Spectrum and Frequency of Chlorophyll Mutation in Grass Pea (Lathyrus Sativus L)

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 8

Bioscience Discovery, 10(4):214-221, Oct.

- 2019

© RUT Printer and Publisher


Print & Online, Open Access, Research Journal Available on http://jbsd.in
ISSN: 2229-3469 (Print); ISSN: 2231-024X (Online)
Research Article
Spectrum and frequency of Chlorophyll mutation in grass pea
(Lathyrus sativus L)
Kulkarni Ganesh. B.

Associate professor in Botany, J.E.S. R.G. Bagdia Arts, S.B. Lakhotia Commerce and
R. Bezonji Science College, Jalna 431203 (M.S.), India
E-mail: dr.kgb98@gmail.com

Article Info Abstract


Received: 25-06-2019,
The seeds of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) various chemical mutagen concentrations
Revised: 10-08-2019, (EMS 0.05%, 0.10%, 0.15%; SA 0.005%, 0.010%, 0.015% and NMU 0.15%, 0.30%,
Accepted: 26-08-2019 0.45%) and physical mutagen doses (Gamma rays- 15KR, 30KR, 45KR) were treated
in laboratory. The Treated and untreated seeds were sown in the field by CRBD
Keywords:
method. The growth of M1 generation observed the characters and number of mutants
Grass pea (Lathyrus in each population thoroughly. The chlorophyll mutation frequency was calculated on
sativus L.), EMS, SA, the basis of plant population with explicit chlorophyll mutation and leaf phenotypic
NMU, Gamma rays, diversity. A noticeable varied range of chlorophyll and morphological mutants were
chlorophyll mutation, observed in the M1 generations. Distinct kinds of spectrum of chlorophyll mutants’
leaf aberrations. viz. xantha, viridis, albino and chlorina were identified in the treated population.
Prominent phenotypic aberrations were also noted viz. reduction in size of leaves,
obtuse and retuse apex, notch at margin, bilobed leaf, lanceolate leaf, wrinkled leaflet
and triforked leaf, etc. The frequency of leaf morphological changes observed in
almost all chemical and physical mutagen in grass pea.

INTRODUCTION cultivate throughout tropical regions of Africa,


Grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) is an annual central and South America, East and West Africa,
winter pulse crop in India occupying an area of Caribbean, Sudan, Egypt, China, Philippines,
about 1.6 million ha (FAO, 2002) and about nearly Indonesia and Malaysia. In India, it is cultivated in
200 species and subspecies. L. sativus is the only Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Madhya
member used as a grain legume (Biswas, 2007). Pradesh and Maharashtra as a pulses, vegetable and
Cultivation was doing for more than 8000 years, a forage. It had also been proved an excellent source
very less evolutionary progress and improvement of of nitrogen fixer, to improve soil fertility, also
this crop was made as a pulse crop mainly due to useful as antioxidants also (Bradley, 1999).
narrow genetic variability and unavailability of Grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) is a crop of
marker genes with prominent morphological some economic value, in developing countries
manifestations, suitable for comprehensive genetic including India, Bangladesh, Nepal, and Ethiopia.
studies and breeding for high yield of low seed The cultivation practices also noticed in China and
neurotoxin (ODAP) lines (Smartt, 1984; Waghmare countries of Europe, the Middle East, and Northern
and Mehra, 2000). Africa. It serves a variety of purposes including
The member of family Fabaceae food, feed and fodder owing in part to its nutritive
(Leguminoceae), is one of the most ancient qualities. In South Asian countries, grass pea is
originated and cultivated crop among all the crops commonly grown for both grain and fodder
in India (Deka and Sarkar, 1990). It grows and
http://jbsd.in 214 ISSN: 2229-3469 (Print)
Kulkarni Ganesh. B.
purposes. Animal feed from Lathyrus is usually Government Institute of Science, Aurangabad.
composed of ground or split grain or flour and is (M.S.) India].
used primarily to feed lactating cattle or other draft 300 (for three replication) healthy and
dal. animals. Human diets include Lathyrus as uniform size of seeds were pre-soaked in distilled
grains that are boiled and then either consumed water for 6 hours, for each dose and concentration,
whole or processed for split In Indian Continent, then theses seeds were immerse in the chemical
Grass pea is a rabbi-season crop adapted to areas mutagenic solution for 6 hours, with the different
with arid or semiarid regions, is generally sown in concentration 0.05, 0.10 and 0.15% for EMS; 0.05,
October or November and harvested in February or 0.010 and 0.015 % for SA and 0.15, 0.30 and
March. Sowing date is largely determined by the 0.45% for NMU, while for the physical mutagen the
time when the monsoon rains end, soil type and soil dose applied 15, 30 and 45 KR.
moisture profile during October. After the each chemical treatment, the
Induction of mutation in recent times treated seeds were washed thoroughly for 1h in
yielded some useful morphological variants and the running tap water to terminate the residual effect of
some author successfully isolated and studied the mutagenic chemicals. After the completion of
inheritance patterns of different flower colour, seed the treatment the treated seeds were sown
coat colour and stipule mutations in grass pea immediately in the field along with their respective
(Talukdar et al., 2001a; Talukdar and Biswas, controls to rise the M1 generation in a completely
2005a, b). The main aim of present investigation is randomized block design (CRBD) with three
to inquire the effect of different doses of chemical replications. All the treatments including the
as well as physical mutagens on chlorophyll controls were raised adopting a spacing of 30 cm in
frequency, its spectrum and leaf morphological between rows and 15 cm in between plants. The
changes in Lathyrus. experiment was conducted during Rabi (winter)
season of 2017. Recommended agronomic practices
MATERIALS AND METHODS were employed for field preparation, sowing and
The Lathyrus seeds variety of ‘Mahatherara’ was subsequent management of the Lathyrus crop.
procured from the Indira Gandhi Krishi The classification and identification of the
Vishvavidyalaya, Raipur (C.G.) India, used and chlorophyll mutants was done based on the
treated by various doses of Chemical viz. EMS, nomenclature adopted by Gustafson (1940). The
SA, NMU and physical mutagen Gamma rays various chlorophyll deficient sectors and leaf
[Co60 gamma source (irradiation source capacity to abnormalities were noted dose wise separately. The
release 3000 Ci delivery 7200 r/min curie), Mutagenic effectiveness and efficiency were
irradiated at the Department of Biophysics, calculated on the basis of formulae suggested by
Konzak et al. (1965).

Mutagenic effectiveness (Physical mutagens) = Mf × 100


K rad.

Mutagenic effectiveness (Chemical mutagens) = Mf × 100


c×t

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION chlorophyll deficient sector of plants was noticed


The induction of chlorophyll deficient highest by EMS and Gamma rays treatment, as
sectors observed in all doses of mutagen. Such compared to other mutagens. The frequency of
sectors were albino (white), xantha (yellow), viridis chlorophyll deficient sectors of Lathyrus plants
(dull green) and chlorina (light green) types. They ranged from 1.74 to 3.14% by EMS treatments,
were distributed in the leaf lamina. It had been from 0.93 to 2.23% by SA treatments, 0.89 to
observed that the various doses of the mutagens 2.45% by NMU and 1.56 to 3.42% by Gamma ray
EMS, SA, NMU and Gamma rays had proved treatments. Result shows the maximum chlorophyll
effective inducing the chlorophyll deficient sectors and viable mutation frequency in all the treated
in Lathyrus seeds (Table 1 and 2). The frequency of seeds of Lathyrus.

http://biosciencediscovery.com 215 ISSN: 2231-024X (Online)


Bioscience Discovery, 10(4):214-221, Oct. - 2019

Table1. Effect of mutagens on frequency of plants carrying chlorophyll deficient sectors in M1 generation
of Lathyrus sativus L.

Treatment Dose (%) / (KR) Frequency of +SE


chlorophyll
Deficient Sectors%
Control -- -- --
0.05 1.74 0.62
EMS 0.10 2.45 0.58
0.15 3.14 0.82
0.005 0.93 0.95
SA 0.010 1.75 0.76
0.015 2.23 0.88
0.15 0.89 0.67
NMU 0.30 1.73 0.59
0.45 2.45 1.02
15 1.56 0.89
Gamma rays 30 2.38 0.96
45 3.42 0.73

Figure1. Effect of mutagens on frequency of plants carrying chlorophyll deficient sectors in M 1 generation
of Lathyrus sativus L.

http://jbsd.in 216 ISSN: 2229-3469 (Print)


Kulkarni Ganesh. B.
Figure 2. Effect of mutagens on total frequency percentage of leaf morphological abnormality observed in
M1 generation of Lathyrus sativus L.

The chlorophyll mutations was also recoded and a set of genes responsible for chlorophyll
earlier by various researcher in Lentil (Sharma and mutations. This conclusion is confirmed by the
Sharma, 1981), in Chickpea (Kharkwal 1998, Khan earlier reports of Kumar et al. (2009) in Mungbean,
et.al 2005, Bara et al., 2017, in Lathyrus (Prasad Monika and Seetharaman, (2017) in Hyacinth bean.
and Das, 1980 and Waghmare and Mehra, 2001), in The seeds of Lathyrus treatment of various
Vicia beans (Bhat et. al, 2007), in Cowpea (Girija chemical concentration and physical mutagen doses
and Dhanavel, 2009 and Kumar et al., 2010), in was revealed the some abnormal shapes and size of
Black Gram (Thilagavathi and Mullainathan, 2009 ; leaves (Fig.1). The leaf variations comprised
Lal et al. 2009), in Mungbean (Kumar et al., 2009), bilobed leaf (C), reduction in size of leaf (L), obtuse
in green gram (Das and Baisakh, 2010), in Urdbean apex (A), retuse apex (B), notch at margin (C),
(Goyal and Khan, 2010), in Trigonella (Vasu and sinuate leaf margin, tri apex leaflet (I), lanceolate
Hasan, 2011), in horse gram (Kulkarni and Mogle, (J) and wrinkled leaflet (L,N). The frequency of
2013), in green gram (Vikram et al., 2014), in plants showed the leaf morphological changes
Lablab (Monika and Seethraman, 2017 and observed in various doses of mutagens (Table 1 and
Undirwade and Kulkarni, 2018). Chlorophyll Table 2).
mutation is shows the directly relation of the Among the four mutagens, the EMS
mutagenic effect. The occurrence of chlorophyll especially its 0.15% dose and Gamma rays 45KR
deficient mutant was noticed due to change in gene succeeded in inducing the highest morphological

http://biosciencediscovery.com 217 ISSN: 2231-024X (Online)


Bioscience Discovery, 10(4):214-221, Oct. - 2019

Figure1. Effect of of chemical and physical mutagens Chlorophyll deficient sectors in M1 plants,
morphological abnormality found in Lathyrus sativus L.

Figure Description: Frequency of Chlorophyll mutation: Albino (O), Xantha (D, M, N), Chlorina (A,B,P),
Viridis (G,F).
Frequency of Phenotypic abnormality: Obtuse leaf apex(A), Acute leaf apex (B), Notch in center of leaf(C),
bilobed leaf (C), reduction in size of leaf (L), retuse apex (B), notch at margin(C), sinuate leaf margin, tri
apex leaflet (G, I), lanceolate (J) and wrinkled leaflet (L,O, P), Bilobed leaflet (E,F), Reduction in size of
leaf (B,J), Wrinkled leaflet (L,O,P), Triforked leaf (G), Broad leaf (I,O,P), Opposite leaf with abnormal
Shape (K).

http://jbsd.in 218 ISSN: 2229-3469 (Print)


Kulkarni Ganesh. B.
frequency (3.14 and 3.42 %) of the leaf and French bean (Mahamune and Kothekar, 2012),
abnormalities, respectively. The lowest frequency in horse gram (Kulkarni and Mogle, 2013), in green
of leaf abnormality changes carrying plants (0.93 % gram (Vikram et al., 2014), in Lablab purpureus
and 0.89 %) could be noted at 0.05% SA and 0.15 (Monika and Seethraman, 2017) in chickpea (Bara
% in NMU, respectively. et al., 2017) in Hyacinth bean (Undirwade and
In present investigation, leaf morphological changes Kulkarni, 2018). The disturbances in phytochromes
may pertinent some abnormalities viz. reduction in causes due to abnormalities in leaves is such as,
size of leaves, various abnormal leaf shapes and chromosomal aberrations, mitotic inhibition,
sizes, observed in the M1 generation mostly noticed disrupted auxin synthesis and mineral deficiencies,
in all treated dosesThe frequency of leaf disturbance in DNA synthesis, enlargement of
morphological changes carrying plants showed palisade, spongy and mesophyll tissues (Undirwade
correlation with increasing concentration of and Kulkarni, 2018). The formation of triforked
mutagen. The changes in leaf morphology had leaves might be developed by the death of apical
reported by some worker earliar, in Pea (Gelin, cells at meristematic zone which have specific
1954), Soyabean (Zacharias, 1956), in Safflower influences on the development of leaves and leaf
Satpute (1994), in mungbean (Singh et al., 2000 and shape.
Sangsiri et al., 2005), Chickpea (More et al., 2011)

Table 2: Frequency (percent) and spectrum of morphological mutants induced by various mutagens in
M1 generation of Lathyrus
Mutant type EMS SA NMU Gama rays frequency
Conc. Freq. Conc. Freq. Conc. Freq. Doses Freq. (%) Total In all
(%) (%) (%)
0.05 0.08 -- -- 0.15 0.06 15KR 0.11 0.25
Plant height
0.62
Tall 0.10 0.12 -- -- 0.30 0.11 30KR 0.14 0.37
0.10 0.06 0.010 0.13 -- -- 15KR 0.07 0.26
Dwarf 0.51
0.15 0.12 -- -- -- -- 30KR 0.13 0.25
Growth 0.10 0.02 0.010 0.15 0.15 0.03 15KR 0.04 0.24
habit 0.39
Bushy -- -- -- -- 0.30 0.15 -- -- 0.15
Leaf 0.10 0.08 0.010 0.13 0.15 0.09 15KR 0.11 0.41
Broad leaf 0.96
0.15 0.11 0.015 0.12 0.30 0.17 30KR 0.15 0.55
Narrow leaf 0.10 0.06 0.010 0.27 0.15 0.02 15KR 0.01 0.36 0.82
0.15 0.09 0.015 0.19 0.30 0.12 30KR 0.06 0.46
Opposite -- -- -- -- -- -- 15KR 0.12 0.12 0.39
leaf 0.15 0.02 0.015 0.08 -- -- 30KR 0.17 0.27
Bilobed leaf 0.10 0.07 0.010 0.1 0.15 0.1 15KR 0.21 0.48 1.13
0.15 0.12 0.015 0.12 0.30 0.17 30KR 0.24 0.65
Elongated 0.10 0.04 0.010 0.19 0.15 0.13 30KR 0.06 0.42 1.02
leaf 0.15 0.17 0.015 0.21 0.30 0.14 45 KR 0.08 0.6
Fused 0.10 0.06 -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.06 0.28
leaflet 0.15 0.14 0.015 0.04 -- -- 30KR 0.04 0.22
wrinkled 0.10 0.19 -- -- 0.15 0.02 15KR 0.02 0.23
0.26
leaflet -- -- -- -- 0.30 0.03 30KR -- 0.03
Triforked 0.10 0.08 0.010 0.07 0.15 0.13 15KR 0.09 0.37 0.87
leaf 0.15 0.1 0.015 0.11 0.30 0.17 30KR 0.12 0.5
Single 0.10 0.09 0.010 0.01 0.15 0.12 30KR 0.12 0.34
flower
0.15 0.12 0.015 0.03 0.30 0.14 45 KR 0.13 0.42
0.76

http://biosciencediscovery.com 219 ISSN: 2231-024X (Online)


Bioscience Discovery, 10(4):214-221, Oct. - 2019
Conclusion: Methane Sulphonate and their Combined
The effects of chemical and physical Treatments in Cowpea (VignaunguiculataL. Walp)
mutagen in chlorophyll in Lathyrus are applied in Global J Mol Sci, 4 (2): 68-75.
identifying the genetic effect of mutagen. Mutations Goyal S and Khan S, 2010. Induced muatagenesis
in the chlorophyll traits might be reflected in in Urdbean (Vigna mungo L. Hepper): a Review,
subsequent generations in the form of different Int. J. Bot. 6(3):194-206.
mutants. The morphological frequency of Gustafsson A, 1940. The mutation system of the
chlorophyll deficient sectors induced in the present chlorophyll apparatus. Lund Univ. Arsskriftm
investigation included agronomical desirable N.F.Avd2 Bd 36(11) Kungliga Fysiografiska
characters which may possibly be utilized in future Sallskapets Handi N.F.Bd 51(11):3-40.
breeding programme. Khan S Wani M R Bhat M and Parveen K, 2005.
Acknowledgement: Induced Chlorophyll Mutations in Chickpea (Cicer
Authors are thankful to the Principal and arietinumL.) Int J Agric and Bio l7 (5): 764–767.
HOD, Botany Department, JES College, Jalna for Kharkwal MC, 1998. Induced mutations in
providing research facilities. Author is grateful to chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Frequency and
UGC WRO Pune, for giving financial support spectrum of chlorophyll mutations. Int J Genet, 58:
through sanction of Minor Research Project. 465-474.
Authors are extremely grateful to the Department of Konzak CF Nilan R A Wagner J and Foster RJ,
Biophysics, Government Institute of Science, 1965. Efficient chemical mutagenesis, the use of
Aurangabad (M.S.) for providing Gamma rays induced mutations in plant breeding. Rep.
irradiation facility. FAO/IAEA Tech. Meeting, Rome, Pergamon press,
pp. 49-70.
REFERENCES Kulkarni GB and Mogle UP, 2013. Effects of
Bara BM Chaurasia AK and Verma P, 2017. mutagen on chlorophyll mutation in horse gram
Gamma rays effect on frequency and spectrum of [macrotyloma uniflorum (Lam) Verdcourt]
chlorophyll mutation in chickpea (Cicer arietinum Bioscience Discovery, 4 (2):214-219.
L.). J of Pharmaco and Phytochem, 6 (3): 590-591 Kumar A Parmhansh P and Prasad R, 2009.
Bhat TA, Khan AH and Parveen S, 2007. Induced chlorophyll and morphological mutations
Spectrum and frequency of chlorophyll mutation in Mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek). Legume
induced by MMS, Gama rays and their combination Res. 32 (1): 41- 45.
in two varieties of Vicia faba L. Assian J Plant kumar AV Ushakumari R Vairam N and
Sciences 6 (3):558-561. Amutha R, 2010. Effect of physical mutagen on
Bradley MS, 1999. Legume genetic resources with expression of characters in arid legume pulse
novel value added industrial and pharmaceutical cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.)Walp.) J of Plant
use. In: perspective on new crops and new uses (ed. Breeding, 1(4): 908-914.
Janik J.) Aslts press. Alexandria pp. 196-201. Lal GM Toms B and Smith S, 2009. Induced
Das TR and Baisakh B, 2010. Effects of Chlorophyll Mutations in Black Gram, Asian J
mutagenic treatment on chlorophyll mutation in Agri. Sci. 1(1): 1-3.
green gram (Vignaradiata L. Wilczek). e-planet 9 Mahadevu P and Byregowda M, 2005. Genetic
(2) : 17 – 20. improvement of Dolichos bean (Lablab purpureus
Deka RK, and Sarkar CR, 1990. Nutrient L.) through the use of exotic and indigenous
composition and antinutritional factors of Dolichos germplasm. Indian J. Plant Genet. Resour. 18: 1-5.
lablab L seeds. Food chem, 38: 239-246. Mahamune SE And Kothekar VS, 2012. Induced
FAO 2002 (Ochatt S J, Muneaux E, Machado C chemical and physical mutagenic studies in M1
J, L, Pontécaille C) The hyperhydricity of in vitro generation of French bean(Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
regenerants of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) is Current Botany, 3 (3): 17-21.
linked with an abnormal DNA content J plant Monika S and Seethraman N, 2017. Induced
physio 159 (9), 1021-1028. chlorophyll and viable mutation in Lablab
Gelin OEA, 1954. X-ray mutants in peas and purpureus (L.) sweet Var. typicus through gamma
vetches. Act Agr. Scand. 4: 558-568. rays and Ethyl Methane Sulphonate. Int J Pharm
Girija M and Dhanavel D, 2009. Mutagenic Bio Sci 8 (2): (B) 240 -249.
Effectiveness and Efficiency of Gamma Rays, Ethyl

http://jbsd.in 220 ISSN: 2229-3469 (Print)


Kulkarni Ganesh. B.
More SB Kulthe M Kulthe M Kashid NG and sativus L.). In: Kharkwal MC (eds) Proc. 4th Intl.
Kothekar VS, 2011. Effect of EMS and SA in Legume Conference held at New Delhi, India,
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Bioscience discovery ISGPB publication, pp. 200.
2(1): 82-84. Talukdar D Biswas AK, 2005b. Induced seed coat
Prasad AB and Das AK, 1980. Studies on induced colour mutations and their inheritance in grass pea
chlorophyll mutations in Lathyrus sativus L. (Lathyrus sativus L.). Indian J. Genet. 65: 135-136.
Cytologia, 45: 335-341. Thilagavathi C and Mullainathan L, 2009.
Sangsiri C, Sorajjapinun W and Srinives P 2005 Isolation of Macro Mutants and Mutagenic
Gamma radiation induced mutations in Mungbean. Effectiveness, Efficiency in Black Gram
Science Asia 31: 251-255. (Vignamungo(L.) Hepper) Global J of Mol Sci, 4
Satpute RA, 1994. Mutation studies in Safflower (2): 76-79.
(Carthamus tictorious L.) Ph.D Thesis, Dr. Undirwade GP and Kulkarni GB, 2018.
B.A.M.U., Aurangabad. Effectiveness and efficiency of mutagen on leaf
Sharma SK and Sharma B, 1981. Induced chlorophyll in Hyacinth bean Lablab purpureus (L.)
chlorophyll mutation in lentil. Indian J. Genet., 41: Sweet Int. J. of Life Sciences, 6 (1):111-116
328-333. Vikram N Ibrahim S M and Vanniarajan C,
Singh GR, Sareen PK And Saharan RP, 2000. 2014. Frequency and spectrum of chlorophyll
Induced chlorophyll and morphological mutations mutations in green gram [Vigna radiata (L.)
in Mungbean. Indian J Genet, 60(3): 391-393. Wilczek] Asian J of Bio Science, 9 (2): 204-207.
Smartt J, 1984. Evolution of grain legumes.I. Waghmare VN and Mehra RB, 2001. Induced
Mediterranean Pulses. Exp. Agric. 20: 275-296. chlorophyll mutations, mutagenic effectiveness and
Talukdar D Biswas SC and Biswas AK, 2001. efficiency in Lathyrus sativus L. Ind J Genet 58:
Induced mutation in grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L). 465-474.
Prespespective in Cytology and Genetics, 10:481- Zacharias M, 1956. Mutations verscheankultir
484 flanzen VI. Rentgen bestranlungender Sosabohne
Talukdar D, Biswas AK, 2005a. Multiple alleles (Glycinesoja L.) Zilcchter 26: 321-328.
controlling stipule characters in grass pea (Lathyrus

How to cite this article


Kulkarni Ganesh. B., 2019. Spectrum and frequency of Chlorophyll mutation in grass pea (Lathyrus
sativus L).. Bioscience Discovery, 10(4):214-221.

http://biosciencediscovery.com 221 ISSN: 2231-024X (Online)

You might also like