Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 73

______________________________________________________________________________

__ 1

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

Background of the Study

Sufficiency and satisfaction on the equipment and

facility is a vital aspect for the athletes. It determines how an athlete would think, experience,

act and may reduce or increase motivation (Mehmet and Mamak, 2017). On the other hand,

satisfaction of athletes is a positive, affective state resulting from a complex evaluation of the

structures, processes and outcomes associated with athletic experience or may express

concern about athletes’ performance or degree to which it reaches or fails to achieve expected

levels. It is a feeling of contentment in the provisions of facilities and equipment needed for a

certain sport which can somehow influence their motivation (Caliskan and Baydar, 2016).

The following studies manifest that enough provision of sport facilities and equipment

constitutes in the development of athletes’ performance and motivation. Many researches

work on facilities, equipment, personnel and maintenance show that the areas are deficient

and that sports management in the state and the country at large cannot function adequately

(Awoma et.al, 2015). The poor performance of the athletes in sports can be traceable to the

inadequate sports equipment in various schools (Sanni’s, 2018).

The provision of sufficient facilities and equipment are as important as providing

sufficient incentive for athletes to reach the satisfaction of student athletes, but the

maintenance of such sufficient facilities and equipment as perceived by the students of

Benguet School (Aron, 2019). Inadequate sport facilities and equipment can affect athletes’

performance on hands-on activities and trainings as observed by the student in Surigao Del

Sur State Uiversity (Balingit et.al, 2017).


______________________________________________________________________________
__ 2

Researchers conducted a survey among the athletes of Carlos Hilado Memorial State

College about the challenges they have experienced regarding the sports facilities and

equipment during trainings and competitions. From the survey, 22% of the athletes stated that

the equipment they used were damaged. While 15% of them stated that there was lack of

schedule for the usage of the sport facilities and equipment and 7% of them stated that there

weren’t enough trainings hours and therefore affect their motivation and performances.

This motivates the researchers to conduct a quantitative study about the significant

difference on the level of sufficiency and level of satisfaction in the provision of equipment

and facilities for athletes needed in training which would greatly benefit the athlete’s

performance. The researcher also aims to identify what sports event is the least provided of

equipment and facilities.

The findings of the study would be of great help in giving awareness of the effects of

sufficiency and satisfaction of facilities and equipment to the motivational performance of

athletes. Further, to promote awareness of the importance of facilities and equipment to

athletes in terms of athletic development and to the institution itself. In relation to the

continuing accreditation of the institution, this study would be utilized as support or evidence

that the institution is doing their part in providing quality facilities and equipment for

athletes.
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 3

Statement of the Problem

This study aims to determine the level of sufficiency and satisfaction in the provision

of facilities and equipment for athletes who participated in the Regional State Colleges and

Universities Athletics Association (RSCUAA) of Carlos Hilado Memorial State College

during the Academic Year 2019 - 2020.

Specifically, it would address the following questions:

1. What is the level of sufficiency in the provision of facilities and equipment of athletes

during RSCUAA 2020 when taken as a whole and when grouped according to the

following variables?

a. Sports Category

a. Male

b. Female

b. Sports Event

a. Individual

b. Dual

c. Team

d. Combative

2. What is the level of satisfaction in the provision of facilities and equipment of athletes

during RSCUAA 2020 when taken as a whole and when grouped according to the

following variables?

a. Sports Category

a. Male

b. Female
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 4

b. Sports Event

a. Individual

b. Dual

c. Team

d. Combative

3. Is there a significant difference between the level of sufficiency in the provision of

facilities and equipment for athletes during sports activities when grouped according

to aforementioned variables?

4. Is there a significant difference between the level of satisfaction in the provision of

facilities and equipment for athletes during sports activities when grouped according

to the aforementioned variables?

5. What recommendations that can be suggested based on the findings of the study?
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 5

Hypothesis

In view of the specific objectives, the following hypothesis are advanced:

1. There is no significant difference between the level of sufficiency in the provision of

facilities and equipment for student athletes during sports activities when grouped

according to aforementioned variables.

2. There is no significant difference between the level of satisfaction in the provision of

facilities and equipment for student athletes during sports activities when are grouped

according to the aforementioned variables.


______________________________________________________________________________
__ 6

Theoretical Framework

This study was anchored on Self- determining Theory (intrinsic and extrinsic

motivation). Self-determining Theory was a broad paradigm for researching human

motivation and personality. This theory describes the roles of intrinsic and extrinsic

motivation in cognitive and social development, as well as individual differences, and

articulates a meta-theory for framing motivational research, a systematic theory that

distinguishes intrinsic and varying extrinsic origins of motivation, and a summary of the

respective roles of intrinsic and types of extrinsic motivation in cognitive and social

development and individual differences. Individuals' perceived independence is strong

because they believe they are participating in sports in a protected environment with enough

equipment and services (Deci and Ryan, 2008).

According to Britt (2005), to motivate an individual, it is necessary to be aware of the

things which are important for him and then adopt an approach to meet his desires. The

approach to be adopted would help maintain the satisfaction of the athlete and positively

affect the outcomes of his behavior. Psychological structure embracing desires, ambitions,

needs, drives and interests (Cücelo lu, 1993). That is, motivation can be defined as what an

individual does and why he/she does it (Gill, 1986). Therefore, physical education teachers,

leaders of exercise programs tried to improve the performance standards of the individuals

participating in sports activities, increase the participants’ demonstration of the target

behaviors, their satisfaction levels and the experiences where they taste the success.

Student athlete are actively directed toward growth, according to the first assumption

of Self-determination Theory. Developing a cohesive sense of self requires mastery of

challenges and exposure to new experiences, with this for letting student athlete to develop
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 7

and grow they must experience the proper and complete provision of equipment and facilities

in their training. Equipment and facilities has integral part in harnessing student athlete

performance they depend on, tools and equipment also on the training ground and facilities

(Deci and Ryan, 2008).

Based on (Deci and Ryan, 2008) volitional and high-quality factors of motivation and

commitment for tasks, such as increased success, persistence, and development, are said to be

fostered by conditions that promote an individual's perception of autonomy, competence, and

relatedness. Furthermore, according to Self-determining Theory, the degree to which any of

these three psychological needs is unmet or hindered in a social environment has a significant

detrimental effect on individuals in that group. This theory suggest that people are able to

become self-determined when their needs for competence, autonomy and relatedness are

fulfilled. (1) competence; the equipment and the training ground must be mastered by the

student athlete. When student athletes believe they possess the necessary skills for success,

they are more likely to be confident in their ability to accomplish their objectives. (2)

relatedness; student athlete need to experience a sense of belonging in a way that they would

feel the support of the school during their training and attachment to other student athlete that

could build their trust to each other. (3) autonomy; this feeling of being able to make a

difference by taking direct action. When it comes to making student athletes feel self-

determined, equipment and services play a big role (Deci and Ryan, 2008).

Self-determining Theory will be useful in this study, especially in determining if there

is a significant effect in the student athlete’s performance without available equipment and

facilities and those provided with equipment and facilities.


______________________________________________________________________________
__ 8

Conceptual Framework

In this study, the researchers took into consideration the Sports Category and Sports

Event of the athletes of Carlos Hilado Memorial State College on determining the level of

sufficiency and satisfaction in the provision of facilities and equipment during RSCUAA

2020, as well as what possible challenges the athletes might encounter concerning with

facilities and equipment and the possible recommendations that can be presented.

Facilities and equipment occupy such available place in all the outcomes of sports

administrations (Awoma, Okakah & Arainwu, 2015). Awoma, Okakah and Arainwu 2015,

added that availability of facilities and equipment determine the standard and the success of a

sports program. They also believe that good sports program can only functions at full

effectiveness when they are supported with sufficient equipment. Further, they stated that

athletes have come to realize that improved performances and development of special skills

which can earn them better incentives can be enhanced through sufficient sports facilities and

equipment.

According to Kivunja and Kuyini 2017, Positivism Research Paradigm defines a

worldview to research, which is grounded in what is known in research methods as the

scientific method of investigation. They also stated that it is chosen as the preferred

worldview for research, which tries to interpret observations in terms of facts or measurable

entities. Hypothesis is put forward in propositional or question form about casual relation

between phenomena. It often produces numerical data that are generated through

experimental, standardized test and large- or small-scale surveys using closed ended

questionnaires which are subjected to descriptive or inferential statistical analysis (Rehman &

Alharthi, 2016).
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 9

The Figure 1 presents the research paradigm of the study. The first box contains the

variables of the study which were the Sports Category and Sports Event. Sports Category

would be classified into two which are the “male” and “female”. On the other hand, Sports

Events would be classified into Individual, Dual, Team and Combative events. Moreover,

assessments were expected to vary when respondents were classified according to the

variables.

The second box includes the level of sufficiency and satisfaction of athletes

provision’s of facilities and equipment during RSCUAA 2020. Assessment on student

athletes on the level of sufficiency and satisfaction would be measured by a self-made test of

the researcher. The third box consist of the recommendations that can be presented.
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 10

Sports Category Level of sufficiency

(Male & Female) and satisfaction of

athletes provision’s of
Recommendations
Sports Event
facilities and
(Individual, Dual,
Team and equipment during
Combative)
RSCUAA 2020.

Figure 1: Research Paradigm of the Study


______________________________________________________________________________
__ 11

Definition of Terms

The following terms were conceptually and operationally defined for a better

understanding of this study:

Athlete. A person who actively participates in sports competition which trains in sports

aiming to improve his or her performance (Araujo and Scharhag, 2016).

In this study, athlete are students of Carlos Hilado Memorial State College that

participated in SCUAA 2020 which serves as the respondents of the study.

Satisfaction of Athletes. A positive, affective state resulting from a complex evaluation of

the structures, processes and outcomes associated with athletic experience or may express

concern about athletes performance or degree to which it reaches or fails to achieve expected

levels (Caliskan and Baydar, 2016).

Operationally, satisfaction of athletes is use as feeling of contentment in the provisions

of facilities and equipment needed for a certain sports which can be somehow influence their

motivation.

SCUAA. An association of the Philippine public colleges and universities that held regional

athletic competition across the country (Defensor, 2020).

Defined by the researchers, SCUAA is an athletic competition participated by the

respondents of the study.

Sports. A special sociocultural phenomenon which is a historically determined activity of

people connected with the use of physical exercises, which is aimed at preparing and

participating in a specially organized system of competitions, as well as individual and

socially significant results of such activity (Vasil Sutula, 2018).


______________________________________________________________________________
__ 12

Operationally, sports are type of game played by the athletes during training and

competitions.

Sports Category. A division of people regarded as having particular shared characteristics

(Oxford University, 2019).

In this study, sports category serves a factor in determining the satisfaction and

sufficiency of the athlete.

Sport Equipment. The indispensable material conditions engaged in sports activities.

Practices with sports equipment can enhance students' muscle strength and improve the

flexibility and coordination of the body sport (Ning Li, 2015).

Defined by the researchers, it refers to the tools, materials, clothing, and gear that the

athlete use to help and participate in sports, and they vary by sport during SCUAA 2020.

Sport Event. It as group of sport based on where and how they are played (Global

Association of International Sports Federations, 2019).

Operationally, this term is use as the types of sports which are categorized into

individual, dual, team and combative during SCUAA 2020.

Sport Facilities. Sports facilities are referred to as mainly the immovable structures for sport

practice (Morgan, 2018).

In this study, sport facilities are structures and establishments use by the athletes in

trainings and competition during SCUAA 2020.

Sufficiency of Athletes. The of athletes as an individual's belief on operating a specific job, it

is an important factor for the athletes. (Mehmet and Mamak, 2017).


______________________________________________________________________________
__ 13

Operationally, the sufficiency of CHMSC athletes determines how an athlete will

think, feel, act and may prevent or increase motivation during SCUAA.

Significance of the Study

School Administrator. This study would serve as a framework to the school administrators

in giving improvements to the facilities and equipment in the field of Sports Programs.

Sport Coordinator. The result of this study would provide sport coordinators the awareness,

learnings, and key ideas to know the most and least provision of facilities and equipment.

Coaches. The result of this study would give them insight into the impact and the satisfaction

of athletes in facilities and equipment.

Student Athlete. The result of this study would lead athletes to perform and participate in

sports with satisfaction. Facilities and equipment strengthen their perception to perform

during trainings and competitions.

Parents. The result of this study would provide awareness and idea to the parents how the

facilities and equipment affects the performance of their children, thus support them in the

endeavors whenever the school lacks the said facility and equipment.

Researchers. The result of this study would provide researchers the knowledge how

important the sufficiency and satisfaction of facilities and equipment in motivating athletes.

Future Researchers. The result of this study would serve as basis for further study on the

sufficiency and satisfaction in the provision of facilities and equipment for student athletes.
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 14

Delimitation of the Study

This study focused on the level of sufficiency and satisfaction in the provision of

facilities and equipment for RSCUAA athletes of Carlos Hilado Memorial State College on

the academic year 2019 - 2020. The respondents of the study would be selected using

Stratified random sampling technique in which the researcher divides the population into

sample population. The study would be conducted in Carlos Hilado Memorial State College,

Talisay City Negros Occidental, A.Y. 2020-2021.


______________________________________________________________________________
__ 15

CHAPTER 2

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

This chapter reviews the literature and research that were relevant to the current study

and would act as background information. The research would also show how infrastructure

and resources were becoming more important in coping with the development of sport

programs, which would support both coaches and athletes.

The adequacy of sports facilities and equipment in school

One of the most important areas of administrative school concern of sports facilitators

involves the management of sports facilities and equipment in sports programs, training and

tournaments. The presence of sports facilities and equipment is important to student athletes

for this is the reason of their own happiness and development. The availability of sports

facilities and equipment determine to considerable extent the type of sports programs that can

be offered. Sports facilities and equipment are for students where games were played or

performed and were important for achievement of goals in Physical Education and sports

(Benguet national high school-main, 2018).

Regardless of the country, good school facilities helped determine the success of

students and the effectiveness of a teacher’s lesson. Adequate facilities make it easier for the

school to deliver better education (Andrews, 2019).

According to Sanni (2018), physical education programs within the school premises

(without basic facilities and equipment) were insufficient to address the need to develop the

abilities and skills of the entire student’s body and increase voluntary participation in games
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 16

and other activities. The findings from his study revealed that the poor performance of the

students in sports can be traceable to the inadequate sports equipment in various schools. The

study further revealed that adequate sports equipment can enhance sports performance in

schools if trained physical instructor/educators were available to teach students on how best

to handle the available equipment.

The result shown on the study of Bamidele et al (2016) revealed that the lack of sports

equipment significantly influenced the teaching and learning of physical education in the

secondary schools. For a meaningful physical education lesson to take place, enough

equipment should be made available so that each individual benefit from maximum

participation and practice. Before any meaningful development can take place in sports and

games, basic equipment should be provided to enhance the successful human participation,

development and promotion.

Physical Education provision are typically driven by multiple factors, including

funding for PE teachers, PE curriculum, and equipment. Potentially just as important, though

unfortunately less studied, is the role of schools’ physical activity facilities in disparities in

PE provision and student physical activity. School facilities have not only been linked to

improved PE-related outcomes, but to overall opportunities for physical activity during the

school day, for students and staff, alike. The presence of safe, attractive, and age-appropriate

equipment (like play structures) and outdoor space (like blacktops with painted markings and

fields) have been linked with greater student accumulation of MVPA during recess. The

facilities encouraged children and adolescents to participate in active play not only during

recess, but during lunch, and before- and after-school, as well. Available and accessible

gymnasiums and open indoor spaces enable students to play actively during inclement

weather or when outdoor facilities are being used for other purposes. Outdoor walkways;
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 17

clean, wide halls; and tracks can increase walking during class breaks and before and after

school. The presence, use, and maintenance of school facilities can have a major impact on

opportunities for both school sports and after-school programs ( Thompson, 2017).

Sports Category

As stated by Ott (2021), performance training programs using complete equipment and

facilities for sports are overseen by professional sports medicine specialists, including

physical therapists, strength coaches and athletic trainers, who emphasize body mechanics

and proper form of the athlete which varies depending on sex, either male or female.

Female

According to Chen (2020), the fitness level of athletes in high school sports programs cannot

be underestimated. According to a report from the National Federation of State High School

Associations (NFHS), a study on female athletes found that when female students were given

more opportunity to participate in sports with complete training using proper facilities, their

weight and body mass improved. Studies also suggest that student athletes were less likely to

participate in unhealthy or risky behavior when they are playing sports in high school.

Male

There were various ways sports training using proper facilities and equipment can help male

athletes to perform better and reach new personal bests. These include lasting endurance,

enhanced agility and speed, and injury prevention. Training integrates strength and cardio

activity to prepare you for the physical demands of an entire match, emphasizes leg strength

to help you achieve explosive speed and also teach you proper form and techniques to help

you reduce your risk for or severity of an injury (Ott, 2021).


______________________________________________________________________________
__ 18

Sports Events

Individual Event

According to Tiwari (2021), sports equipment and facilities were very helpful for an

individual athlete because it prevents contusion or ligament injuries; furthermore, equipment

should be of good quality because high-quality equipment prevents bone injuries.

Dual Event

Green (2021) stated that sports equipment and facilities enable the sportsmen and

sportswomen, including those performing with a partner (dual sports) to perform at their best

of abilities. It is paramount that these parameters be in good shape for the participants to

prepare for the game and then take part of course.

Combative Event

Sports facilities were used in two major aspects that allow players to participate and stay

healthy while doing so. Sport facilities were often used to prevent injury or treat injuries

especially for combative sports. For instance, an athlete would use a training room to ice

there body after practice in an effort to stay healthy. If an athlete sprains an ankle the training

room will be utilized to perform physical therapy on the injured ankle and treatments like

icing can also be applied (Strader, 2018).

Team Event

Sports equipment and practice facilities were used in order to prepare teams for a season or

throughout a game week in order to prepare for particular opponents. The equipment and

facilities used in this manner are extremely important to a team’s performance (Strader,

2018).
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 19

Effects on Athletes

Facilities, supplies and equipment provision were important aspect of physical

education and sports management. Excellent programmed is the key word in physical

education and sports competitions, and this requires well equipped good play-ground for

training (Tiamzon, 2019).

Availability of sporting facilities was important in the promotion of sports in

workplace because participation among staff motivates them to stay at work in order

to participate in sports activities after work. Therefore, competitive sports programs can

optimally function only when they are complemented with effective equipment (Kamatu,

2015).

Sports equipment and facilities showed significant associations to the performance of

the athletes, these indicators should be further enhanced and/or provided in the campus in

order to produce better-performing or excellent athletes (Lacaba, 2020).

In sports, the proper use of protective equipment is important for accident prevention.

Any country's national governing sports body was responsible for establishing equipment

standards that were specific to each sport. It is the duty of the coach of either organization, or

even an athlete, to follow these rules to ensure that the proper protective equipment was used.

Wearing the right gear decreases the risk of being harmed, allowing you to concentrate on the

game rather than worrying about potential mishaps. Often, wearing the proper equipment isn't

limited to rugged activities (CP, 2020).

Awoma et al (2015) exposed that many research works on facilities, equipment,

personnel and maintenance show that the areas were deficient and that sports management in

the state and the country at large cannot function adequately. The availability of adequate
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 20

equipment and facilities plays a major role in sports development. It would not be important

to achieve satisfactory results from athletes, whose training facilities were inadequate or

substandard which in actual fact would not compliment the work of the coach. Good sports

programmes can function at full effectiveness only when they were supported with effective

equipment in good conditions. Athletes have come to realize that improved performances and

development of special skills which can earn them better incentives can be enhanced through

better sports facilities and modern equipment.

Facilities were actually structures that were fixed or permanent and used in sports

arenas. Many sports facilities were not built for any specific sports. Today, especially at

social and community levels of sports and recreation, many improvised and converted

buildings or spaces were used, and they may be far from ideal in terms of safety. Therefore,

where this is the case, facility managers must ensure that the facility does not endanger

players or spectators in any way. Facilities must be used in a safe manner. Even the safest

facility can be turned into an unsafe environment. (University of Calabar, 2018).

Synthesis

The studies we have reviewed assisted us in gaining information about the effect of

having insufficient sports equipment and facilities in schools, sports categories, sports events,

and athletes. According to the studies, having inadequate provision of these facilities and

equipment would cause negative effects to each of these variables particularly, it would lead

to inappropriate practice that may extend to poor performance of athletes. While having

sufficient sports equipment would generate positive outcomes both in schools and athletes as

it would enhance the capabilities of the athletes that may prepare them to be more

competitive which would show great result and could lead to success.
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 21

Having sufficient and quality sports equipment and facilities in certain schools

doesn’t just enhance the capabilities of the athletes but also gives them safety during training

and competitions. This would be the perfect ground to help themselves train and compete

while being safe.


______________________________________________________________________________
__ 22

CHAPTER 3

METHODOLOGY

This chapter discussed the Research Design, Respondents of the Study, Research

Instrument, Data Gathering Procedure, Ethical Considerations and Data Analysis Procedure

that would be used in the study.

Research Design

Descriptive quantitative design collect information about variables without changing

the environment or manipulating any variables, so they do not look at possible cause and

effect (Baker, 2017).

This study used descriptive method in quantitative approach wherein the researchers

utilized a self-made checklist questionnaire in order to gather the data needed. To interpret

the instrument, descriptive research design was employed in order to determine the status of

facilities and equipment for all student athlete. It was generally done using scientific

methods, which includes developing the concepts, theories and hypothesis on what the

researchers expected to find.

Respondents of the Study

Stratified Random Sampling was used in this study. The respondents of the study

were officially enrolled athletes of Carlos Hilado Memorial State College-Talisay Campus,

academic year 2019-2020 who participated in the Regional State Colleges and Universities

Athletics Association (RSCUAA) 2020.


______________________________________________________________________________
__ 23

Table 1

Profile of the 2020 RSCUAA Athletes

Variables Total Population Sample %


(f) Population (f)
A. Entire Group 171 121 100
B. Sports Category
Male 83 59 48.76
Female 88 62 51.24
C. Sports Event
Individual 28 20 16.53
Dual 20 15 12.40
Team 83 58 47.93
Combative 40 28 23.14

Table 1 shows the profile and distribution of the 2020 Regional State Colleges and

University Athletic Association Athletes as respondents of the study. Based on the stratified

random sampling, out of 83 athletes in the male category 59 or 48.76% of athletes was the

respondents of the study and out of 88 athletes in the female category, 62 or 51.24% of

athletes was the respondents of the study.

Out of 28 athletes in the individual events, 20 or 16.53% of athletes was the

respondents of the study. Out of 20 athletes in the dual events, 15 or 12.40% of athletes was

the respondents of the study. Out of the 83 athletes in the team events, 58 or 47.93% of

athletes was the respondents of the study. Out of the 40 combative events, 28 or 23.14% of

athletes was the respondents of the study. In summary, out of 171 athletes of Carlos Hilado

Memorial State College-Talisay Campus who participated in RSCUAA 2020, 121 athletes

were the respondents of the study.


______________________________________________________________________________
__ 24

Research Instrument

The researcher used a self-made questionnaire to determine the level of sufficiency

and satisfaction in the provision of facilities and equipment for athletes during Regional State

Colleges and Universities Athletic Association (RSCUAA) 2020. The questionnaire

comprised into three parts.

Part I include profile of the participants such as name, sports category and sport

events.

Part II consist of a 15-item statements reflecting the level of sufficiency in the

provision of facilities and equipment for student athletes during sport activities.

The response in each item was rated by the use of four-point scale with the following

description:

Numerical Scale Verbal Interpretation


4 Very Sufficient

3 Sufficient
2 Insufficient
1 Very Insufficient

Part III consist of a 15-item statements reflecting the level of satisfaction in the

provision of facilities and equipment for student athletes during sport activities.

The response in each item was rated by the use of four-point scale with the following

description:

Numerical Scale Verbal Interpretation


4 Very Satisfied
3 Satisfied
2 Dissatisfied
1 Very Dissatisfied
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 25

Validity of the Instrument

Research validity relates to the extent at which the survey measures right elements

that need to be measured. In simple terms, validity refers to how well an instrument measures

what it is intended to measure [ CITATION Dud16 \l 1033 ]

For the validation purposes, the researchers presented a self-made questionnaire to the

research experts to name the Director for Students Affairs and Services, (2) Faculty members,

an Associate Professor IV and the Coordinator of PEHK Department of Carlos Hilado

Memorial State College-Talisay Campus. They rated and evaluated the research instruments

through Lawshe’s Content Validity Ratio. The validity rating was 0.849, which rendered the

research instrument valid.

Reliability of the Instrument

Reliability refers to whether or not you get the same answer by using an instrument to

measure something more than once. In simple terms, research reliability is the degree to

which research method produces stable and consistent results [ CITATION Dud16 \l 1033 ].

To test the reliability of the questionnaire, the researchers conducted a one shot test of

the research instrument. This involved the administering of the researcher-made

questionnaire to 30 athletes of Carlos Hilado Memorial State College in Alijis, Binalbagan

and Fortune Town Campus, who were not included as respondents of the study. Result of the

one-shot test was 0.987 which was assessed using Cronbach Alpha to establish the reliability

of the instrument.

Data Gathering Procedure


______________________________________________________________________________
__ 26

After establishing the validity and reliability of the researcher-made instrument, the

researcher provided a researcher-made instrument for conduct of the study to actual

respondents in a Google Form. Prior to the administration of the survey, permission to

conduct the study was secured at the Director for Student Affairs and Services of Carlos

Hilado Memorial State College-Talisay Campus.

The researchers reached out the respondents through social media such as Facebook,

Messenger, Instagram or Gmail to have an ease in administering the survey. The researchers

reassured the respondents of the confidentiality of their responses.

Ethical Considerations

Before, during, and after the study, the researchers observed the fundamental ethical

principles. For the approval of the study's conduct, letters were written and properly

communicated. The respondents were carefully selected and informed about the research

study's details. The respondents were also assured that their privacy would be respected and

that the data and information they gave would be kept confidential. The respondents' data and

information were securely stored and discarded three weeks after the final defense.

Data Analysis Procedure

Upon the retrieval of the researcher-made instruments, the data was tallied, analyzed

and interpreted. The data for each sub problem stated in Chapter 1 was treated using the

following statistical tools.


______________________________________________________________________________
__ 27

Problem No. 1, which was to determine the level of sufficiency in the provision of facilities

and equipment of athletes during sports activities when taken as a whole and when grouped

according to the following variables: sport category and sport events, mean and standard

deviation was used.

The result was interpreted by the following verbal interpretations:

Mean Range Interpretation Description

3.50 – 4.00 Extremely Adequate The athletes are highly

sufficient to the provision of

facilities and equipment

during the RSCUAA 2020.

2.50 – 3.49 Adequate The athletes are sufficient to

the provision of facilities

and equipment during the

RSCUAA 2020.

1.50 – 2.49 Fairly Adequate The athletes are fairly

sufficient to the provision of

facilities and equipment

during the RSCUAA 2020.

1.00 – 1.49 Inadequate The athletes are insufficient

to the provision of facilities

and equipment during the

RSCUAA 2020.
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 28

Problem No. 2, which was to determine the level of satisfaction in the provision of facilities

and equipment of athletes during sports activities when taken as a whole and when grouped

according to the following variables: sport category and sport events, mean and standard

deviation was also used.

The result was interpreted by the following verbal interpretations:

Numerical Scale Verbal Interpretation Description

3.50 – 4.00 Extremely Contented The athletes are highly

satisfied to the provision of

facilities and equipment

during the RSCUAA 2020.

2.50 – 3.49 Contented The athletes are satisfied to

the provision of facilities

and equipment during the

RSCUAA 2020.

1.50 – 2.49 Fairly Contented The athletes are fairly

satisfied to the provision of

facilities and equipment

during the RSCUAA 2020.

1.00 – 1.49 Not Contented The athletes are dissatisfied

to the provision of facilities

and equipment during the


______________________________________________________________________________
__ 29

RSCUAA 2020.

Problem No. 3, which was to find out whether or not a significant difference exists between

the levels of sufficiency in the provision of facilities and equipment for athletes during sports

activities when grouped according to sport category and sport events, t-test and annova was

used.

Problem No. 4, which was to find out whether or not a significant difference exists between

the levels of satisfaction in the provision of facilities and equipment for athletes during sports

activities when grouped according to sport category and sport events, t-test and annova was

also used.

CHAPTER 4

PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

This chapter presents, analyzes and interprets the data gathered at Carlos Hilado

Memorial State College-Talisay Campus. The findings were presented as follows:

The Level of Sufficiency in the Provision of Facilities and Equipment of Athletes during

RSCUAA 2020 when Taken as a Whole and Grouped According to Variables


______________________________________________________________________________
__ 30

The first objective of the study was to determine the level of sufficiency in the

provision of facilities and equipment of athletes during RSCUAA 2020 when taken as a

whole and grouped according to Sports Category and Sports Event.

The table 2 shows that sports category the male has M = 3.20, SD = 0.53 and female

has M = 3.10, SD = 0.66 while in sport event the individual has M = 3.18, SD = 0.71, the

dual has M = 2.92, SD = 0.43, the team has M = 3.27, SD = 0.55, and the combative has M

= 3.00, SD = 0.66. This result shown means that in sports category the male respondents

considered it to be more “adequate” in the provision of facilities and equipment compared to

the female respondents while in sport event the team respondents considered to be more

adequate in the provision of facilities and equipment than of the individual, dual and

combative respondents.

Table 2

Level of Sufficiency in the Provision of Facilities and Equipment of the 2020


RSCUAA Athletes
Variables Mean Interpretation SD
A. Entire Group 3.15 Adequate 0.60
B. Sports Category
Male 3.20 Adequate 0.53
Female 3.10 Adequate 0.66
C. Sports Event
Individual 3.18 Adequate 0.71
Dual 2.92 Adequate 0.43
Team 3.27 Adequate 0.55
Combative 3.00 Adequate 0.66
Note: Extremely Adequate (3.50 – 4.00), Adequate (2.50 – 3.49), Fairly Adequate (1.50 – 2.49), Inadequate (1.00 – 1.49)

This can be attributed to the greater mean value of the male category than the

mean of the female category for sports category, and to the highest mean value of team

event than the mean of individual, dual and combative events under the sport events.

This implies that the provision of facilities and equipment in sport category and sport

events are sufficient for the athletes during RSCUAA 2020. This is supported by the
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 31

study of Lacaba and Lacaba (2020), where findings show that there is a sufficient

provision of sport facilities and equipment for utilization by the athletes during trainings

and competitions. In contrary, the study of Ekuri (2018) state that the findings shows that

there is an insufficient provision of facilities and equipment which made a significant

influence on the performance of Cross River State. This shows that sufficiency of sport

facilities and equipment may affect athlete’s performance in trainings and competitions.

According to Awoma, C.I, et al (2015) provision of adequate sports facilities and

equipment of the appropriate standard are available of promote the athletes performance.

The Level of Satisfaction in the Provision of Facilities and Equipment of Athletes during

RSCUAA 2020 when Taken as a Whole and Grouped according to Variables

The second objective of the study was to determine the level of satisfaction in the

provision of facilities and equipment when taken as a whole and grouped according to Sports

Category and Sports Event.

The table 3 presents that in sport category the male has M = 3.08, SD = 0.50 and the

female has M = 3.00, SD = 0.62 while in sport event the individual has M = 3.05, SD = 0.66,

the dual has M = 2.79, SD = 0.44, the team has M = 3.19, SD = 0.52 and the combative has

M = 2.85, SD = 0.56. The result shown means that in sport category the male respondents are

more “contented” in the provision of facilities and equipment in comparison to female

respondents while in sport event the team event is considered to be more “contented” in the

provision of facilities and equipment compared to individual, dual and combative events.

Table 3

Level of Satisfaction in the Provision of Facilities and Equipment of the 2020 RSCUAA
Athletes
Variables Mean Interpretation SD
A. Entire Group 3.04 Contented 0.56
B. Sports Category
Male 3.08 Contented 0.50
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 32

Female 3.00 Contented 0.62


C. Sports Event
Individual 3.05 Contented 0.66
Dual 2.79 Contented 0.44
Team 3.19 Contented 0.52
Combative 2.85 Contented 0.56
Note: Extremely Contented (3.50 – 4.00), Contented (2.50 – 3.49), Fairly Contented (1.50 – 2.49), Not Contented (1.00 – 1.49)

This can be attributed to the greater mean value of male category than the mean of

female category for sport category, and to the highest mean value of team event than the

mean of individual, dual and combative events under the sport events. This implies that the

2020 RSCUAA athletes considering the provision of facilities and equipment to be satisfied

both in the sports category and sports events. This is supported by the study of Gokce and

Bozyigit (2019) where male respondents are more satisfied than female respondents.

Furthermore, the study of Chaudhari (2016) findings show that there is satisfaction in the

provision of sport facilities and equipment among athletes which improves performance and

participation in sports. According to the study of Abidin, N.E, et.al. (2017) the level of

satisifaction of athletes will help provide important information that can help administrators

understand facilities and equipment assesment which plays a significant role in athlete’s

motivation and performance.

The Significant Difference between the Level of Sufficiency in the Provision of Facilities

and Equipment for Athletes during Sports Activities when Grouped according to

Variables

The third objective of the study was to determine the significant difference between

the level of sufficiency in the provision of facilities and equipment for athletes when grouped

according to Sports Category and Sports Event.


______________________________________________________________________________
__ 33

The table 4 shows that the male and female category has a t(119) = 0.967 and p =

0.335 with an interpretation of “not significant”. This means that when variables are grouped

according to sport category for male and female the result shows no significant difference.

Table 4

t-test Results for the Difference in the Level of Sufficiency in the Provision of Facilities
and Equipment of the 2020 RSCUAA Athletes when grouped according to Sports Category
Variable Mean SD df t-ratio P interpretation
Male 3.20 0.53
119 0.967 0.335 not significant
Female 3.10 0.66

This implies that there is no significant difference in the level of sufficiency in the

provision of facilities and equipment of the 2020 RSCUAA athletes when grouped according

to sports category. Thus, the null hypothesis was accepted. This is contrary to the study of

Coleman and Shreve (2020), where they stated that there is a significant difference in the

level of sufficiency between male category and female category. The same with the study of

Ramli and Zain (2019) findings shows that there was a significant difference in the

sufficiency level of sport facilities and equipment according to male and female.

The table 5 shows that the Individual, Dual, Team and Combative events has a F(3,

117) = 2.097 and p = 0.104 with an interpretation of “not significant”. This means that when

variables are grouped according to sport events for individual, dual, team and combative

result shows no significant difference.

Table 5

One-Way ANOVA Results for the Difference in the Level of Sufficiency in the Provision of
Facilities and Equipments of the 2020 RSCUAA Athletes when grouped according to
Sports Event
Variables Mean SD df f-ratio p interpretation
Individual 3.18 0.71 (3, 117) 2.097 0.104 not significant
Dual 2.92 0.43
Team 3.27 0.55
Combative 3.00 0.66
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 34

This implies that there is no significant difference in the level of sufficiency in the

provision of facilities and equipment of the 2020 RSCUAA athletes when grouped according

to sports event. Thus, the null hypothesis was accepted. This is supported by the comparative

study of Singh (2017) among the individual, dual team and combative sports, where there is

also no significant difference reported in the provision of facilities and equipment according

to individual, dual, team and combative events.

The Significant Difference between the Level of Satisfaction in the Provision of Facilities

and Equipment for Athletes during Sports Activities when Grouped according to

Variables

The table 6 shows that the male and female category has t(119) = 0.871, p = 0.386

with an interpretation of “not significant”. This means that when variables are grouped

according to sport category for male and female result shows no significant difference.

Table 6

t-test Results for the Difference in the Level of Satisfaction in the Provision of Facilities
and Equipments of the 2020 RSCUAA Athletes when grouped according to Sports
Category
Variable Mean SD df t-ratio p interpretation
Male 3.08 0.50
119 0.871 0.386 not significant
Female 3.00 0.62

This implies that there is no significant difference in the level of satisfaction in the

provision of facilities and equipment of the 2020 RSCUAA athletes when grouped according

to sport category. Thus, the null hypothesis was accepted. This is contrary to the study of

Boateng (2015), where it stated in the findings that there is a significant difference in the

relationship between the level of satisfaction and gender such as male and female. The same

with the study of Raghavendran and Gajendra (2018), findings shows that there is significant

difference in the level of satisfaction when grouped into male and female. Also, findings in
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 35

the study of Gokce and Bozyigit (2019) shows also differences between the level of

satisfaction according to gender.

The table 7 results shows that Individual, Dual, Team and Combative has F(3, 117) =

3.766, p = 0.013 with an interpretation of “significant”. This means that when variables when

grouped according to sport events for individual, dual, team and combative result shows a

significant difference.

Table 7

One-Way ANOVA Results for the Difference in the Level of Satisfaction in the Provision
of Facilities and Equipments of the 2020 RSCUAA Athletes when grouped according to
Sports Event
Variables Mean SD df f-ratio p interpretation
Individual 3.05 0.66 (3, 117) 3.766 0.013 significant
Dual 2.79 0.44
Team 3.19 0.52
Combative 2.85 0.56

This implies that there is a significant difference in the level of satisfaction in the

provision of facilities and equipment of the 2020 RSCUAA athletes when grouped according

to sport events but a robust test of Post Hoc Tukey would be needed to determine as to which

pairing was it found significant. Thus, the null hypothesis was rejected. This is in contrary to

the study of Barth and Schnitzer (2019), where finding shows no significant difference

between the level of satisfaction when grouped by sport events.

For sports event, there was homogeneity of variances as assessed by Levene’s test

with p=0.081. So Post Hoc Tukey test was used in Table 8. The result shows that the Team

and Combative comparison has mean difference of 0.347 with p=0.032 and an interpretation

of significant. Meaning to say that the result of comparing team event with combative event

has significant difference. This can be attributed to the value of p which 0.032 which is less

than the 0.05 standard level in determining the significance of mean difference.
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 36

Table 8

Post Hoc Analysis of the Significant Difference in the Level of Satisfaction in the
Provision of Facilities and Equipment of the 2020 RSCUAA Athletes when grouped
according to Sports Event (n-121)
Variable (I) (J) Mean Difference p Interpretation
Sports Event Individual Dual 0.262 0.494 not significant
Team –0.139 0.759 not significant
Combative 0.208 0.559 not significant
Dual Team –0.401 0.058 not significant
Combative –0.054 0.174 not significant
Team Combative 0.347* 0.032 significant
*p < 0.05

This implies that there is a significant difference in the level of satisfaction in the

provision of facilities and equipment of the 2020 RSCUAA athletes when grouped according

to sports event mainly in team and combative. According to the study of Glen (2016), Post

Hoc Tukey test was used to determine where specific group’s mean (compared with each

other) shows difference. In the study of Akarah, E. et al. (2015), discussed that they also used

Post Hoc Tukey test to determine the specific group which has a significant relationship.

Findings show that the significant difference in the satisfaction level of the respondents

according to sports event found in dual and team which was contrary to the result of the

study. Thus, the null hypothesis was neglected specifically in team and combative events.

CHAPTER 5

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS

This chapter presents the summary and conclusion derived in the conduct of the study

which is the Sufficiency and Satisfaction of Athletes Provision’s of Facilities and Equipment

during RSCUAA 2020. It also provides recommendation that can be pursued by the school

administrators, sports coordinator and people related to sports.


______________________________________________________________________________
__ 37

Summary of Findings

The findings of the study were summarized according to the statement of the problems

stated in Chapter 1.

1. What is the level of sufficiency in the provision of facilities and equipment of

student athletes during RSCUAA 2020 when taken as a whole and when grouped

according to the following variables?

a. Sports Category

As for the level of sufficiency when grouped according to sports category, male

respondents considered it to be more “adequate” compared to the female respondents.

b. Sports Event

In the matter of level of sufficiency when grouped according to sports event, those

athletes belonging to the team category has the highest mean value in the level of

sufficiency in the provision of the facilities and equipment to be adequate compared to

individual, combative, and dual.

2. What is the level of satisfaction in the provision of facilities and equipment of

student athletes during RSCUAA 2020 when taken as a whole and when grouped

according to the following variables?

a) Sports Category

As for the level of satisfaction, 2020 RSCUAA when grouped according to sports

category, results showed that male respondents are more contented in comparison to the

female respondents.

b) Sports Event
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 38

In terms of level of satisfaction when grouped according to sports event, those athletes

belonging to the team category has the highest level of satisfaction in the provision of

facilities and equipment to be “contented” compared to the individual, combative, and

dual.

3. Is there a significant difference between the level of sufficiency in the provision of

facilities and equipment for student athletes during sports activities when grouped

according to aforementioned variables?

There is no significant difference in the level of sufficiency in the provision of

facilities and equipment of the 2020 Regional State Colleges and Universities Athletic

Association (RSCUAA) athletes when grouped according to sports category for male and

female. Thus, the null hypothesis was accepted.

It is yielded no significant difference in the level of sufficiency in the provision of

facilities and equipment of the 2020 RSCUAA athletes when grouped according to sports

event for those in Individual, Dual, Team and Combative. Thus, the null hypothesis was

also accepeted.

4. Is there a significant difference between the level of satisfaction in the provision of

facilities and equipment for student athletes during sports activities when grouped

according to the aforementioned variables?

There was no significant difference in the level of satisfaction in the provision of

facilities and equipment of the 2020 Regional State Colleges and Universities

(RSCUAA) athletes when grouped according to sports category for male and female.

Thus, the null hypothesis was accepted.


______________________________________________________________________________
__ 39

There was a significant difference in the level of satisfaction in the provision of

facilities and equipment of the 2020 Regional State Colleges and Universities

(RSCUAA) athletes when grouped according to sports event belonging in individual,

dual, team and combative. Analysis revealed that the level of satisfaction in the provision

of facilities and equipment of the 2020 RSCUAA athletes when grouped according to

sports event was statistically significant only in the comparison of Team and Combative.

This result emphasized that sports event categorized in team are more satisfied that those

who belong in the combative category. Thus, the null hypothesis was neglected

significantly between Team and Combative Events.

Conclusions

Based upon the summary of findings, the following conclusions were drawn:

1. Faclities and Equipment were adequately sufficient to the respondent’s needs during

SCUAA 2020 regardless to the sports category and sports event.

2. Male respondents were more satisfied in the provision of facilities and equipment of

athletes during SCUAA 2020 than female. The same with the variable in sports event

where team category got more satisfied.

3. The level of sufficiency to the provision of facility and equipment of athletes during

RSCUAA 2020 has no significant relationship with sports category and sports event.

4. The level of satisfaction to the provision of facilities and equipment of athletes during

RSCUAA 2020 has no significant relationship with sports category but has significant

relationship with sports event.

Recommendations
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 40

The data on the level of sufficiency shows that dual sports ranked as the lowest event

though there was an adequate provision in sports facilities and equipment when grouped

according to sports event. Thus, the following recommendations were hereby presented:

5. School Administrators should continually improve sports facilities and may also provide a

separate area for the dual sports athletes where they can train and enhance their skills.

6. School Administrators should also consider providing seminars and orientation on the effects

of sports facilities and equipment to the performance of athletes in the regional competitions

among faculty, coaches and students.

7. Sports Coordinator should prioritize the dual sports when purchasing sports facilities and

equipment as they need more attention among all the sports event.

8. Coaches should attend seminars and orientations about the effects of sports facilities and

equipment to the performance of athletes.

9. Parents of the athletes may provide an extra support when it comes to sports equipment as it

also plays a role when it comes to the athlete’s satisfaction.

10. A similar study must be undertaken on a wider sample to see if the same findings will be

attained.

REFERENCES

Abidin, N.Z., et.al. (2017). Athletes’ Satisfaction towards Facilities in Malaysian Public

Universities. World Journal of Education.

Akarah, E., et. al. (2015). Availability and Satisfaction of Facilities and Equipment for Sports

Administration at the Local Government Areas of Delta State, Nigeria. Academic Journal of

Interdisciplinary Studies
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 41

Araujo, C. (2016). The Terms "Athlete" and "Exercisers". American College of Cardiology

Foundation. https://www.acc.org/latest-in-cardiology/articles/2016/06/27/07/06/the-terms-

athlete-and-exercisers

Aron. (2019). Adequacy of Sports Facilities and Equipment Benguet National High School-

Main. Course Hero Inc. https://www.coursehero.com/file/37698565/Adequatedocx/

Awoma, C.I., Okakah, R.O. & Arainwu, G. (2015). Facilities/Equipment as Predictor of

Sport Development in Edo State, Nigeria. Progressive Academic Publishing, UK.

www.idpublications.org

Baker, C. (2017). Quantitative research designs: Experimental, quasi-experimental, and

descriptive. Evidence-based practice: An integrative approach to research, administration,

and practice, 155-183.

Balingit, C.M., et.al. (2017). The Dearth of Facilities and Equipments for Physical Education

Teachers and Students. Surigao Del Sur State University.

Bamidele, B. B., Bamidele, O. B., & Obaseki, S. J. (2016). Assessment of the Lack of Sports

Equipment as Constraint to the Teaching and Learning of Physical Education in the

Secondary Schools in Kogi state, Nigeria. International Journal of Scientific Research in

Education. p 91-96. http://www.ijsre.com

Boateng, K. (2015). Satisfaction with Recreational Sports Facilities and Services in

Malaysia:Demographic influences. Annals of Leisure Research,12:1,22-46, DOI:

10.1080/11745398.2009.9686807

Chaudhari, A.N. (2016). A Study of Sport Management and Student Players Satisfaction in

Colleges. International Journal of Research.


______________________________________________________________________________
__ 42

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306031646

Chen, G. (2020). 10 Reasons Why High School Sports Benefit Students.Public School

Review. https://www.publicschoolreview.com/blog/10-reasons-why-high-school-sports-

benefit-students.

Cherry, K. (2021). Self-Determination Theory. Verywell mind Inc.

http://www.verywellmind.com

Coleman, D.L. & Shreve, W. (2020). Comparing Athletic Performances the Best Elite

Woman to Boys and Men. Academia.edu.

Defensor, M.C. (2020). A Retrospective Evaluation of Interscholastic Athletic Program of a

State University in the Philippines. Psychology and Education Journal.

www.psychologyandeducation.net

Dudovskiy, J. (2016). The Ultimate Guide to Writing a Dissertation. Business Research

Methodology. https://www.research-methodology.net

Eisau. (2016). The importance of Good Technological Equipment in School. Science-

Educational Infrastructure Service Australia Inc. http://www.eisau.com.au

Ekuri, P. (2018). Standard Facilities and Equipment as Determinants of High Sports

Performance of Cross River State at National Sports Festival. Journal of Public

Administration and Governance. https://dio.org/10.5296/jpag.v8i2.13177

Gokce, H. & Bozyigit, E. (2019). Satisfaction Levels of Sports Event Participants. Canadian

Center of Science and Education. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v9n1p136


______________________________________________________________________________
__ 43

Lacaba, A., Lacaba, T. (2020). Coaches’ Profile and Adequacy of Sports Equipment and

Facilities Vis-à-vis Athletic Performance in the ESSU–Guiuan: Input to Policy Program.

SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3665175

Ott, J. (2021). 5 Ways Performance Training Benefits Athletes: Ochsner Health.Ochsner

Health System. https://ochsner.org/articles/5-ways-performance-training-can-make-you-a-

better-athlete

Raghavendran, V. & Gajendra, N.J. (2018). A Study on the satisfaction level of the sports

infrastructure facility provided at colleges across the Dakshina Kannada District.

https://www.academia.edu/7270560

Ramli, A. & Zain, R.M. (2019). The Impact of Facilities on Student Athlete’s Performance.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337590619

Sanni, D. (2018). A study on the effects of inadequate sport equipment and facilities on sports

development and academic performance in primary schools: a case study of Bwari area

council of Abuja-Nigeria. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326914191

Schwarz, E., et.al. (2016). Managing Sport Facilities and Major Events.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309348162

Singh, A. (2017). Compartive Study of Social Support among Individual, Team, Dual and

Combative Sport Athletes. Healthcare Sci. Journal. DIO:10.7324/IJCRR.2017.9145

Strader, R., Green, T & Tiwari, A. (2018). What is the importance of sport facilities and

equipment to sports participation? Quora. https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-importance-

of-sport-facilities-and-equipment-to-sports-participation.
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 44

Tiamzon, M. (2019). Facilities and Equipment in Relation to Performance in Physical

Education. Scribd Inc. https://www.scribd.com/document/424819375

Wong, K. (2014). Research 101: Paradigms and Methodologies.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268449309
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 45

APPENDICES
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 46

Appendix A

LETTER TO CONDUCT THE STUDY


______________________________________________________________________________
__ 47

Appendix B

RESEARCH INSTRUMENT

Dear Respondents,

We, researchers the Bachelor of Physical Education from Carlos Hilado

Memorial State College are conducting a research on the SUFFICIENCY AND

SATISFACTION OF ATHLETES PROVISIONS’ OF FACILITIES AND

EQUIPMENT DURING THE REGIONAL STATE COLLEGES AND

UNIVERSITIES ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION (RSCUAA 2020). As part of our

Physical Education Research (PERESE) 1, the researchers are respectfully asking for

your time to answer the researcher-made instrument on the said study.

Your participation and support to this request is highly appreciated. Rest

assured that the given information will be kept with utmost confidentially.

Thank you for your kind consideration.

Sincerely yours,

The Researchers

________________________________________________________________________

Part I: Respondent’s Profile

Instructions: Please provide the information below. Put a check on what type of Sports

Category and Sports Event you belong.

Name: ____________________________________

Sports Category: ___Male ___Female


______________________________________________________________________________
__ 48

Sports Event: ___Individual ___Dual ___Team ___Combative

Part II. Sufficiency

Instructions: Please answer the questionnaire HONESTLY; your answers will be kept

confidential. Rate the following statement by checking the box which represent your

answer.

4 – Very Sufficient

3 – Sufficient

2 – Insufficient

1 – Very Insufficient

1 2 3 4
Statement
1. The school has facilities for indoor sport events (i.e Dining

hall, Function hall, Gymnasium, Library for board games,

Students Multi-purpose Hall/Dance Room).


2. The school has facilities for outdoor sport events (i.e Dining

hall, Function hall, Gymnasium, Library for board games,

Students Multi-purpose Hall/Dance Room).


3. The school has alternative spaces for trainings and practice of

athletes.
4. There are restrooms for athletes during training and

competitions.
5. Sports facilities are well-lighted and well-ventilated

6. There is a medical clinic during trainings and competitions.


______________________________________________________________________________
__ 49

7. There are equipment for athletes to use during trainings and

competition.
8. There is fitness gym for trainings of athletes.
9. Safety provisions (e.g. emergency exits, fire extinguisher,

signage, etc.) are installed in sports venues.


10. Equipment are stored in a separate and secured area.
11. There are sports attire/armors for athletes.
12. There are technical support for trainings and competition such

as sound system, megaphones, etc.


13. There are technological equipment used during trainings and

competitions such as digital scoring, stopwatch.


14. There are policies and guidelines in the utilization of

equipment and facilities.


15. Equipment are properly organized and maintained in good

working condition.

Part III. Satisfaction

Instructions: Please answer the questionnaire HONESTLY; your answers will be kept

confidential. Rate the following statement by checking the box which represent your

answer.

4 – Very Satisfied

3 – Satisfied

2 – Dissatisfied

1 – Very Dissatisfied

1 2 3 4
Statement
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 50

1. The school has facilities for indoor sport events (i.e Dining

hall, Function hall, Gymnasium, Library for boardgames,

Students Multi-purpose Hall/Dance Room).


2. The school has facilities for outdoor sport events (i.e Dining

hall, Function hall, Gymnasium, Library for boardgames,

Students Multi-purpose Hall/Dance Room).


3. The school has alternative spaces for trainings and practices of

athletes.
4. There are restrooms for athletes during training and

competitions.
5. Sports facilities are well-lighted and well-ventilated

6. There is a medical clinic during trainings and competitions.


7. There are equipment for athletes to use during trainings and

competition.
8. There is fitness gym for trainings of athletes.
9. Safety provisions (e.g. emergency exits, fire extinguisher,

signage, etc.) are installed in sports venues.


10. Equipment are stored in a separate and secured area.
11. There are sports attire/armors for athletes.
12. There are technical support for trainings and competition such

as sound system, megaphones, etc.


13. There are technological equipment used during trainings and

competitions such as digital scoring, stopwatch.


14. There are policies and guidelines in the utilization of

equipment and facilities.


15. Equipment are properly organized and maintained in good

working condition.
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 51

Appendix C

LETTER FOR VALIDATORS


______________________________________________________________________________
__ 52
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 53
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 54
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 55
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 56

Appendix D
VALIDATION RESULTS

Appendix E
LETTER TO CONDUCT RELIABILITY
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 57

Appendix F
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 58

RELIABILITY RESULTS
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 59

Appendix G
STATISTICAL RESULTS

SOP 1 and SOP 2 Appendices

LEVEL_OF_SUFFICIENCY LEVEL_OF_SATISFACTION * Sports Category


Sports Category Level_of_Sufficiency Level_of_Satisfaction
Male Mean 3.2045 3.0847
N 59 59
Std. Deviation .53475 .49963
Female Mean 3.0989 2.9957
N 62 62
Std. Deviation .65651 .61598
Total Mean 3.1504 3.0391
N 121 121
Std. Deviation .60009 .56172

LEVEL_OF_SUFFICIENCY LEVEL_OF_SATISFACTION * Sports Event


Sports Event Level_of_Sufficiency Level_of_Satisfaction
Individual Mean 3.1767 3.0533
N 20 20
Std. Deviation .70893 .65698
Dual Mean 2.9244 2.7911
N 15 15
Std. Deviation .42974 .43707
Team Mean 3.2701 3.1920
N 58 58
Std. Deviation .54582 .51505
Combative Mean 3.0048 2.8452
N 28 28
Std. Deviation .66368 .56220
Total Mean 3.1504 3.0391
N 121 121
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 60

Std. Deviation .60009 .56172

SOP 3 Appendices
a. Sports Category

Group Statistics
Sports Std. Std. Error
Category N Mean Deviation Mean
LEVEL_OF_SUFF Male 59 3.2045 .53475 .06962
ICIENCY Female 62 3.0989 .65651 .08338
LEVEL_OF_SATI Male 59 3.0847 .49963 .06505
SFACTION Female 62 2.9957 .61598 .07823

Independent Samples Test

Levene's Test for

Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means

95% Confidence

Interval of the

Sig. (2- Mean Std. Error Difference

F Sig. t df tailed) Difference Difference Lower Upper

LEVEL_OF_SUFFI Equal variances 1.490 .225 .967 119 .335 .10560 .10917 -.11057 .32176

CIENCY assumed

Equal variances .972 116.269 .333 .10560 .10862 -.10954 .32073

not assumed

LEVEL_OF_SATIS Equal variances .858 .356 .871 119 .386 .08905 .10227 -.11345 .29154

FACTION assumed

Equal variances .875 116.126 .383 .08905 .10174 -.11246 .29055

not assumed
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 61

b. Sports Event

Descriptives
95% Confidence
Interval for Mean
Std. Std. Lower Upper Minimu Maximu
N Mean Deviation Error Bound Bound m m
LEVEL_OF_SUFF Individual 20 3.1767 .70893 .15852 2.8449 3.5085 1.00 4.00
ICIENCY Dual 15 2.9244 .42974 .11096 2.6865 3.1624 2.27 3.80
Team 58 3.2701 .54582 .07167 3.1266 3.4136 1.00 4.00
Combative 28 3.0048 .66368 .12542 2.7474 3.2621 2.07 3.93
Total 121 3.1504 .60009 .05455 3.0424 3.2584 1.00 4.00
LEVEL_OF_SATI Individual 20 3.0533 .65698 .14691 2.7459 3.3608 1.33 4.00
SFACTION Dual 15 2.7911 .43707 .11285 2.5491 3.0332 2.07 3.80
Team 58 3.1920 .51505 .06763 3.0565 3.3274 1.00 4.00
Combative 28 2.8452 .56220 .10625 2.6272 3.0632 2.00 3.93
Total 121 3.0391 .56172 .05107 2.9380 3.1402 1.00 4.00

Test of Homogeneity of Variances


Levene
Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
LEVEL_OF_SUF Based on Mean 2.296 3 117 .081
FICIENCY Based on Median 2.125 3 117 .101
Based on Median 2.125 3 107.457 .101
and with adjusted
df
Based on trimmed 2.326 3 117 .078
mean
LEVEL_OF_SATI Based on Mean 1.404 3 117 .245
SFACTION Based on Median 1.197 3 117 .314
Based on Median 1.197 3 113.653 .314
and with adjusted
df
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 62

Based on trimmed 1.534 3 117 .209


mean

ANOVA
Sum of Mean
Squares df Square F Sig.
LEVEL_OF_SUF Between 2.205 3 .735 2.097 .104
FICIENCY Groups
Within Groups 41.009 117 .351
Total 43.214 120
LEVEL_OF_SATI Between 3.334 3 1.111 3.766 .013
SFACTION Groups
Within Groups 34.530 117 .295
Total 37.864 120

Robust Tests of Equality of Means


Statistica df1 df2 Sig.
LEVEL_OF_SUFFICI Welch 2.679 3 43.068 .059
ENCY
LEVEL_OF_SATISF Welch 4.286 3 42.567 .010
ACTION
a. Asymptotically F distributed.

Multiple Comparisons
95% Confidence
Mean Interval
(I) Sports (J) Sports Differenc Std. Lower Upper
Dependent Variable Event Event e (I-J) Error Sig. Bound Bound
LEVEL_OF_SATI Tukey HSD Individual Dual .26222 .18556 .494 -.2214 .7458
SFACTION Team -.13862 .14087 .759 -.5058 .2285
Combative .20810 .15905 .559 -.2064 .6226
Dual Individual -.26222 .18556 .494 -.7458 .2214
Team -.40084 .15736 .058 -.8110 .0093
Combative -.05413 .17383 .989 -.5072 .3989
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 63

Team Individual .13862 .14087 .759 -.2285 .5058


Dual .40084 .15736 .058 -.0093 .8110
Combative .34672* .12501 .032 .0209 .6725
Combative Individual -.20810 .15905 .559 -.6226 .2064
Dual .05413 .17383 .989 -.3989 .5072
*
Team -.34672 .12501 .032 -.6725 -.0209
Games- Individual Dual .26222 .18525 .499 -.2392 .7636
Howell Team -.13862 .16173 .827 -.5807 .3034
Combative .20810 .18130 .663 -.2796 .6958
Dual Individual -.26222 .18525 .499 -.7636 .2392
Team -.40084* .13156 .026 -.7627 -.0390
Combative -.05413 .15499 .985 -.4719 .3636
Team Individual .13862 .16173 .827 -.3034 .5807
*
Dual .40084 .13156 .026 .0390 .7627
Combative .34672* .12594 .040 .0119 .6815
Combative Individual -.20810 .18130 .663 -.6958 .2796
Dual .05413 .15499 .985 -.3636 .4719
*
Team -.34672 .12594 .040 -.6815 -.0119
*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.

Tests of Normalitya
Kolmogorov-Smirnovb Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
LEVEL_OF_SUFFICI .178 11 .200* .950 11 .649
ENCY
LEVEL_OF_SATISF .150 11 .200* .932 11 .435
ACTION
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
a. Sports Category = Male, Sports Event = Individual
b. Lilliefors Significance Correction

Tests of Normalitya
Kolmogorov-Smirnovb Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
LEVEL_OF_SUFFICI .257 7 .178 .834 7 .088
ENCY
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 64

LEVEL_OF_SATISF .217 7 .200* .937 7 .614


ACTION
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
a. Sports Category = Male, Sports Event = Dual
b. Lilliefors Significance Correction

Tests of Normalitya
Kolmogorov-Smirnovb Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
LEVEL_OF_SUFFICI .158 26 .093 .907 26 .053
ENCY
LEVEL_OF_SATISF .158 26 .093 .934 26 .097
ACTION
a. Sports Category = Male, Sports Event = Team
b. Lilliefors Significance Correction

Tests of Normalitya
Kolmogorov-Smirnovb Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
LEVEL_OF_SUFFICI .187 15 .169 .870 15 .054
ENCY
LEVEL_OF_SATISF .199 15 .115 .903 15 .105
ACTION
a. Sports Category = Male, Sports Event = Combative
b. Lilliefors Significance Correction

Tests of Normalitya
Kolmogorov-Smirnovb Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
LEVEL_OF_SUFFICI .251 9 .106 .827 9 .055
ENCY
LEVEL_OF_SATISF .200 9 .200* .915 9 .349
ACTION
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
a. Sports Category = Female, Sports Event = Individual
b. Lilliefors Significance Correction
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 65

Tests of Normalitya
Kolmogorov-Smirnovb Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
LEVEL_OF_SUFFICI .152 7 .200* .927 7 .522
ENCY
LEVEL_OF_SATISF .279 7 .107 .919 7 .460
ACTION
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
a. Sports Category = Female, Sports Event = Dual
b. Lilliefors Significance Correction

Tests of Normalitya
Kolmogorov-Smirnovb Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
LEVEL_OF_SUFFICI .179 32 .058 .860 32 .056
ENCY
LEVEL_OF_SATISF .195 32 .073 .888 32 .075
ACTION
a. Sports Category = Female, Sports Event = Team
b. Lilliefors Significance Correction

Tests of Normalitya
Kolmogorov-Smirnovb Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
*
LEVEL_OF_SUFFICI .184 13 .200 .861 13 .269
ENCY
LEVEL_OF_SATISF .171 13 .200* .923 13 .273
ACTION
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
a. Sports Category = Female, Sports Event = Combative
b. Lilliefors Significance Correction
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 66

Appendix H
CURRICULUM VITAE

PERSONAL BACKGROUND
Name : IMEE LOREN S.
ABONALES
Birth Date : JUNE 27, 2000
Age : 20
Address : PRK. HERVIAS II, BRGY. VILLAMONTE,
BACOLOD CITY
Civil Status : SINGLE
Religion : ROMAN CATHOLIC

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
Tertiary : CARLOS HILADO MEMORIAL STATE COLLEGE
Senior Highschool : STI- WEST NEGROS UNIVERSITY
Junior Highschool : ST. JOSEPH SCHOOL- LA SALLE
Elementary : CORAZON LOCSIN MONTELIBANO
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

HONORS AND AWARDS RECEIVED


Elementary : DRUM AND BUGLE AWARD
Junior Highschool : N/A
Senior Highschool : N/A
College : PARTICIPANT IN PASUC (SWEET PLAY)
PARTICIPANT IN SCUAA (SOFTBALL)
AND TRAININGS ATTENDED:
N/A
TALENTS AND SKILLS:
Dancing, Drawing
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 67

CURRICULUM VITAE

PERSONAL BACKGROUND
Name : ROMULO L. ANDRADA JR.
Birth Date : MARCH 8, 1996
Age : 25
Address : RED MAHOGANY, BRGY. TABUGON, KABANKALAN
CITY, NEGROS OCCIDENTAL
Civil Status : SINGLE
Religion : ROMAN CATHOLIC EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
Tertiary : CARLOS HILADO MEMORIAL STATE COLLEGE
Junior High : TABUGON NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Elementary : PONTEVEDRA NORTH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

HONORS AND AWARDS RECEIVED


Tertiary : 2ND PLACER IN 2014 AND 2015 REGIONAL SCUAA
MEET DANCE SPORT, TOP 6 FINALIST IN 2015 NATIONAL SCUAA OYMPICS
DANCE SPORT
Senior High : N/A
Junior High : SPORTS AND CULTURAL AWARDEE, ARTIST OF THE
YEAR, EDITORIAL CARTOONIST IN OFFICIAL SCHOOL PUBLICATION
Elementary : N/A

AND TRAININGS ATTENDED:


N/A
TALENTS AND SKILLS:
Visual Arts, Dancing
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 68

CURRICULUM VITAE

PERSONAL BACKGROUND
Name : KYZIA MAUREEN L.
BARGAMENTO
Birth Date : OCTOBER 22, 2000
Age : 20
Address : BRGY. SAN ISIDRO, CALATRAVA, NEGROS
OCCIDENTAL
Civil Status : SINGLE
Religion : IGLESIA NI CRISTO

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
Tertiary : CARLOS HILADO MEMORIAL STATE COLLEGE
Senior Highschool : CALATRAVA SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL
Junior Highschool : CALATRAVA NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Elementary : CALATRAVA 1- CENTRAL SCHOOL

HONORS AND AWARDS RECEIVED


Elementary : Top 8 with HONOR
Junior Highschool : GIRL SCOUT of the YEAR
Senior Highschool : with HONOR
College : PARTICIPANT IN SCUAA (ARNIS)

AND TRAININGS ATTENDED:


N/A
TALENTS AND SKILLS:
Singing
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 69

CURRICULUM VITAE

PERSONAL BACKGROUND
Name : KRIZZIA-AN R. CANILLO
Birth Date : NOVEMBER 20, 1999
Age : 21
Address : SITIO BANGKAL, BRGY. JONOB-JONOB,
ESCALANTE CITY NEG. OCC.
Civil Status : SINGLE
Religion : ROMAN CATHOLIC

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
Tertiary : CARLOS HILADO MEMORIAL STATE COLLEGE
Senior Highschool : ESCALANTE NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Junior Highschool : ESCALANTE NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Elementary : ESCALANTE CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

HONORS AND AWARDS RECEIVED


Elementary : N/A
Junior Highschool : with HONOR
Senior Highschool : with HONOR
College : N/A

AND TRAININGS ATTENDED:


N/A
TALENTS AND SKILLS:
Singing, Acting
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 70

CURRICULUM VITAE

PERSONAL BACKGROUND
Name : HERLYN ROSE B. DELA CRUZ
Birth date : FEBRUARY 11 2000
Age : 21
Address : VILLA VILLETA BARANGAY ESTEFANIA BACOLOD
CITY NEGROS OCCIDENTAL
Civil status : SINGLE
Religion : BAPTIST

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
Tertiary : CARLOS HILADO MEMORIAL STATE COLLEGE
Senior high : STI WEST NEGROS UNIVERSITY
Junior high : EMILIANO LIZARES NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Elementary : APOLINARIO MABINI ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

HONORS AND AWARDS RECEIVED


Tertiary : N/A
Senior high school : N/A
Junior high school : CULTURAL AWARD
Elementary : N/A

AND TRAININGS ATTENDED:


N/A
TALENTS AND SKILLS:
Dancing
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 71

CURRICULUM VITAE

PERSONAL BACKGROUND
Name : ALLEN C. DIOJOY
Birth Date : OCTOBER 20, 1999
Age : 21
Address : TALISAY CITY
Civil Status : SINGLE
Religion : ROMAN CATHOLIC

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
Tertiary : CARLOS HILADO MEMORIAL STATE COLLEGE
Senior Highschool : INOCENCIO V. FERRER MEMORIAL SCHOOL OF
FISHERIES
Junior Highschool : INOCENCIO V. FERRER MEMORIAL SCHOOL OF
FISHERIES
Elementary : TALISAY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

HONORS AND AWARDS RECEIVED


Elementary : N/A
Junior Highschool : with HONOR
Senior Highschool : with HONOR
College : PARTICIPANT IN RSCUAA (SWIMMING)

AND TRAININGS ATTENDED:


Ripples training camp.
TALENTS AND SKILLS:
Dancing
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 72

CURRICULUM VITAE
PERSONAL BACKGROUND
Name : JOHN JEFFERSON N.
MANAGUIT
Birth Date : MARCH 17, 2000
Age : 21
Address : HDA. HINICAYAN BRGY. E. LOPEZ SILAY CITY
NEGROS OCC.
Civil Status : SINGLE
Religion : ROMAN CATHOLIC

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
Tertiary : CARLOS HILADO MEMORIAL STATE COLLEGE
Senior Highschool : STI- WEST NEGROS UNIVERSITY
Junior Highschool : DOÑA MONSERRAT LOPEZ MEMORIAL HIGH
SCHOOL SILAY CITY NEGROS OCC.
Elementary : HINICAYAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SILAY
CITY NEGROSS OCC.

HONORS AND AWARDS RECEIVED


Elementary : Top 8 with Honor
Junior Highschool : with HONOR and BEST in DANCE
Senior Highschool : N/A
College : PARTICIPANT IN PASUC (CONTEMPORARY)

AND TRAININGS ATTENDED:


N/A
TALENTS AND SKILLS:
Dancing, Singing
______________________________________________________________________________
__ 73

CURRICULUM VITAE
PERSONAL BACKGROUND
Name : ELAH GRACE B.
VIAJEDOR
Birth Date : APRIL 17, 1999
Age : 22
Address : RIO VISTA HOMES, TACULING, BACOLOD CITY,
NEG. OCC.
Civil Status : SINGLE
Religion : BAPTIST

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
Tertiary : CARLOS HILADO MEMORIAL STATE COLLEGE
Senior Highschool : NEGROS OCCIDENTAL HIGH SCHOOL
BACOLOD CITY, NEGROS OCCIDENTAL
Junior Highschool : NEGROS OCCIDENTAL HIGH SCHOOL
BACOLOD CITY, NEGROS OCCIDENTAL
Elementary : MONTEVISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
BACOLOD CITY, NEGROS OCCIDENTAL

HONORS AND AWARDS RECEIVED


Elementary : with HONOR
Junior Highschool : with HONOR
Senior Highschool : with HONOR
College : PARTICIPANT IN RSCUAA (ATHLETICS)
AND TRAININGS ATTENDED:
Ripples Training Camp
TALENTS AND SKILLS:
Singing, Athlete, Pianist

You might also like