Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Big Ligas V Paulo Londra: Joint Pre-Trial Statement
Big Ligas V Paulo Londra: Joint Pre-Trial Statement
Plaintiff,
v.
Defendant.
-and-
Plaintiff,
v.
Pursuant to the Court’s 2019 Uniform Pre-Trial Preparation Order, Big Ligas, LLC (“Big
Ligas”), Cristian Andres Salazar (“Salazar”), Daniel Echavarria Oviedo (“Oviedo”) (collectively,
the “Big Ligas Parties”) and Paulo Londra (“Londra”) file their Joint Pre-Trial Report. The Big
Ligas Parties and Londra are at times collectively referred to hereinafter as the Parties.
I. ATTORNEY INFORMATION
B. Londra
2
5552789 v2
II. BRIEF FACTUAL STATEMENT
In the Fall of 2017, Salazar was introduced to Paulo Londra by a social media influencer.
Salazar invited Londra to visit him and Oviedo in Colombia to meet them and discuss doing
business together. At Salazar’s expense, Londra flew to Colombia on November 13, 2017. The
three met and, realizing they had excellent chemistry, began working together to create music.
Having instantly begun to achieve success together, Salazar, Oviedo and Londra decided to form
a company of which each would be a 1/3 owner. The three also decided to enter into an agreement
to organize their project and regulate their professional relationship. Their company was to be
called “Big Ligas”, as their vision was to create music and develop a successful project that would
Each of the three members played a significant and important role in the venture. Salazar
is a computer scientist and an experienced entrepreneur in online marketing and promotion who
worked to build Londra’s audience via YouTube, Spotify, Apple Music, Twitter, Facebook, Tidal
and other online platforms. Oviedo is a successful record producer and songwriter who, by 2017,
had already produced hit music recordings for international recording artists. Oviedo helped write
songs, created the “beats” for the songs, and produced the music. Londra was the singer and artistic
talent.
The Big Ligas entity was formed in February 2018. Shortly thereafter, the parties entered
into the written agreement that governed their relationship and doubled as the company’s operating
agreement, known as the “Deal Memo.” Much like they had done with the few songs they had
worked on together in November 2017 (which led to their commercial relationship), the three
members immediately continued to work together to create music and Salazar and Oviedo began
3
5552789 v2
to market Big Ligas. With the combined efforts of the members, their small company quickly
became a huge success and Londra began to reach stardom and widespread recognition at a level
This soon caused other parties in the music industry to take an interest in Big Ligas and its
relationships with major industry players. In less than an 18 month period, Big Ligas went from a
startup being fully financed by one of its members to a rising company that had the opportunity to
enter into contracts worth tens of millions of dollars. To name just one example, effective January
2, 2019, Big Ligas, Londra, and Warner Music Latina entered into a multi-million dollar recording
agreement. Then, on May 23, 2019 Big Ligas, Londra and Warner launched “Home Run” — Big
Shortly after Londra began to experience his newfound fame and financial success, Londra
started to turn on his partners. Londra, purposely ignoring that his meteoric rise was largely (if not
entirely) owed to Salazar and Oviedo’s significant contributions, began to refuse to comply with
his obligations to Big Ligas. Worse yet, Londra — with the help of others — began to take
affirmative steps to hurt Big Ligas by hindering Big Ligas’s growth and obstructing its ability to
enter into additional commercial and business relationships that would have a significant impact
on the value of the company and its position in the music industry. Londra’s actions were
calculated and intentionally carried out to harm Big Ligas and its other two members.
Since Londra began to take these actions, he has been uninterruptedly breaching many of
his obligations under the Deal Memo. His breaches include, but are not limited to: 1) failing to
comply with obligations he has under the Warner Agreement, as amended; 2) interfering with and
obstructing Big Ligas’s rights and ability to enter into a multi-million dollar deal with Kobalt
4
5552789 v2
Music Group; and 3) embezzling and converting assets and funds belonging to Big Ligas.
Even though he has been given the opportunity to rectify his actions, Londra has made
clear he will continue to breach his obligations. As a result of Londra’s ill-intended actions, Londra
breached not only the Deal Memo, but a number of laws in Florida, including laws that apply to
contractual relationships and fiduciary duties that emerge from relationships like the one that
Londra has with the Big Ligas parties. Big Ligas is entitled to recover tens of millions of dollars
Unable to face the consequences of his breaches, Londra has attempted to disavow the
existence of these obligations. To try to claim that he has no obligations under the contract, Londra
has falsely alleged that he had no idea that he was signing the Deal Memo — even after signing a
Spanish AND English version of the 9-page agreement and initialing every single page. To make
credible his lie that he did not know he was signing the Deal Memo, Londra has further fabricated
additional lies. These include, but are not limited to, lies about what had happened the days leading
to his signing of the agreement and the days that followed. Londra also fabricated stories about
alleged breaches of contract and breaches of other duties by the Big Ligas parties.
Londra has had absolutely no problem lying about the actions of others without any of care
or consideration of how it would affect those individuals. Of course, Londra’s lies are contradicted
by his own actions and statements during the course of his relationship with the Big Ligas parties.
B. Londra
This is a music industry dispute between Argentinian recording artist and songwriter
Paulo Londra, on the one hand, and Cristian “Kristo” Salazar, a self-proclaimed online marketer,
In the fall of 2017, and at the precocious age of 19, Londra was a well-known and rising
5
5552789 v2
musical artist in Argentina. Without any industry professionals, Londra and his best friend began
self-distributing Londra’s works, generating millions of streams, significant revenue, and social
media likes. Londra’s meteoric rise put him on the radar of major labels Universal, Sony, Roc
Nation and Warner. Londra had also caught the eye of Salazar and Oviedo, whom Salazar
managed.
Salazar and Oviedo sensed that Londra’s naïveté made him an easy mark for exploitation.
They courted Londra, inviting him to travel to meet with them in Medellín, Colombia in
November 2017. During this trip, Oviedo and Londra worked on music, while Salazar began
touting what the three of them could accomplish as “brothers” and “family.” After this initial
meeting, Salazar began assuming managerial duties over Londra’s music career, and persuaded
Londra to turn over his passwords to all of his social media accounts, and to his Distrokid and
YouTube accounts (in which Londra was already receiving tens of thousands per month).
Salazar and Oviedo repeatedly touted their love for Londra, and claimed that together
they would make “music history.” The three individuals loosely discussed the idea of forming
a company together, with Salazar and Oviedo – afraid of losing Londra to record labels, without
being able to cash-in on Londra’s talents – falsely represented that a “company structure” would
help Londra substantially increase the advance monies he would receive from a record label. The
lynchpin of this relationship was, in Oviedo’s words, that “everything has to be done as a team,”
In early December 2017, Salazar and Oviedo told Londra that they had retained lawyers
to provide advice to all of them in forming Big Ligas. Salazar repeatedly advised Londra that
the attorneys were being retained to protect Londra. In truth, Salazar – on behalf of the not-yet-
formed LLC – retained co-defendants Ritholz Levy Fields LLP, (“RLF”), Matthew Greenberg
6
5552789 v2
(“Greenberg”), and/or Stephanie Chopurian (“Chopurian”) (collectively, the “RLF Defendants”)
for the purposes of being adverse to Londra. Specifically, on December 12, 2017, Oviedo and
Salazar engaged RLF on behalf of Big Ligas – a non-existent company – to “acquire various
rights from the artist Paulo Londra.” Salazar and Oviedo, then, discussed the Deal Memo with
Consistent with their engagement, the RLF Defendants prepared an agreement that was
adverse to Londra. On February 21, 2018, Salazar and Oviedo presented Londra with the one-
side Deal Memorandum and an annexed Songwriter Agreement (collectively, the “Deal Memo”)
and told him to sign it as part of a video. Salazar and Oviedo did not provide Londra with a copy
of the Deal Memo prior to the video shoot and did not explain its terms. Londra believed that
the Deal Memo was a simply a prop for the video that would symbolically recognize their plans
The Deal Memo purported to form a “joint venture” in which the sole asset is Londra and
his prodigious musical talents. The Deal Memo earmarked excessive fees for Salazar and
Oviedo, who stood to gain approximately three times the amounts that industry custom dictates
that they should have earned. Moreover, contrary to Salazar and Oviedo’s promises of
“transparency” and “unanimity,” the Deal Memo purported to name Salazar and Oviedo as
managing members of the LLC with the right to make some, but not all decisions, without
Londra’s approval. Further, the Deal Memo also purported to transfer ownership of all of
Londra’s intellectual property (including his pre-existing musical writing and recordings),
copyrights in music publishing, live concert performances, and name and likeness to Big Ligas.
Immediately after signing the Deal Memo in February 2018, Londra became concerned
that Big Ligas misled him. Londra expressed his concerns to Salazar and Oviedo. Oviedo
7
5552789 v2
responded, both orally and in writing, that Londra should consider the Deal Memo to be of no
legal importance. Specifically, Oviedo wrote, “That contract we signed if we have to spoil it we
spoil it ....”.
Salazar and Oviedo agreed to amend the Deal Memo. On May 18, 2018, Chopurian
emailed Pablo Contreras (Londra’s father’s counsel), that Big Ligas was “preparing a
modification to the agreement that was requested by Paulo … .” The parties then met in-person
in Argentina on June 1, 2018 for express purpose of addressing Londra’s concerns by amending
the Deal Memo. Londra’s concerns were not fully satisfied during the meeting, as the parties did
not discuss, much less resolve, all of the outstanding items, leaving the matter “open ended.”
Salazar and Oviedo did, however, agree to amend the Deal Memo and had the RLF Defendants
dispute boiled over in November of 2018, when Salazar and Oviedo endeavored to unilaterally
bind Londra to an agreement with Warner Music Latina, Inc. (“Warner Agreement”). After
Londra expressed his unwillingness to provide his contractually-required consent to the Warner
Agreement, Greenberg wrote to Londra demanding that he sign the Warner Agreement,
threatening:
“By refusing to sign, … you are violating, i.e., “breaching”, the agreement you signed
with Big Ligas and exposing yourself to huge financial and career risks” (emphasis in
original);
“… Big Ligas can stop you – and will stop you – if you try to release your music through
any company other than Big Ligas.”
“… Big Ligas will be entitled to sue you and obtain a judgment against you for all monies
that Big Ligas will have lost by your violation of the Big Ligas Agreement.”
“When Big Ligas obtains a multi-million judgment against you – which it undoubtedly will
– you will have to write a check to Big Ligas for the amount. If you fail to pay Big Ligas,
8
5552789 v2
[Oviedo] and [Salazar] will enforce that judgment against any money or property you may
ever own or acquire until that judgment – plus interest – is paid in full.”
“Is it smart for you to engage in a long, extremely costly lawsuit which will shut down your
music career and drain your bank account?”
Coerced, Londra signed the accompanying letter of inducement. His mistrust only grew,
however, when he did not receive a single account statement for all of 2018, and was paid a grand
total of $10,000.00 (in the form of a recoupable advance). An audit revealed, among other things:
Big Ligas’ untimely accountings have been rife with errors and underreported hundreds
of thousands of dollars; and
Big Ligas failed to remit any monies to Londra in 2018, despites earnings in excess of
$800,000.00.
Big Ligas’ financial misdeeds continued in 2019, when Big Ligas wrongly attempted to
deduct touring revenues (which it own business manager sworn under oath were not due) and,
On February 14, 2020, Londra timely exercised his right to terminate the Deal Memo. Two
weeks after receiving Londra’s termination notice, on March 2, 2020, Big Ligas purported to enter
into an “amendment” to the Warner Agreement requiring Londra to record at least a second album.
means to claim that the Deal Memo had been extended until “sometime in 2027”. Big Ligas also
flip-flopped on its long-stated position in which it acknowledged that the Deal Memo expired on
February 21, 2020, disingenuously claiming that the Deal Memo did not expire until May of 2024.
Londra’s career is stuck – a reality that Big Ligas has attempted to use as leverage. Londra
has been unable to record his next album, close on a multi-million dollar publishing deal, or pursue
interest from third parties. Through this action, Londra seeks to have the fraudulently-induced
9
5552789 v2
Deal Memo be deemed void; be deemed terminated as of February 21, 2020 (such that he can
continue his career without being forced to tithe his earnings to Big Ligas); and be reimbursed for
all the monies that Big Ligas has misappropriated from him – including the amounts that Big
2. Did the Deal Memo expire on February 21, 2021 or, instead, does it expire once the term
of the Warner Recording Agreement expires?
3. If Londra breached the Deal Memo, what damages did Big Ligas suffer and therefore is
entitled to recover from Londra?
5. If Londra breached his fiduciary duties, what damages did Big Ligas suffer and therefore
is entitled to recover from Londra?
6. If Londra breached his fiduciary duties, is Big Ligas entitled to recover punitive damages
from Londra?
7. Whether Warner is an indispensable party to this litigation as it relates to the Second Album
Amendment to the recording agreement or any other agreement with Warner.
8. In the event that Londra meets his burden of proving fraud in the inducement and/or fraud
in the factum (which he cannot), whether Londra is still bound by the terms of the Deal
Memo as a result of 1) his ratification of the Deal Memo; 2) receiving the benefit of the
bargain under the Deal Memo; and/or 3) entering into a separate agreement where in that
agreement Londra agrees to be bound by and comply with the Deal Memo.
9. Whether Londra’s alleged claims of conversion and civil theft are in reality breach of
contract claims against Big Ligas, LLC.
10. Whether Londra has valid conversion and civil theft claims against the other members of
Big Ligas when Londra has not filed a derivative action on or regarding these claims.
10
5552789 v2
B. Londra
2. Did Salazar or Oviedo deceive Londra about the nature or contents of the Deal Memo? Did
Londra sign the Deal Memo believing it was a symbolic prop for the Big Ligas launch
video? Is the Deal Memo actually signed by Londra different than the prop that Londra
intended to sign?
3. Did Salazar or Oviedo fraudulently induce Londra to sign the Deal Memo?
7. Did the parties perform under the Deal Memo? Did the parties breach the Deal Memo? If
so, who breached first? Was the first breach material?
8. Did Salazar or Oviedo violate his implied duty of good faith and fair dealing?
9. Did the Big Ligas Defendants intentionally interfere with Londra’s business relations with
third parties?
10. Did the Big Ligas Defendants commit conversion by wrongful act inconsistent with the
property rights of Londra?
11. Did the Big Ligas Defendants obtain or use Londra’s property with criminal intent?
2. Did Mr. Londra terminate the Deal Memo effective February 20, 2021 via his February
14, 2020 letter?
3. Was Big Ligas required to obtain Londra’s consent to enter the Warner Amendment? Is
the Warner Amendment binding?
4. Did Big Ligas extend the term of the Deal Memo by entering into the Warner
Amendment?
11
5552789 v2
5. When did the term of the Deal Memo expire?
B. Londra
V. WITNESS LIST
B. Londra
B. Londra
Fully-briefed motions:
1
The Big Ligas Parties’ Exhibit List and Witness List was submitted directly to the opposing
counsel and the Court on May 28, 2021 so as to preserve confidentiality, particularly as to personal
addresses for witnesses. The Joint Pre-Trial Report is similarly being filed without the
accompanying Exhibits, which will be submitted directly to the Court.
12
5552789 v2
2. Londra’s motion in limine to preclude the presentation of legal opinions as evidence at
trial;
6. Joint Motion to Modify Pre-Trial Deadlines (but not the Trial Period).
Not-yet-fully-briefed motions:
7. Big Ligas’ amended motion for partial summary judgment (filed May 28, 2021);
8. Big Ligas’s motion to strike or alternative motion to exclude under Daubert the
opinions and testimony of plaintiff’s expert Keith Cooper (filed May 28, 2021);
9. Big Ligas’s motion to strike or alternative motion to exclude under Daubert the
opinions and testimony of plaintiff’s expert Thomas Smith (filed May 28, 2021);
10. Big Ligas’s motion to strike or alternative motion to exclude under Daubert the
opinions and testimony of plaintiff’s expert Howard Williamson (filed May 28, 2021);
11. Londra’s motion in limine to preclude evidence or argument about his taxes (filed May
28, 2021).
VIII. STIPULATIONS
Given that discovery and depositions are still ongoing, the parties jointly request an
extension of time to submit stipulations up to and including June 30, 2021, as soon as depositions
1. Big Ligas is in the process of deposing the following individuals: Paulo Londra;
Helen Yu; Polo Molina; Thomas Smith; Keith Cooper; Howard Williamson; and Christine
Jeanneret. Big Ligas respectfully requests a brief extension of the fact and expert discovery
deadline until June 25, 2021, the date agreed to by the parties in their May 14, 2021 Joint Motion
13
5552789 v2
to Modify Pre-Trial Deadlines (but not the Trial Period).
2. Given that discovery and depositions are still ongoing, Big Ligas respectfully
requests an extension to file Motions in Limine up to and including June 14, 2021, the date agreed
to by the parties in their May 14, 2021 Joint Motion to Modify Pre-Trial Deadlines (but not the
Trial Period).
3. The Big Ligas parties submit that certain claims will require resolution by the Court
after the Trial because they are issues to be ruled upon by the Judge and not the jury (i.e., Londra’s
4. The Big Ligas parties submit that any of the allegations and expert witnesses (i.e.,
Anthony Alfieri) related to Londra’s claims against the Ritholz Levy Fields defendants may not
be utilized by Londra at trial, given the settlement between Londra and the Ritholz Levy Fields
defendants.
B. Londra
1. Londra submits that the fact witness discovery deadline has closed, with the sole
exception of those depositions that cannot be completed until receipt of the documents pending
2. Londra submits that he should be afforded time to file opposition briefs to the
3. Londra submits that, as except as expressly ruled upon by the Court, that all pre-
4. Londra submits that certain claims require resolution by the Court because they are
issues to be ruled upon by the Judge and not the jury (i.e., the Term of the Deal Memo).
14
5552789 v2
5. Londra wishes to have the Court approve the engagement letter for Michael Elkin
15
5552789 v2
Dated: June 1, 2021 Respectfully submitted,
Counsel for Big Ligas, LLC, Cristian Salazar, Co-Counsel for Big Ligas, LLC, Cristian
and Daniel Oviedo Salazar, and Daniel Oviedo
16
5552789 v2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on June 1, 2021, a true and correct copy of the foregoing was
electronically filed via the Florida Courts e-Filing Portal, which will serve this Notice on all
17
5552789 v2