
possible, and should be based on the principles of resuscitation, reduction of the volume of the
intracranial contents, and reassessment. Interventions should be based on careful assessment
of the individual clinical scenario rather than on strict protocols. Specific recommendations
regarding the assessment and treatment of elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) in individual
disease settings, including trauma, cerebrovascular disease, and other conditions, are
discussed separately. As examples:
● (See "Management of acute moderate and severe traumatic brain injury", section on
'Intracranial pressure management'.)
● (See "Malignant cerebral hemispheric infarction with swelling and risk of herniation".)
● (See "Management of vasogenic edema in patients with primary and metastatic brain
tumors".)
● (See "Clinical management and monitoring during antifungal therapy for cryptococcal
meningoencephalitis in patients with HIV", section on 'Monitoring of intracranial pressure'.)
● (See "Acute liver failure in adults: Management and prognosis", section on 'Cerebral
edema'.)
REFERENCES
1. Adams RA, Ropper AH. Principles of neurology, 6th ed, McGraw Hill, New York 1997.
10. Wilkins RS. Neurosurgery, 2nd ed, McGraw-Hill, New York 1996. Vol 1, p.347.
11. Strandgaard S, Paulson OB. Cerebral blood flow and its pathophysiology in hypertension.
Am J Hypertens 1989; 2:486.
12. Strandgaard S, Andersen GS, Ahlgreen P, Nielsen PE. Visual disturbances and occipital brain
infarct following acute, transient hypotension in hypertensive patients. Acta Med Scand
1984; 216:417.
13. Enevoldsen EM, Jensen FT. Autoregulation and CO2 responses of cerebral blood flow in
patients with acute severe head injury. J Neurosurg 1978; 48:689.
14. Lassen NA, Agnoli A. The upper limit of autoregulation of cerebral blood flow--on the
pathogenesis of hypertensive encepholopathy. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1972; 30:113.
23. Mauritz W, Steltzer H, Bauer P, et al. Monitoring of intracranial pressure in patients with
severe traumatic brain injury: an Austrian prospective multicenter study. Intensive Care
Med 2008; 34:1208.
24. Marik PE, Varon J, Trask T. Management of head trauma. Chest 2002; 122:699.
25. Bullock R, Chesnut RM, Clifton G. Guidelines for the Management of Severe Brain Injury, Br
ain Trauma Foundation/American Association of Neurologic Surgeons, New York 1995.
26. Dennis LJ, Mayer SA. Diagnosis and management of increased intracranial pressure. Neurol
India 2001; 49 Suppl 1:S37.
27. Eisenberg HM, Gary HE Jr, Aldrich EF, et al. Initial CT findings in 753 patients with severe
head injury. A report from the NIH Traumatic Coma Data Bank. J Neurosurg 1990; 73:688.
28. O'Sullivan MG, Statham PF, Jones PA, et al. Role of intracranial pressure monitoring in
severely head-injured patients without signs of intracranial hypertension on initial
computerized tomography. J Neurosurg 1994; 80:46.
29. Lobato RD, Sarabia R, Rivas JJ, et al. Normal computerized tomography scans in severe
head injury. Prognostic and clinical management implications. J Neurosurg 1986; 65:784.
30. Brain Trauma Foundation, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Congress of
Neurological Surgeons, et al. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain
injury. VII. Intracranial pressure monitoring technology. J Neurotrauma 2007; 24 Suppl
1:S45.
31. Mayhall CG, Archer NH, Lamb VA, et al. Ventriculostomy-related infections. A prospective
epidemiologic study. N Engl J Med 1984; 310:553.
32. Holloway KL, Barnes T, Choi S, et al. Ventriculostomy infections: the effect of monitoring
duration and catheter exchange in 584 patients. J Neurosurg 1996; 85:419.
33. Ghajar J. Intracranial pressure monitoring techniques. New Horiz 1995; 3:395.
34. Ostrup RC, Luerssen TG, Marshall LF, Zornow MH. Continuous monitoring of intracranial
pressure with a miniaturized fiberoptic device. J Neurosurg 1987; 67:206.
47. Tan H, Feng H, Gao L, et al. Outcome prediction in severe traumatic brain injury with
transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. Chin J Traumatol 2001; 4:156.
48. Kristiansson H, Nissborg E, Bartek J Jr, et al. Measuring elevated intracranial pressure
through noninvasive methods: a review of the literature. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2013;
25:372.
49. Michaeli D, Rappaport ZH. Tissue resonance analysis; a novel method for noninvasive
monitoring of intracranial pressure. Technical note. J Neurosurg 2002; 96:1132.
50. Soldatos T, Karakitsos D, Chatzimichail K, et al. Optic nerve sonography in the diagnostic
evaluation of adult brain injury. Crit Care 2008; 12:R67.
51. Moretti R, Pizzi B, Cassini F, Vivaldi N. Reliability of optic nerve ultrasound for the evaluation
of patients with spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care 2009; 11:406.
52. Moretti R, Pizzi B. Optic nerve ultrasound for detection of intracranial hypertension in
intracranial hemorrhage patients: confirmation of previous findings in a different patient
population. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2009; 21:16.
53. Dubourg J, Javouhey E, Geeraerts T, et al. Ultrasonography of optic nerve sheath diameter
for detection of raised intracranial pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Intensive Care Med 2011; 37:1059.
54. Geeraerts T, Launey Y, Martin L, et al. Ultrasonography of the optic nerve sheath may be
useful for detecting raised intracranial pressure after severe brain injury. Intensive Care
Med 2007; 33:1704.
55. Geeraerts T, Merceron S, Benhamou D, et al. Non-invasive assessment of intracranial
pressure using ocular sonography in neurocritical care patients. Intensive Care Med 2008;
34:2062.
56. Kimberly HH, Shah S, Marill K, Noble V. Correlation of optic nerve sheath diameter with
direct measurement of intracranial pressure. Acad Emerg Med 2008; 15:201.
57. Lashutka MK, Chandra A, Murray HN, et al. The relationship of intraocular pressure to
intracranial pressure. Ann Emerg Med 2004; 43:585.
58. Sheeran P, Bland JM, Hall GM. Intraocular pressure changes and alterations in intracranial
pressure. Lancet 2000; 355:899.
59. Han Y, McCulley TJ, Horton JC. No correlation between intraocular pressure and intracranial
pressure. Ann Neurol 2008; 64:221.
60. Kirk T, Jones K, Miller S, Corbett J. Measurement of intraocular and intracranial pressure: is
there a relationship? Ann Neurol 2011; 70:323.
61. Kast R. A new method for noninvasive measurement of short-term cerebrospinal fluid
pressure changes in humans. J Neurol 1985; 232:260.
62. Reid A, Marchbanks RJ, Bateman DE, et al. Mean intracranial pressure monitoring by a non-
invasive audiological technique: a pilot study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1989; 52:610.
63. Procaccio F, Stocchetti N, Citerio G, et al. Guidelines for the treatment of adults with severe
head trauma (part I). Initial assessment; evaluation and pre-hospital treatment; current
criteria for hospital admission; systemic and cerebral monitoring. J Neurosurg Sci 2000;
44:1.
64. Procaccio F, Stocchetti N, Citerio G, et al. Guidelines for the treatment of adults with severe
head trauma (part II). Criteria for medical treatment. J Neurosurg Sci 2000; 44:11.
65. Davella D, Brambilla GL, Delfini R, et al. Guidelines for the treatment of adults with severe
head trauma (part III). Criteria for surgical treatment. J Neurosurg Sci 2000; 44:19.
66. Robinson N, Clancy M. In patients with head injury undergoing rapid sequence intubation,
does pretreatment with intravenous lignocaine/lidocaine lead to an improved neurological
outcome? A review of the literature. Emerg Med J 2001; 18:453.
67. Smith ER, Madsen JR. Neurosurgical aspects of critical care neurology. Semin Pediatr
Neurol 2004; 11:169.
68. Smith ER, Madsen JR. Cerebral pathophysiology and critical care neurology: basic
hemodynamic principles, cerebral perfusion, and intracranial pressure. Semin Pediatr
Neurol 2004; 11:89.
69. Bullock R, Clifton G. Guidelines for the Management of Severe Brain Injury, Brain Trauma F
oundation/American Association of Neurologic Surgeons, New York 1995.
70. Schmoker JD, Shackford SR, Wald SL, Pietropaoli JA. An analysis of the relationship between
fluid and sodium administration and intracranial pressure after head injury. J Trauma 1992;
33:476.
71. Tranmer BI, Iacobacci RI, Kindt GW. Effects of crystalloid and colloid infusions on
intracranial pressure and computerized electroencephalographic data in dogs with
vasogenic brain edema. Neurosurgery 1989; 25:173.
72. SAFE Study Investigators, Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials
Group, Australian Red Cross Blood Service, et al. Saline or albumin for fluid resuscitation in
patients with traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med 2007; 357:874.
73. Lassen NA, Christensen MS. Physiology of cerebral blood flow. Br J Anaesth 1976; 48:719.
74. Rosner MJ, Coley IB. Cerebral perfusion pressure, intracranial pressure, and head elevation.
J Neurosurg 1986; 65:636.
75. Durward QJ, Amacher AL, Del Maestro RF, Sibbald WJ. Cerebral and cardiovascular
responses to changes in head elevation in patients with intracranial hypertension. J
Neurosurg 1983; 59:938.
76. Busija DW, Leffler CW, Pourcyrous M. Hyperthermia increases cerebral metabolic rate and
blood flow in neonatal pigs. Am J Physiol 1988; 255:H343.
77. Murray MJ, Cowen J, DeBlock H, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for sustained
neuromuscular blockade in the adult critically ill patient. Crit Care Med 2002; 30:142.
78. Lassen NA. Control of cerebral circulation in health and disease. Circ Res 1974; 34:749.
79. Gabor AJ, Brooks AG, Scobey RP, Parsons GH. Intracranial pressure during epileptic
seizures. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1984; 57:497.
80. Cooper DJ, Myles PS, McDermott FT, et al. Prehospital hypertonic saline resuscitation of
patients with hypotension and severe traumatic brain injury: a randomized controlled trial.
JAMA 2004; 291:1350.
81. Schwarz S, Georgiadis D, Aschoff A, Schwab S. Effects of hypertonic (10%) saline in patients
with raised intracranial pressure after stroke. Stroke 2002; 33:136.
82. Munar F, Ferrer AM, de Nadal M, et al. Cerebral hemodynamic effects of 7.2% hypertonic
saline in patients with head injury and raised intracranial pressure. J Neurotrauma 2000;
17:41.
83. Suarez JI, Qureshi AI, Bhardwaj A, et al. Treatment of refractory intracranial hypertension
with 23.4% saline. Crit Care Med 1998; 26:1118.
84. Shackford SR, Bourguignon PR, Wald SL, et al. Hypertonic saline resuscitation of patients
with head injury: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Trauma 1998; 44:50.
85. Lescot T, Degos V, Zouaoui A, et al. Opposed effects of hypertonic saline on contusions and
noncontused brain tissue in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Crit Care Med
2006; 34:3029.
86. Koenig MA, Bryan M, Lewin JL 3rd, et al. Reversal of transtentorial herniation with
hypertonic saline. Neurology 2008; 70:1023.
87. Francony G, Fauvage B, Falcon D, et al. Equimolar doses of mannitol and hypertonic saline
in the treatment of increased intracranial pressure. Crit Care Med 2008; 36:795.
88. Ware ML, Nemani VM, Meeker M, et al. Effects of 23.4% sodium chloride solution in
reducing intracranial pressure in patients with traumatic brain injury: a preliminary study.
Neurosurgery 2005; 57:727.
89. Lewandowski-Belfer JJ, Patel AV, Darracott RM, et al. Safety and efficacy of repeated doses
of 14.6 or 23.4 % hypertonic saline for refractory intracranial hypertension. Neurocrit Care
2014; 20:436.
90. Battison C, Andrews PJ, Graham C, Petty T. Randomized, controlled trial on the effect of a
20% mannitol solution and a 7.5% saline/6% dextran solution on increased intracranial
pressure after brain injury. Crit Care Med 2005; 33:196.
91. Vialet R, Albanèse J, Thomachot L, et al. Isovolume hypertonic solutes (sodium chloride or
mannitol) in the treatment of refractory posttraumatic intracranial hypertension: 2 mL/kg
7.5% saline is more effective than 2 mL/kg 20% mannitol. Crit Care Med 2003; 31:1683.
92. Schwarz S, Schwab S, Bertram M, et al. Effects of hypertonic saline hydroxyethyl starch
solution and mannitol in patients with increased intracranial pressure after stroke. Stroke
1998; 29:1550.
93. Ichai C, Armando G, Orban JC, et al. Sodium lactate versus mannitol in the treatment of
intracranial hypertensive episodes in severe traumatic brain-injured patients. Intensive
Care Med 2009; 35:471.
94. Kamel H, Navi BB, Nakagawa K, et al. Hypertonic saline versus mannitol for the treatment
of elevated intracranial pressure: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Crit Care
Med 2011; 39:554.
95. Mortazavi MM, Romeo AK, Deep A, et al. Hypertonic saline for treating raised intracranial
pressure: literature review with meta-analysis. J Neurosurg 2012; 116:210.
96. Bhardwaj A, Ulatowski JA. Hypertonic saline solutions in brain injury. Curr Opin Crit Care
2004; 10:126.
97. Hinson HE, Stein D, Sheth KN. Hypertonic saline and mannitol therapy in critical care
neurology. J Intensive Care Med 2013; 28:3.
98. Bell BA, Smith MA, Kean DM, et al. Brain water measured by magnetic resonance imaging.
Correlation with direct estimation and changes after mannitol and dexamethasone. Lancet
1987; 1:66.
99. Millson C, James HE, Shapiro HM, Laurin R. Intracranial hypertension and brain oedema in
albino rabbits. Part 2: Effects of acute therapy with diuretics. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1981;
56:167.
100. Nath F, Galbraith S. The effect of mannitol on cerebral white matter water content. J
Neurosurg 1986; 65:41.
101. Paczynski RP. Osmotherapy. Basic concepts and controversies. Crit Care Clin 1997; 13:105.
102. Jafar JJ, Johns LM, Mullan SF. The effect of mannitol on cerebral blood flow. J Neurosurg
1986; 64:754.
103. Kaufmann AM, Cardoso ER. Aggravation of vasogenic cerebral edema by multiple-dose
mannitol. J Neurosurg 1992; 77:584.
104. Polderman KH, van de Kraats G, Dixon JM, et al. Increases in spinal fluid osmolarity induced
by mannitol. Crit Care Med 2003; 31:584.
105. Pollay M, Fullenwider C, Roberts PA, Stevens FA. Effect of mannitol and furosemide on
blood-brain osmotic gradient and intracranial pressure. J Neurosurg 1983; 59:945.
106. Wilkinson HA, Rosenfeld SR. Furosemide and mannitol in the treatment of acute
experimental intracranial hypertension. Neurosurgery 1983; 12:405.
107. Chesnut RM, Marshall LF. Management of head injury. Treatment of abnormal intracranial
pressure. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1991; 2:267.
108. García-Sola R, Pulido P, Capilla P. The immediate and long-term effects of mannitol and
glycerol. A comparative experimental study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1991; 109:114.
109. Node Y, Nakazawa S. Clinical study of mannitol and glycerol on raised intracranial pressure
and on their rebound phenomenon. Adv Neurol 1990; 52:359.
110. Roberts I, Yates D, Sandercock P, et al. Effect of intravenous corticosteroids on death within
14 days in 10008 adults with clinically significant head injury (MRC CRASH trial):
randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2004; 364:1321.
111. Edwards P, Arango M, Balica L, et al. Final results of MRC CRASH, a randomised placebo-
controlled trial of intravenous corticosteroid in adults with head injury-outcomes at 6
months. Lancet 2005; 365:1957.
112. McLone D. Pediatric Neurosurgery: Surgery of the Developing Nervous System, 4th ed, W.
B. Saunders, Philadelphia 2001. p.626.
113. Muizelaar JP, Marmarou A, Ward JD, et al. Adverse effects of prolonged hyperventilation in
patients with severe head injury: a randomized clinical trial. J Neurosurg 1991; 75:731.
117. Stocchetti N, Maas AI, Chieregato A, van der Plas AA. Hyperventilation in head injury: a
review. Chest 2005; 127:1812.
118. Marion DW, Puccio A, Wisniewski SR, et al. Effect of hyperventilation on extracellular
concentrations of glutamate, lactate, pyruvate, and local cerebral blood flow in patients
with severe traumatic brain injury. Crit Care Med 2002; 30:2619.
119. Coles JP, Minhas PS, Fryer TD, et al. Effect of hyperventilation on cerebral blood flow in
traumatic head injury: clinical relevance and monitoring correlates. Crit Care Med 2002;
30:1950.
120. Imberti R, Bellinzona G, Langer M. Cerebral tissue PO2 and SjvO2 changes during
moderate hyperventilation in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg 2002;
96:97.
121. Lafferty JJ, Keykhah MM, Shapiro HM, et al. Cerebral hypometabolism obtained with deep
pentobarbital anesthesia and hypothermia (30 C). Anesthesiology 1978; 49:159.
122. Marshall LF, Shapiro HM, Rauscher A, Kaufman NM. Pentobarbital therapy for intracranial
hypertension in metabolic coma. Reye's syndrome. Crit Care Med 1978; 6:1.
123. Messeter K, Nordström CH, Sundbärg G, et al. Cerebral hemodynamics in patients with
acute severe head trauma. J Neurosurg 1986; 64:231.
124. Nordström CH, Messeter K, Sundbärg G, et al. Cerebral blood flow, vasoreactivity, and
oxygen consumption during barbiturate therapy in severe traumatic brain lesions. J
Neurosurg 1988; 68:424.
125. Marshall LF, Smith RW, Shapiro HM. The outcome with aggressive treatment in severe head
injuries. Part II: acute and chronic barbiturate administration in the management of head
injury. J Neurosurg 1979; 50:26.
126. Rea GL, Rockswold GL. Barbiturate therapy in uncontrolled intracranial hypertension.
Neurosurgery 1983; 12:401.
127. Eisenberg HM, Frankowski RF, Contant CF, et al. High-dose barbiturate control of elevated
intracranial pressure in patients with severe head injury. J Neurosurg 1988; 69:15.
128. Ward JD, Becker DP, Miller JD, et al. Failure of prophylactic barbiturate coma in the
treatment of severe head injury. J Neurosurg 1985; 62:383.
129. Ng SY, Chin KJ, Kwek TK. Dyskalaemia associated with thiopentone barbiturate coma for
refractory intracranial hypertension: a case series. Intensive Care Med 2011; 37:1285.
130. Wilkins RH, Rengachary SS. Neurosurgery, 2nd ed, McGraw-Hill, New York 1996. Vol 1, p.34
7.
131. James HE, Langfitt TW, Kumar VS, Ghostine SY. Treatment of intracranial hypertension.
Analysis of 105 consecutive, continuous recordings of intracranial pressure. Acta Neurochir
(Wien) 1977; 36:189.
132. Marion DW, Obrist WD, Carlier PM, et al. The use of moderate therapeutic hypothermia for
patients with severe head injuries: a preliminary report. J Neurosurg 1993; 79:354.
143. Gaab M, Knoblich OE, Fuhrmeister U, et al. Comparison of the effects of surgical
decompression and resection of local edema in the therapy of experimental brain trauma.
Investigation of ICP, EEG and cerebral metabolism in cats. Childs Brain 1979; 5:484.
144. Dam Hieu P, Sizun J, Person H, Besson G. The place of decompressive surgery in the
treatment of uncontrollable post-traumatic intracranial hypertension in children. Childs
Nerv Syst 1996; 12:270.
145. Gower DJ, Lee KS, McWhorter JM. Role of subtemporal decompression in severe closed
head injury. Neurosurgery 1988; 23:417.
146. Guerra WK, Gaab MR, Dietz H, et al. Surgical decompression for traumatic brain swelling:
indications and results. J Neurosurg 1999; 90:187.
147. Jourdan C, Convert J, Mottolese C, et al. [Evaluation of the clinical benefit of decompression
hemicraniectomy in intracranial hypertension not controlled by medical treatment].
Neurochirurgie 1993; 39:304.
148. Jaeger M, Soehle M, Meixensberger J. Effects of decompressive craniectomy on brain tissue
oxygen in patients with intracranial hypertension. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003;
74:513.
149. Carter BS, Ogilvy CS, Candia GJ, et al. One-year outcome after decompressive surgery for
massive nondominant hemispheric infarction. Neurosurgery 1997; 40:1168.
150. Polin RS, Shaffrey ME, Bogaev CA, et al. Decompressive bifrontal craniectomy in the
treatment of severe refractory posttraumatic cerebral edema. Neurosurgery 1997; 41:84.
151. Delashaw JB, Broaddus WC, Kassell NF, et al. Treatment of right hemispheric cerebral
infarction by hemicraniectomy. Stroke 1990; 21:874.
152. Kondziolka D, Fazl M. Functional recovery after decompressive craniectomy for cerebral
infarction. Neurosurgery 1988; 23:143.
153. Schwab S, Steiner T, Aschoff A, et al. Early hemicraniectomy in patients with complete
middle cerebral artery infarction. Stroke 1998; 29:1888.
154. Hofmeijer J, van der Worp HB, Kappelle LJ. Treatment of space-occupying cerebral
infarction. Crit Care Med 2003; 31:617.
155. Pranesh MB, Dinesh Nayak S, Mathew V, et al. Hemicraniectomy for large middle cerebral
artery territory infarction: outcome in 19 patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003;
74:800.
156. Albanèse J, Leone M, Alliez JR, et al. Decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain
injury: Evaluation of the effects at one year. Crit Care Med 2003; 31:2535.
157. Diedler J, Sykora M, Blatow M, et al. Decompressive surgery for severe brain edema. J
Intensive Care Med 2009; 24:168.
158. Fields JD, Lansberg MG, Skirboll SL, et al. "Paradoxical" transtentorial herniation due to CSF
drainage in the presence of a hemicraniectomy. Neurology 2006; 67:1513.
159. Oyelese AA, Steinberg GK, Huhn SL, Wijman CA. Paradoxical cerebral herniation secondary
to lumbar puncture after decompressive craniectomy for a large space-occupying
hemispheric stroke: case report. Neurosurgery 2005; 57:E594; discussion E594.
160. Sarov M, Guichard JP, Chibarro S, et al. Sinking skin flap syndrome and paradoxical
herniation after hemicraniectomy for malignant hemispheric infarction. Stroke 2010;
41:560.
Topic 1659 Version 14.0
GRAPHICS
Ischemic stroke
Neoplasm
Vasculitis
Hydrocephalus
Hypertensive encephalopathy
* For further information on clinical manifestations, diagnosis, or treatment of these conditions, refer to specific UpToDate topics.
Data from Pathophysiology and management of the intracranial vault. In: Textbook of Pediatric
Intensive Care, 3rd ed, Rogers, MC (Ed), Williams and Wilkins 1996. p. 646; figure 18.1.
Redrawn from: Kaplan NM. Management of hypertensive emergencies. Lancet 1994; 344:1335.
Data from: Plum F, Posner JB. The Diagnosis of Stupor and Coma III. FA Davis, Philadelphia 1995. p. 103.
Score
Eye opening
Spontaneous 4
Response to pain 2
No eye opening 1
Oriented 5
Confused 4
Inappropriate words 3
Incomprehensible sounds 2
No verbal response 1
Obeys commands 6
Flexion to pain 3
Extension to pain 2
No motor response 1
Total
The GCS is scored between 3 and 15, 3 being the worst and 15 the best. It is composed of three parameters: best eye response
(E), best verbal response (V), and best motor response (M). The components of the GCS should be recorded individually; for
example, E2V3M4 results in a GCS score of 9. A score of 13 or higher correlates with mild brain injury, a score of 9 to 12
correlates with moderate injury, and a score of 8 or less represents severe brain injury.
Ventriculostomy allows both ICP monitoring and therapeutic drainage of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF).
Subdural and intraparenchymal monitors cannot be used to drain CSF.
Interpreting ICP waveforms: A waves. The most clinically significant ICP waveforms are
A waves, which may reach elevations of 50 to 100 mm Hg, persist for 5 to 20 minutes,
then drop sharply - signaling exhaustion of the brain's compliance mechanisms. A
waves may come and go, spiking from temporary rises in thoracic pressure or from
any condition that increases ICP beyond the brain's compliance limits. Activities, such
as sustained coughing or straining during defecation, can cause temporary elevations
in thoracic pressure.
Reproduced with permission from: Nursing Procedures, 4th Ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins,
2004. Copyright © 2004 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
An external ventricular drain (EVD) is a small catheter inserted through the skull usually into the lateral
ventricle, which is typically connected to a closed collecting device to allow for drainage of
cerebrospinal fluid. The EVD can also be connected to a transducer that records intracranial pressure.
Contributor disclosures are reviewed for conflicts of interest by the editorial group. When found, these are
addressed by vetting through a multi-level review process, and through requirements for references to be
provided to support the content. Appropriately referenced content is required of all authors and must
conform to UpToDate standards of evidence.