Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Global Advantage Across Multiple Countries. Explain The Primary Sources of Advantage
Global Advantage Across Multiple Countries. Explain The Primary Sources of Advantage
What and where should CEMEX focus on over the next 5-10 years? Use your analysis of CEMEX’ advantages
to help shape your recommendations.
Use the heptagon model (see notes on Global Competitive Advantage) to identify the sources of CEMEX’s
global advantage (See Blackboard for 7-side diagram in the notes on Creating Global Advantage)
EXPLAIN HOW CEMEX HAS CREATED A GLOBAL ADVANTAGE ACROSS MULTIPLE COUNTRIES. AND EXPLAIN
THE PRIMARY SOURCES OF ADVANTAGE. Does CEMEX have a global advantage? If so, what is its source
or sources? Explain how CEMEX, a competitor in the commodity cement and concrete sector, has created
a global advantage across multiple countries.
CEMEX is a global building materials company which was founded in Mexico in the early 1900’s.
The firm has many characteristics that make for an interesting in-depth analysis, such as serving a
low-income population, focusing on flexibility, creativity, sustainability, innovation, and efficiency.
By the end of 1999, this company operated cement plants in 15 countries, owned production or
distribution facilities in a total of 30 and trade cement in more than 60.
Over the years, after having secured its leadership in Mexico, CEMEX began to look for
opportunities beyond Mexico borders. Internationalization began with exports, principally to USA
and by 2000 CEMEX become the largest international cement trader in the world, with projected
trading volumes of 13 million tons of cement. For that reason, its international trade offered
opportunities to arbitrage price differentials across national boundaries.
First of all, CEMEX has created a global advantage across multiple countries. An obvious
advantage that CEMEX has achieved is diversification. CEMEX knew that they had a great deal of
competition in the market, and needed to gain competitive advantage, so diversification has
brought and brings opportunity to reduce the risk of relying on one single source of income. At the
beginning they began to diversify horizontally into areas such as petrochemicals, mining and
tourism in order to reduce the risks related to its dependence on a highly cyclical core business.
But then geographic diversification was preferable to horizontal diversification. CEMEX gained
significant expertise, access to natural resources in global expansion by trading in USA (1970’s) to
FDI, acquisition in Texas, Spain (1991), Venezuela (1994) with strong country specific and firm
specific advantages. CEMEX achieved sustained competitive advantage by acquiring existing
capacity in various countries, with the global standardization strategy to make a global product but
tailored to customer needs by adopting following steps: i) Focus on countries with large
population growth, low current consumption, enter similar markets using CAGE framework for
better risk management; ii) Gain access to cheap labor, natural resources, leveraging on advanced
technology and logistics; iii) CEMEX strategically consolidated its position in Mexican market first
(60% share by 2000), expanded in various geographies developing better tools to identify
opportunities, codified its post-merger integration (PMI) process, increasing operational efficiency
and product differentiation, utilizing its core capability to speed up these processes(AÑADIR AQUI
LO DEL PROCESO ESE); iv) Acquired new core competencies for speedy and no-surprise situation
by due diligence of market, invested heavily in IT and satellite system to enable faster
communication, tracking sales figures geographically, ensure delivery of cement bags within 20
minutes on the line of Pizza delivery, getting popularity as ‘Master in Digital Design’, established e-
procurement market place (45% of global orders), four stage process called Materiality Matrix to
reduce operation risks[ CITATION 20118 \l 2057 ].
They targeted geographical areas what were not ‘distant’ to mexico in terms of ghemawats cage
framework. Expansion started in America before moving to spain, south America countries such as
Venezuela anc Columbia and then onto south east asia such as the Philippines. As we can seen bno
one of these countries are distant in terms of cultural, administrative and geographic elements.
The following attributes were also important in proceeding with an analysis of Cemex’s
international strategy development: aggregation, arbitrage, adaptation/responsiveness, and the
spread of learning across divisions and borders.
Arbitrage Arbitrage advantages, or location advantages from sourcing in countries with cost
advantages, has not been a viable method of expansion for Cemex. The low weight to value ratio
of Cemex’s products has not enabled the company to take advantage of the arbitrage effects
usually possible in international corporations.
Adaptation/Responsiveness For the most part, cement, concrete, and aggregates are a
‘standardized’ product, and in that sense the pressures for globalization are fairly high. However,
there are still local preferences and tastes that Cemex needs to incorporate into their product
offering if they are to be successful. For example, “consumers in Egypt preferred darker cement
believing it was of higher quality whereas Mexicans preferred light colored cement” (Lessard &
Reavis, 2009). Cement companies, including Cemex, have had to be prepared to meet local
preferences, even though they compete in a fairly globalized and standardized category.
Spreading Learning Cemex has been effective in transferring best practices and maintaining
standardization of procedures and operations as can be seen in the aggregation section of this
report. In addition to spreading learning through the Cemex Way, the 2013 Annual report states,
“each of our business units continually works to perfect and present new, innovative building
materials for their specific markets (Cemex 2013 Annual Report). The successful results of these
trials are then incorporated throughout the organization and enable customers to achieve better
quality 26 results and to generate savings (Cemex 2013 Annual Report). In an organization the size
of Cemex, spreading learning from headquarters to subsidiaries and vice versa could become very
complex or non-existent. Cemex has developed a manner to allow regions to not only receive best
practices, but also take a part in developing them.
. Begin by analyzing Exhibit 4. (Hint: standardize the financial at a per ton level.) What global competitive
advantages has CEMEX been able to build and exploit? How much of a financial advantage have these global
competitive advantages created?
What and where should CEMEX focus on over the next 5-10 years? Use your analysis of cemex
advantages to help shape your recommendations.
Over the next five-ten years, CEMEX should focus in establishing a globalized culture. Actually,
they are facing issues with communication across regions, as language and cultural barriers exist.
They should continue their strategy of expansion through global mergers and acquisitions. This is
due to the fact that the cement industry is gaining momentum in terms of industry consolidation.
Also, CEMEX has presence only in 15 countries, so they should focus on entering new markets
which will help the company expanding its global presence and increase market share. This will
also led to a better global brand image. Other recommendations, would be investing in R & D and
quality initiatives for product differentiation, improving processes, and reducing costs. 7) Before
entering a country, CEMEX should consider the following parameters: a. EBITDA b. Cultural
barriers c. Geographical factors such as length of coastline d. Climatic conditions such as amount
of rainfall received e. Stability: in terms of political f. Macroeconomic environment g. Existing
Competitors.
Company Expansion Cemex is very international and fairly geographically diversified, however,
during the crisis their core markets of Mexico, the United States, and Northern Europe were hit
hard, and as such the company took a financial blow that it is still struggling to recover from. This
option suggests that the company should expand into some of the regions in which it is currently
underrepresented. Some regions that Cemex should consider are the Middle East and North
Africa, Sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, and India, which all have yearly projected growth rates of
between 2-7.1% (See Appendix F). Currently less than 30% of the company’s yearly sales come
from the aforementioned regions. Additionally, all of these emerging economies are very dynamic
and present an opportunity for industry players prepared to act. One major consideration before
choosing this strategic option is the portfolio and operations of key competitors Lafarge and
Holcim who have operations in the regions of note. However, if their 27 merger is approved they
may be looking to divest assets in these regions. More research would need to be conducted by
insiders in Cemex before this option is chosen.
Location Drivers
- National differences: Cemex is present at Indonesia, Philippines, Egypt, Spain, US, Mexico
and Venezuela. Proliferation in markets with different needs make possible that new customer
segments would emerge. This is a clear opportunity to obtain lower transportation cost for each
plant which would be able to export to its belonging region. NAFTA, EU free trade zone and ASEAN
are key for Cemex to approach the regions where it has presence. Possibility to divert away the
low priced imports from home market.
- Global leverage & flexibility: Any economic/political risk would be hedged since
geographic diversification is conducted. A dominant position is held by Cemex in most of the
markets where it is present, which allow them to dominate a market managed by price
competition.
- Economies of replication: Cemex has found the way of success in its activities since the
very first stage. Its due diligence and PMI methodology allows them to take advantage from
competitors before the game starts. Moreover, IT applied to managers as well as production
standards are transferred from one place to another, decreasing learning costs.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5) Continue to use IT to leverage sales and operations capabilities, to reduce cost and make
efficient supply chain management.
BRICS countries have a higher market potential for CEMEX, as it has almost zero presence in these
countries; but the EBITDA pattern is not very good in these countries for cement industry. This
may be due to the reason that the quality of cement production in China is not up to the mark. As
no data is given for other developing countries we can assume the same scenario in other
developing countries. So CEMEX can invest in technological advancements for developing higher
quality cements that may increase the EBITDA ratio.
7) Before entering a country, CEMEX should consider the following parameters: a. EBITDA b.
Cultural barriers c. Geographical factors such as length of coastline d. Climatic conditions such as
amount of rainfall received e. Stability: in terms of political f. Macroeconomic environment g.
Existing Competitors
E.g. there have been concerns CEMEX entering into Egypt and Indonesia. They should decide upon
an official language of communication, mostly English so that that would be easier for global
cultural expansion.
Global presence of CEMEX is very low in comparison to its competitors. They should continue their
strategy of expansion through global mergers and acquisitions. This is due to the fact that the
cement industry is gaining momentum in terms of industry consolidation. Lafarge had tried to
acquire Blue Circle which has presence in 14 countries.
3) CEMEX has presence only in 15 countries. So to avoid the possibility of hostile takeover, its
focus should be on entering new markets that will help the company expanding its global presence
and increase market share. This will also help in building a global brand image.
4) Invest in R & D and quality initiatives for product differentiation, improving processes, and
reducing costs.
5) Continue to use IT to leverage sales and operations capabilities, to reduce cost and make
efficient supply chain management.
BRICS countries have a higher market potential for CEMEX, as it has almost zero presence in these
countries; but the EBITDA pattern is not very good in these countries for cement industry. This
may be due to the reason that the quality of cement production in China is not up to the mark. As
no data is given for other developing countries we can assume the same scenario in other
developing countries. So CEMEX can invest in technological advancements for developing higher
quality cements that may increase the EBITDA ratio.
7) Before entering a country, CEMEX should consider the following parameters: a. EBITDA b.
Cultural barriers c. Geographical factors such as length of coastline d. Climatic conditions such as
amount of rainfall received e. Stability: in terms of political f. Macroeconomic environment g.
Existing Competitors
Company Expansion Cemex is very international and fairly geographically diversified, however,
during the crisis their core markets of Mexico, the United States, and Northern Europe were hit
hard, and as such the company took a financial blow that it is still struggling to recover from. This
option suggests that the company should expand into some of the regions in which it is currently
underrepresented. Some regions that Cemex should consider are the Middle East and North
Africa, Sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, and India, which all have yearly projected growth rates of
between 2-7.1% (See Appendix F). Currently less than 30% of the company’s yearly sales come
from the aforementioned regions. Additionally, all of these emerging economies are very dynamic
and present an opportunity for industry players prepared to act. One major consideration before
choosing this strategic option is the portfolio and operations of key competitors Lafarge and
Holcim who have operations in the regions of note. However, if their 27 merger is approved they
may be looking to divest assets in these regions. More research would need to be conducted by
insiders in Cemex before this option is chosen.
HEPTAGON FRAMEWORK ANALYSIS
Location Drivers
- National differences: Cemex is present at Indonesia, Philippines, Egypt, Spain, US, Mexico
and Venezuela. Proliferation in markets with different needs make possible that new customer
segments would emerge. This is a clear opportunity to obtain lower transportation cost for each
plant which would be able to export to its belonging region. NAFTA, EU free trade zone and ASEAN
are key for Cemex to approach the regions where it has presence. Possibility to divert away the
low priced imports from home market.
- Global leverage & flexibility: Any economic/political risk would be hedged since
geographic diversification is conducted. A dominant position is held by Cemex in most of the
markets where it is present, which allow them to dominate a market managed by price
competition.
- Economies of scale: One of the main objective in the industry. Cemex has great
production capacities that has increased its margins way above from the competence.
- Economies of replication: Cemex has found the way of success in its activities since the
very first stage. Its due diligence and PMI methodology allows them to take advantage from
competitors before the game starts. Moreover, IT applied to managers as well as production
standards are transferred from one place to another, decreasing learning costs.
For the long term, we are trying to ensure that no one market accounts for more than one third of
our business. They don’t see volatility as an occasional, random element added to the cost of
doing business in an interconnected global marketplace. They plan for volativity
In 1990, faced trade sanctions in its major export market, the united states. By the end of 1999 the
operated cement plants in 15 countries, owned production or distribution facilities in a total of 30
and trade cement in more than 60.
Revenues increased form 1 billion in 1989 to 5 billion in 1999. And it had become the third largest
cement company in the world in terms of capacity, as well as the largest international trader
DEMAND: Cross-country comparisons indicated that the long run demand for cement was directly
related to GDP, with per capita consumption increasing up. Rainfall had a negative effect since it
made cement-based construction more difficult and increased the likelihood of using substitutes
such as wood or steel instead. Population desnisty had a positive effect, it led to taller buildings
and more complex infrastructure
COMPETITION
Cyclicality on the demand side combined with capital intensity, durability and specialization on the
supply side to mean that overcapacity in the cement industry could be ruinous in its effects.
Basing point pricing systems: the leading firm set a base price, and the other firms calculated their
prices by taking the base price and increasing it by the cost of transportation from leading firms
plant to the delivery point. This offered a transparent price structure
CEMEX
By the year 2000, CEMEX had become the third largest cement company in the world. Its first
years they began to diversify horizontally into areas such as petrochemicals, mining and tourism in
order to reduce the risks related to ist dependence on a highly cyvlival core business. But then
geographic diversification was preferable to horizontal diversification
INTERNATIONAL EXPANSION
After having secured its leadership in mexico, CEMEX began to look for opportunities beyond
mexico borders. Internationalization began with exports, principally to USA. By 2000 cemex as the
largest international cement trader in the world, with projected trading volumes of 13 millions
tons of cement. International trade offered opportunities to arbitrage price differentials acreoss
national boundaries.