Since we will be using the cycle approach then we will

solve the problem thru looping, by using the variables. You

make a loop for Re-enforcing, which is the cause of the
problem and a loop for Balancing. It could be a negative
re-enforcing or a positive re-enforcing. How to determine
whether it is a re-enforcing or balancing. For re-enforcing,
you have 2 negative signs or 2 positive signs, or 4
negative signs or 4 positive signs. For balancing, 3
negative signs and 1 positive sign.
If you are going to solve the problem, you view the
problem as a whole. Do not ask the cause of the problem
but instead the solution of the problem, but later on you
will know the cause of the problem.

OVERPOPULATION

(+) ( ) (-)
BIRTH RATE R BIRTH
CONTROL

(+) ( ) (-)
FAMILY PLANNING

(1)
ECONOMIC CRISIS

( -) ( ) (+)
EMPLOYEMENT B INVESTORS

(+) ( ) (+)
CREATE MORE JOB
(2)
EXAMPLE 1. MORE OVERPOPULATION, THEREFORE THERE IS NO BIRTH
CONTROL SO THE SIGN IS (-), IF THERE IS (-) BIRTH CONTROL SO THE RESULT
IS (-) FAMILY PLANNING, AND IF THERE IS NO FAMILY PLANNING, THEN EXPECT
MORE BIRTH RATE SO IT IS (+), AND MORE BIRTH RATE THE RESULT IS (+) IN
OVERPOPULATION. THE RESULT OF THE LOOPING IS RE-ENFORCING. WE
HAVE 2 (-), AND 2 (+).

2. THERE IS AN ECONOMIC CRISIS, SO WHAT IS NEEDED IS AN INVESTOR, SO

IT IS (+), SINCE THERE IS ALREADY AN INVESTOR, SO IT CAN CREATE MORE
JOB, AGAIN THE SIGN IS (+), WHEN THERE ARE MORE JOB CREATED
THEREFORE THERE ARE EMPLOYEMENT (+) WHEN THERE ARE EMPLOYEMENT
ALREADY THEN THE ECONOMIC CRISIS WILL BE NEGATIVE. THE RESULT OF
THE LOOPING IS BALANCING; 3(+) AND 1 (-). IN THE BALANCING LOOP, IT WILL
ALWAYS END ON A NEGATIVE SIGN BECAUSE YOU ARE SOLVING THE
PROBLEM, WHILE ON THE RE-ENFORCING IT COULD BE ALL POSITIVE OR 2 (-),
2 (+) BECAUSE WE ARE LOOKING FOR THE PROBLEM AND THE CAUSE OF THE
PROBLEM.