Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Activity Guide and Evaluation Rubric - Task 3 - The Nature of Grammar
Activity Guide and Evaluation Rubric - Task 3 - The Nature of Grammar
Step 1: Checking
- Check your mates’ individual works and give relevant feedback in order to
improve. You can provide some recommendations in terms of contents,
presentation, organization, language, etc. Take in mind that your comments
have to be really important. Comments like “excellent work”, “congratulations”,
“good job” are not considered as relevant feedback, just the comments that
allow your partners to improve. It is asked to check at least once each one of
your mates’ works. At the end, if you don’t give relevant feedback to any of
your mates, your score will be affected.
1
Step 2: Analysis
“I was snippy with him because I was running late for work.”
Even though, in English you can find similarities in the grammar structure with
Spanish, some differences are evident, write 1 example for each one of the
following items:
Step 3: Delivery
2
In the Learning Environment, you must:
- Upload a PDF file with the task’s individual evidences. Identify your file as
follows: 518017 - Task 3 - Your Full Name.pdf
Please keep in mind that all individual or collaborative written products must comply
with the spelling rules and presentation conditions defined in this activity guide.
Regarding the use of references, consider that the product of this activity must
comply with APA style.
3
In any case, make sure you comply with the rules and avoid academic plagiarism.
You can review your written products using the Turnitin tool found in the virtual
campus.
Under the Academic Code of Conduct, the actions that infringe the academic order,
among others, are the following: paragraph e) Plagiarism is to present as your own
work all or part of a written report, task or document of invention carried out by
another person. It also implies the use of citations or lack of references, or it
includes citations where there is no match between these and the reference and
paragraph f) To reproduce, or copy for profit, educational resources or results of
research products, which have rights reserved for the University. (Acuerdo 029 - 13
de diciembre de 2013, artículo 99)
3. Evaluation Rubric
4
Low level: The information hardly shows that the student
explored and analyzed the provided references. It is hardly
evident that the student understood the concepts and
mastered the topics.
Second evaluation High level: Actively participates in the forum to give relevant
criterion: feedback to all the group members that participated on the
task.
Participate in forum.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 24
This criterion points and 30 points
represents 30
points of the total Average level: Partially participates in the forum giving two or
of 120 points of more incomplete comments to partners.
the activity.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 18
points and 23 points
Third evaluation
criterion: High Level: The student shows assertiveness and relevance in
the answers given to the provided questions.
Answer assertively
If your work is at this level, you can get between 40
and relevantly to
points and 50 points
the provided
questions.
Average Level: The student partially shows assertiveness
and relevance in the answers given to the provided questions.
This criterion
represents 50 If your work is at this level, you can get between 30
points of the total points and 39 points
of 120 points of
the activity.
5
Low level: The student hardly shows assertiveness and
relevance in the answers given to the provided questions.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 0
points and 29 points
Fourth evaluation High level: The document meets the criteria for presentation
criterion: according to APA standards.
Present a PDF file If your work is at this level, you can get between 8
according to APA points and 10 points
standards.
Average level: The document partially meets the criteria for
This criterion presentation according to APA standards.
represents 10
points of the total If your work is at this level, you can get between 6
of 120 points of points and 7 points
the activity.
Low level: The document does not meet the criteria for
presentation according to APA standards.