Obe Criminal Law 1

CHRIST THE KING COLLEGE
COLLEGE OF LAW
Calbayog City
Samar
OUTCOMES – BASED EDUCATION (OBE) ALIGNED SYLLABUS

(FLEXIBLE LEARNING)
COURSE TITLE: Criminal Law I
COURSE CREDIT: 3 Units
COURSE PRE-REQUISITES: None
ACADEMIC TERM AND SCHOOL YEAR: First Semester / 2021~2022
COURSE DESCRIPTION: A detailed examination into the characteristics of criminal law, nature of felonies, stages of execution,
circumstances affecting criminal liability, persons criminally liable, the extent and extinction of criminal liability as well as the
understanding of penalties in criminal law, their nature and theories, classes, crimes, habitual delinquency, the Indeterminate Sentence
Law and Probation Law. The course covers Articles 1 to 113 of the Revised Penal Code, as amended, and related laws and jurisprudence
on the matter.
1
VISION AND MISSION OF CKC:
CKC VISION
Christ the King College, a Catholic Franciscan Institution in Calbayog City, envision itself as a center of development of human
resources and of excellence in education, with the special focus on Christian formation and preferential option for the poor, thereby
contributing to the local, national and global progress.
CKC MISSION
Christ the King College commits to the integral formation of the students, the promotion of excellence among the members of the
school community, and the relevant research and projects for the transformation of society,
CORE VALUES:
EXCELLENCE, INTEGRITY, JUSTICE, COMPASSION FOR THE POOR, SERVICE.
2
TOPICS LEARNING OUTCOME TIME RESOURCES TEACHING
FRAME LEARNING ASSESSMENT
ACTIVITIES
PART I. Fundamental Principles. Given the topics to be Week I and II. Books, Supreme Week I – Giving of Graded Oral
(Articles 1-2 of the Revised Penal read, the students during
Court Reports topics for reading Recitation;
Code). the oral recitation will be
able to: Annotated (SCRA) assignment (No face to
A. Definition of Criminal Law, penal
and online sources face contact). Long Quiz;
law and crime.  Define criminal law,
penal law and crime, and such as
B. Basis of State’s authority to state the basis of the
http://elibrary.jud Week II – Face to face Submission of
punish crimes. State’s authority to
punish crimes. iciary.gov.ph/ and oral graded recitation written digested
C. Sources of Philippine criminal
lawphil.net for for a maximum of 10- cases.
law.  Identify the sources of
Philippine criminal law jurisprudence. 15 students.1
D. Theories in criminal law. and the theories in
criminal law.
Jurisprudence:
 Understand the concept
1. Villareal vs. People, G.R. No. 151258,
February 1, 2012. of common law crimes
and the limitations of
2. Oriel Magno vs. C.A., G.R. No. 96132, Congress to enact penal
June 26, 1992. laws.
E. Common law crimes.  Explain the cardinal

features or main
1
As per IATF Resolution, MGCQ areas have limited face to face teaching modality. However, the face to face teaching modality is subject to the approval of Local Government Unit (IATF).
3
F. Limitations on Congress to enact characteristics of
penal laws. Philippine criminal law.
G. Construction of penal laws.  Determine the scopes of

application of the
H. Cardinal features or main provisions of the Revised
characteristics of Philippine Penal Code as well as the
criminal law. rules on jurisdiction over
crimes committed aboard
I. Scopes of application of the foreign merchant vessels
provisions of the Revised Penal while in the territorial
Code. waters of another state.
Jurisprudence: Given the actual cases

decided by the Honorable
1. U.S. vs. Bull, G.R. No. 5270, January 15,
1910. Supreme Court, the
students will be able to:
2. People vs. Wong Cheng, G.R. No. L-18924,
October 19, 1922.  State the facts;
3. U.S. vs. Lol-lo, G.R. No. L-17958, February
determine the issues
27, 1922. raised; and discuss the
ruling of the Supreme
4. U.S. vs. Sweet, G.R. No. 448, September 20, Court in the assigned
1901. cases through the
5. Liang vs. People, G.R. No. 125865, January submission of case
28, 2000. digests or case briefs.
6. U.S. vs. Ah Sing, G.R. No. L-13005, October

10, 1917.
7. Gumabon vs. Director of Prisons, G.R. No. L-

30026, January 30, 1971.
4
J. Rules on jurisdiction over crimes
committed aboard foreign merchant
vessels while in the territorial
waters of another state. (Please refer
to the preceding jurisprudence).
PART II. Felonies (Article 3 of the Given the topics to be Week III and Books, Supreme Week III – Giving of Graded Oral
Revised Penal Code). read, the students during
IV. Court Reports topics for reading Recitation;
the oral recitation will be
A. Definition of felonies. able to: Annotated (SCRA) assignment (No face to
B. Distinction between felonies and
 State the definition of
statutory offenses. such as
felonies and distinguish
the same from statutory http://elibrary.jud Week IV – Face to face Submission of
C. Distinction between felonies and
offenses.
infractions. iciary.gov.ph/ and oral graded recitation written digested
 Distinguish felonies lawphil.net for for a maximum of 10- cases.
D. Elements of felonies in general.
from infractions.
jurisprudence. 15 students.2
E. Concept of act or omission.
 Enumerate and explain
Jurisprudence: the elements of felonies in
general.
1. People vs. Gonzales, G.R No. 80726, March
19, 1990.  Classify felonies
according to the means by
2. People vs. Lizada, G.R. Nos. 143468-71,
January 24, 2003. which they are
committed.
F. Concept of the latin maxim Actus
Non Facit Reum Nisi Mens Sit Rea.
2
5
Jurisprudence:  State the concept of
intentional and culpable
1. Manzanaris vs. People, G.R. No. L-64750,
January 30, 1984. felonies.
2. Relucio vs. Civil Service Commission, G.R.  Distinguish intentional

No. 147182, November 21, 2002. felonies from culpable
felonies.
G. Classifications of felonies
according to the means by which
 Enumerate the
they are committed.
requisites of intentional
Jurisprudence:
felonies.
1. Villareal vs. People, G.R. No. 151258,  Define intent and state
February 1, 2012. its categories.
H. Concept of intentional felony.  State the concept of

mens rea and actus rea.
I. Concept of culpable felony.
 Explain good faith as a
Jurisprudence: defense.
1. Calimutan vs. People, G.R. No. 152133,
February 9, 2006.  Define motive.
2. People vs. Buan, G.R. No. L-25366, March  Distinguish intent from
29, 1968.
motive.
J. Distinction between intentional
and culpable felonies.  Enumerate the
requisites of culpable
K. Requisites of intentional felonies. felonies.
L. Definition of intent.  State the concept of

negligence; deficiency of
6
M. Categories of intent. perception; imprudence
and deficiency of action.
N. Concept of mens rea and actus
rea.  Enumerate and explain
the forms of felonies.
O. Good faith as a defense.
 State the concept of
Jurisprudence: crimes mala in se, and
crimes mala prohibita.
1. Beradio vs. CA, G.R. No. L-49483-86, March
30, 1981.
 Distinguish crimes
2. Luage vs. CA, G.R. No. 55683 & 55903-04, mala in se from crimes
February 22, 1982. mala prohibita.
3. Abundo vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 97880,
January 15, 1992. Given the actual cases
4. Lecaroz vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. Supreme Court, the
130872, March 25, 1999. students will be able to:
5. Bahalidad vs. People, G.R. No. 185195,
March 17, 2010.  State the facts;
6. Manuel vs. People, G.R. No. 165842, raised; and discuss the
November 29, 2005.
Court in the assigned
P. Concept and requisites of
cases through the
mistake of fact.
submission of case
Jurisprudence: digests or case briefs.
1. U.S vs. Ah Chong, G.R. No. 5272, March 19,

1910.
2. U.S. vs. Bautista, G.R. No. 10678, August 17,

1915.
7
3. People vs. Bayambao, G.R. No. 29481,
October 31, 1928.
4. Baxinela vs. People, G.R. No. 149652, March

24, 2006.
5. Yapyuco vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No.

120744-46 June 25, 2012.
Q. Definition of motive.
R. Distinction between intent and

motive.
Jurisprudence:
1. Calimutan vs. People, G.R. No. 152133,

February 9, 2006.
2. People vs. Buan, G.R. No. L-25366, March

29, 1968.
S. Requisites of culpable felonies.
T. Concept of negligence.
U. Concept of deficiency of
perception.
V. Concept of imprudence.
W. Concept of deficiency of action.
X. Forms of felonies.
8
Y. Concepts of crimes mala in se
and crimes mala prohibita.
Z. Distinction between crimes mala

in se vs. crimes mala prohibita.
Jurisprudence:
1. Villareal vs. People, G.R. No. 151258,

February 1, 2012.
2. People vs. Carmen, G.R. No. 137268, March

26, 2001.
3. Bagajo vs. Marave and People, G.R No. L-

33345, November 20, 1978.
4. Garcia vs. CA, G.R. No. 157171, March 14,

2006.
5. Ysidoro vs. People, G.R. 192330, November

14, 2012.
6. Estrada vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No.

148560, November 19, 2001.
PART III. Criminal Liability Given the topics to be Week V and Books, Supreme Week V – Giving of Graded Oral
(Article 4 of the Revised Penal read, the students during
VI. Court Reports topics for reading Recitation;
A. Doctrine of proximate cause.
 Explain the doctrine of
Jurisprudence: proximate cause, the such as
accelerated death rule
1. People vs. Cagoco, G.R. No. 38511, October http://elibrary.jud Week VI – Face to face
6, 1933. and the instilling fear
rule. iciary.gov.ph/ and oral graded recitation
9
 Explain the doctrine of
2. People vs. Dalag, G.R. No. 129895, April 30, lawphil.net for for a maximum of 10- Submission of
2003. supervening event as an
jurisprudence. 15 students.3 written digested
3. People vs. Vagallon, G.R. No. 22688, exception to Paragraph 1
January 26, 1925. of Article 4 of the Revised cases.
Penal Code.
4. U.S. vs. Brobst, G.R. No. 4935, October 25,
1909.
 Discuss the doctrine of
5. People vs. Martin, G.R. No. L-3002, May 23, efficient intervening
1951. cause.
6. People vs. Piamonte, G.R. No. L-5775,  Explain the concept
January 28, 1954.
and legal effects of error in
7. People vs. Itlanas, G.R. No. 60118, February personae; aberratio ictus
28, 1985. and praetor intentionem to
the criminal liability of the
8. People vs. Opero, G.R. No. L-48796, June
11, 1981.
accused.
9. People vs. Sitchon, G.R. No. 134362,  Elucidate the concept of

February 27, 2002. mistake and its legal
effect as well as
10. U.S. VS. Rodriguez, G.R. No. 7123, August
17, 1912. enumerate its requisites.
11. People vs. Quianzon, G.R. No. 42607, Distinguish mistake of

September 28, 1935. fact from ignorance of the
12. People vs. Reloj, G.R. No. L-31335, law.
February 29, 1972.
 Explain the concept of
13. People vs. Iligan, G.R. No. 75369, impossible crime and
November 26, 1990.
enumerate its requisites.
3
10
B. Accelerated death rule.  State and explain the
inherent impossibilities in
Jurisprudence: impossible crimes.
1. Garcia vs. People, G.R. No. 171951, August
28, 2009. Given the actual cases
2. U.S. vs. Rodriguez, G.R. No. L-7123, August Supreme Court, the
17, 1912. students will be able to:
3. People vs. Ulep, G.R. No. L-36858, June 20,
1988.  State the facts;
C. Instilling fear rule. raised; and discuss the
Jurisprudence: Court in the assigned
cases through the
1. People vs. Toling, G.R. No. L-27097, January
submission of case
17, 1975.
digests or case briefs.
2. People vs. Page, G.R. No. L-37507, June 7,
1977.
3. People vs. Castromero, G.R. No. 118992,

October 9, 1997.
D. Supervening event as an
exception to Paragraph 1 of Article
4 of the Revised Penal Code.
Jurisprudence:
1. Urbano vs. IAC, G.R. No. 72964, January 7,

1988.
11
E. Effect of failure or refusal of the
victim to submit to medical
treatment.
Jurisprudence:
1. U.S. vs. Marasigan, G.R. No. 9426, August

15, 1914.
F. Effect of intervening disease.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Ancasan, G.R. No. 28620,

February 24, 1928.
G. Presumption of death as a
natural consequence of the injury.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Reyes, G.R. No. 42117, March

29, 1935.
2. People vs. Moldes, G.R. No. 42122,

December 1, 1934.
H. Efficient intervening cause.
Jurisprudence:
1. Urbano vs. Intermediate Appellate Court,

G.R. No. 72964, January 7, 1988.
12
I. Concepts and legal effects of:
i) Error in personae;
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Oanis, G.R. No. L-47722, July

27, 1943.
ii) Aberratio ictus; and
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Mabug-at, G.R. No. 25459,

August 10, 1926.
iii) Praeter intentionem.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Tomotorgo, G.R. No. L-47941,

April 30, 1985.
2. People vs. Ortega, G.R. No. 116736, July

24, 1997.
J. Concept and requisites of

mistake of fact and its legal effect.
K. Distinction between mistake of

fact and ignorance of the law.
L. Concept of impossible crime.
M. Requisites of an impossible
crime.
13
N. Inherent impossibilities in
impossible crimes.
i) Factual impossibility.
Jurisprudence:
1. Intod vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.

103119, October 21, 1992.
2. Jacinto vs. People, G.R. No. 162540, July

13, 2009.
ii) Legal Impossibility.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Balmores, G.R. No. L-1896,

February 16, 1950.
PART IV. Duty of the court in Given the topics to be Week VII and Books, Supreme Week VII – Giving of Graded Oral
connection with acts which read, the students during
VIII. Court Reports topics for reading Recitation;
should be repressed but which are the oral recitation will be
not covered by the law, and in able to: Annotated (SCRA) assignment (No face to
cases of excessive penalties
(Article 5 of the Revised Penal  Discuss the duty of the
Code). court in connection with such as
acts which should be
http://elibrary.jud Week VIII – Face to Submission of
Jurisprudence: repressed but which are
not covered by the law, iciary.gov.ph/ and face oral graded written digested
1. People vs. Orifon, G.R. No. 36173,
and in cases of excessive
November 25, 1932. lawphil.net for recitation for a cases.
penalties.
jurisprudence.
14
Given the actual cases maximum of 10-15
students.4
Supreme Court, the
 State the facts;

raised; and discuss the
cases through the
submission of case
PART V. Stages in the Given the topics to be Week IX and Books, Supreme Week IX – Giving of Graded Oral
Commission of Felonies (Article 6 read, the students during X. Court Reports topics for reading Recitation;
of the Revised Penal Code). the oral recitation will be
A. Stages in the development of a  Enumerate and explain and online sources face contact). Long Quiz;
crime: the stages in the such as
development of a crime.
i) Internal acts; http://elibrary.jud Week X – Face to face Submission of
 Enumerate and explain iciary.gov.ph/ and oral graded recitation written digested
ii) External acts. the stages in the
execution of a felony.
B. Stages in the execution of a jurisprudence. 15 students.5
felony.
4
5
15
C. Two phases in the execution of  State and explain the
felonies: two phases in the
execution of felonies.
i) Subjective phase;
ii) Objective phase. attempted felony.
D. Concept of attempted felony.  Enumerate and explain

the elements of attempted
E. Elements of attempted felony. felony.
Jurisprudence:  Elucidate the concept of

overt act as well as that of
1. U.S. vs. Villanueva, G.R. No. 307, September
12, 1902. spontaneous desistance.
 Explain the concept of

2. People vs. Villegas, G.R. No. 34039, January
16, 1931. frustrated felony and
3. Paddayuman vs. People, G.R. No. 120344,
enumerate its elements.
January 23, 2002.
4. Serrano vs. People, G.R. No. 175023, July 5, consummated felony.
2010.
 Discuss the criteria in
5. People vs. Kalalo, G.R. Nos. L-39303-39305,
March 17, 1934. determining whether the
crime is attempted,
6. People vs. Campuhan, G.R. No. 129433, frustrated or
March 30, 2000.
consummated.
7. Baleros vs. People, G.R. No. 138033,
February 22, 2006.  Discuss the concept of
formal crimes as well as
8. Koh Tiech Heng vs. People, G.R. Nos. material crimes.
48535-36 December 21, 1990.
16
9. Lateo vs. People, G.R. No. 161651, June 8,  Elucidate the concept of
2011. desistance.
10. Epifanio vs. People, G.R. No. 157057, June
11. People vs. Tiu, et al., G.R. Nos. 75032-33, Supreme Court, the
December 1, 1992, 216 SCRA 410.
12. People vs. Trinidad, G.R. No. 79123-25,
January 9, 1989, 169 SCRA 51.  State the facts;
13. Velasco vs. People, G.R. No. 166479, raised; and discuss the
February 28, 2006.
14. People vs. Lopez, G.R. No. 119380, August Court in the assigned
19, 1999. cases through the
submission of case
15. People vs. de la Cruz, G.R. No. 109619,
June 26, 1998.
16. Rivera vs. People, G.R. No. 166326,

January 25, 2006.
F. Concept of overt act.
G. Concept of spontaneous
desistance.
H. Concept of frustrated felony.
I. Elements of frustrated felony.
Jurisprudence:
1. U.S. vs. Dominguez, G.R. No. 17021,

February 23, 1921.
17
2. People vs. Caballero, G.R. Nos. 149028-30,
April 2, 2003.
3. U.S. vs. Eduave, G.R. No. 12155, February

2, 1917.
4. Nicario vs. People, G.R. No. 173106,

September 30, 2008.
5. Josue vs. People, G.R. No. 199579,

December 10, 2012.
J. Concept of consummated felony.
Jurisprudence:
1. Salcedo vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. L-

45830, October 3, 1985.
2. Valenzuela vs. People, G.R. No. 160188,

June 21, 2007.
3. People vs. Caballero, G.R. Nos. 149028-30,

April 2, 2003.
4. People vs. Orita, G.R. No. 88724, April 3,

1990.
K. Criteria to determine whether the

crime is attempted, frustrated or
consummated.
L. Concept of formal crimes.
M. Concept of material crimes.
N. Desistance.
18
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Pelagio, G.R. No. L-16177, May

24, 1967.
PART VI: Conspiracy and Given the topics to be Week XI and Books, Supreme Week XI – Giving of Graded Oral
Proposal (Article 8 of the Revised read, the students during
XII. Court Reports topics for reading Recitation;
Penal Code). the oral recitation will be
A. Concept of conspiracy to commit
a felony.  State the concept of
conspiracy to commit a such as
B. Two kinds of conspiracy to felony.
http://elibrary.jud Week XII – Face to face Submission of
commit a felony.
 Enumerate and discuss iciary.gov.ph/ and oral graded recitation written digested
C. Concept of proposal to commit a the two kinds of
felony. conspiracy to commit a
felony. jurisprudence. 15 students.6
D. Nuances of appreciating
conspiracy.  Explain the concept of
proposal to commit a
Jurisprudence: felony.
1. Macapagal-Arroyo vs. People and
Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 220598, July 19,  Enumerate the forms of
2016. proposal to commit a
felony.
E. Forms of proposal to commit a
felony. Given the actual cases
Supreme Court, the
6
19
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Peralta, G.R. No. L-19069,
October 29, 1968. determine the issues
2. People vs. Berdin, G.R. No. 137598, ruling of the Supreme
November 28, 2003. Court in the assigned
3. People vs. Ruiz, G.R. Nos. L-33604-05,
cases through the
October 30, 1979. submission of case
4. People vs. Medios, G.R. Nos. 132066-67,
November 29, 2001.
5. People vs. Abut, G.R. No. 137601, April 24,

2003.
6. People vs. Hernandez, G.R. No. 90641,

February 27, 1990.
7. People vs. Aguilos, G.R. No. 121828, June

27, 2003.
8. People vs. Baltar, G.R. No. 125306,

December 11, 2000.
9. People vs. Cantuba, G.R. No. 79811, March

19, 1990.
10. People vs. Portugueza, G.R. No. L-22604,

July 31, 1967.
11. People vs. Geronimo, G.R. No. L-35700,

October 15, 1973.
12. People vs. Varroga, G.R. No. L-38100,

March 15, 1982.
13. People vs. Agda, G.R. No. L-36377,

January 30, 1982.
20
14. People vs. Rafael, G.R. No. 123176,
October 13, 2000.
15. People vs. Santiago, G.R. No. 129371,

October 4, 2000.
PART VII: Classifications of Given the topics to be Week XIII Books, Supreme Week XIII – Giving of Graded Oral
Felonies According to Their read, the students during
and XIV. Court Reports topics for reading Recitation;
Gravity (Article 9 of the Revised the oral recitation will be
Penal Code).
 State and discuss the
A. Grave felonies. concepts of grave felonies, such as
less grave felonies and
http://elibrary.jud Week XIV – Face to Submission of
B. Less grave felonies. light felonies.
iciary.gov.ph/ and face oral graded written digested
C. Light felonies. Given the actual cases
lawphil.net for recitation for a cases.
Supreme Court, the jurisprudence. maximum of 10-15
See R.A. 10951(An Act Adjusting students will be able to:
the Amount or the Value of Property students.7
and Damage on Which a Penalty is  State the facts;
Based and the Fines Imposed Under determine the issues
the Revised Penal Code, Amending raised; and discuss the
for the Purpose Act No. 3815, ruling of the Supreme
Otherwise Known as "The Revised Court in the assigned
Penal Code", as Amended.) cases through the
submission of case
7
21
Part VIII. Offenses not subject to Given the topics to be Week XV and Books, Supreme Week XV – Giving of Graded Oral
the provisions of the Revised read, the students during
XVI. Court Reports topics for reading Recitation;
Code (Article 10 of the Revised the oral recitation will be
Penal Code).
 Discuss offenses not
Jurisprudence:
subject to the provisions such as
of the Revised Penal Code.
1. People vs. Chowdury, G.R. No. 129577-80, http://elibrary.jud Week XVI – Face to Submission of
February 15, 2000.
Given the actual cases iciary.gov.ph/ and face oral graded written digested
2. Yu vs. People, G.R. No. 134172, September decided by the Honorable
20, 2004. Supreme Court, the
students will be able to: jurisprudence. maximum of 10-15
students.8
cases through the
submission of case
PART IX: Justifying Given the topics to be Week XVII Books, Supreme Week XVII – Giving of Graded Oral
Circumstances (Article 11 of the read, the students during
and XVIII. Court Reports topics for reading Recitation;
Revised Penal Code). the oral recitation will be
A. Self-defense.
 Enumerate and discuss
a1. Nature of self-defense. the concept and such as
complexities of the
http://elibrary.jud
a2. Burden of proof in self-defense. different justifying
8
22
circumstances under the iciary.gov.ph/ and Week XVIII – Face to Submission of
a3. Rights included in self-defense. Revised Penal Code.
lawphil.net for face oral graded written digested
a4. Requisites of self-defense.  Enumerate and explain jurisprudence. recitation for a cases.
the different requisites of
maximum of 10-15
Jurisprudence: the justifying
circumstances under the students.9
1. People vs. Boholst-Caballero, G.R. No. L-
232449, November 25, 1974. Revised Penal Code.

2. People vs. Agripa, G.R. No. 72244, May 8, Understand the
1992. application of the different
3. People vs. Luague, G.R. No. 43588,
justifying circumstances
November 7, 1935. under the Revised Penal
Code.
4. Cano vs. People, G.R. No. 155258, October
5. Gotis vs. People, G.R. No. 157201, decided by the Honorable
September 14, 2007. Supreme Court, the
6. Masipequiña vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.
51206, August 25, 1989.
7. People vs. Arnante, G.R. No. 148724, determine the issues
October 15, 2002. raised; and discuss the
8. U.S. vs. Guy-sayco, G.R. No. 4912, March
25, 1909.
cases through the
9. People vs. Dala, G.R. No. 134563, October submission of case
28, 2003. digests or case briefs.
10. People vs. Sabio, G.R. No. L-23734, April
27, 1967.
9
23
11. People vs. Bautista, G.R. No. 109800,
March 12, 1996.
12. People vs. Galit, G.R. No. 97432, March 1,

1994.
13. People vs. Yuman, G.R. No.43469, August

21, 1935.
14. People vs. Ebrada, G.R. No. 122774,

September 25, 1998.
15. People vs. Anies, G.R. No. L-30882,

October 29, 1982.
16. People vs. Daquipil, G.R. Nos. 86305-06,

January 20, 1995.
17. People vs. Malazzab, G.R. No. L-39136,

April 15, 1988.
18. People vs. Escarlos, G.R. No. 148912,

September 10, 2003.
19. People vs. Ganzagan, G.R. No. 113793,

August 11, 1995.
20. Razon vs. People, G.R. No. 158053, June

21, 2007.
21. People vs. Alconga, G.R. no. L-162, April

30, 1947.
22. People vs. Gutierrez, G.R. No. 31010,

September 26, 1929.
23. People vs. Quinto, G.R. No. 32948,

November 1, 1930.
24
24. Jacobo vs. People, G.R. No. 107699, March
21, 1997.
25. Justo vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. L-

8611, June 28, 1956.
26. Rugas vs. People, G.R. No. 147789,

January 14, 2004.
27. U.S. vs. Sta. Ana, G.R. No. 7020, March 15,
1912.
28. U.S. vs. Merced, G.R. No. 14170,

November 23, 1918.
29. People vs. Mangantilao, G.R. No. 30764,

July 16, 1929.
30. People vs. Borreros, G.R. No. 125185, May

5, 1999.
31. SPO2 Lolito Nacnac vs. People, G.R. No.

191913, March 21, 2012.
32. People vs. Punzalan, G.R. No. L-54562,

August 6, 1987.
33. Espinosa vs. People, G.R. No. 181071,

March 15, 2010.
34. Guillermo vs. People, G.R. No. 153287,

June 30, 2008.
35. People vs. Lara, G.R. No. 24014, October

16, 1925.
36. People vs. Rabandan, G.R. No. L-2228,

February 28, 1950.
25
37. U.S. vs. Laurel, G.R. No. 7037, March 15,
1912.
38. People vs. Ignacio, G.R. No. 40140,

November 27, 1933.
39. People vs. Sumicad, G.R. No. 35524, March

18, 1932.
40. U.S. vs. Pasca, G.R. No. 9247, October 15,

1914.
41. People vs. Almendralejo, G.R. No. 23948,

November 19, 1925.
42. People vs. Saul, G.R. No. 124809,

December 19, 2001.
43. People vs. Batas, G.R. No. 84277-78,

August 2, 1989.
44. People vs. Panganiban, G.R. No. L-22476,

February 27, 1968.
45. People vs. Tolentino, G.R. No. 31479,

November 29, 1929.
46. People vs. Perez, G.R. No. L-28583, April

24, 1974.
47. People vs. Gregorio, G.R. Nos. 109614-15,

March 29, 1996.
48. People vs. Manansala, G.R. No. L-23514,

February 17, 1970.
49. People vs. Concillado, G.R. No. 181204,

November 28, 2011.
26
50. People vs. Mayingque, G.R. No. 179709,
July 6, 2010.
51. U.S. vs. Salazar, G.R. No. 5439, February

23, 1910.
52. People vs. Monroy, G.R. No. L-11177,

October 30, 1958.
53. People vs. Viernes, G.R. No. 118091,

October 3, 1996.
54. People vs. Nemeria, G.R. No. 96288, March

20, 1995.
55. U.S. vs. McCray, G.R. No. 1166, September

29, 1903.
56. People vs. Sotelo, G.R. No. 33304,

December 13, 1930.
57. U.S. vs. Domen, G.R. No. L-12963, October

25, 1917.
B. Defense of relatives.
b1. Requisites of defense of

relatives.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Eduarte, G.R. No. 72976, July 9,

1990.
2. Olbinar vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 76235,

January 21, 1991.
3. U.S. vs. Rivera, G.R. No. 8924, November

13, 1913.
27
4. U.S. vs. Padilla, G.R. No. 11597, August 1,
1916.
5. U.S. vs. Paz, G.R. No. 6438, September 1,

1911.
6. U.S. vs. Esmedia, G.R. No. 5749, October

21, 1910.
7. People vs. Cabungcal, G.R. No. 28451,

August 1, 1928.
8. Eslabon vs. People, G.R. No. L-66202,

February 24, 1984.
C. Defense of strangers.
c1. Requisites of defense of

strangers.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Punzalan, G.R. No. L-54562,

August 6, 1987.
2. U.S. vs. Subingsubing, G.R. No. 10736,

August 31, 1915.
3. People vs. Valdez, G.R. No. 37754, March 4,

1933.
D. Avoidance of greater evil or

injury.
d1. Requisites of avoidance of

greater evil or injury.
28
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Ayaya, G.R. No. 29396,

November 9, 1928.
2. People vs. Punzalan, G.R. No. 199892,

December 10, 2012.
E. Fulfillment of duty or exercise of

right or office.
e1. Requisites of fulfillment of duty

or exercise of right or office.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Oanis, G.R. No. L-47722, July 27,

1943.
2. Frias vs. People, G.R. No. L-65762, June 23,

1984.
3. Masipequiña vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.

51206, August 25, 1989.
4. People vs. Delima, G.R. No. 18660,

December 22, 1922.
5. Valcorza vs. People, G.R. No. L-28129,

October 31, 1969.
6. People vs. Lagata, G.R. Nos. L-1940-42,

March 24, 1949.
7. People vs. De la Cruz, G.R. Nos. 101000-01,

October 18, 1993.
29
F. Obedience to a lawful order.
f1. Requisites of obedience to an

order issued for some lawful
purpose.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Wilson, G.R. Nos. 30012-30015,

March 9, 1929.
2. People vs. Barroga, G.R. No. 31563, January

16, 1930.
3. People vs. Margen, G.R. No. L-2681, March

30, 1950.
4. People vs. Bernadez, G.R. No. L-572, June

8, 1948.
PART X: Exempting Given the topics to be Week XIX Books, Supreme Week XIX – Giving of Graded Oral
and XX. Court Reports topics for reading Recitation;
A. An imbecile or an insane person.
Jurisprudence: the concept and such as
complexities of the
1. People vs. Dungo, G.R. No. 89420, July 31, http://elibrary.jud Week XX – Face to face Submission of
1991. different exempting
circumstances under the iciary.gov.ph/ and oral graded recitation written digested
2. People vs. Nuñez, G.R. Nos. 112429-30, July Revised Penal Code.
23, 1997. lawphil.net for for a maximum of 10- cases.
jurisprudence. 15 students.10
10
30
3. People vs. Ambal, G.R. No. L-52688,  Enumerate and explain
October 17, 1980. the different elements of
4. People vs. Ocfemia, G.R. No. 126135, exempting circumstances
October 25, 2000. under the Revised Penal
Code.
5. People vs. Bonoan, G.R. No. 45130,
February 17, 1937.
Given the actual cases
6. People vs. Almaden, G.R. No. 112088, decided by the Honorable
March 25, 1999. Supreme Court, the
7. People vs. Gimena, G.R. No. 33877,
February 6, 1931.
8. People vs. Austria, G.R. Nos. 111517-19, determine the issues
July 31, 1996. raised; and discuss the
9. People vs. Aragon, G.R. No. 51736, August
4, 1988.
cases through the
10. People vs. Tabugoca, G.R. No. 125334, submission of case
January 28, 1998. digests or case briefs.
11. People vs. Magallano, G.R. No. L-32978,
October 30, 1980.
12. People vs. Aquino, G.R. No. 128887,

January 20, 2000.
13. People vs. Opuran, G.R. Nos. 147674-75,

March 15, 2004.
B. A child 15 years old or under

(amended by Section 6 of Republic
Act No. 9344).
31
Jurisprudence:
1. Sierra vs. People, G.R. No. 182941, July 3,

2009.
2. People vs. Jacinto, G.R. No. 182239, March

16, 2011.
C. A child over 15 but below 18

years old (amended by Section 6 of
Republic Act No. 9344).
Jurisprudence:
1. Llave vs. People, G.R. No. 166040, April 26,

2006.
2. Madali vs. People, G.R. No. 180380, August

4, 2009.
3. Padua vs. People, G.R. No. 168546, July 23,

2008.
D. Accident.
Jurisprudence:
1. Pomoy vs. People, G.R. No. 150647,

September 29, 2004.
2. People vs. Fallorina, G.R. No. 137347, March

4, 2004.
3. People vs. Javier, G.R. No. 130489, February

19, 2002.
4. People vs. Abrazaldo, G.R. No. 124392,

February 7, 2003.
32
5. U.S. vs. Tayongtong, G.R. No. 6897,
February 15, 1912.
6. People vs. Genita, G.R. No. 126171, March

11, 2004.
E. Compulsion of irresistible force.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Montenegro, G.R. No. 157933,

August 10, 2004.
2. People vs. Cando, G.R. No. 128114, October

25, 2000.
3. People vs. Ancheta, G.R. No. 70222,

February 27, 1987.
F. Impulse of an uncontrollable fear

of equal or greater injury.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Bayambao, G.R. No. 29481,

October 31, 1928.
2. People vs. Sarip, G.R. Nos. L-31481, L-

31482 and L-31483, February 28, 1979.
3. Ty vs. People, G.R. No. 149275, September

27, 2004.
4. People vs. Rogado, G.R. No. L-13025,

December 29, 1959.
33
G. Prevention by some lawful or
insuperable cause.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Bandian, G.R. No. 45186,

September 30, 1936.
2. People vs. Vincentillo, G.R. No. 6082, March

18, 1911.
Entrapment and instigation.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Juma, G.R. No. 90391, March 24,

1993.
2. People vs. Tadepa, G.R. No. 100354, May

26, 1995.
3. People vs. Marcos, G.R. No. 83325, May 8,

1990.
4. People vs. Cortez, G.R. No. 183819, July 23,

2009.
5. People vs. Doria, G.R. No. 125299, January

22, 1999.
6. People vs. Valmores, G.R. No. L-58635,

June 24, 1983.
7. People vs. Yutuc, G.R. No. 82590, July 26,

1990.
8. People vs. Boco, G.R. No. 129676, June 23,

1999.
34
PART XI: Mitigating Given the topics to be Week XXI Books, Supreme Week XXI – Giving of Graded Oral
and XXII. Court Reports topics for reading Recitation;
A. Incomplete justifying or
exempting circumstances.  Enumerate and discuss
the concept and such as
a1. Incomplete defense of one’s complexities of the
http://elibrary.jud Week XXII – Face to Submission of
person. different mitigating
circumstances under the iciary.gov.ph/ and face oral graded written digested
Jurisprudence: Revised Penal Code.
1. U.S. vs. Pasca, G.R. No. 9247, October 15,
1914.  Enumerate and explain jurisprudence. maximum of 10-15
the different elements of
students.11
2. People vs. Lucero, G.R. No. 24854, July 26, mitigating circumstances
1926. under the Revised Penal
Code.
a2. Incomplete defense of a relative.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Toring, G.R. No. 56358, October Supreme Court, the
26, 1990. students will be able to:
2. Pepito vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.  State the facts;
119942, July 8, 1999.
a3. Incomplete defense of honor.
cases through the
1. People vs. Jaurigue, Adm. Matter No. 384, submission of case
February 21, 1946. digests or case briefs.
11
35
a4. Incomplete defense of property.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Narvaez, G.R. Nos. L-33466-67,

April 20, 1983.
a5. Incomplete justifying

circumstance of fulfillment of duty.
a6. Incomplete justifying

circumstance of obedience to an
order.
a7. Incomplete exempting

circumstance of uncontrollable fear
and irresistible force.
Jurisprudence:
People vs. Macbul, G.R. No. L-48976, October

11, 1043
b1. Over 15 but under 18 with

discernment (amended by Section
6, Paragraph 2 of Republic Act No.
9344).
b2. Over 70 years of age.
C. No intent to commit so grave a

wrong as that committed.
36
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Gonzales, G.R. No. 139542, June

21, 2001.
2. People vs. Amoto, G.R. No. L-28273,

January 18, 1982.
3. People vs. Boyles, G.R. No. L-15308, May

29, 1964.
4. Pabulario vs. Palarca, G.R. No. L-23000,

November 4, 1967.
5. Talampas vs. People, G.R. No. 180219,

November 23, 2011.
6. People vs. Gona, G.R. No. 32066, March 15,

1930.
7. People vs. Braña, G.R. No. L-29210, October

31, 1969.
8. People vs. Cardel, G.R. No. 105582, July 19,

2000.
9. People vs. Sales, G.R. No. 177218, October

3, 2011.
10. People vs. Gonzales, G.R. No. 139542,

June 21, 2001.
11. Garcia vs. People, G.R. No. 171951, August

28, 2009.
D. Sufficient provocation or threat.
Jurisprudence:
37
1. Pepito vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.
119942, July 8, 1999.
2. People vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.

103613, February 23, 2001, also known as
Tangan vs. People, G.R. No. 105830, February
23, 2001.
3. People vs. Agapinay, G.R. No. 77776, June

27, 1990.
4. People vs. Marquez, G.R. No. 31268, July

31, 1929.
5. People vs. Deguia, G.R. No. L-3731, April 20,

1951.
6. People vs. Macariola, G.R. No. L-40757,

January 24, 1983.
7. People vs. Manansala, G.R. No. L-23514,

February 17, 1970.
8. Tangan vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.

105830, January 15, 2002.
9. People vs. Tan Cui, G.R. No. L-22697,

October 5, 1976.
10. People vs. Lopez, G.R. No. 136861,

November 15, 2000.
11. People vs. Benito, G.R. No. L-32042,

February 13, 1975.
12. David vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. Nos.

111168-69, June 17, 1998.
38
E. Immediate vindication of a grave
offense.
Jurisprudence:
1. U.S. vs. Ampar, G.R. No. L-12883,

November 26, 1917.
2. People vs. Molina, G.R. No. 129051, July 28,

1999.
3. People vs. Rosel, G.R. No. 46095, October

10, 1938.
4. People vs. Capalac, G.R. No. L-38297,

October 23, 1982.
5. People vs. Parana, G.R. No. 45373, March

31, 1937.
6. People vs. Ong, L-34497, January 30, 1975.
7. People vs. Ruiz, G.R. Nos. L-33604-05,

October 30, 1979.
8. David vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. Nos.

111168-69, June 17, 1998.
9. People vs. Babor, G.R. No. 106875,

September 24, 1996.
10. People vs. Diokno, G.R. No. 45100, October

26, 1936.

December 17, 1976.
12. People vs. Cañete, G.R. No. 138366,

September 11, 2003.
39
13. People vs. Ventura, G.R. Nos. 148145-46,
July 5, 2004.
14. People vs. Doniego, G.R. L-17321,

November 29, 1963.
F. Passion or obfuscation.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Alcacid, G.R. No. 59, January 11,

1902.
2. People vs. Austria, G.R. No. 27352, August

4, 1927.
3. People vs. Lobino, G.R. No. 123071, October

28, 1999.
4. Tangan vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.

105830, January 15, 2002.
5. People vs. Formigones, G.R. No. L-3246,

November 29, 1950.
6. People vs. Pansensoy, G.R. No. 140634,

September 12, 2002.
7. People vs. Muit, G.R. No. L-48875, October

21, 1982.
8. People vs. Lobino, G.R. No. 123071, October

28, 1999.
9. People vs. Pacot, G.R. Nos. 62295-96,

March 22, 1984.
40
10. U.S. vs. Hicks, G.R. No. 4971, September
23, 1909.
11. People vs. Cruz, G.R. No. 31045, October

1, 1929.

119942, July 8, 1999.
G. Voluntary surrender /
Confession of guilt.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Deopante, G.R. No. 102772,

October 30, 1996.
2. People vs. Caber, G.R. No. 129252,

November 28, 2000.
3. People vs. Ignacio, G.R. No. 134568,

February 10, 2000.
4. People vs. Dawaton, G.R. No. 146247,

September 17, 2002.
5. People vs. Danao, G.R. No. 96832,

November 19, 1992.
6. People vs. Bautista, G.R. No. 109800, March

12, 1996.
7. People vs. Radomes, G.R. No. L-68421,

March 20, 1986.
8. People vs. Morato, G.R. Nos. 95358-59, July

5, 1993.
41
February 13, 1975.
10. People vs. Santos, G.R. No. L-32073,

October 23, 1978.
11. People vs. Dayrit, G.R. No. L-14388, May

20, 1960.
12. People vs. Santillana, G.R. No. 127815,

June 9, 1999.
13. People vs. Guzman, G.R. No. 132750,

December 14, 2001.
14. People vs. De la Cruz, G.R. No. 140513,

November 18, 2003.
15. People vs. Calpito, G.R. No. 123298,

November 27, 2003.
16. People vs. Magallanes, G.R. No. 114265,

July 8, 1997.
17. People vs. Palermo, G.R. No. 120630, June

28, 2001.
18. People vs. Ong, G.R. No. L-34497, January

30, 1975.
H. Physical defect.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Garillo, G.R. No. L-30281, August

2, 1978.
2. People vs. Montemayor, G.R. No. 124474 &

139972-78, January 28, 2003.
42
I. Illness that diminishes will-
power.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Formigones, G.R. No. L-3246,

November 29, 1950.
2. People vs. Puno, L-33211, June 29, 1981.
3. People vs. Rafanan, G.R. No. L-54135,

November 21, 1991.
4. People vs. Antonio, G.R. No. 144266,

November 27, 2002.

30, 1975.
6. People vs. Macbul, G.R. No. 48976, October

11, 1943.
7. U.S. vs. Abanzado, G.R. No. 12887,

February 15, 1918.
J. Similar or analogous
circumstances.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Villamora, G.R. No. L-2054, April

29, 1950.
2. People vs. Soriano, G.R. No. 142565, July

29, 2003.
43
3. People vs. Navasca, G.R. No. L-28107,
March 15, 1977.
4. Danofrata vs. People, G.R. No. 143010,

September 30, 2003.
5. People vs. Ong, G.R. No. L-37908, October

23, 1981.
PART XII: Aggravating Given the topics to be Week XXIII Books, Supreme Week XXIII – Giving of Graded Oral
and XXIV. Court Reports topics for reading Recitation;
Preliminary:
Jurisprudence: the concept and such as
complexities of the
1. People vs. Villaver, G.R. No. L-32104, March http://elibrary.jud Week XXIV – Face to Submission of
25, 1983. different aggravating
circumstances under the iciary.gov.ph/ and face oral graded written digested
2. Palaganas vs. People, G.R. No. 165483, Revised Penal Code.
September 12, 2006. lawphil.net for recitation for a cases.
 Enumerate and explain jurisprudence. maximum of 10-15
A. Abuse of public position. the different elements of
students.12
aggravating
Jurisprudence:
circumstances under the
1. People vs. Ural, G.R. no. L-30801, March 27, Revised Penal Code.
1974.
2. People vs. Reyes, G.R. No. L-33154, decided by the Honorable
February 27, 1976.
Supreme Court, the
3. People vs. Alegarbes, G.R. No. L-49761, students will be able to:
September 21, 1987.
12
44
4. Fortuna vs. People, G.R. No. 135784,  State the facts;
December 15, 2000. determine the issues
5. People vs. Gutierrez, G.R. No. 116281, raised; and discuss the
February 8, 1999. ruling of the Supreme
6. People vs. Herrera, G.R. Nos. 140557-58, cases through the
December 5, 2001.
submission of case
B. Contempt of or insult to public
authorities.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Tenorio, G.R. No. L-15478, March

30, 1962.
2. People vs. Magdueño, G.R. No. L-68699,

September 22, 1986.
C. Disregard of rank, age, sex or

dwelling of the offended party.
Jurisprudence:
1. El Pueblo de Filipinas vs. Santos, G.R. No. L-

4189, May 21, 1952.
c1. Disregard of rank.

Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Arizala, G.R. No. 130708, October

22, 1999.
2. People vs. Rodil, G.R. No. L-35156,

November 20, 1981.
45
3. People vs. Torres, G.R. No. L-4642, May 29,
1953.
c2. Disregard of age.

Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Valera, G.R. No. L-15662, August

30, 1962.
2. People vs. Bajar, G.R. No. 143817, October

27, 2003.
3. People vs. Lora, G.R. No. L-49430, March

30, 1982.

March 31, 1992.
c3. Disregard of sex.

Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Clementer, G.R. No. L-33490,

August 30, 1974.
2. People vs. Taboga, G.R. Nos. 144086-87,

February 6, 2002.
3. People vs. Suza, G.R. No. 130611, April 6,

2000.
c4. Disregard of dwelling.

Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Balansi, G.R. No. 77284, July 19,

1990.
46
2. People vs. Belo, G.R. No. 109148, December
4, 1998.
3. People vs. Garcia, G.R. No. L-32071, July 9,

1981.

31, 1969.
5. People vs. Fabon, G.R. No. 133226, March

16, 2000.
6. People vs. Rosario, G.R. No. 108789, July

18, 1995.
7. People vs. Sarino, G.R. No. 94992-93, April

7, 1993.
8. People vs. Talay, G.R. No. L-24852,

November 28, 1980.
9. People vs. Dacibar, G.R. No. 111286,

February 17, 2000.
10. People vs. Albar, G.R. No. L-3024, April 1,

1950.
11. People vs. Daniel, G.R. No. L-40330,

November 20, 1978.
12. People vs. Calongui, G.R. No. 170566,

March 3, 2006.
13. People vs. Taño, G.R. No. 133872, May 5,

2000.

119942, July 8, 1999.
47
D. Abuse of confidence or obvious
ungratefulness.
d1. Abuse of confidence.

Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Caliso, G.R. No. 37271, July 1,

1933.
2. People vs. Villas, G.R. No. L-20953, April 21,

1969.
3. People vs. Verdad, G.R. No. L-51797, May

16, 1983.
4. People vs. Arrojado, G.R. No. 130492,

January 31, 2001.
5. People vs. Ponciano, G.R. No. 86453,

December 5, 1991.
6. People vs. Ruiz, G.R. No. L-33609,

December 14, 1981.
7. People vs. Luchico, G.R. No. 26170,

December 6, 1926.
8. People vs. Comendador, G.R. No. L-38000,

September 19, 1980.
9. People vs. Ong, G.R. No. L-37908, October

23, 1981.
d2. Obvious ungratefulness.

Jurisprudence:
48
1. People vs. Lupangco, G.R. No. L-32633,
November 12, 1981.
2. People vs. Bautista, G.R. No. L-38624, July

25, 1957.
3. People vs. Develos, G.R. No. L-18866,

January 31, 1966.
4. People vs. Nismal, G.R. No. L-51257, June

25, 1982.
5. People vs. Valera, G.R. No. L-34356, May

31, 1979.
6. People vs. Mandolado, G.R. No. L-51304,

June 28, 1983.
E. Place where the crime was

committed.
Jurisprudence:
1. U.S. vs. Punsalan, G.R. No. 1431, January

27, 1904.

September 10, 1990.
F. Nighttime, uninhabited place or

band.
f1. Nighttime.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Codilla, G.R. No. 100720-23, June

30, 1993.
49
2. People vs. Pardo, G.R. No. L-562, November
19, 1947.
3. People vs. Manzano, G.R. No. L-38449,

November 25, 1982.
4. People vs. Ventura, G.R. Nos. 148145-46,

July 5, 2004.
5. People vs. Aquino, G.R. No. 46725,

September 29, 1939.
6. People vs. Pamintuan, G.R. No. L-48273,

November 28, 1983.
7. People vs. Magnayon, G.R. No. L-32074,

May 3, 1983.
8. People vs. Bautista, G.R. Nos. 96618-19,

August 11, 1999.
9. People vs. Atencio, G.R. No. L-22518,

January 17, 1968.
10. People vs. Baring, G.R. No. 87017, July 20,

1990.
11. People vs. Lungbos, G.R. No. 57293, June

21, 1988.
12. People vs. Veloso, G.R. No. L-32900,

February 25, 1982.
13. People vs. Cabangcala, G.R. No. 135065,

August 8, 2001.
14. People vs. Abitona, G.R. Nos. 96943-45,

January 20, 1995.
50
15. People vs. Soriano, G.R. No. L-32244, June
24, 1983.
16. People vs. Silva, G.R. No. 140871, August

8, 2002.
17. People vs. Berbal, G.R. No. 71527, August

10, 1989.
18. People vs. Reyes, G.R. No. 142467, June

10, 2003.
19. People vs. Bergonio, G.R. No. 133981,

September 13, 2000.
20. People vs. Bello, G.R. No. L-18792,

February 28, 1964.
21. People vs. Cruz, G.R. No. 116989,

September 20, 1996.
f2. Uninhabited place.

Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Desalisa, G.R. No. 95262,

January 4, 1994.
2. People vs. Asibar, G.R. No. L-37255,

October 23, 1982.
3. People vs. Saquing, G.R. No. L-27903,

December 26, 1969.
4. People vs. Manzano, G.R. No. L-38449,

November 25, 1982.
5. People vs. Capillas, G.R. No. L-27177,

October 23, 1981.
51
6. People vs. Tiongson, G.R. Nos. L-35123-24,
July 25, 1984.

30, 1975.
f3. Band.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Escabarte, G.R. No. L-42964,

March 14, 1988.
2. People vs. Manlolo, G.R. No. L-40778,

January 26, 1989.
3. Gamara vs. Valero, G.R. No. L-36210, June

25, 1973.

January 20, 1993.
G. Calamity or other misfortune.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Arpa, G.R. No. L-26789, April 25,

1969.
H. Aid of armed men.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Cara, G.R. Nos. 117483-84,

December 12, 1997.
2. People vs. Dalusag, G.R. No. L-38988,

October 31, 1984.
52
3. People vs. Boado, G.R. No. L-44725, March
31, 1981.
4. People vs. San Miguel, G.R. No. L-39746,

September 27, 1983.
I. Recidivism.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Del Carmen, G.R. No. 42609,

April 24, 1935.

February 25, 1982.
3. People vs. Fuentesuela, G.R. No. 48273,

April 22, 1942.
4. People vs. Bado, G.R. No. L-44775, March 5,

1984.
5. People vs. Lagarto, G.R. No. 65833, May 6,

1991.
6. People vs. Lacao, G.R. No 95320,

September 4, 1991.
7. People vs. Oquiño, G.R. No. L-32244, June

24, 1983.
8. People vs. Haloot, G.R. No. 45490,

September 15, 1937.
9. People vs. Rapisora, G.R. No. 147855, May

28, 2004.
53
10. People vs. Gaorana, G.R. Nos. 109138-39,
April 27, 1998.
J. Reiteracion or habituality.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Mendoza, G.R. No. L-16392.
2. People vs. Nabual, G.R. No. L-27758, July

14, 1969.
K. Price, reward or promise.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Young, G.R. No. L-2161, May 26,

1949.
2. People vs. Racca, G.R. No. L-15812,

December 30, 1961.
3. People vs. Fuertes, G.R. Nos. 95891-92,

February 28, 2000.
4. People vs. Orenciada, G.R. No. 21562,

August 7, 1924.
5. People vs. Fabro, G.R. No. 95089, August

11, 1997.
L. Inundation, fire, poison, etc.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Magalona, G.R. No. 143294, July

17, 2003.
54
M. Evident premeditation.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Talok, G.R. No. 45611, June 21,

1938.
2. People vs. Cortaga, G.R. No. 55049,

February 25, 1985.
3. People vs. Fabro, G.R. No. 95089, August

11, 1997.
4. People vs. Ulita, G.R. No. L-12655, June 30,

1960.
5. People vs. Jaravata, G.R. No. L-22029,

August 15, 1967.
6. People vs. Lunar, G.R. No. L-15579, May 29,

1972.
7. People vs. Abadies, G.R. No. 135975,

August 14, 2002.
8. People vs. Balatucan, g.R. Nos. 93805-06,

February 7, 1992.
9. Yapyuco vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. Nos.

120744-46, June 25, 2012.
10. People vs. Dollendo, G.R. No. 181701,

January 18, 2012.
11. People vs. Tiongson, G.R. No. L-35123-24,

July 25, 1984.
55
12. People vs. Rabanillo, G.R. No. 130010, May
26, 1999.
13. People vs. Mostoles, G.R. No. L-2880,

March 31, 1950.
14. People vs. Ubiña, G.R. No. L-6969, August

31, 1955.
15. Rabor vs. People, G.R. No. 140344, August

18, 2000.
16. U.S. vs. Manalinde, G.R. No. 5292, August

28, 1909.
17. People vs. Manansala, G.R. No. 88752, July

3, 1992.
N. Craft, Fraud or Disguise.
n1. Craft.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Saliling, G.R. No. L-27974,

February 27, 1976.
2. People vs. Mendoza, G.R. No. L-16392,

January 30, 1965.
3. People vs. Revotoc, G.R. no. L-37425, July

25, 1981.
4. People vs. Saquing, G.R. No. L-27903,

December 26, 1969.
5. People vs. Valiente, G.R. No. L-37937,

September 30, 1986.
56
6. People vs. Zea, G.R. Nos. L-23109 and L-
23110, June 29, 1984.
7. People vs. Aspili, G.R. Nos. 89418-19,

November 21, 1990.
n2. Fraud.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Famador, G.R. No. L-36553,

March 30, 1982.
2. People vs. Lor, G.R. Nos. L-47440-42,

September 12, 1984.
n3. Disguise.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Bermas, G.R. Nos. 76416 &

94312, July 5, 1999.

February 25, 1982.
3. People vs. Cabato, G.R. No. L-37400, April

15, 1988.
O. Taking advantage of superior

strength/means be employed to
weaken defense.
o1. Taking advantage of superior

strength.
Jurisprudence:
57
1. People vs. Mosquerra, G.R. No. 129209,
August 9, 2001.
2. People vs. Bongadillo, G.R. No. 96687, July

20, 1994.
3. People vs. Mariano, G.R. No. 134847,

December 6, 2000.

31, 1969.
5. People vs. Amoto, G.R. No. L-28273,

January 18, 1982.
6. People vs. Berbal, G.R. No. 71527, August

10, 1989.
7. People vs. Roxas, G.R. No. 140762,

September 10, 2003.
8. People vs. Barcelon, G.R. No. 144308,

September 24, 2002.
9. People vs. Rabanillo, G.R. No. 130010, May

26, 1999.
10. People vs. Delim, G.R. No. 142773, January

28, 2003.
11. People vs. Fronda, G.R. Nos. 102361-62,

May 14, 1993.
12. People vs. Mondijar, G.R. No. 141914,

November 21, 2002.
13. People vs. Narciso, G.R. No. L-24484, May

28, 1968.
58
14. People vs. Mactal, G.R. No. 141187, April
28, 2003.
o2. Means be employed to weaken

defense.
Jurisprudence:
1. U.S. vs. Devela, G.R. No. 1542, April 9, 1904.
2. People vs. Ducusin, G.R. No. 30724, August

8, 1929.
3. People vs. Ferrer, G.R. No. L-60073,

September 23, 1983.
P. Treachery.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Manalang, G.R. No. L-47136-39,

July 25, 1983.
2. People vs. Lagman, G.R. No. 197807, April

16, 2012.
3. People vs. Barro, G.R. No. 118098, August

17, 2000.
4. People vs. Patrolla, G.R. No. 112445, March

7, 1996.
5. People vs. Biglete, G.R. No. 182920, June

18, 2012.
6. People vs. Malicdem, G.R. No. 184601,

November 12, 2012.
59
7. People vs. Padilla, G.R. Nos. 138472-73,
August 9, 2001.
8. People vs. Guevarra, G.R. No. L-24371, April

16, 1968.
9. People vs. Nelmida, G.R. No. 184500,

September 11, 2012.
10. People vs. Rivera, G.R. No. 117471,

September 3, 1998.
11. People vs. Vilbar, G.R. No. 186541,

February 1, 2012.
12. People vs. Cabacan, G.R. No. 130965,

August 22, 2002.
13. Ramos vs. People, G.R. No. L-22348,

August 23, 1967.
14. People vs. Sebastian, G.R. No. 131734,

March 7, 2002.
15. People vs. Nugas, G.R. No. 172606,

November 23, 2011.
16. People vs. Tac-an, G.R. Nos. 76338-39,

February 26, 1990.
17. People vs. Leal, G.R. No. L-28379, August

31, 1971.
18. People vs. Escleto, G.R. No. 183706, April

25, 2012.
19. People vs. Agacer, G.R. No. 1777751,

December 14, 2011.
60
20. People vs. Cagoco, G.R. No. 38511,
October 6, 1933.
21. People vs. Vilbar, G.R. No. 186541,

February 1, 2012.
22. People vs. Gonzalez, G.R. No. 139542,

June 21, 2001.
23. People vs. Agpawan, G.R. No. 123853,

August 25, 2000.
24. People vs. Cabarrubias, G.R. Nos. 94709-

10, June 15, 1993.
25. People vs. Bernal, G.R. Nos. 132791 &

140465-66, September 2, 2002.
26. People vs. Mil, G.R. Nos. L-28104-05, July

30, 1979.
27. People vs. Sarino, G.R. No. 94992-93, April

7, 1993.

30, 1975.
29. People vs. Isla, G.R. No. 199875,

November 21, 2012.
30. People vs. Bello, G.R. No. L-18792,

February 28, 1964.
Q. Ignominy.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Fuertes, G.R. Nos. 95891-92,

February 28, 2000.
61
2. People vs. Carmina, G.R. No. 81404,
January 28, 1991.
3. People vs. Alfanta, G.R. No. 125633,

December 9, 1999.
R. Unlawful entry.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Galapia, G.R. Nos. L-39303-05,

August 1, 1978.
2. People vs. Talo, G.R. No. 125542, October

25, 2000.
3. People vs. Baello, G.R. No. 101314, July 1,

1993.
S. Breaking of wall, roof, floor,

door, etc.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Capillas, G.R. No. L-27177,

October 23, 1981.
2. People vs. Lamosa, G.R. Nos. 74291-93,

May 23, 1989.
T. Aid of persons under 15 or

motor vehicle.
t1. Motor vehicle.

Jurisprudence:
62
1. People vs. Lachica, G.R. No. 94432, Ocober
12, 1999.
2. People vs. Del Castillo, G.R. No. L-32995,

April 30, 1984.
3. People vs. Bardon, G.R. No. L-60764,

September 19, 1988.
4. People vs. Lozano, G.R. Nos. 137370-71,

September 29, 2003.
5. People vs. Mil, G.R. Nos. L-28104-05, July

30, 1979.
6. People vs. Muñoz, G.R. No. L-38016,

September 10, 1981.
U. Cruelty.
Jurisprudence:

December 6, 2000.
2. People vs. Valdez, G.R. No. 128105, January

24, 2001.
3. People vs. Bonito, G.R. No. 128002, October

10, 2000.
4. People vs. Sitchon, G.R. No. 134362,

February 27, 2002.
5. People vs. Laspardas, G.R. No. L-46146,

October 23, 1979.
63
6. People vs. Artieda, G.R. No. L-38725, May
15, 1979.

30, 1975.
PART XIII: Alternative Given the topics to be Week XXV Books, Supreme Week XXV – Giving of Graded Oral
and XXVI. Court Reports topics for reading Recitation;
A. Concept of alternative
circumstances.  Enumerate and discuss
the concept and such as
B. Relationship. complexities of the
http://elibrary.jud Week XXVI – Face to Submission of
different alternative
Jurisprudence: circumstances under the iciary.gov.ph/ and face oral graded written digested
Revised Penal Code.
1. People vs. Orilla, G.R. Nos. 148939-40, lawphil.net for recitation for a cases.
February 13, 2004.
 Enumerate and explain jurisprudence. maximum of 10-15
the different elements of
2. People vs. Solmoro, G.R. Nos. 139187-94
students.13
[140427-34], November 27, 2002. alternative circumstances
3. People vs. Marcos, G.R. No. 132392,
under the Revised Penal
January 18, 2001. Code.
4. People vs. Bajar, G.R. No. 143817, October Given the actual cases
27, 2003. decided by the Honorable
Supreme Court, the
C. Intoxication.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Tambis, G.R. No. 124452, July 28, determine the issues
1999. raised; and discuss the
13
64
2. People vs. Bernal, G.R. Nos. 132791 & Court in the assigned
140465-66, September 2, 2002.
cases through the
3. People vs. Cortes, G.R. No. 137050, July 11, submission of case
2001. digests or case briefs.
4. People vs. Fuentes, G.R. No. L-32756,
March 28, 1983.
D. Degree of instruction or
education of the offender.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Ripas, G.R. No. L-6246, May 26,

1954.
2. People vs. Undong, G.R. No. L-32641,

August 29, 1975.
3. People vs. Mangsant, G.R. No. 45704, May

25, 1938.
4. People vs. Luna, G.R. No. L-28812, July 31,

1974.
PART XIV: Persons Criminally Given the topics to be Week XXVII Books, Supreme Week XXVII – Giving of Graded Oral
Liable for Felonies/Degree of read, the students during
and XXVIII. Court Reports topics for reading Recitation;
Participation (Articles 16-20 of the oral recitation will be
the Revised Penal Code. able to: Annotated (SCRA) assignment (No face to
Jurisprudence:  Identify the persons
criminally liable for such as
65
1. Jariol vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. Nos. 52095- felonies under the Revised http://elibrary.jud Week XXVIII – Face to Submission of
52116, August 13, 1990. Penal Code.
A. Principals.  Determine the degree of lawphil.net for recitation for a cases.
participation of persons
a1. Principal by Direct criminally jurisprudence. maximum of 10-15
liable for
Participation. felonies. students.14
Jurisprudence:
 Demonstrate
1. People vs. Dinglasan, G.R. No. 101312, knowledge of the
January 28, 1997. application of the Anti-
Fencing Law and P.D.
2. People vs. Obello, G.R. No. 108772, January
14, 1998.
1829.
3. People vs. Abordo, G.R. No. 107245,  Identify the accessories

December 17, 1999. who are exempt from
criminal liability.
4. People vs. Tila-on, G.R. No. L-12406, June
30, 1961.
5. Retoni vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 96776,
February 5, 1993. Supreme Court, the
6. People vs. Aguilos, G.R. No. 121828, June students will be able to:
27, 2003.
7. People vs. Berdin, G.R. No. 137598, determine the issues
November 28, 2003.
8. People vs. Baltar, G.R. No. 125306, ruling of the Supreme
December 11, 2000. Court in the assigned
cases through the
9. People vs. Cantuba, G.R. No. 79811, March submission of case
19, 1990.
14
66
10. People vs. Rafael, G.R. No. 123176,
October 13, 2000.
a2. Principal by Inducement.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Canaguran, G.R. No. 108174,

October 28, 1999.
2. Santos vs. People, G.R. No. 167671,

September 3, 2008.
3. People vs. Yanson-Dumancas, G.R. No.

133527-28, December 13, 1999.
4. Guillergan vs. People, G.R. No. 185493,

February 2, 2011.
5. People vs. Rendoque, G.R. No. 106282,

January 20, 2000.
6. People vs. Balderama, G.R. Nos. 89597-98,

September 17, 1993.
7. People vs. Agapinay, G.R. No. 77776, June

27, 1990.
8. People vs. Cruz, G.R. No. 74048, November

14, 1990.
9. People vs. Caimbre, G.R. No. L-12087,

December 29, 1960.
10. People vs. Castillo, G.R. No. L-19238, July

26, 1966.
a3. Principal by Indispensable

Cooperation.
67
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Dulay, G.R. No. 193854,

September 24, 2012.
2. People vs. Montealegre, G.R. No. L-67948,

May 31, 1988.
3. People vs. Guevarra, G.R. No. 65017,

November 13, 1989.
4. People vs. Labis, G.R. No. L-22087,

November 15, 1967.
5. People vs. Martinez, G.R. No. L-33907,

January 31, 1984.
6. People vs. Lopez, G.R. No. 112448, October

30, 1995.
7. People vs. Quillosa, G.R. No. 115687,

February 17, 2000.
8. People vs. Maluenda, G.R. No. 115351,

March 27, 1998.
9. People vs. Elijorde, G.R. No. 126531, April

21, 1999.
10. People vs. Escober, G.R. Nos. L-69564 and

L-69658, January 29, 1988.
11. People vs. Simbra, G.R. No. L-39401,

September 30, 1982.
B. Accomplices.
Jurisprudence:
68
1. People vs. Anin, G.R. No. L-39046, June 30,
1975.
2. People vs. Castro, G.R. No. L-17465, August

31, 1964.
3. People vs. Tawat, G.R. No. L-62547,

December 21, 1983.
4. People vs. De Vera, G.R. No. 128966,

August 18, 1999.
5. People vs. Corbes, G.R. No. 113470, March

26, 1997.
6. People vs. Suarez, G.R. No. 111193, 267

SCRA 119.
7. People vs. Villegas, G.R. No. L-16818, May

31, 1961.
8. People vs. Tumayao, G.R. No. 35442, March

4, 1932.
9. People vs. Tatlonghari, G.R. No. L-22094,

March 28, 1969.
10. People vs. Doble, G.R. No. L-30028, May

31, 1982.
11. People vs. Villanueva, G.R. No. 110613,

March 26, 1997.
12. People vs. Tamayo, G.R. No. 18289,

November 17, 1922.
13. People vs. Tolentino, G.R. No. 139179, April

3, 2002.
69
14. People vs. Continente, G.R. Nos. 100801-
02, August 25, 2000.
15. People vs. Aguilos, G.R. No. 121828, June

27, 2003.
C. Accessories.
c1. Accessories who profit

themselves or assist the offender to
profit by the effects of the crime.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Cui, G.R. No. 121982, September

10, 1999.
2. People vs. Maluenda, G.R. No. 115351,

March 27, 1998.
3. Taer vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 85204,

June 18, 1990.
4. Mendoza vs. People, G.R. No. L-46484,

January 29, 1988.
5. People vs. Tunday, G.R. No. L-67813,

January 29, 1988.
c1a. ANTI-FENCING LAW OF 1979

(P.D. NO. 1612).
Jurisprudence:
1. Capili vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 139250,

August 15, 2000.
70
2. Francisco vs. People, G.R. No. 146584, July
12, 2004.
3. Dimat vs. People, G.R. No. 181184, January

25, 2012.
c2. Accessories who conceal or

destroy the body of the crime or the
effects or instruments thereof, in
order to prevent its discovery.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Realon, G.R. No. L-30832, August

29, 1980.
2. People vs. Yanson-Dumancas, G.R. No.

133527-28, December 13, 1999.
3. People vs. Verzola, G.R. No. L-35022,

December 21, 1977.
4. People vs. Toring, G.R. No. 56358, October

26, 1990.
c3. Accessories who harbor,

conceal, or assist in the escape of
the principals of the crime, provided
the accessory acts with abuse of his
public functions or whenever the
author of the crime is guilty of
treason, parricide, murder, or an
attempt to take the life of the Chief
71
Executive, or is known to be
habitually guilty of some other
crime.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Antonio, G.R. No. 128900, July

14, 2000.
2. People vs. Lojo, G.R. No. L-33522, June 24,

1983.
3. Vino vs. People, G.R. No. 84163, October 19,

1989.
4. People vs. Rafael, G.R. No. 123176, October

13, 2000.
c3a. P.D. NO. 1829 (OBSTRUCTION

OF JUSTICE).
Jurisprudence:
1. Naval vs. Panday, A.M. No. RTJ-95-1283,

December 21, 1999.
2. Posadas vs. Ombudsman, G.R. No. 131492,

September 29, 2000.
D. Accessories who are exempt from

criminal liability.
Jurisprudence:

December 6, 2000.
72
2. People vs. Ortega, G.R. No. 116736, July 24,
1997.
3. U.S. vs. Dueda, G.R. No. 5344, December

14, 1909.
PART XV: Plurality of Crimes Given the topics to be Week XXIX Books, Supreme Week XXIX – Giving of Graded Oral
(Article 48 of the Revised Penal read, the students during
and XXX. Court Reports topics for reading Recitation;
A. Penalty for complex crime.
 Understand and
explain the plurality of such as
crimes and their effect on
http://elibrary.jud Week XXX – Face to Submission of
Jurisprudence: the imposable penalty.
1. Intestate Estate of Gonzales vs. People, G.R.
No. 181409, February 11, 2010. lawphil.net for recitation for a cases.
2. People vs. Hernandez, G.R. Nos. L-6025-26, Supreme Court, the jurisprudence. maximum of 10-15
July 18, 1956. students will be able to:
students.15
3. People vs. Gaffud, G.R. No. 168050,
September 19, 2008.  State the facts;
B. Philosophy of complex crime. raised; and discuss the
cases through the
1. People vs. Comadre, G.R. No. 153559, June
8, 2004. submission of case
C. Composite crimes.
Jurisprudence:
15
73
1. People vs. Malinao, G.R. No. 128148,
February 16, 2004.
2. People vs. Laog, G.R. No. 178321, October

5, 2011.
D. Composite crimes vs. Compound

crimes.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Villaflores, G.R. No. 184926, April

11, 2012.
E. Ordinary complex crimes vs.
Special complex crimes.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Escote, G.R. No. 140756, April 4,

2003.
F. Delito compuesto.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Nelmida, G.R. No. 184500,

September 11, 2012.
2. People vs. Caldito, G.R. Nos. 78432-33,

February 9, 1990.
3. People vs. Patrolla, G.R. No. 112445, March

7, 1996.
4. People vs. Lojo, G.R. Nos. 29535 & 29536,

November 26, 1928.
Other Jurisprudence:
74
1. People vs. De Leon, G.R. Nos. 25375 &
25376, October 8, 1926.
2. People vs. Mision, G.R. No. 63480, February

26, 1991.
3. People vs. Del Rosario, G.R. No. L-2254,

April 20, 1950.
4. People vs. Aquino, G.R. Nos. L-8777-79,

August 14, 1956.
5. People vs. De Leon, G.R. Nos. 25375 &

25376, October 8, 1926.
6. People vs. Rodriquez, G.R. No. L-13981,

April 25, 1960.
7. People vs. Buynay, G.R. No. L-39960-61,

March 5, 1984.
8. People vs. Cesar, G.R. No. L-26185, March

13, 1968.
9. People vs. Abalos, G.R. No. 88189, July 9,

1996.
10. People vs. Madali, G.R. Nos. 67803-04, July

30, 1990.
11. People vs. Magalona, G.R. No. 143294,

July 17, 2003.
12. People vs. Salcedo, G.R. No. 178272,

March 14, 2011.
13. People vs. Desalisa, G.R. No. 95262,

January 4, 1994.
75
14. People vs. Mercado, G.R. No. 116239,
November 29, 2000.
15. People vs. Escote, G.R. No. 140756, April

4, 2003.
16. People vs. Toling, G.R. No. L-28548, July

13, 1979.
17. People vs. Fabula, G.R. No. 115401,

December 16, 1996.
18. People vs. Penillos, G.R. No. 65673,

January 30, 1992.
19. People vs. Camat, G.R. No. 112262, April 2,

1996.
20. People vs. Dimaano, G.R. No. 95231, June

15, 1992.
21. People vs. Mendoza, G.R. No. 96397,

November 21, 1991.
22. People vs. Rostata, G.R. No. 91482,

February 9, 1993.
G. Delito complejo.
Jurisprudence:
1. Patula vs. People, G.R. No. 164457, April 11,

2012.
2. Ambito vs. People, G.R. No. 127327,

February 13, 2009.
3. People vs. Fortich, G.R. Nos. 80399-404,

November 13, 1997.
76
4. Reodica vs. People, G.R. No. 125066, July 8,
1998.
5. People vs. Hon. Villalon, December 21, 1990.
6. People vs. Salvilla, April 26, 1990.
H. Plurality of crimes (concurso de

delitos).
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Barros, G.R. Nos. 101107-08,

June 27, 1985.
Other Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Malngan, G.R. No. 170470,

September 26, 2006.
2. People vs. Cruz, G.R. No. 101844,

November 18, 1991.
3. People vs. Moreno, G.R. No. 140033,

January 25, 2002.
4. People vs. Sendaydiego, G.R. No. L-33252-

54, January 20, 1978.
5. People vs. Caling, G.R. No. 94784, May 8,

1992.
6. People vs. Somooc, G.R. No. 100921, June

2, 1995.
7. People vs. Lobitania, G.R. No. 142380,

September 5, 2002.
77
I. Single criminal impulse.
Jurisprudence:
1. Gonzales vs. Arcilla, G.R. No. L-27923,

November 18, 1991.
J. Delito compuesto vs. Delito

complejo.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Macagaling, G.R. Nos. 109131-

33, October 3, 1994.
K. Delito continuado (continued

crime).
Jurisprudence:
1. Mallari vs. People, G.R. No. L-58886,

December 13, 1998.
2. Defensor-Santiago vs. Garchitorena, G.R.

No. 109266, December 2, 1993.
3. People vs. De Leon, G.R. No. 179943, June

26, 2009.
PART XVI: Penalties in General Given the topics to be Week XXXI Books, Supreme Week XXXI – Giving of Graded Oral
(Articles 21-24 of the Revised read, the students during
and XXXII. Court Reports topics for reading Recitation;
Preliminary.
Jurisprudence: penalties, its definition, such as
78
1. People vs. Carillo, G.R. No. L-2043, February theories, juridical http://elibrary.jud Week XXXII – Face to Submission of
28, 1950. conditions and three-fold
purposes under the
A. Definition of penalty. Revised Penal Code. lawphil.net for recitation for a cases.
B. Concept of penalty. jurisprudence. maximum of 10-15
decided by the Honorable students.16
C. Different Juridical Conditions of Supreme Court, the
Penalty. students will be able to:
D. Theories Justifying Penalty.  State the facts;
E. Three-fold purpose of penalty raised; and discuss the
under the Revised Penal Code. ruling of the Supreme
F. Penalties that may be imposed. cases through the
Jurisprudence: submission of case
1. U.S. vs. Paronne, G.R. No. 7038, January 7,
1913.
2. People vs. Veneracion, G.R. Nos. 119987-

88, October 12, 1995.
G. Retroactive effect of penal laws.

Jurisprudence:
1. Gumaua vs. Espino, G.R. L-36188-37586,

February 29, 1980.
2. People vs. Tamayo, G.R. No. 41423, March

19, 1935.
16
79
3. People vs. Pastor, G.R. No. L-335, February
12, 1947.
4. People vs. Moran, G.R. No. 17905, January

27, 1923.
5. Ortega vs. People, G.R. No. 151085, August

20, 2008.
H. Effect of pardon by the offended

party.
Jurisprudence:
1. Eraña vs. Vera, G.R. No. 48955, July 27,

1943.
2. Ligtas vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. L-

47498, May 7, 1987.
I. Measures of prevention or safety

which are not considered penalties.
Jurisprudence:
1. Bayot vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. L-61776

to No. L-61861, March 23, 1984.
PART XVII: Penalties (Articles 25- Given the topics to be Week XXXIII Books, Supreme Week XXXIII – Giving Graded Oral
88 of the Revised Penal Code). read, the students during
and XXXIV. Court Reports of topics for reading Recitation;
the oral recitation will be
See also R.A. 10951 (An Act able to: Annotated (SCRA) assignment (No face to
Adjusting the Amount or the Value
of Property and Damage on Which a  State and discuss the and online sources face contact). Long Quiz;
Penalty is Based and the Fines classification of penalties, such as
Imposed Under the Revised Penal its durations and effects,
Code, Amending for the Purpose Act http://elibrary.jud
80
No. 3815, Otherwise Known as "The its application as well as iciary.gov.ph/ and Week XXXIV – Face to Submission of
Revised Penal Code", as Amended.) its execution and service.
lawphil.net for face oral graded written digested
A. Classification of penalties.  State and discuss the jurisprudence. recitation for a cases.
different special penal
B. Penalties which may be imposed. laws maximum of 10-15
affecting the
Jurisprudence: imposition of penalties students.17
1. People vs. Penillos, G.R. No. 65673, January under the Revised penal
30, 1992. Code.
C. Afflictive, correctional, or light Given the actual cases

penalty. decided by the Honorable
Supreme Court, the
Jurisprudence: students will be able to:
1. People vs. Yu Hai, G.R. No. L-9598, August
15, 1956.  State the facts;
2. People vs. Dacuycuy, G.R. No. 45127, May raised; and discuss the
5, 1989. ruling of the Supreme
3. People vs. Crisostomo, G.R. No. L-16945, Court in the assigned
August 31, 1962. cases through the
submission of case
D. Duration and effects of penalties. digests or case briefs.
E. Reclusion Perpetua.
Jurisprudence:
People vs. Uycogue, G.R. No. 107495, July 31,

1995.
F. Computation of penalties.
17
81
G. Period of preventive
imprisonment deducted from term
of imprisonment.
Jurisprudence:
1. Santos vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. Nos.

71523-25, December 8, 2000.
2. People vs. Race, G.R. No. 93143, August 4,

1992.
3. People vs. Tañeza, G.R. No. 121668, June

20, 2000.
4. People vs. Bastasa, G.R. No. L-32792,

February 2, 1979.
H. Effects of the penalties of

perpetual or temporary absolute
disqualification.
Jurisprudence:
1. Conducto vs. Monzon, A.M. No. MTJ-98-

1147, July 2, 1998.
I. Effect of the penalties of perpetual

or temporary special
disqualification.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Rafanan, G.R. No. 48362,

February 28, 1990.
82
J. Effect of the penalties of
perpetual or temporary special
disqualification for the exercise of
the right of suffrage.
Jurisprudence:
1. Lacuna vs. Abes, G.R. No. L-28613, August

27, 1968.
2. People vs. Corral, G.R. No. 42300, January

31, 1936.
K. Effects of the penalties of

suspension from any public office,
profession or calling, or the right of
suffrage.
L. Civil interdiction.
M. Effects of bond to keep the

peace.
N. Pardon; its effect.

Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Salle, G.R. No. 103567,

December 4, 1995.
2. People vs. Patriarca, G.R. No. 135457,

September 29, 2000.
3. Cristobal vs. Labrador, G.R. No. 47941,

December 7, 1940.
O. Cost; what are included.

83
P. Pecuniary liabilities; order of
payment.
Q. Subsidiary penalty.
See also: R.A. 10159.
Jurisprudence:
1. Ramos vs. Gonong, G.R. No. L-42010,

August 31, 1976.
2. People vs. Subido, G.R. No. L-21734,

September 5, 1975.
3. People vs. Narvaez, G.R. Nos. L-33466-67,

April 20, 1983.
4. Guinhawa vs. People, G.R. No. 162822,

August 25, 2005.
5. People vs. Lacson, G.R. No. 126174, August

29, 2000.
6. People vs. Cubelo, G.R. No. L-13678,

November 20, 1959.
7. Yu vs. People, G.R. No. 134172, September

20, 2004.
R. Death; its accessory penalties.
S. Reclusion Perpetua and Reclusion

Temporal; their accessory penalties.
Jurisprudence:
84
1. People vs. Larin, G.R. No. 128777, October
7, 1998.
2. People vs. Jimenez, G.R. No. 128364,

February 4, 1999.
3. People vs. Labarias, G.R. No. 87165,

January 25, 1993.
T. Prision Mayor; its accessory

penalties.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Romualdez, G.R. No. 31012,

September 10, 1932.
U. Prision Correccional; its

accessory penalties.
Jurisprudence:
1. Samalio vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.

140079, March 31, 2005.
V. Arresto; its accessory penalties.

Jurisprudence:
1. Icao vs. Apalisok, G.R. No. 59581, December

29, 1989.
W. Confiscation and forfeiture of the

proceeds or instruments of the
crime.
Jurisprudence:
85
1. People vs. Onarosa, G.R. No. L-30256,
February 29, 1984.
2. People vs. Castiller, G.R. No. 87783, August

6, 1990.
3. Catalina Security Agency vs. Gonzales-

Decano, G.R. No. 149039, May 27, 2004.
X. Application of penalties
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Tomotorgo, G.R. No. L-47941,

April 30, 1985.
2. Jacinto vs. People, G.R. No. 162540, July 13,

2009.
Y. Effect of the attendance of

mitigating or aggravating
circumstances and of habitual
delinquency.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Asuncion, G.R. No. 83870,

November 14, 1989.
2. People vs. Baron, G.R. No. 185209, June 28,

2010.
Z. Habitual delinquency.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Blanco, G.R. No. L-2700, January

13, 1950.
86
2. Llobrera vs. Director of Prisons, G.R. No. L-
3994, August 16, 1950.
3. People vs. Bernal, G.R. No. 44988, October

31, 1936.
4. People vs. Morales, G.R. No. 42924, March

12, 1935.
5. People vs. Santiago, G.R. Nos. 32456,

32457, November 14, 1930.
AA. Rules for the application of

indivisible penalties.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Dapitan, G.R. No. 90625, May 23,

1991.
2. People vs. Galang, G.R. No. 70713, June 29,

1989.
BB. Rules for the application of

penalties which contain three
periods and those in which the
penalty is not composed of three
periods.
CC. Imposition of fines.

Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Kuan, G.R. No. 48515, November

11, 1942.
87
DD. Penalty to be imposed when not
all the requisites of exemption of the
fourth circumstance of article 12
are present; penalty to be imposed
upon a person under eighteen years
of age and penalty to be imposed
when the crime committed is not
wholly excusable.
EE. Successive service of sentence.

Jurisprudence:
1. IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION FOR

HABEAS CORPUS OF LAGRAN, G.R. No.
147270, August 15, 2001.
2. IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION

FOR THE HABEAS CORPUS OF RIGOR vs.
The Superintendent, New Bilibid Prison, G.R.
No. 156983, September 9, 2001.
3. Barredo vs. Vinarao, G.R. No. 168728,

August 2, 2007.
4. People vs. Li Wai Cheung, G.R. Nos. 90440-

42, October 13, 1992.
FF. Presumption in regard to the

imposition of accessory penalties.
GG. Penalty higher than Reclusion

Perpetua in certain cases.
Jurisprudence:
88
1. People vs. Cristobal, G.R. No. 159450,
March 30, 2011.
HH. Increasing or reducing the

penalty of fine by one or more
degrees.
Jurisprudence:
1. De los Angeles vs. People, G.R. No. L-

10969, March 31, 1958.
II. Legal period of duration of

divisible penalties.
JJ. When the penalty is a complex

one composed of three distinct
penalties.
KK. Indeterminate Sentence Law

(ISLAW) or Act No. 4103, as
amended by Act No. 4225 and
Republic Act No. 4203.
Jurisprudence:
1. So vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 138869,

August 29, 2002.
2. Bacar vs. Judge De Guzman, Jr., A.M. No.

RTJ-96-1349, April 18, 1997.
3. Basan vs. People, G.R. No. L-39483,

November 29, 1974.
4. People vs. Catuiran, G.R. No. 134761,

October 17, 2000.
89
5. People vs. Simon, G.R. No. 930280, July 29,
1994.
6. People vs. Sembrano, G.R. No. 185848,

August 16, 2010.
7. Ong vs. People, G.R. No. 176546,

September 25, 2009.
8. Malto vs. People, G.R. No. 164733,

September 21, 2007.
LL. Probation Law (P.D. No. 968 as

amended) See also: R.A. 10707.
Jurisprudence:
1. Budlong vs. Apalisok, G.R. No. L-60151,

June 24, 1983.
2. Santos To vs. Cruz-Paño, G.R. No. L-55130,

January 17, 1983.
3. Yusi vs. Morales, G.R. No. L-61958, April 28,

1983.
4. Bala vs. Martinez, G.R. No. 67301, January

29, 1990.
5. Francisco vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.

108747, April 6, 1995.
6. Bernardo vs. Balagot, G.R. No. 86561,

November 10, 1992.
7. Palo vs. Militante, G.R. No. 76100, April 18,

1990.
90
8. Adecer vs. Akut, Adm. Case No. 4809, May
3, 2006.
9. Del Rosario vs. Rosero, G.R. No. L-65004,

November 29, 1983.
10. Cal vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 114343,

December 28, 1995.
11. Colinares vs. People, G.R. No. 182748,

December 13, 2011.
12. Heirs of Abueg vs. Court of Appeals, G.R.

No. 96803, February 17, 1993.
13. Santos vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.

127899, December 2, 1999.
14. Baclayon vs. Mutia, G.R. No. L-59298, April

30, 1984.
15. Salgado vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.

89606, August 30, 1990.
16. People vs. Combate, G.R. No. 189301,

December 15, 2010.
17. Soriano vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.

123936, March 4, 1999.
18. People vs. Vera, G.R. No. 45685,

November 16, 1937.
KK. Execution and service of

penalties.
PART XVIII: Extinction of Given the topics to be Week XXXV Books, Supreme Week XXXV – Giving Graded Oral
Criminal Liability (Articles 89-99 read, the students during
and XXXVI. Court Reports of topics for reading Recitation;
of the Revised Penal Code). the oral recitation will be
able to:
91
A. Total extinction of criminal Annotated (SCRA) assignment (No face to
liability.  Enumerate and discuss
the causes of extinction of
Jurisprudence: criminal liability. such as
1. Petralba vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. http://elibrary.jud Week XXXVI – Face to Submission of
81337, August 16, 1991. Given the actual cases
decided by the Honorable iciary.gov.ph/ and face oral graded written digested
2. People vs. Bayotas, G.R. No. 102007, Supreme Court, the
September 2, 1994. lawphil.net for recitation for a cases.
3. Villareal vs. People, G.R. No. 151258, jurisprudence. maximum of 10-15
February 1, 2012.  State the facts;
students.18
4. Llamas vs. Executive Secretary, G.R. No. raised; and discuss the
99031, October 15, 1991.
5. People vs. Casido, G.R. No. 116512, March Court in the assigned
7, 1997. cases through the
submission of case
6. Monsanto vs. Factoran, G.R. No. 78239,
February 9, 1989.
7. Flora vs. Oximana, G.R. No. L-19745,

January 31, 1964.
8. People vs. Jose, G.R. No. L-22, December

20, 1945.
9. People vs. Santiago, G.R. No. 27972,

October 31, 1927.
10. People vs. De Guzman, G.R. No. 185843,

March 3, 2010.
11. People vs. Bundalian, G.R. No. L-29985,

October 23, 1982.
18
92
12. Bautista vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.
121683, March 26, 1998.
13. Cruz vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 134493,

August 16, 2005.
14. Valencia vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No.

141336, June 29, 2004.
15. Uriarte vs. People, G.R. No. 169251,

December 20, 2006.
B. Prescription of crime.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Crisostomo, G.R. No. L-16945,

August 31, 1962.
2. People vs. Lacson, G.R. No. 149453, April 1,

2003.
3. People vs. Rafales, G.R. No. 133477,

January 21, 2000.
4. Dalao vs. Geronimo, G.R. No. L-5969, April

29, 1953.
5. Cabral vs. Puno, G.R. No. L-41692, April 30,

1976.
6. Reodica vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.

125066, July 8, 1998.
7. Llenes vs. Dicdican, G.R. No. 1222274, July

31, 1996.
8. People vs. Tayco, G.R. Nos. 48707-48709,

December 5, 1941.
93
9. People vs. Cruz, G.R. No. L-15132, May 25,
1960.
10. Tadeo vs. Visperas, G.R. No. L- 20891, May

23, 1968.
11. Intengan vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.

128996, February 15, 2002.
C. Computation of prescription of
offenses.
Jurisprudence:
1. Francisco vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. L-

45674, May 30, 1983.
2. Quizon vs. Baltazar, G.R. Nos. L-2379-80,

April 29, 1977.
3. Garcia vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.

119063, January 27, 1997.
4. Cañiza vs. People, G.R. No. 53776, March

18, 1988.
5. People vs. De Peralta, G.R. No. L-40837,

April 29, 1977.
6. People vs. Abuy, G.R. No. L-17616, May 30,

1962.
7. People vs. Coquia, G.R. No. L-16456, June

29, 1963.
8. Reodica vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.

125066, July 8, 1998.
94
9. Astorga vs. Puno, G.R. No. L-25600,
September 30, 1975.
10. People vs. Duque, G.R. No. 100285, August

13, 1992.
D. When and how penalties

prescribe.
E. Computation of the prescription

of penalties.
Jurisprudence:
1. Tanega vs. Masakayan, G.R. No. L-27191,

February 28, 1967.
2. Pangan vs. Gatbalite, G.R. No. 141718,

January 21, 2005.
F. Partial extinction of criminal

liability.
Jurisprudence:
1. Baking vs. The Director of Prisons, G.R. No.

L-30364, July 28, 1969.
2. Alonte vs. Savellano, G.R. No. 131652,

Match 9, 1998.
3. Donio-Teves vs. Vamenta, G.R. No. L-38308,

December 26, 1984.
G. Obligation incurred by person

granted conditional pardon.
95
H. Effect of commutation of
sentence.
I. Allowance for good conduct.
See R.A. 10592.

Jurisprudence:
1. Adam-White vs. Bugtas, A.M. No. RTJ-02-

1738 [formerly OCA IPI No. 01-1325-RTJ],
November 17, 2005.
2. Tiu vs. Dizon, et al., G.R. No. 211269, June

15, 2016.
PART XVIX: Civil Liability Given the topics to be Week XXXVII Books, Supreme Week XXXVII – Giving Graded Oral
(Articles 100-113 of the Revised read, the students during
and XXXVIII. Court Reports of topics for reading Recitation;
A. Civil liability of a person guilty of
felony.  Determine the civil
liability of a person guilty such as
Jurisprudence: of felony.
http://elibrary.jud Week XXXVIII – Face Submission of
1. Community Rural Bank of Guimba vs.
Talavera, A.M. No. RTJ-05-1909, April 6, 2005.  Determine what is iciary.gov.ph/ and to face oral graded written digested
included in civil liability.
2. Lim vs. Kou Co Ping, G.R. No. 175256, lawphil.net for recitation for a cases.
August 23, 2012.
 State how civil liability jurisprudence. maximum of 10-15
3. Kou Co Ping vs. Lim, G.R. No. 179160, is extinguish and how it students.19
August 23, 2012. survives.
19
96
4. Lu Chu Sing vs. Lu Tiong Gui, G.R. No. L-
122, May 11, 1946. decided by the Honorable
5. Quiming vs. De la Rosa, G.R. No. 46317, Supreme Court, the
April 18, 1939. students will be able to:
6. Garcia vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.  State the facts;

119063, January 27, 1997.
7. Jarantilla vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. raised; and discuss the
80194, March 21, 1989. ruling of the Supreme
8. Sanchez vs. Far East Bank and Trust Co., cases through the
G.R. No. 155309, November 15, 2005.
submission of case
B. Rules regarding civil liability in digests or case briefs.
certain cases.
Jurisprudence:
1. Tan vs. Standard Vacuum Oil Co., G.R. No.

L-4160, July 29, 1952.
2. Fuellas vs. Cadano, G.R. No. L-144009,

October 31, 1961.
3. Salen vs. Balce, G.R. No. L-14414, April 27,

1960.
4. People vs. Castañeda, G.R. No. L-49781-91,

June 24, 1983.
5. People vs. Austria, G.R. Nos. 111517-19,

July 31, 1996.
C. Subsidiary civil liability of

innkeepers, tavern keepers and
proprietors of establishments.
97
D. Subsidiary civil liability of other
persons.
Jurisprudence:
1. Santos vs. Pizarro, G.R. No. 151452, July 29,

2005.
2. Canlas vs. Chan Lin Po, G.R. No. L-16929,

July 31, 1961.
3. Baza Marketing Corp. vs. Bolinao Security

and Investigation Service, Inc., G.R. No. L-
32383, September 30, 1982.
4. Equitable Leasing Corp. vs. Suyom, G.R. No.

143360, September 5, 2002.
5. Pangonorom vs. People, G.R. No. 143380,

April 11, 2005.
6. Heirs of Diaz-Leus vs. Melvida, G.R. No. L-

77716, February 17, 1988.
7. Miranda vs. Malate Garage and Taxicab, Inc.,

G.R. No. L-8943, July 31, 1956.
8. Yonaha vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.

112346, March 29, 1996.
9. Alvarez vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. L-

59621, February 23, 1988.
10. Yusay vs. Adil, G.R. No. L-56612, August

18, 1988.
11. Franco vs. Intermediate Appellate Court,

G.R. No. 71137, October 5, 1989.
98
12. Magboo vs. Bernardo, G.R. No. L-16790,
April 30, 1963.
13. Basilio vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.

113433, March 17, 2000.
14. Mendoza vs. La Mallorca Bus Co., G.R. No.

L-26407, March 31, 1978.
15. Copiaco vs. Luzon Brokerage Co., Inc.,

G.R. No. 46135, September 19, 1938.
16. Generoso vs. Universal Textile Mills, Inc.,

G.R. No. L-28586, January 22, 1980.
17. Rafael Reyes Trucking Corporation vs.

People, G.R. No. 129029, April 3, 2000.
18. Diana vs. Batangas Transportation Co.,

G.R. No. L-4920, June 29, 1953.
E. What is included in civil liability.

Jurisprudence:
1. Ramiscal vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. Nos.

140576-99, December 13, 2004.
F. Restitution; how made.

Jurisprudence:
1. Azucena vs. Muñoz, A.C. No. 130-J, June 30,

1970.
2. People vs. Vallejo, G.R. No. 125784,

November 19, 2003.
3. People vs. Almoguerra, G.R. No. 121177,

November 12, 2003.
99
4. Ramirez vs. Yatco, G.R. No. L-19263,
October 31, 1963.
5. Gacula vs. Martinez, G.R. No. L-3038,

January 31, 1951.
6. Chua Hai vs. Kapunan, G.R. No. L-11108,

June 30, 1958.
G. Reparation; how made.

Jurisprudence:
1. Cristobal vs. People, G.R. No. L-1542,

August 30, 1949.
H. Indemnification; what is
included.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Sarcia, G.R. No. 169641,

September 10, 2009.
2. People vs. Elarcosa, G.R. No. 186539, June

29, 2010.
3. People vs. Ravelo, G.R. Nos. 78781-82,

October 15, 1991.
4. People vs. Dinamling, G.R. No. 134605,

March 12, 2002.
I. Obligation to make restoration,

reparation for damages, or
indemnification for consequential
100
damages and actions to demand the
same; upon whom it devolves.
J. Share of each person civilly

liable.
K. Several and subsidiary liability of

principals, accomplices and
accessories of a felony; preference
in payment.
Jurisprudence:
1. People vs. Matibag, G.R. No. 110515, July

18, 2000.
2. People vs. Hasiron, G.R. No. 100797,

October 15, 1992.
3. People vs. Lacao, G.R. No. 95320,

September 4, 1991.
4. People vs. Manalo, G.R. No. 144734, March

7, 2002.
L. Obligation to make restitution in

certain cases.
M. Extinction of civil liability.
N. Obligation to satisfy civil liability.

Jurisprudence:
1. Budlong vs. Apalisok, G.R. No. L-60151,

June 24, 1983.
101
COURSE REQUIREMENTS
 Attendance
 Oral Recitation
 Submission of digested case
 Long Quizzes
 Major Exams (Midterm/Final Exams)
GRADING SYSTEM
Class Standing (quizzes, oral recitations) ---------- 40%

Case Digest --------------------------------------------- 10%
Midterm ------------------------------------------------- 20%
Final ----------------------------------------------------- 30%
102
Prepared by: Approved by: Noted by:
ATTY. NEDDEJOHN L. MABUTE ATTY. JOSEPH G. DINOY FR. JOVITO M. MALINAO, OFM
Instructor Dean, CKC College of Law VP for Academic Affairs
103

Obe Criminal Law 1

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Obe Criminal Law 1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CHRIST THE KING COLLEGE

OUTCOMES – BASED EDUCATION (OBE) ALIGNED SYLLABUS

COURSE TITLE: Criminal Law I

COURSE CREDIT: 3 Units

COURSE PRE-REQUISITES: None

ACADEMIC TERM AND SCHOOL YEAR: First Semester / 2021~2022

EXCELLENCE, INTEGRITY, JUSTICE, COMPASSION FOR THE POOR, SERVICE.

E. Common law crimes.  Explain the cardinal

G. Construction of penal laws.  Determine the scopes of

Jurisprudence: Given the actual cases

6. U.S. vs. Ah Sing, G.R. No. L-13005, October

7. Gumabon vs. Director of Prisons, G.R. No. L-

2. Relucio vs. Civil Service Commission, G.R.  Distinguish intentional

H. Concept of intentional felony.  State the concept of

L. Definition of intent.  State the concept of

1. U.S vs. Ah Chong, G.R. No. 5272, March 19,

2. U.S. vs. Bautista, G.R. No. 10678, August 17,

4. Baxinela vs. People, G.R. No. 149652, March

5. Yapyuco vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No.

R. Distinction between intent and

1. Calimutan vs. People, G.R. No. 152133,

2. People vs. Buan, G.R. No. L-25366, March

S. Requisites of culpable felonies.

W. Concept of deficiency of action.

Z. Distinction between crimes mala

1. Villareal vs. People, G.R. No. 151258,

2. People vs. Carmen, G.R. No. 137268, March

3. Bagajo vs. Marave and People, G.R No. L-

4. Garcia vs. CA, G.R. No. 157171, March 14,

5. Ysidoro vs. People, G.R. 192330, November

6. Estrada vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No.

9. People vs. Sitchon, G.R. No. 134362,  Elucidate the concept of

11. People vs. Quianzon, G.R. No. 42607, Distinguish mistake of

3. People vs. Castromero, G.R. No. 118992,

1. Urbano vs. IAC, G.R. No. 72964, January 7,

1. U.S. vs. Marasigan, G.R. No. 9426, August

F. Effect of intervening disease.

1. People vs. Ancasan, G.R. No. 28620,

1. People vs. Reyes, G.R. No. 42117, March

2. People vs. Moldes, G.R. No. 42122,

H. Efficient intervening cause.

1. Urbano vs. Intermediate Appellate Court,

1. People vs. Oanis, G.R. No. L-47722, July

ii) Aberratio ictus; and

1. People vs. Mabug-at, G.R. No. 25459,

iii) Praeter intentionem.

1. People vs. Tomotorgo, G.R. No. L-47941,

2. People vs. Ortega, G.R. No. 116736, July

J. Concept and requisites of

K. Distinction between mistake of

L. Concept of impossible crime.

1. Intod vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.

2. Jacinto vs. People, G.R. No. 162540, July

ii) Legal Impossibility.

1. People vs. Balmores, G.R. No. L-1896,

 State the facts;

D. Concept of attempted felony.  Enumerate and explain

Jurisprudence:  Elucidate the concept of

 Explain the concept of

16. Rivera vs. People, G.R. No. 166326,

F. Concept of overt act.

H. Concept of frustrated felony.