Professional Documents
Culture Documents
International Trade 1
International Trade 1
Diversification
SUBMITTED BY:
KITTY SINGLA
MBA 4503/10
DEEPSHIKHAR
MBA 4547/10
1
o
International Trade
Introduction
2
Difference between international trade and domestic
trade:
The main difference is that international trade is typically more costly than
domestic trade. The reason is that a border typically imposes additional costs
such as tariffs, time costs due to border delays and costs associated with
country differences such as language, the legal system or culture.
3
China
3 Germany $2,457,000,000,000 2010 est.
4 Japan $1,402,000,000,000 2010 est.
5 France $1,086,400,000,000 2010 est.
6 United Kingdom $952,100,000,000 2010 est.
7 Italy $918,100,000,000 2010 est.
8 South Korea $884,200,000,000 2010 est.
9 Netherlands $859,700,000,000 2010 est.
10 Canada $813,200,000,000 2010 est.
- Hong Kong $795,600,000,000 2010 est.
11 Singapore $666,800,000,000 2010 est.
12 Russia $614,000,000,000 2010 est.
13 Mexico $609,000,000,000 2010 est.
14 Spain $592,900,000,000 2010 est.
15 Belgium $560,900,000,000 2010 est.
16 India $528,000,000,000 2010 est.
Taiwan (Republic of
17 $524,800,000,000 2010 est.
China)
18 Switzerland $453,000,000,000 2010 est.
19 Australia $411,100,000,000 2010 est.
20 Brazil $387,400,000,000 2010 est.
4
medical, etc apparatus
7 Plastics and articles there of $386,628,064 2009
Pearls, precious stones, metals,
8 $320,174,080 2009
coins, etc
9 Organic chemicals $310,106,432 2009
10 Iron and steel $273,024,416 2009
5
powerful themselves. As tariff levels fall there is also an increasing
willingness to negotiate non tariff measures, including foreign direct
investment, procurement and trade facilitation. The latter looks at the
transaction cost associated with meeting trade and customs procedures.
6
• Regulatory risk (e.g., a change in rules that prevents the transaction);
• Intervention (governmental action to prevent a transaction being
completed);
• Political risk (change in leadership interfering with transactions or
prices); and
• War and other uncontrollable events.
Gallery
Triangle trade: Slaves being sold from Africa to The Caribbean, sugar
from South America to New England, and Rum and other goods from
North America back to Africa.
7
Portfolio Diversification:
First of all we would discuss what is portfolio and then diversification, and
after that both ….
What is portfolio?
In finance, a portfolio is a collection of investments held by an institution or
an individual.
What is diversification?
8
A risk management technique that mixes a wide variety of investments
within a portfolio. The rationale behind this technique contends that a
portfolio of different kinds of investments will, on average, yield higher
returns and pose a lower risk than any individual investment found within
the portfolio.
In finance, diversification means reducing risk by investing in a variety of
assets. If the asset values do not move up and down in perfect synchrony, a
diversified portfolio will have less risk than the weighted average risk of its
constituent assets, and often less risk than the least risky of its constituents.
[1]
. Therefore, any risk-averse investor will diversify to at least some extent,
with more risk-averse investors diversifying more completely than less risk-
averse investors.
The risk reduction from diversification does not mean anyone else has to
take more risk. If person A owns $10,000 of one stock and person B owns
$10,000 of another, both A and B will reduce their risk if they exchange
$5,000 of the two stocks, so each now has a more diversified portfolio
Examples
The simplest example of diversification is provided by the proverb "don't put
all your eggs in one basket". Dropping the basket will break all the eggs.
Placing each egg in a different basket is more diversified. There is more risk
of losing one egg, but less risk of losing all of them. In finance, an example
of an undiversified portfolio is to hold only one stock. This is risky; it is not
unusual for a single stock to go down 50% in one year. It is much less
common for a portfolio of 20 stocks to go down that much, even if they are
selected at random. If the stocks are selected from a variety of industries,
company sizes and types (such as some growth stocks and some value
stocks) it is still less likely.
9
Diversifiable and non-diversifiable risk ••
If one buys all the stocks in the S&P 500 one is obviously exposed only to
movements in that index. If one buys a single stock in the S&P 500, one is
exposed both to index movements and movements in the stock relative to the
index. The first risk is called “non-diversifiable,” because it exists however
many S&P 500 stocks are bought. The second risk is called “diversifiable,”
because it can be reduced it by diversifying among stocks, and it can be
eliminated completely by buying all the stocks in the index.
10
abounds throughout investment circles, any wise and mature approach to
investing is the same. Your best protection against risk is portfolio
diversification; investing in multiple investment options instead of choosing
to place all of your investments in only one area. one can, for example, use
the stability of cash investments like CDs and money market funds to
diversify your portfolio and offset the liability of stocks, futures, options and
stock or bond mutual funds. Picking stocks of riskier small growth
companies while also investing in the traditional blue chippers, which are
the stocks of large, well-established companies allows for a structured
stability that will translate to the bottoms line of an investor’s portfolio. In
other words, when the return is down in one area, it’s usually balanced by a
positive performance in another. In the simplest terms, portfolio
diversification is an excellent hedge against stock volatility and the ups and
downs of investing.
As with any stock trading plan, it is imperative to evaluate assets and realign
the investment mix from time to time. For example, as the value of a stock
increases, it consumes a larger percentage of the total, thus affecting the total
diversification of the portfolio. In an effort to maintain a healthy balance, it
may be necessary to decrease the holding in that particular stock and
increase in a different area, such as bond or cash holdings. Such decisions
require not only experience but the benefit of a method such as candlestick
chart analysis.
11
What is an asset class?
It to say that asset classes are significantly different investments. Here are
some examples:
A Well-Diversified Portfolio
The definition is highly dependent upon factors that are unique to each
investor. Those factors include: risk tolerance, targeted terminal wealth,
investment horizon (planned holding period) and the universe an individual
is willing to accept as the pool from which they will select their assets.
12
Consider part (i) of the table. In this case both assets have the same expected
return (20 per cent) and the same degree of risk. (The possible range of
outcomes is between 10 and 30 per cent on each asset.) If all that mattered in
investment decisions were the risk and return of individual shares, the
investor would be indifferent between assets A and B. Indeed, if the choice
were between holding only A or only B, all investors should be indifferent
(whether they were risk-averse, risk-neutral, or risk-loving) because the risk
and expected return are identical for both assets. However, this is not the end
of the story, because the returns on these assets are not independent. Indeed,
there is a perfect negative correlation between them: when one is high the
other is low, and vice versa.
. Let the investor decide to hold half his wealth in asset A and half in asset
B. His risk will then be reduced to zero, since his return will be 20 per cent
whichever situation arises. This diversified portfolio will clearly be preferred
to either asset alone by risk-averse investors. The risk-neutral investor is
indifferent to all combinations of A and B because they all have the same
expected return, but the risk-lover may prefer not to diversify. This is
because, by picking one asset alone, the risk-lover still has a chance of
getting a 30 per cent return and the extra risk gives positive pleasure.
13
The relationship between international trade and portfolio
diversification is related to the portfolio diversification in terms of
export and import goods.
Our study is based on:
• How the country diversify their export and import portfolio.
• Why there is need to diversify export and import activity
14
In the short term, volatility and instability in foreign exchange earning
which have adverse macroeconomic effect (on growth, employment,
investment planning, import and export capacity, foreign exchange cash
flow, inflation, capital flight and undersupply of investments by
risk averse investors, debt repayment); and
In the long term, secular and unpredictable declining terms of trade
trends which exacerbate short run effects.
• Political risks include :
Worsened governance and risk of civil war in fragile states and the
risk of conflict is strongly related to the level and growth of income, as well
as its structure as reflected in the dependence upon a few primary
Commodity exports. Heavy dependence on a small number of primary
commodities products exposes a country to the negative effects of
unfavorable characteristics of world demand and negative supply side
features of these primary products.
On the demand side, the low income elasticity of world demand of primary
commodities can lead to falling export revenues which can be exacerbated
by historically downward trends in primary commodities relative to
manufactures. Although, according to Cashin and Mc.Dermott (2002), real
commodity prices have declined by about 1% per year over the last
140 years, volatility and persistence of commodity price shocks can have
more dramatic consequences than the long term downward trend of
commodity prices.
On the supply side, the combined effect of lower skills and technology
content of commodity production and its negligible backward and forward
linkages with the rest of the economy usually lead to negative growth
spillovers.
15
• makes it easier to channel positive terms of trade shocks into growth,
• knowledge spillovers and increasing returns to scale,
• creates learning opportunities that lead to new forms of comparative
advantage.
As traditional exports are particularly vulnerable to exogenous shocks
and face limited demand due to their low income elasticity and declining
terms of trade, diversifying away from traditional exports is expected to
raise growth rates and lower their variability. Hence, export
diversification can also aim at improving backward and forward linkages
to domestic inputs and services, and expanding opportunities for export
in existing or new markets. Reducing dependence upon one or a limited
number of geographical destinations or origins can also be a major
objective for export diversification.
• The incentives regime. A key challenge for policy makers is to ensure that
domestic resources are channeled to their most productive activities. If
private investors can make more money by investing in highly protected
16
local markets, they will do so, and opportunities to invest in markets abroad
will be lost. Creating a modern incentive framework that spurs national
competitiveness requires careful analysis to ensure that land, labor, capital
and technology are moving to :
(a) Sectors in which the country has a long-term capacity to compete and
(b) to the most productive firms within sectors.
This necessitates a clear understanding of how trade, tax, the business
environment and labor market policies interact to affect investment, output
and trade decisions. In many small, low income countries the economy tends
to be dominated by a small number of sectors, so that many of the key issues
regarding the allocation of resources can be unearthed by analyses that focus
on these sectors.
• Lowering the costs of backbone services and, generally, of doing business.
• Pro-active policies to support trade. Both market and government
failures tend to afflict low-income countries as they seek to expand exports
and growth. Laissez faire policies cum low-tariffs are rarely sufficiently to
prompt dynamic export drives or overcome obstacles in other areas. In
many cases these constraints to competitiveness require specific
interventions and institutions.
17
Incorporating competitiveness broadly into the national development
strategies may require more effective mechanisms to review and
coordinate policies. One option is to create an inter-ministerial council on
competitiveness with the mandate of undertaking analysis of the
existing policy framework and for reviewing policies before they are
put in place.
18