Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Critical Thinking and Reflective Practices: (Assignment 01)
Critical Thinking and Reflective Practices: (Assignment 01)
8/26/2021 Practices
[Assignment 01]
1: In order to help their students to develop critical-thinking skills and to take critical
action, teachers need to:
have a sound knowledge base from which to support students as they delve more
deeply into content
remain open to challenge by students, not representing themselves as the sole
source of knowledge
encourage students to look at the big picture by engaging them in critical-thinking
processes that have relevance beyond the classroom
be prepared to listen to voices that originate in the classroom and to use students'
personal experiences as starting points for gathering information
encourage students to question and challenge existing beliefs, structures, and
practices
avoid offering 'how to do it' approaches
encourage students to be sensitive to the feelings of others
provide opportunities for inquiry by giving students time for planning, processing,
and debriefing
structure lessons so that students can work safely and co-operatively and develop
creative forms of shared responsibility
Encourage students to take critical action. When students learn to use democratic
processes inside he classroom, they can transfer these to situations outside the
classroom
2: For students, learning to think critically and to take critical action will include:
think about and evaluate their own thinking and behavior on issues related to
health education, physical education, and home economics
make reasonable and defensible decisions about issues related to individual and
community well-being
challenge and take action (individually and collectively) to address social,
cultural, economic, and political inequalities
understand the role and significance of the movement culture and its influence
on our daily lives and the lives of people in our community
Isolation resulting from social exclusion can be connected to a person's social class, race,
skin color, ethnicity, living standards, or religion. Anyone who appears to be different in
any way from perceived norms of a community may thereby become subject to
offensive or subtle forms of social exclusion. The outcome of social exclusion is that
affected individuals or communities are prevented from participating fully in the
economic, social, and political life of the society in which they live. Social exclusion
appears at individual or group level in four correlated dimensions i.e. lack of access to
social rights, material poverty, limited social participation and lack of normative
integration. Hence it becomes the combined result of personal risk factors i.e. age,
gender, race; macro social change such as development of demographic, economic
and labor market; state legislation and the actual behavior of organizations and citizens.
The concept of social exclusion appears to be a complex and multidimensional
phenomena.
Ans. Connectivism is a learning theory that was coined by George Siemens in 2005.
Siemens is a technology and education writer who is credited with co-creating the
Massive Open Online Course (MOOC).
Put simply, connectivism is the theory that students learn best if they are taught to
navigate and create social networks via technology and use these networks to learn. For
example, joining a science forum that discusses mitosis and asking questions on the forum
to learn from other members.
In Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age, Siemens outlines what he sees as
a pedagogy that truly aligns with the technology available to us as educators. To him,
traditional pedagogies are components within connectivism, but he believes that only
connectivism has enough distinct differences from others.
Technically, cooperative learning includes any form of instruction in which students are
working together for a purpose. As we will examine in this chapter, the effects will be
more powerful to the extent that certain ingredients are present. The more any activity
requires mutual interdependence, collective problem solving, and striving for a common
goal, the better chance it will have at achieving the potential that cooperative learning
offers.
As we seek to create the most valuable, engaging and productive cooperative learning
experiences for our students, consider how learning within a social context is different
from learning independently. Recall our discussion of the social learning theory in the
previous chapters. The key to a successful collaborative effort will be to use the social
aspect of the activity to the class collective advantage. This will be true for both
instructional and managerial goals.
If you are incorporating cooperative learning because you think your students need a
break from the routine and you want to try something a bit more social, you may be
missing the purpose and the potential of this teaching strategy. Having students simply
work in groups may be a nice change of pace and can be inherently more engaging
for some students, but group work only scratches the surface of what is possible when
students learn within a cooperative context. While this chapter will address how to
manage any form of group learning, it is suggested that one consider tapping as much
of the potential as possible that cooperative learning has to offer.
Ans. There are several types of assessments that take place in schools, the most common
being formative (ongoing assessment e.g. quiz) This allows for progress to be checked.
Summative (usually an exam and at the end of the year or course) confirms achievement
(and allows for improvements and changes to be made). These provide learners with the
chance to remain focused, motivated and determined to succeed/reach their highest
potential.
CAT are formative in nature. Unlike final exams or major term papers, CATs provide faculty
with feedback on student learning while the teaching/learning relationship is still intact,
so that faculty can intervene during the semester (as opposed to the next semester) to
help students learn more completely.
They are speedy. They often consume just a few minutes of classroom time to administer,
and can be read easily and quickly by faculty. They are flexible. They can be tailored to
the unique and specific concerns of the instructor. They can be anonymous for students
(although they need not be). The aim of classroom assessment is not necessarily to grade
individual student work or to provide individual students with feedback on their
performance; rather, the aim is to provide the instructor with feedback on student
learning. Anonymity may prove useful in freeing students to express not only what they
do understand but also what they do not understand.
Classroom Assessment helps teachers to focus on student learning. By determining what
students have learned and what is unclear, instructors can focus the class more
effectively to meet the learning needs of that group. This may mean reviewing some
areas, or spending less time in other areas. Unlike student evaluation surveys [summative
evaluation] which are typically given at the end of the semester, Classroom Assessment
provides an on-going formative evaluation. The instructor can find out what can be
changed immediately to help students to learn. Students may be hesitant to ask
questions during class. Classroom Assessments give students opportunities to provide
anonymous feedback to their instructor about their learning. Students often discover, as
the instructor reviews the feedback, that others in the class had similar questions.
Classroom assessment activities can themselves be positive learning activities for
students; they can be developed both to promote (and not just measure) writing skills or
critical thinking skills, and to increase student motivation to take themselves and their
learning more seriously. In addition, students may become more involved in their learning
when they find that others in the class learned some interesting things that they had not
picked up from the class session. Through greater involvement, students are likely to
become more self-directed learners, and may be more motivated to successfully
complete the class.
They are extremely useful for planning future activities, and in thinking critically about
motivation in every class. To that end, the teaching diaries will continue to be a useful
tool for developing not only methods to motivate students, but also to watch progress of
both the teacher and the learner. Also, they are a starting point for research on a broader
scale, to see if the findings (such as PoD and Hierarchy of Game Motivation) apply to
other teachers' classrooms.