Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Split-Split Plot Arrangement
Split-Split Plot Arrangement
Split-Split Plot Arrangement
The split-split plot arrangement is especially suited for three or more factor experiments where
different levels of precision are required for the factors evaluated.
1. Three plot sizes corresponding to the three factors; namely, the largest plot for the main
factor, the intermediate size plot for the subplot factor, and the smallest plot for the sub-
subplot factor.
2. There are three levels of precision with the main plot factor receiving the lowest
precision, and the sub-subplot factor receiving the highest precision.
Example
Split-split plot arrangement randomized as an RCBD. Three levels of the whole plot factor, A,
two levels of the subplot factor, B, and three levels of the sub-subplot factor, C. Diagram shows
the first replicate.
Randomization Procedure
The randomization procedure for the split-split plot arrangement consists of three parts:
1. Randomly assign whole plot treatments to whole plots based on the experimental design
used.
2. Randomly assign subplot treatments to the subplots.
3. Randomly assign sub-subplot treatments to the sub-subplots.
The experimental design used to randomize the whole plots will not affect randomization of the
sub and sub-subplots.
1
The example to be given will be for an RCBD with factor A as the whole plot factor, factor B as
the subplot factor, and factor C as the sup-subplot factor. Factors A, B, and C will be
considered random effects.
Total rabc-1
2
ANOVA of a Split-split Plot Arrangement - Table 1. Data for split-split plot example
Treatments Replicates Treatment
Aj Bk Cl 1 2 3 4 totals
Whole plot tot. Yi0.. 199.9 206.6 191.0 179.0 776.5= Y.0..
Whole plot tot. Yi1.. 223.9 193.2 189.9 185.2 792.2= Y.1..
Whole plot tot. Yi2.. 164.9 174.6 155.7 163.5 658.7= Y.2..
3
Table 2. Totals for two-way interactions.
Y...2
CF =
rabc
(2227.4) 2
=
(4 x3x 2 x3)
= 68,907.094
Total SS = ∑ Yijkl
2
− CF
4
Step 3. Calculate replicate sum of squares
Rep SS =
∑Y 2
i...
− CF
abc
= 143.456
A SS =
∑Y 2
.j..
− CF
rbc
=
(776.5 2 + 792.2 2 + 658.7 2 )
= − CF
4 x 2 x3
= 443.689
Whole Plot SS =
∑Y 2
ij
− CF
bc
= 698.903
5
Step 7. Calculate B sum of squares.
B SS =
∑Y 2
..k.
− CF
rac
(1000.9 2 + 1226.5 2 )
= − CF
4x3x3
= 706.880
AxB SS =
∑Y 2
.jk.
− CF − A SS - B SS
rc
= 40.687
Subplot SS =
∑Y 2
ijk.
− CF
c
= 1524.813
6
Step 11. Calculate C sum of squares.
C SS =
∑Y 2
...l
− CF
rab
= 962.335
AxC SS =
∑Y 2
.j.l
− CF - A SS - C SS
rb
= 13.1097
BxC SS =
∑Y 2
..kl
− CF - B SS - C SS
ra
= 127.831
7
Step 14. Calculate AxBxC sum of squares.
AxBxC SS =
∑Y 2
.jkl
- CF - A SS - B SS - C SS - AxB SS - AxC SS - BxC SS -
r
= 44.019
Error(c) SS = Total SS-AxBxC SS-BxC SS-AxC SS-C SS-Error(b) SS- AxB SS-B SS-
Error(a) SS-A SS-Rep SS
= 168.498
Step 16 ANOVA
8
LSD’s for Split-split Plot Arrangement
1. To compare two whole plot means averaged over all sub and sub-sub-plot treatments
(e.g. a0 vs. a1).
2Error(a)MS
LSD = t α
2
, Err(a)df rbc
2(18.626)
= 2.447
4x2x3
= 3.05
2. To compare two subplot means averaged over all whole and sub-sub plot treatments (e.g.
b0 vs. b1).
2Error(b)MS
LSD = t α
2
, Err(b)df rac
2(8.705)
= 2.262
4x3x3
= 1.57
3. To compare two sub-subplot means averaged over all whole and subplot treatments (e.g.
c0 vs c1).
2Error(c)MS
LSD = t α
2
, Err(c)df rab
2(4.681)
= 2.030 2
4x3x3
= 1.27
9
4. To compare two subplot means (averaged over all sub-subplot treatments) at the same
levels of the whole plot (e.g. a0b0 vs. aob1).
2Error(b)MS
LSD = t α
2
, Err(b)df rc
2(8.705)
= 2.262
4x3
= 2.72
5. To compare two whole plot means (averaged over all sub-subplot treatments) at the same
or different levels of the subplot (e.g. a0b0 vs a1b0 or a0b0 vs a2b1).
(2 - 1)(8.705)(2.262) + 18.626(2.447 )
t AB =
(2 − 1)8.705 + 18.626
= 2.388
and
2[(2 - 1)8.705 + 18.626]
LSD = 2.388
4x2x3
10
6. To compare two sub-subplot means (averaged over all subplot treatments) at the same
levels of the whole plot (e.g. a0c0 vs. aoc1).
2Error(c)MS
LSD = t α
2
, Err(c)df rb
2(4.681)
= 2.030
4x2
= 2.20
7. To compare two whole plot means (averaged over all subplot treatments) at the same or
different levels of the sub-subplot (e.g. a0c0 vs. a1c0 or a0c0 vs. a2c1).
(3 - 1)(4.681)(2.030) + 18.626(2.447 )
t AC =
(3 − 1)4.681 + 18.626
= 2.307
and
2[(3 - 1)4.681 + 18.626]
LSD = 2.307
4x2x3
= 3.52
11
8. To compare two sub-subplot means (averaged over all whole plot treatments) at the same
levels of the subplot (e.g. b0c0 vs. boc1).
2Error(c)MS
LSD = t α
2
, Err(c)df ra
2(4.681)
= 2.030
4x3
= 1.79
9. To compare two subplot means (averaged over all whole plot treatments) at the same or
different levels of the sub-subplot (e.g. b0c0 vs. b1c0 or b0c0 vs. b2c1).
(3 - 1)(4.681)(2.030 ) + 8.705(2.262 )
t BC =
(3 − 1)4.681 + 8.705
= 2.142
and
2[(3 - 1)4.681 + 8.705]
LSD = 2.142
4x3x3
= 2.15
12
10. To compare two sub-subplot means at the same combination of whole plot and subplot
treatments (e.g. a0b0c0 vs. a0b0c2).
2Error(c)MS
LSD = t α
2
, Err(c)df r
2(4.681)
= 2.030
4
= 3.11
11. To compare two subplot means at the same level of whole plot and sub-subplot (e.g.
a0b0c0 vs. a0b1c0).
(3 - 1)(4.681)(2.030 ) + 8.705(2.262 )
t ABC =
(3 − 1)4.681 + 8.705
= 2.142
and
2[(3 - 1)4.681 + 8.705]
LSD = 2.142
4x3
= 3.72
13
12 To compare two whole plot means at the same combination of subplot and sub-subplot
treatments (a0b0c0 vs. a1b0c0).
= 2.242
and
2[(2 * (3 - 1)4.681) + ( 2 − 1)8.705 + 18.626]
LSD = 2.242
4x2x3
= 4.39
14