Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Seminar Report
Seminar Report
Submitted by -
Rituraj Ghosh
Roll No. 18I170009
I have studied the analysis if nuclear reactors form some of the previous research papers and
gained a preliminary concept of nuclear reactor stability. In a paper by Wahi and Kumawat[1],
studies done for general parametric values of reduced order model of Boiling Water Reactors
(BWR) is discussed. But the results are demonstrated for the parametric values relevant to the
Advanced Heavy Water Reactor (AHWR). First mathematical modeling was done which lead
to a system of nonlinear equations. We coupled, linearized and non-dimensionalized the
equations as per our convenience. Then we find the eigenvalues from the Jacobian matrix of
the system and apply bifurcation conditions to find the parametric values corresponding to the
bifurcation boundary
1
Contents
List of symbols………………………………………………………………………………...3
1 Introduction…………...………………………………………………………………4
1.1 Need of Nuclear Energy and Reactor………………………………………….4
1.2 Nuclear Reactor………………………………………………………………..4
2 Literature Review…………………………………....…..…………………………...7
3 Mathematical Modelling………………………….…………...………...…………...8
3.1 Neutronics………………………………………….……………………...…..8
3.1.1 Neutronics Equation………………………..………………………….8
3.2 Thermal Hydraulics……………………….…………………………………...9
3.3 Reactivity Feedback………….……………………………………...……….10
4 Results and Discussion………………....……………......……………………...…..11
4.1 Stability Analysis……………………………....……………………………..11
4.1.1 Nonlinearity in the equations………………………………………....11
4.1.2 Coupling of the equations……………………………....…………….11
4.1.3 Non-dimensionalization……………..…………….…….…………...12
4.1.4 Linear Stability Analysis……....…………………….……………….13
5 Conclusion……………………...………...………………………………………….15
5.1 Present Work……………………...……..…………………………………...15
5.2 Future Work………....………………………………………………………..15
Bibliography………………………...……...………………………………………………..16
2
List of symbols
N (τ ) Density of neutrons
C (τ ) Concentration of precursors of delayed neutrons
ϱ(τ ) Reactivity of the reactor
β Fraction of delayed neutrons
Λ Generation time of neutrons
λ1 Decay constant of precursors of delayed neutrons
Cf Fuel heat capacity
P (τ ) Power of the reactor
V (τ ) Void volume of the coolant
hf g Saturation pressure specific enthalpy
3
Chapter 1
Introduction
Basically the energy released in the whole process of the chain reaction is first converted into
thermal energy and then it is converted into mechanical energy or electrical energy according
to our need. The part of the nuclear reactor where the nuclear reaction takes place is called the
reactor core. In the reactor core we have fuel rods, control rods, moderator, coolant and steam
separator[1].
Fuel rods are made of radioactive materials which undergoes nuclear fission such as
Uranium-235 or Uranium-238. The fuel rods are struck by thermal neutrons which causes the
4
nuclear fission of the uranium nucleus into two fission products of lighter nuclei releasing
tremendous amount of energy. In the reactor core heat energy is obtained in three forms :
I. Kinetic energy of the fission products, which is then converted into thermal
energy when the fission products collide with other molecules
II. Heat is produced by absorption of gamma rays emitted during fission
III. Radioactive decay of the particles formed from nuclear fission
Coolant : It is that medium in the reactor core which absorbs the heat energy
produced in the reactor core and transfer it to the turbines through pipes. Mostly water
is used as a coolant.
Steam separator : When the coolant absorbs the heat energy it gets converted into
steam and it rises up to reach the turbines. Now this steam before reaching the turbines
through the pipes is made to pass through steam separator. The steam separator
separates the wet steam from water molecules or any other particles that is present
with the steam and only pure dry steam passes through it.
5
Control rods : Control rods are used to control the rate of the chain reaction. It
absorbs the excess neutrons and thus preventing them from causing fission of the
uranium atoms. It also maintains the safety of the reactor. Mainly Boron-Carbide,
Silver or Cadmium is used as control rod materials.
Normally as the chain reaction proceeds the production of neutrons and the rate of the
reaction increases. But this needs to be controlled otherwise tremendous amount to energy
will be released and it will blast. For this the control rods are placed. If the rate of reaction or
the number of neutrons increases with time the reactor is in a supercritical state and is they
decrease the reactor is in subcritical state. If the rate of reaction and the number of neutrons
remains constant over time then the reactor is in a critical state. Initially the control rods are
removed and the chain reaction is initiated and after the reaction rate reaches a desired value
the control rods are inserted so that the reactor is in a critical state or simply a steady state.
The superheated steam generated from the reactor core is now moved to the turbine through
pipes. The steam rotates the turbine and the heat energy is converted into mechanical energy
which in turn is converted into electrical energy by generators. The steam coming out of the
turbine is then passed through a condenser where the steam is condensed to warm water. This
warm water with the help of a pump is supplied back to the pressure vessel and the reactor
core.
6
Chapter 2
Literature Review
To understand the basic functioning of nuclear reactors and stability analysis I had gone
through some research papers. I am going to briefly discuss about them.
In a paper by Wahi and Kumawat[3], stability analysis of reduced order model of a BWR near
the Hopf bifurcation point have been done. But the results demonstrated were that of
parameter values for AHWR model. For neutronics model, point reactor kinetic equations
were used. For thermal hydraulics of both fuel and coolant, one-node lumped parameter
model have been used. It was observed that AHWR model shows Hopf bifurcation resulting
in power oscillations when bifurcation parameter like void fraction coefficient and coolant
temperature coefficient was varied. My study was mainly focussed on this model.
Also March-Leuba in their paper[4] developed a model to simulate the qualitative behavior of
BWRs in the nonlinear regime. When two unstable equilibrium points and phase-space
trajectories interact limit cycle oscillations appear. This happens only when linear stability
threshold is crossed. When feedback gain exceeds a certain critical value the limit cycle
becomes unstable.
7
Chapter 3
Mathematical Modelling
3.1 Neutronics
To derive the neutronics equation we use the point-reactor model. For complete neutron
balance we have the neutron density depending upon time, position of the neutron in the
three-dimensional space, direction vector and the energy. To reduce complexity, we only
consider the time dependency and neglect all others
dN (τ ) [ρ(τ )−β]
dτ
= Λ
N (τ ) + λ 1 C(τ ) (1)
Transfer of heat energy between the fuel rods and the coolant fluid is described here. Here we
consider one-node lumped parameter model, where a parameter is considered on the system
as a whole and an average value is taken. For two-node model, we take two different values
of the parameter. To minimise complications in the stability analysis we take one-node
model. So the temperature here is considered to be uniformly distributed over the coolant
fluid an the fuel rods. We assume that the temperature does not vary throughout the fuel rods
and the void volume of the coolant.
8
The fuel rods as a lump have an average temperature Tf . The temperature of the coolant is
assumed to be at a steady state or saturation temperature (Tsat). The change in temperature of
the fuel with reference to the saturation temperature of the saturation temperature of the
coolant is studied. The heat generated in fuel rods during fission is transferred to the
coolant fluid by the process of conduction inside the fuel rods and by convection in the
coolant fluid. The overall heat transfer coefficient is U. Similarly, the change in void volume
is considered with respect to a steady state void volume. Also we assume that a constant
power (P0) is being withdrawn by the coolant at steady state. Now the final equations
balancing the power of the fuel rods and the coolant are given by :
dT f (τ )
Cf dτ
= P (τ ) − U [T f (τ ) − T sat ] (3)
hf g dV (τ )
v g dτ
= U [T f (τ ) − T sat ] − P 0 (4)
Now since the heat is transferred from the fuel rods to the coolant, the second term in the
right-hand side of (3) has a negative sign and (4) has a positive sign. The reactor power is
directly proportional to the number of neutrons and N0, the steady state neutron density being
the proportionality constant we have
N0
P (τ ) = P0 N (τ ) (5)
Here we consider the change in reactivity of a nuclear reactor caused by the nuclear power
transients. Sometimes the reactor power change can be large enough to affect the reactivity of
a reactor and hence the reactor behaviour as a whole.
The reactivity feedback is affected by many factors. But we consider only two of them as
others factors does not have much of an impact on the reactivity. The factors taken into
consideration are fuel and moderator temperature and void fraction of the coolant.the
reactivity is assumed to be linearly dependent on the two factors. Hence the reactivity
feedback equation is given by :
V (τ )−V 0
ρ(τ ) = αf [T f (τ ) − T f 0 ] + αv [ V0 ] (6)
9
Chapter 4
So far we see the five equations that describes the functioning of the nuclear reactor which
includes two equations from nuclear kinetics, two from thermal hydraulics and one from
reactivity feedback. Now when we substitute the reactivity feedback equation (6) in the first
reactor kinetics equation (1) we see nonlinearities which is the only nonlinearity source in our
work. Also we substitute the value of P (τ ) from equation (5) to equation (3). So the finally
we get four equations
dN (τ ) αf [T f (τ )−T f 0 ] V 0 + αv [V (τ )−V 0 ] − βV 0
dτ = ΛV0 N (τ ) + λ1 C(τ ) (7)
dC(τ ) β
dτ
= [ Λ N (τ ) − λ1 C(τ )] (8)
dT f (τ ) N0
Cf dτ
= P0
N (τ ) − U [T f (τ ) − T sat ] (9)
hf g dV (τ )
v g dτ
= U [T f (τ ) − T sat ] − P 0 (10)
Among the above four equations we see only (7) is nonlinear, rest are all linear.
We see that the reactivity feedback equation is basically not a differential equation. It is an
equation which is used for coupling of the neutronics and thermal hydraulics equations. We
can clearly see from equations (1) and (2) that they are coupled among themselves and
equations (3) and (4) are coupled among themselves. Only when the substitutions mentioned
in section 3.1.1 is done the neutron kinetics and thermal hydraulics gets coupled with each
other.
10
4.1.3 Non-dimensionalization of equations
It becomes easier to solve the equations when we substitute some dimensionless parameters
in place of the original parameters. This is known as non-dimensionalization. The variables
are made dimensionless when they are substituted are as follows :
N −N 0 P −P 0 C−C 0 T f −T f 0 V −V 0 βτ
x1 = N0 = P0 ; x2 = C0 ; x3 = T f 0 −T sat ; x4 = V0 ; t= Λ
Also for more simplification of the equations we substitute the following dimensionless
parameters :
ΛP 0 β ρV g P 0 λ1 Λ αf [T f 0 −T sat ] αv
p= C f (T f 0 −T sat ) ; q= hf g βV 0 ; b= β ; af = β ; av = β
In the last chapter it is mentioned that N0, C0, Tf0 and V0 denote the steady state conditions of
the system variables that is neutron density, concentration of precursors of delayed neutrons,
fuel temperature and void volume of the coolant. Now N0 and C0 have any arbitrary values
depending upon various conditions and parameters. But Tf0 and V0 have only specific values
depending on the following steady state conditions :
β P0
C0 = Λλ1 N 0 ; T f 0 = T sat + U
dx1
dt = −x1 (t) + x2 (t) + af x3 (t) + av x4 (t) + af x1 (t) x3 (t) + av x1 (t) x4 (t) (11)
dx2
dt = b[x1 (t) − x2 (t)] (12)
dx3
dt = p[x1 (t)−x3 (t)] (13)
dx4
dt = qx3 (t) (14)
11
4.1.4 Linear Stability analysis
For analysis of nonlinear system first we analyze the linear stability. The source of
instabilities and dynamical behaviour of the system under small disturbances about a steady
state can also be determined. Linear stability analysis is done by nonlinear system
linearization about the desired equilibrium point or steady state. Since the equations are non
dimensionalized and parameters are substituted such that the steady state solution is zero, the
nonlinear system is linearized simply by excluding the nonlinear terms. So the linear system
of equations stands as :
dx1
dt
= −x1 (t) + x2 (t) + af x3 (t) + av x4 (t) (15)
dx2
dt = b[x1 (t) − x2 (t)] (16)
dx3
dt = p[x1 (t)−x3 (t)] (17)
dx4
dt
= qx3 (t)
(18)
Now after this is done, we have to study the dynamical behaviour of this linearized form
about the desired steady state and also the roots of the linearized system. To find the roots of
the system of equations, we denote the whole system in a single vectorial form as
[ dxdt = [A] x] , where x = [x1 , x2 , x3 , x4 ]T. At equilibrium we have dx
dt
= 0 . So the eigenvalues
of [A] are the equilibrium solutions of the system and are used for the stability analysis. The
matrix [A] is as given below :
The system is stable only if all the roots of the equations lie on the left side of the complex
plane which means they have negative real parts. If any of the roots have a positive real part
the the system will be unstable. In the complex plane the path of the eigenvalues are
determined by changing the parameter values. Different types of bifurcations are observed
due to different movements of eigenvalues. When pair of complex conjugate roots cross the
12
imaginary axis transversally Hopf bifurcations are observed. When the roots cross the
imaginary axis through the origin, pitch-fork or transcritical bifurcations are observed.
The characteristic equation of the matrix [A] is given |A − λI | = 0 and I is the identity matrix
of order 4. The simplified value of the above determinant is :
4 3 2
λ + λ (p + b + 1) + λ (bp + p − paf ) − λ(pqav + pbaf ) − pbqav = 0 (19)
Solving the above equations we get the values of the parameters av and af to be
13
Chapter 5
Conclusion
A reduced order model has been demonstrated for a BWR leading to a system of equations.
There are three dynamic processes in a nuclear reactor : thermal hydraulics, neutronics and
reactivity feedback. Of these three only nonlinearity due to heat transfer processes were
ignored and reactivity feedback nonlinearity were considered. The reactivity feedback and
thermal hydraulics equations were coupled. Then the equations were nondimensionalized and
some parameters were introduced for our ease. The Jacobian matrix and characteristic
equations were obtained from the system equations. Then applying conditions of Hopf
bifurcations to the characteristic equation two parameter values namely fuel temperature
coefficient of reactivity (αf ) and coolant void coefficient of reactivity (αv ) are obtained.
These critical parameter values are that along the hopf bifurcation stability boundary. Any
change in these critical parameter values will make the fixed point loose stability via Hopf
bifurcation.
This was all for my seminar work since there was time limitations. I have managed to gain a
lot of interest and some knowledge of stability analysis. In future for my project I would like
to know about pressure drop oscillations and density wave oscillations. Also I would like to
work more on instabilities and stability analysis of two phase flow for my research work
14
Bibliography
[1] "Nuclear reactor." https://www.britannica.com/technology/nuclear-reactor. Accessed
2 April. 2019.
[3]. Wahi, P., & Kumawat, V. (2011). Nonlinear stability analysis of a reduced order
model of nuclear reactors: A parametric study relevant to the advanced heavy water reactor.
Nuclear Engineering and Design, 241(1), 134-143.
[4]. March-Leuba, J., Cacuci, D. G., & Perez, R. B. (1986). Nonlinear dynamics and
stability of boiling water reactors: part 1—qualitative analysis. Nuclear Science and
Engineering, 93(2), 111-123.
[5]. Prasad, G. D., & Pandey, M. (2008). Stability analysis and nonlinear dynamics of
natural circulation boiling water reactors. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 238( 1), 229-240.
15