This document outlines the defense for offenses under Section 3(2) of Cap. 241K Prohibition on Face Covering Regulation. It states that a person charged with such an offense has a defense if they can establish they had lawful authority or a reasonable excuse to use a facial covering. It considers a person to have such a defense if evidence raises the issue and the prosecution cannot disprove it. Reasonable excuses include using a covering for safety during employment, for religious reasons, or due to pre-existing medical conditions while at an assembly.
This document outlines the defense for offenses under Section 3(2) of Cap. 241K Prohibition on Face Covering Regulation. It states that a person charged with such an offense has a defense if they can establish they had lawful authority or a reasonable excuse to use a facial covering. It considers a person to have such a defense if evidence raises the issue and the prosecution cannot disprove it. Reasonable excuses include using a covering for safety during employment, for religious reasons, or due to pre-existing medical conditions while at an assembly.
This document outlines the defense for offenses under Section 3(2) of Cap. 241K Prohibition on Face Covering Regulation. It states that a person charged with such an offense has a defense if they can establish they had lawful authority or a reasonable excuse to use a facial covering. It considers a person to have such a defense if evidence raises the issue and the prosecution cannot disprove it. Reasonable excuses include using a covering for safety during employment, for religious reasons, or due to pre-existing medical conditions while at an assembly.
第241K章 《禁止蒙面規例》 05/10/2019 Cap. 241K Prohibition on Face Covering 05/10/2019
Regulation
4. 第3(2)條所訂罪行的免責辯護 4. Defence for offence under section 3(2)
(1) 被控犯第3(2)條所訂罪行的人,如確立在有關指控罪 (1) It is a defence for a person charged with an offence under 行發生時,該人對使用蒙面物品有合法權限或合理辯 section 3(2) to establish that, at the time of the alleged offence, 解,即為免責辯護。 the person had lawful authority or reasonable excuse for using (2) 在以下情況下,有關的人須視為已確立該人對使用蒙 a facial covering. 面物品有合法權限或合理辯解 —— (2) A person is taken to have established that the person had (a) 有足夠證據帶出以下爭論點︰該人有上述合法權 lawful authority or reasonable excuse for using a facial 限或合理辯解;及 covering if— (b) 控方沒有提出足以排除合理疑點的證據,證明並 (a) there is sufficient evidence to raise an issue that the 非如此。 person had such lawful authority or reasonable excuse; and (3) 在不局限第(1)款所提述的合理辯解的範圍的原則下, 在以下情況下,有關的人即屬有合理辯解 —— (b) the contrary is not proved by the prosecution beyond reasonable doubt. (a) 該人當時身處有關集結、集會或遊行,正在從事 某專業或受僱工作,並於正在作出與該專業或受 (3) Without limiting the scope of the reasonable excuse referred to 僱工作相關的作為或活動時,為了該人的人身安 in subsection (1), a person had a reasonable excuse if, at the 全,而使用有關蒙面物品; assembly, meeting or procession concerned— (b) 該人當時身處有關集結、集會或遊行,並正在因 (a) the person was engaged in a profession or employment 宗教理由,而使用有關蒙面物品;或 and was using the facial covering for the physical safety of the person while performing an act or activity (c) 該人當時身處有關集結、集會或遊行,並正在因 connected with the profession or employment; 先前已存在的醫學或健康理由,而使用有關蒙面 物品。 (b) the person was using the facial covering for religious reasons; or (c) the person was using the facial covering for a pre- existing medical or health reason.