Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Are Tenants Entitled To Parking Space in A CHS - Housing News
Are Tenants Entitled To Parking Space in A CHS - Housing News
Owing to a dearth of parking spaces, many housing complexes in metropolitan cities, often restrict
tenants from parking their vehicles in the premises. We look at what the law says and how the
availability of parking affects the rental market
In metro cities, many people who invested in properties looking for rental income, did not think that
parking space could be a major issue between the owner and the tenant. Real estate agent
Chandrabhan Vishwakarma, says that “In a city like Mumbai, one of the most important amenities
that tenants look for, is adequate parking. Parking spaces have become such an important part of a
rental property that it is one of the top frustrations and sources of conflict between landlords and
tenants.” This problem is particularly severe for tenants of middle-income group (MIG) apartments,
who often face difficulties in finding parking for their vehicles due to limited space and are forced to
park their vehicles on the road.
See also: Important amenities that tenants look for in a rental house
Rohit Poddar, MD of Poddar Housing, explains why this situation is so prevalent: “Very often,
societies have inadequate car parking slots, especially open car parking. Hence, they ideally like to
provide the same to permanent residents.”
In cities like Mumbai, Delhi and Bengaluru, many tenants are unwilling to rent a property, if it does not
have parking space. Others are happy to park on the street, as long as it is reasonably easy. On the
other hand, there are also people who do not own cars are not prepared to pay extra for
parking amenities. Punit Agarwal, MD and CEO of Nirvana Realty concurs that “It is unfair if a
tenant is not allowed to park within the campus, even after paying rent and for all other facilities. The
tenant has all rights to park within the campus, where his apartment is located.”
Avnish Yadav, deputy general manager, residential services, Colliers International India,
attributes the problem to improper planning, where parking facilities are developed on the basis of the
number of units. “Generally, the allotment of the parking facility, is done on a ‘first come, first serve’
basis or is decided by the managing committee. With limited parking slots in a society, it is the owner’s
responsibility, to get the requisite parking facility for the tenant,” says Yadav.
Tenants have the right to park cars in owner’s parking space, rules
Maharashtra court
The Maharashtra State Cooperative Appellate Court has also ruled that tenants or leave and licence
holders, have a right to park their four-wheelers allotted to the landlord, adding that a car parking
space allotted to the owner can be used by the tenant, as he has full rights over it. While passing a
judgment to this effect on February 9, 2021, the appellate court restrained a cooperative housing
society at Mumbai’s Nepean Sea Road from stopping an apartment owner from allowing his tenant to
use his parking slot.
“As per the development control (DC) rules framed under the MRTP (Maharashtra Regional and Town
Planning) Act, 1966, the tenant cannot be denied parking. The society should not discriminate, as
parking rules are governed by the DC Rules and if the owner is eligible to get parking space, then, the
tenant should also get the benefit of that space,” the appellate court said, in its order on a petition filed
by one SS Kadan against a cooperative court order in 2020.
Kadan, 68, who purchased a flat in the south Mumbai cooperative housing society in 2006, was
prohibited by the society from permitting his tenant to park a car in the premises, citing provisions in
the society’s 2014 car parking policy.
Challenging the society move, Kadan moved a trial court, stating that his licencee was entitled to his
car parking slot in the society. His petition also sought to prevent the society from stopping other
tenants from using parking spaces.
While setting aside a trail court order that decided not to offer any relief to Kadan, the state court said:
“The trial court failed to consider that the licencee has the right to enjoy the facilities and amenities
attached to the flat, which he/she has taken on a licence basis till the licence period is over.’’