Group Work (GW#4)

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Group Work (GW#4)

Baguio, Samantha Faye

Cangco, Cedric

Corbe, Matthew Raphael

Custodio, John Ronald

Francisco, Jerold

Kotani, Kenji

Sobrepena, Kim Miguel

Suarez, Kyle Anrie

Tuason, Jaime Rodolfo

Valiente, John Remuel

BM1 – Mapua University

GED103 – Readings in Philippine History

Ms. Josephine Tuliao

September 24, 2021


Investigating the Agrarian Reform Issue
Instructions: Interview six people (three from each side) about what they see as a problem or
hindrances to the full implementation of agrarian reform and what solutions they can recommend
for these. List down your significant observations and synthesize the interviewees’ remarkable
responses.

Side 1: A tenant who cultivates another person’s agricultural land.


Side 2: An owner of an agricultural land that is tilled by a tenant.
Tenant Landlord
1. Farmers from Kaisahan Tungo 1. Joselito Lucas from Victoria,
Background information on sa Kaunlaran ng Kanayunan at Tarlac. His parents owned a
Repormang Pansakahan small-scale farming land,
the interviewees (KAISAHAN) which he inherited at the age
2. Cathy Estavillo, Secretary of 48; he became a landlord
(Name, place, age, no. of General of Amihan Women, for almost 21 years.
representative of farmer- 2. Roberto Palomo, Licab, Nueva
years being a tenant/landlord)
tenants. Ecija, 20 years of being
3. Melchor Deinla, Ticao island Landlord.
Masbate, 64 years old, 32 3. “The impact of Agrarian
years being a tenant. Reform on the Landowners”
by Gilberto Llanto and
Dingcong
1. Farmers-tenants are subjected 1. Mr. Lucas claims that
to human rights breaches by compensation payments are
the government, which owns still being delayed for an
extended period despite the
their property. They also see
passage of time. Another issue
the consequences of poor is the lack of government
agricultural reform incentives and support for
implementation. They are also landowners in industrialization
confronted by the revocation and other investment
of their Certificate of Land opportunities.
Ownership (CLOA). 2. Mr. Palomo's issues as a
landlord are numerous,
particularly the government's
2. Farmers were denied access to lack of assistance when natural
Major Problems their crops, resulting in a loss disasters strike. Typhoons
of revenue and starvation. Ulysses and Rolly, he claims,
Farmers who are tenants on have wreaked havoc on their
government-owned farms have rice farm, wiping off nearly all
not received government of their crops. Furthermore, in
terms of the government's
assistance since the outbreak
response to the disaster, they
of COVID-19. They are facing claim that support is weak and
the prospect of losing a source did not aid recoup their losses
of revenue due to the proposed from the loss of the field.
land use shift. 3. Landowner incentives are
lacking, making it challenging
3. Mr. Deinla is one of 137 to invest earnings from
agrarian reform in developing
farmers that are eligible for
industries, create jobs, and
agricultural benefits. Deinla facilitate public sector firms'
should have gotten his
hacienda portion in 1994, but privatization. Cash portions or
the landowner has applied to cash flow were also
be excluded from CARP insufficient to entice
landowners to participate in
coverage. Deinla may soon be
the burgeoning sector. The
without a house and a farm, as help provided to landowners
thousands of farmworkers for other investment
across Masbate and the rest of alternatives was also deemed
the country have experienced. to be inadequate. There were
also delays in compensation
payments.

1. A structured, national registry


1. Mr. Lucas and other
of installed and uninstalled
landowners and renters in
Agrarian Reform Beneficiaries
Kaisahan Tungo sa Kaunlaran
(ARBs) can aid in the
ng Kanayunan at Repormang
monitoring of program
Pansakahan (KAISAHAN) are
beneficiaries. The Department
requesting an up-to-date
of Agrarian Reform (DAR),
nationwide inventory of
which is executing CARP,
Agrarian Reform Beneficiaries
should provide confidence to
(ARBs) for better monitoring
the farmers from KAISAHAN
and more significant
by providing security and
incentives than they now
safety.
receive. Finally, they
anticipate financial support in
2. Some non-government
the event of natural disasters
Possible Remedies organizations should propose
and calamities.
plans to monitor the farmers
affected by the crisis and give
2. Mr. Palomo offers some
aids to them that can be
remedies to the problem, such
utilized for a long time.
as being a member of the
Academic councils can give
Samahan ng Magsasaka ng
suggestions using proposals
Nueva Ecija. This non-
that can replace the supposed
government group works to
land-use conversion and
assist landlords and renters in
benefit the farmers who run
upgrading and enhancing their
the agriculture in the country.
lands. Another alternative he
Programs that can preserve
proposed was alternating
agricultural lands can help
cropping, which included rice
sustain the food supply and
crops and corn, calamansi, and
economy of the Philippines.
other crops, which helped him
recoup his losses. These
3. There should be a re-
alternate crops also have a
evaluation of the CARP
shorter harvesting period,
because some applications
which helps him dodge
were rejected from the
typhoons.
program, causing the purchase
and distribution of land to be
3. Additional incentives should
delayed or ignored for many
be given to landlords, as well
years.
as more industrialization
alternatives being taught to
them. Finally, assurance that
the payment of compensation
will not be delayed.

You might also like