Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Definitation of Intellectual Property
Definitation of Intellectual Property
individuals. This includes a variety of creations such as literary works, technological inventions,
performances, traditional practices etc. Intellect means Mind, Creativity and property means
assets, bundles of rights and right means power of use etc. Intellectual property is the property
which is the creation of human intellect (mind). These can be broadly divided into two
categories.
Trademarks etc.
• Intellectual property used for protecting literary interests such as copyright, related
rights etc.
• PATENTS
Patents are the rights that are granted to an individual for the invention of a product or a process
that offers a new way of solving a problem or for doing something. The main test for the grant of
a patent is the novelty of the invention. An individual claiming a patent for his invention is
required to show that his invention new. It adds to the technology that is already in existence in
A Patent is granted for a fixed period of time. After the term period of a patent expires, it
becomes free to use for the general public without paying any fees for it. Different countries
have different term periods for which a patent is valid. The term for a standard patent in India,
Other countries such as Canada, Japan, and Australia have different term period for different
types of patents.
• TRADEMARK
provider is known. These can be in the form of a logo, sign or written name. The recent trends
have seen that form of packaging can also be trademarked. A trademark helps the consumer to
associate a certain standard of quality to his products which can be easily relied upon by the
Trademark is granted for a certain term period. But unlike patents, a trademark can be renewed
for as long as the owner wants by paying renewal fees in the concerned office. Both, as well as
Trademarks are country-specific i.e. they protect the identity of a company only in the country in
which it has been filed. But this can be circumvented by organizations such as the World
Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) which has an international registration system for
trademarks.
be purely in the nature of aesthetics and not utility. Product form a wide category such as
technical instruments, medical instruments, garments, ornaments etc. can be protected under
Industrial Design.
To be eligible for protection, the Industrial Design shall be new i.e. no similar design shall exist
in the market. Some examples of Industrial designs are Coca Cola Contour bottle, iconic VW
Beetle car and most recently the round-edged design of an iPhone which was the subject matter
• GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATION
Geographical Indications indicates the place where a product originates from. Such products
have certain traits that can be found in the products that originate from that particular
geographical location.
For products that can be produced in a specific region only, an “Appellation of Origin”
geographical indication is used. It indicates that product with such GI can be produced only in
that part of the world and not anywhere else owing to the special geographical condition of that
place. Some example of such products is “Bordeaux Wine” for wine produced in the Bordeaux
returns, also helps the consumer by protecting him from buying counterfeit products that are not
Copyright is the rights which are granted to the creators of creative works. Creations such as
literary works (literature, poetry, and non-fiction) and artistic works (paintings, music) are
protected under Copyright laws. Newspapers, as well as architecture designs, are protected by
It also protects rights which originate out of such creative creations. They are known as Related
Rights. These are rights which have been accrued due to the availability of the copyrighted
content. Some examples of related rights are right of an artist to their performances, rights of a
Copyrights can be held by individuals as well as companies. Unlike other forms of Intellectual
Property, the Copyright holders enjoy the rights in his creation for the lifetime. Even after their
death, Copyright continues to exist for a period of 50-60 years depending upon the jurisdictions.
In such a scenario, the holder of the Copyright exercises controls over the Copyright.
Related rights, on the other hand, don’t enjoy such duration of protection as Copyright does.
Subject to the jurisdiction Related rights are generally valid for a period of 50 years from the
Unlike the other types of Intellectual Property, Copyright holders are not required by the law
register their creations as they are automatically protected under the Copyright laws from being
exploited of their creative creations. But there do exist laws that allow the creators the option of
When there was no existence of any international convention in the field of industrial property, it
was difficult to obtain protection for inventions in different countries of the world due to the
diversity of laws. In addition, patent applications were filed at the same time in all countries to
prevent a publication in one country destroying the novelty of the invention in other countries.
These practical problems constituted a strong objective to overcome such problems in the case of
IPR. In the late nineteenth century, the development of a more international-oriented flow of
technology and increased international trade increased the need for harmonization of industrial
property laws in both the patent and trademark sectors. The Paris Convention is also
intellectual property laws and was adopted on March 20, 1883, at Paris and enforced on July 7,
1884. It provides basic guidelines for the protection of intellectual property such as patents,
utility models, industrial designs, trademarks, service marks, trade names, sources of
information or signs of appeal, and some provisions for harassment and national treatment of
unfair competition. This treaty came into existence in India on December 7, 1998. Under the
nationals of other member countries the equal protection and advantages as it grants to its own
• National Treatment:
National treatment can be defined with regards to the protection of industrial property as each
country who is a member of the Paris Convention must grant equal protection of their invention
to nationals of the other member countries as it grants to its own nationals. The relevant
provisions are included in Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention. Equal national treatment should
be given to citizens of countries that are not members of the Paris Agreement if they are
domicile of the country where protection is claimed may be imposed upon nationals of member
countries as a condition for benefiting from an industrial property right. The doctrine of national
treatment not only guarantees that the foreigners will be protected, but also that they will not be
discriminated on any basis. Example: A Russian national applying for a patent in China will
have the same patent rights and level of protection in China as a Chinese national.
• Right of Priority:-
Another fundamental principle of the Paris Convention is a ‘Right of priority’. Under the Paris
Convention, an invention can be protected at the same time in various countries. This also means
of access to national patent systems to foreign applicants. An inventor has the authority to claim
the filing date of his first patent application in respective convention country as an effective
filing date for further subsequent applications (regarding the same invention) in any other
member country. Further, the applications must be filed within 12 months of the earliest
Example: A USA patent application is lodged on 10 March 2000. On 10 March 2001, the same
patent application is filed in China. China is a convention member and as a result, the Chinese
application is treated as though it was filed on 10 March 2000. If without the treaty, the patent in
the example was treated as though it was filed on 10 March 2002 in China, the invention would
will be filed from the earliest date of filing in the home country for purposes of the prior art.
This is profitable for an inventor , as it allows the inventor to prevent detrimental effects of
public disclosure of his invention that occurred after the earliest application and before filing in
foreign countries.
Copyright protection on the international level took its first step in the middle of the nineteenth
century on the basis of bilateral treaties. India became a signatory of the Berne Convention on
April 1, 1928. A number of such treaties providing for mutual recognition of rights were
concluded but they were neither comprehensive enough nor of a uniform pattern. The need for a
uniform system led to the formation of the Berne Convention for the preservation of Literary and
Artistic Works. The Berne Convention is the primeval international treaty in the field of
copyright. It is open to all states. Adopted on September 9, 1886, at Berne and entered into force
on December 4, 1887. Originally signed in 1886 at Berne, Switzerland, it was revised in 1914,
1928, 1948, 1967, 1971, and 1979. This Convention is based on three fundamental principles:
• Works in one of the contracting states (works of which the author is a national of
such state or a work already published in such a state) should be given equal
“national treatment”).
• Protection should not be conditional upon compliance with any formalities (the
protection for a longer term than the minimum term prescribed by the Convention
and the work ceases to be protected in the country of origin, protection may be denied
• As to works, protection must include “every production in the literary, scientific and
artistic domain, whatever the mode or form of its expression” (Article 2(1) of the
Convention).
• the right to use the work as a basis for an audiovisual work, and
• the right to reproduce, distribute, perform in public or communicate to the public that
audiovisual work.
• World Intellectual Property Organization
grants worldwide protection to the rights of creators and owners of intellectual property. It was
adopted on July 14, 1967, at Stockholm and enforced on April 26, 1970. WIPO came into
India became an official member of WIPO on May 1, 1975. WIPO’s origin dates back to 1884
when the Paris Convention entered into force with 14 member States, which set up an
International Bureau to carry out administrative tasks, such as organizing meetings of the
member States. Like the Paris Convention, the Berne Convention also set up an International
Bureau to carry out the tasks of administration. In 1893, these two small bureaux came together
and form an international organization known as the United International Bureaux for the
Protection of Intellectual Property. Based in Berne, Switzerland, with a staff of seven, this small
organization was the predecessor of the World Intellectual Property Organization of today – a
dynamic entity with 185 member States, number of staff who are around 938, from 95 different
countries around the world, and with a mission and a mandate that are constantly flourishing.
This International Bureau emerged over time to be recognised in 1970 as WIPO. In 1974, WIPO
became a specialized agency of the United Nations and in 1996, WIPO expanded its role into
globalized trade by entering into a cooperation agreement with the World Trade Organization.
WIPO administers 25 treaties (three of those jointly with other international organizations) and
carries out a rich and varied program of work, through its member States and the secretariat, that
seeks to:
• To integrate national laws and procedures related to intellectual property.
individuals.
• To keep a check on the use of information technology as an instrument for access and
According to the Convention held at Stockholm on 14th July 1967 and Article 2(viii) of the
• Scientific discoveries;
• Industrial designs;
• Trademarks;
• Service marks;
(TRIPS)
The Uruguay Round of multilateral trade negotiations held in the framework of the General
Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (“GATT”) was concluded on December 15, 1993.The
agreement which established the World Trade Organization (“WTO Agreement”), was enforced
on April 15, 1994, in Marrakech. For the first time the negotiations included within the GATT,
discussions on aspects of intellectual property rights of international trade. The result of those
The WTO Agreement, including the TRIPS Agreement (which is binding on all WTO
Members), enforced on January 1, 1995. A new organization was established by the former
agreement known as the World Trade Organization, which came into force from January 1,
1995. Member States of WTO were granted a specific period of time after the enforcement of
the agreement establishing the WTO before being obligated to apply the TRIPS Agreement.
Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) is the most global and essential
international agreement on intellectual property rights. The member countries of the WTO are
automatically binded by the agreement. The agreement consists of most of the forms of
intellectual property like patents, copyright, trademarks, trade secrets, geographical indications,
international level. TRIPS mainly introduced the global minimum standard for the protection
and enforcing of all forms of intellectual property but it failed to specify the global minimum
standard for the patent. The main object of the trade related aspect of intellectual property is to
promote effective and adequate protection of intellectual property rights and ensuring that
measures and procedures to enforce intellectual property rights do not themselves become
• How basic principles of the trading system and other international intellectual
• How countries should enforce those rights adequately in their own territories.
• Special transitional arrangements during the period when the new system is being
introduced.
There are three main feature of the TRIPS agreement which are as follow:
• Standard
• Enforcement
• Dispute settlement
Standard: The main element of trade related aspect of intellectual property is to protect the
subject matter.
Dispute settlement: The agreement makes dispute between world trade organization members
arising with respect to the trade related aspect of intellectual property obligation subject to the
property. In particular, this requires Member States to follow their own criteria for intellectual
property monopoly grants for limited period along with adherence to the Paris Agreement, the
Berne Convention and other WTO conventions. The norms are the minimum standards for
granting monopolies over any kind of IP, as well as duration limits, enforcement provisions, and
methods of IP dispute settlement. When the TRIPS agreement was enforced on 1 January 1995,
all developed countries were given twelve months from the date of signing the agreement to
implement its provisions. Developing countries and transition economies (under certain
conditions) were granted five years until 2000. As of 2006, least developed countries (LDCs)
were given 11 years to comply. Some countries have indicated that the long term should be
achieved. For pharmaceutical patents in these LDCs, the compliance period has been extended to
2016.
Currently, there are 30 LDCs within the WTO organization bound by TRIPS and another 10
LDCs are awaiting accession. The Most Favoured-Nation Principle (MFN) – The TRIPS
Agreement contains the most favoured nation doctrine, which has not traditionally been
provided in the context of intellectual property rights at the multilateral level. This doctrine
provides that any advantage, favour, privilege or immunity granted to the citizens of any other
country shall be immediately unconditional to all other members (whether or not a member)
with a specified exemption. As is the case for national remedies, the procedures provided in the
multilateral agreements discussed under the aegis of the WIPO relating to the acquisition or
The World Trade Organization (WTO) is responsible for maintaining the free flow of trade
between its member countries. WTO, in the form of Dispute Settlement Undertaking (DSU),
provides an instrument for the settling of trade disputes between the parties. The dispute
generally arises when any member country violates any provision of WTO agreement which
This dispute settlement process is the outcome of the Uruguay round (1996-1994). This
mechanism provides a speedy resolution of a trade dispute. This settlement system applies to all
disputes covered under the WTO agreement. The Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) is responsible
date of receipt of the request for consultation, then the complaining party may request for
construction of the panel. All such requests for consultation and construction shall be notified in
writing including reasons for such requests to the Dispute Settlement Body by the complaining
member.
If no satisfactory solution is reached through consultation between the member countries, the
complaining member may request for the establishment of panels in writing to the Dispute
Settlement Body including a summary of the case and issues involved. The panel is established
at the second meeting of DSB at which request appears as an agenda item of the meeting.
The function of the Panel is to aid the Dispute Settlement Body in resolving the matter in
dispute. The panel assesses the entire dispute, including the facts of the case and issues involved
therein and examines whether it conforms with the covered agreement between the member
countries. The Panel shall provide its final report to the parties within 6 months from the date
After the establishment of the panel, the next step is to select panellists. The panellists are
selected by the WTO Secretariat. The parties cannot oppose the selection unless they state
reasons satisfactory to the Secretariat. The panel shall consist of three panellists. The parties can
agree to have five panellists on board if they consider necessary within 10 days from the
The WTO Secretariat assists the parties in the selection of panellists by creating a list of all
Members may, at any reasonable time, make an addition to the list of individuals by suggesting
the name of individuals who can assist the parties by providing any information related to
international trade law or any of the matter as covered in the agreement because of which dispute
arose in the first place. The addition to the list can be made only after the approval of the Dispute
Settlement Body.
If panellists are not selected within 20 days after the date of establishment of the panel, the
Director-General, in consultation with the Chairman of Dispute Settlement Body and Chairman
of relevant Council or Committee appoint panellists which they consider appropriate. The
chairman of the Dispute Settlement Body, then informs the members of the composition of the
The panellists shall, within one week after the composition of the panel fix a timetable for the
panel process. After this, the panel decides a deadline for written submission to be made by each
party. Each party has to submit its submissions with the secretariat which shall transfer each
submission to the panel and submission made by one party shall be sent to the other party as
well. At the first substantive meeting of the panel, the complaining party shall be the first to
The third parties who have notified the Dispute Settlement Body having substantial interest in
the subject matter of the dispute are also asked to present their views during the same meeting.
Any rebuttals between the parties shall be made at the subsequent meeting of the panel. Here, the
responding party shall be the first to respond against the complaining party. The parties, before
that meeting, have to submit their written rebuttals to the panel. The panel, if they consider
necessary, put any questions before the parties to be answered in the duration of that meeting.
Where after the examination, a solution has been reached between the parties, the panel shall
submit a written report to the Dispute Settlement Body which shall have a brief description of
the case along with the solution which has been reached. Where the solution has not been found,
the panel shall send a written report to the Dispute Settlement Body mentioning its findings of
The report has to be sent within six months of its examination. In case of urgency, including the
case of perishable goods, the report has to be sent within three months. The maximum period
during which the report has to send is nine months from the establishment of the panel.
Following the oral arguments and rebuttal that has been performed and examination has been
made, the panel shall issue a draft report to the parties. The parties have to submit their
comments in writing after receiving the draft report within the period set by the panel.
After the expiration of the said period for receiving the comments from the parties, the panel
shall issue an interim report, including its findings in the draft report and its new findings and
conclusion. Both the parties, within the time given the panel may submit its written request to
At the request made by the parties, the panel shall call for a further meeting to discuss the
comments made by the parties to the dispute. If both the parties are satisfied with the solution
reached, then such a revised interim report shall be the final panel report and is circulated among
the members.
In case, the parties are not satisfied with the outcome of the report reached then any objections of
the members shall be considered at the meeting of the Dispute Settlement Body. Such objections
have to be reported at least 10 days before the meeting of the Dispute Settlement Body.
The final report shall be adopted by the Dispute Settlement Body within 60 days from the date
panel report is circulated to the members unless any party to the dispute is unsatisfied with such
report and notifies its decision of appeal to Dispute Settlement Body or the Dispute Settlement
Body unanimously decides not to adopt such report, as the case may be. In case of an appeal, the
report shall deem to be invalid for adoption by the Dispute Settlement Body unless the Standing
Either of the parties unsatisfied with the ruling of the panel report can appeal to the Standing
Appellate Body established by the Dispute Settlement Body. Only parties to the dispute can
appeal to a panel report and not the third parties. Third parties can be allowed to be heard only in
case such third party has notified in writing to the Dispute Settlement Body of its substantial
The proceeding of the Appellate Body shall not exceed 60 days from the date a party to the
dispute notifies its intention of appealing to the Appellate Body to the Dispute Settlement Body.
In case of delay, the maximum period granted to the Appellate Body is 90 days. The Appellate
Body has to submit in writing to the Dispute Settlement Body its reasons for the delay together
The Appellate Body will not re-examine any shreds of evidence, issues or previous arguments
but its examination shall be limited to laws covered in the panel report or legal interpretation
evolved by the panellists. The Appellate Body has the power to uphold, modify or reverse the