Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 8

Chapter IV

PRESENTATION , ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

SWOT Analysis

Strength

 S
 S

Weakness

 S
 S

Oppurtunities

 S
 S

Threats

 S
 S
The following results presented are the attained data during the experiment conducted

Experiment 1
The first experiment conducted is the daily reading of the Pure Artificial and Hybrid Lighting
System for a week.

Experiment 1.1
The experiment is conducted by the daily reading of the Pure Artificial Lighting System for a week.

TRIAL WEEK PURE ARTIFICIAL READING ( in KWH ) READING DIFFERENCE


DAY 1 3779.4 0
DAY 2 3780.1 0.7
DAY 3 3780.6 0.5
DAY 4 3781.1 0.5
DAY 5 3781.6 0.5
DAY 6 3782.2 0.6
DAY 7 3782.7 0.5
TABLE
ARTIFICIAL CONSUMPTION 1:
0.8

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0
DAY 1 DAY 2 DAY 3 DAY 4 DAY 5 DAY 6 DAY 7
Experiment 1.1
Experiment 1.2
The experiment is conducted by the daily reading of the Hybrid Lighting System for a week.

TRIAL WEEK HYBRID SYSTEM READING ( in KWH ) READING DIFFERENCE


DAY 1 3053.6 0
DAY 2 3053.9 0.3
DAY 3 3054.1 0.2
DAY 4 3054.3 0.2
DAY 5 3054.4 0.2
DAY 6 3054.6 0.2
DAY 7 3054.9 0.3
TABLE 2:
HYBRID CONSUMPTION Experiment
0.35 1.2
0.3

0.25

0.2

0.15 In the
0.1 experiment
0.05 1.1
conducted
0
DAY 1 DAY 2 DAY 3 DAY 4 DAY 5 DAY 6 DAY 7 by the

Consumption researchers,
it can be
seen in the
table 1 that at day 2 of the reading of Pure Artificial System it has a reading difference of 0.7. At its
succeeding day it has almost the same difference of reading which is 0.5.So in this table we can assume
that the reading of Pure Artificial is essentialy the same everyday.

In the experiment 1.2 it can be seen in the table 1.2 that at day 2 of the reading of Hybrid Lighting
System it has a reading difference of 0.3.At its succeeding day it has almost the same reading which is
0.2.Comparing the figure 1 and figure 2 the researchers can conclude that they have the same graph but
different readings.

COMPARISON OF PURE ARTIFICIAL AND HYBRID LIGHTING SYSTEM

TRIAL WEEK PURE ARTIFICIAL READING HYBRID READING


DAY 1 0 0
DAY 2 0.7 0.3
DAY 3 0.5 0.2
DAY 4 0.5 0.2
DAY 5 0.5 0.2
DAY 6 0.6 0.2
DAY 7 0.5 0.3
TOTAL: 3.3 Kwh 1.3 Kwh
TABLE 1.3 PURE ARTIFICIAL VS HYBRID LIGHTING SYSTEM

ARTIFICIAL VS HYBRID
0.8 The researchers
0.7 compare the data
gathered for a week for
0.6
both Pure artificial and
0.5
Hybrid Lighting
0.4
System.It can be seen in
0.3 the figure 3 the graph
0.2 of its comparison that
0.1 the energy
0 consumption of Hybrid
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Lighting System is
ARTIFICIAL HYBRID almost half of the
energy consumption of
Pure Artificial Lighting System.

To solve the Percentage Discount

S=P-rP

Where

P=Pure Artificial Total Reading

S=Hybrid Artificial Total Reading

R=Percentage Discount

Derive the formula for r

R=(P-S)/P

Substitute

R=(3.3-1.3)/3.3x100
R=60.72 %

By getting this percentage discount the researchers can assume that in the final experiment the
percentage discount must be the same or higher than this.

EXPERIMENT 2:
The second experiment conducted is the weekly reading of the Pure Artificial and Hybrid
Lighting System for a two months.

EXPERIMENT 2.1
Weekly reading of the Pure Artificial Lighting System for two months.

TIME PURE ARTIFICIAL READING ( in KWH ) READING DIFFERENCE


WEEK 1 3782.2 0
WEEK 2 3785.9 3.7
WEEK 3 3790.2 4.3
WEEK 4 3793.4 3.2
WEEK 5 3797.7 4.3
WEEK 6 3800.4 2.7
WEEK 7 3804.5 4.1
WEEK 8 3808.4 3.9
TABLE 1: Experiment 2.1

PURE ARTIFICIAL CONSUMPTION


5 Experiment 2.2
4.5
4 The experiment is
3.5 conducted by the
3 weekly reading of the
2.5 Hybrid Lighting System
2
for two months.
1.5
1 TIME HYBRID READING ( in KWH ) READING DIFFERENCE
0.5 WEEK 1 3054.6 0
0 WEEK
WEEK 1 WEEK 2 2 WEEK 3 WEEK 4 WEEK 5 3056.2
WEEK 6 WEEK 7 WEEK 8 1.6
WEEK 3 3057.8 1.6
WEEK 4 PURE ARTIFICIAL CONSUMPTION
3058.4 0.6
WEEK 5 3059.1 0.7
WEEK 6 3059.9 0.8
WEEK 7 3060.6 0.7
WEEK 8 3061.6 1
HYBRID CONSUMPTION TABLE 1: Experiment
1.8 2.2
1.6 1.6 1.6
1.4
1.2 In the experiment 2.1
1 1 conducted by the
researchers, it can be
0.8 0.8
0.7 0.7 seen in the table 3 that
0.6 0.6
0.4
0.2
00
WEEK 1 WEEK 2 WEEK 3 WEEK 4 WEEK 5 WEEK 6 WEEK 7 WEEK 8
at week 2 of the weekly reading of Pure Artificial System it has a reading difference of 3.7 but on its
succeeding weeks the reading varies.The researcher search for the reason on why the weekly reading on
Pure Artificial is not identical and the researchers found that sometimes the breaker in which our circuit
is connected is off.Hence why the reading difference varies weekly.

In the experiment 2.2 it can be seen in the table 2.2 that at week 2 of the weekly reading of Hybrid
Lighting System it has a reading difference of 1.6.At its succeeding weeks the reading also varies since
they are connected in the same breaker.

COMPARISON OF PURE ARTIFICIAL AND HYBRID LIGHTING SYSTEM

TIME PURE ARTIFICIAL READING HYBRID READING


WEEK 1 0 0
WEEK 2 3.7 1.6
WEEK 3 4.3 1.6
WEEK 4 3.2 0.6
WEEK 5 4.3 0.7
WEEK 6 2.7 0.8
WEEK 7 4.1 0.7
WEEK 8 3.9 0.9

TOTAL: 26.2 Kwh 6.9 Kwh


5 TABLE 1.3 PURE
4.5 ARTIFICIAL VS HYBRID
4 LIGHTING SYSTEM
3.5
3
2.5 The researchers
compare the data
2
gathered for two
1.5
months in both Pure
1
artificial and Hybrid
0.5
Lighting System.It can
0 be seen in the figure 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
the graph of its
ARTIFICIAL HYBRID
comparison that the energy consumption of Hybrid Lighting System is almost half of the energy
consumption of Pure Artificial Lighting System.

To solve the Percentage Discount

S=P-rP

Where

P=Pure Artificial Total Reading

S=Hybrid Artificial Total Reading

R=Percentage Discount

Derive the formula for r

R=(P-S)/P

Substitute

R=(26.2-6.9)/26.2 x 100

R=73.66 %

You might also like