Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Main Discourse Topo Edited
Main Discourse Topo Edited
PROJECT ONE
(MAIN DISCOURSE)
TITLE:
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF LANDED PROPERTY
BELONGING TO DOVE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOLS AT
MBAK 4, MBAK ETOI VILLAGE, UYO LOCAL GOVT.
AREA, AKWA IBOM STATE.
BY
MR NDIFREKE IME UDOEKPO
PUPIL SURVEYOR
SUBMITTED TO
SURVEYORS COUNCIL OF NIGERIA (SURCON)
JULY, 2019
11
PROJECT CERTIFICATION
TITLE OF PROJECT/LOCATION:
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF LANDED PROPERTY BELONGING TO DOVE
INTERNATIONAL SCHOOLS, AT MBAK 4, MBAK ETOI VILLAGE, UYO LOCAL
GOVT. AREA, AKWA IBOM STATE.
I hereby certify that all the information given to this project were obtained as a result
of observations and measurements made by me and that the survey was carried out in
accordance with Survey Laws and Regulations.
I solemnly declare that I will abide by all the Rules and Regulations governing the
conduct of the Surveyors Council of Nigeria Professional Examinations and any false
information given in this project will automatically disqualify me from being
considered for Examination and the decision of the Council shall be final.
Signature:………………………………………………………………………………..
Date:…………………………………………………………………………………......
12
TITLE OF PROJECT/LOCATION:
This is to certify that MR NDIFREKE IME UDOEKPO has satisfactorily carried out the
survey duties contained in the above named project under my instruction and supervision.
I hereby declare that she has conducted herself with due diligence, honesty and sobriety on
the said duties and accepts liability for any false information discovered in this project report.
I will solemnly accept and abide by any sanctions instituted against me by the Surveyors
Council of Nigeria as a result of any such false information.
ABSTRACT
This topographic survey of the proposed Dove International Schools at Mbak Etoi,
Uyo, Akwa Ibom State, was performed in 2018. It entailed typical planimetric and
topographic work over a 3.035 Hectare site, with extensive terrain detailing. The
project was controlled relative to established survey control. Ground elevations were
shot at a 25 m grid spacing using a Sokkia SET 530R Total Station. Data was
processed using Microsoft Excel. Linear Errors were corrected using Bowditch's
Compass Rule and a linear accuracy of 1: 6550 was obtained. Final drawings were
delivered in metric format with a 0.5 m contour interval and Spot heights at 50 meters
intervals all plotted in AutoCAD Civil 3D 2018. A digital Terrain Model of the site
was produced with Surfer 9. The final products were a Contour Plan, Spot Heights
Plan, Overlay of the Contour and Spot heights Plan as well as a DTM plan of the site.
14
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SUBJECT PAGE
PROJECT ONE ....................................................................................................................... 10
(MAIN DISCOURSE) ............................................................................................................. 10
TITLE: ................................................................................................................................. 10
PROJECT CERTIFICATION ............................................................................................. 11
CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION BY SUPERVISING SURVEYOR ......................... 12
ABSTRACT ......................................................................................................................... 13
TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................................... 14
CHAPTER ONE ...................................................................................................................... 16
INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 16
1.10 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYS ................................................................................ 16
1.11 LOCATION OF THE SURVEY AND SIZE ........................................................ 18
1.12 AIM OF THE PROJECT....................................................................................... 18
1.13 ORDER OF THE SURVEY AND SCOPE OF WORK ....................................... 19
1.14 EQUIPMENT USED FOR THE PROJECT ......................................................... 19
1.15 PROJECT PERSONNEL ...................................................................................... 20
1.16 DURATION OF THE PROJECT.......................................................................... 20
1.17 CANDIDATES INVOLVEMENT........................................................................ 20
CHAPTER TWO ..................................................................................................................... 21
PROJECT PLANNING ....................................................................................................... 21
1.20 DATA SEARCH ................................................................................................... 21
1.21 SITE RECONNAISSANCE .................................................................................. 21
1.22 OFFICE PLANNING .................................................................................................. 22
1.22.1 Determination of Accuracy requirement of the project: ........................................ 22
1.22.2 Determination of Contouring Method ................................................................... 22
1.22.3 Determination of Scale to be used for the Drawing .............................................. 23
1.22.4 Baseline Selection.................................................................................................. 23
1.23 PRE ANALYSIS ................................................................................................... 23
1.23.1 Computation of Expected Misclosures .................................................................. 24
1.24 CHOICE OF INSTRUMENT ............................................................................... 24
1.25 INSTRUMENT TEST ........................................................................................... 25
1.25.1 HORIZONTAL and VERTICAL COLLIMATION TEST ............................... 25
1.25.2 EDM DISTANCE CONSTANT DETERMINATION ......................................... 28
1.25.3 PLATE LEVEL AND CIRCULAR BUBBLE TESTS ......................................... 30
1.25.4 OPTICAL PLUMMET TEST ............................................................................... 31
15
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
designed to document the existence, the identity, location, and dimension or size of
natural or artificial features on land in the air, in space or water for the purpose of
producing accurate and reliable maps, suitable for visualization if needed, of such
features of a part of the earth’s surface to determine horizontal and vertical spatial
relations.
mapping products, ranging from aerial mapping to ground and underground surveys.
surveying and other special techniques to establish both horizontal and vertical
control. The relief or configuration of the terrain and the natural or artificial features
are located by measurement and depicted on a flat sheet to form a topographic map.
Topographic surveys are the basis for detailed plans showing the layout and utilities of
sites.
Prior to the advent of total stations, GPS, LIDAR, and other spatial data acquisition
systems, Theodolite, transit and plane table topographic surveying methods and
instruments were the standard. They are rarely used today, other than perhaps for
small surveys when a Total Station or RTK system is not available. However, the
17
basic field considerations regarding detail and accuracy have not changed, and field
observing methods with total stations or RTK are not significantly different from the
surveys. These photos were then reconstituted into stereo models for drafting true-
scale maps. Photogrammetry and other Remote Sensing techniques are generally used
today, to carry out the topographic mapping of expansive areas. However for small
areas, ground based survey methods using Total Stations and GPS have been applied
normally used to prepare highly detailed site plan (and digital databases) of a project
site, facilities, or utility infrastructure; for future design, on-going construction, or as-
units, topographic survey of the site is required to determine the rate of erosion, the
trajectory of surface run off or the volume of earthworks quantities of cut or fill.
The applications of topographical survey are diverse. Topographical maps are useful
studies. It is useful for designing engineering projects like roads, railways, canals,
drainage irrigation systems, layout of industrial plans, city planning as well as the
combined with other information types for the detection of areas vulnerable to
phenomena like floods, erosion, and landslides as well as volumetric/risk analysis etc.
The analytical capacity and series of information/data that can be derived from a
earmarked for the construction of a Dove International School at Iba Oku, Uyo, Akwa
The site is located At Mbak 4, Mbak Etoi Village, Uyo Local Govt. Area, Akwa Ibom
State. The site is 3.035 Hectares in area, with an estimated terrain elevation above sea
level of 25 metres. The topography of the Mbak Etoi area is rugged, being in
proximity with the Nwaniba River, which is characterised by ridges with steep-sided
valleys. The existing climatic factors in Akwa Ibom State in general and the site in
particular favours tropical rainforests. The native vegetation is predominantly wild oil
The intended purpose of this project was to obtain a topographic plan defining the
terrain layout of the area by locating the position of ground points and spot elevations
to make the drawing of contour lines and other terrain representation possible. The
Overall objective was to yield a field- finish information package, complete in detail
Surveys, to help in decision making, design and construction of the proposed School;
19
and to provide information readily available for use by the client or its agents. In other
words,
This was a third order project, and the scope of work was as follows:
Reconnaissance
Line Clearing
Contouring/Spot Heighting
Data Processing
Report Writing
50 Meter Tapes
4 Machetes
Ranging Poles
Project Vehicle
20
The entire project was executed between July 17th and 26th, 2018. The specific tasks
were as follows.
Reconnaissance - 1 day
Contouring - 3 days
Total = 10 days
This author was involved in planning, logistics, data collection and data processing.
21
CHAPTER TWO
PROJECT PLANNING
Prior to the fieldwork, Data search was performed which aim was to acquire all
relevant information for the area under the required task. Specifically, the Perimeter
Plan indicating the area to be surveyed was obtained. Another piece of valuable
information obtained was existing primary survey controls, including their physical
location and coordinates. The perimeter plan having been produced in-house was
Survey of the site. Also obtained was the base map showing the area and adjoining
villages.
Reconnaissance is useful in showing the general site layout. Recce was carried out to
enable the proper visualisation of those areas, which should be covered by the more
Physical features relevant to the subject plot were identified and marked. The site was
covered with trees and shrubs, which would be opened during grid line clearing.
Existing survey monuments were located and marked with caution tapes for easy
identification. It was observed that the site had a cascading relief which was
susceptible to erosion.
Office Planning was a pre-field operation planning sequence to consider the several
factors required for the successful completion of the survey. It was also a way of
itemizing what was needed and how to achieve them. For this project, the planning
The stipulated third order accuracy must be better than 1:5000 both for the vertical
guaranteed by using precise instruments. It was decided that reasonable care must be
taken, particularly during observations to ensure that gross errors were eliminated and
systematic errors were kept as minimal as possible. It was also decided that a Total
Station with a refined least count could easily achieve the required accuracy if
carefully used.
An indirect contouring method where a baseline was chosen, and from which grid
trigonometrical levelling using a Total Station. The method allowed for the
economic in time, since the vertical and horizontal components could be captured
The choice of plotting scale was dependent upon the size and shape of the area and
upon the nature of the terrain, i.e., density of information to be contained and
steepness of slope. Taking all these into consideration, the paper size of the final
output, which would represent it in a legible and aesthetically pleasing manner was
also factored in. Therefore, for a site approximately 3 hectares, a scale of 1:2500
The perimeter survey of the area had been completed and the survey plan was
available at the office. Given the methodology adopted for the project, a baseline from
which the grids would be projected was chosen. This was marked on the Perimeter
plan, preparatory for setting out on site. A line was drawn between SC/AK/C –
SC/AK/C approximately in the North West-South East direction. This line was the
longest line, and projections from it would cover the entire site, hence its choice as
baseline.
Pre analysis was carried out to determine a priori the accuracy expectations from the
survey exercise. Basically, computations were carried out to determine the expected
24
precision level that would be accepted or rejected as the case may be. Two major
Grid levelling was carried out from subsidiary traverse station, which was the basis for
the coordination of grid points. To ascertain precision of data collected, the acceptable
angular misclosures for a third - order traverse was computed. Eqn 1.1 was used.
Where;
k = 30√n
The Maximum Allowable linear accuracy of the subsidiary traverse must not be less
The measure of precision for vertical coordinates of a 3rd Order levelling exercise was
The choice of instrument was dependent on the data type and instrument’s capability
to capture it. Contouring by Total Station was chosen for the project. This was
because Total stations combine the functions of several devices in one unit. The unit
25
can be used for the measurement of distances, angles and differences in height
between points. It was also a digital component, which was automated, enabling data
Grid levelling was planned at 25 meters interval; hence for such a large expanse of
land, a large amount of ground relief detail was collected in the field. Therefore an
instrument that could adequately collect the sufficient shot density and store same
without loss of data was indispensable. Furthermore, the Total Station Instrument was
readily available and the expertise to use it was available; therefore it was the most
preferred.
To establish confidence in the data collected and to give weight to them, it was
appropriate to check the precision of the Total Station Instrument for the project. The
tests were necessitated by the accuracy requirements of the project. The following
A Total Station's Horizontal collimation is in error when its line of sight is not
perpendicular to the trunnion axis. This error affects all horizontal circle readings and
26
increases with steep sightings. This error is modelled such that when the telescope is
rotated about the trunnion axis, it defines a conical surface instead of a true circle. To
verify that this error existed or otherwise, readings to a point on left and right face
Likewise, a Vertical Collimation Error exists on a Total Station if the 0o vertical line
in the instrument's vertical circle is inclined and does not coincide with its true vertical
axis. This zero point error would be present in all vertical circle readings. The
presence of this error is verified if the vertical reading to a point on the instrument's
To carry out this test, the Total Station was set over a point P and temporarily
adjusted. Two tripods T1 and T2 were set up and mounted with reflectors on opposite
sides of the instrument each at approximately 100 meters from the instrument on both
sides.
(1) The reflector on tripod T1 was sighted with the Total Station on Face Left, the
horizontal and vertical circle readings were recorded in a field book. The
opposite side. The horizontal and vertical circle readings were read and
(2) The instrument was then rotated horizontally, and the tripod transited and
rotated through 180 degrees to read the reflector on T2, but this time on face
right. The same procedure repeated, only that this time, it was to T2 first, then
27
to T1. Horizontal and Vertical Circle readings were recorded were as shown in
Table 1.1.
Total Station
T1 T2
Point P T1 L 00 00 00 88 09 45
R 180 00 02 00 00 02 271 50 16
360 00 01 00 00 01
T2 L 180 12 42 92 17 00
R 00 12 44 00 00 02 267 43 02
360 00 02 00 00 02
MEAN 00 00 02 00 00 1.5
From Table 1.1 it could be seen that the horizontal angle measurements as observed
on face left and face right differed by 180o with a 2 second horizontal collimation
error after a mean of three sets of readings was taken. There was also a vertical index
error of 1.5 seconds. These errors were within allowable limits. The instrument was
therefore assumed to be in good adjustment. It also meant that the instrument was
This test was carried out simultaneously with the test for horizontal and vertical
affected by factors like age of instrument and rate of use on site. The EDM distance
constant test was carried out on the Total Station using a 3 peg test. Nominally, an
EDM error is of constant magnitude and does not depend on the length of the line
A line T1PT2 200 meters in length was set on a level ground with point P chosen
T1 P T1
(1) The Total Station instrument was set up over point P and temporarily adjusted
(2) Reflector T1 was sighted, and the distance T1-P was observed five times and the
(3) The procedure was repeated, this time to reflector T2, whose distance P-T2, was
(4) The instrument was moved and set up at point T1 and temporarily adjusted
measurements T1-P and T1-T2 were each made and recorded five times
respectively. The mean values were computed and are shown and are shown in
Table 1.2
4 100.003
5 100.004
100.004
P-T2 1 100.009
2 100.006
3 100.008
4 100.010
5 100.009
100.008
T1 T1- T2 1 200.020
2 200.018
3 200.019
4 200.018
5 200.018
200.019
The following equation was used to determine the instrument constant/offset error.
A value of 0.007m was considered relatively insignificant, hence the Total Station's
When the Plate and Circular Levels of a Total Station are not in the horizontal plane,
angle. However, when the bubbles in the plate a circular levels are centred
simultaneously it gives some level of confidence that they are in the horizontal plane.
If on the other hand, it is found to be off centre, the bubble must be adjusted, to ensure
that both bubbles are centred whenever the Total Station is levelled.
This test was carried out on the SOKKIA SET 530R Total Station to be used for this
(1) The instrument was set up and levelled by ensuring that the plate and circular
(2) With the instrument firmly fixed to the tribrach, the upper part was turned
(3) After turning the instrument thought its horizontal axis severally, both bubbles
Since both bubbles in the circular and plate levels were centred after levelling the
instrument, they were assumed to be in the horizontal plan, and there was no need for
adjustment.
31
The optical plummet on the total station was also checked prior to the fieldwork. A
piece of plain paper was fixed to a level surface and a clear mark was made in pen on
it. The instrument was then set up on a tripod and centred and leveled over the mark.
With the mark on the ground in clear focus and the cross hairs centred over it, the
instrument was rotated around its vertical axis roughly 90o. If the cross hairs left the
mark, then the optical plummet required calibration (i.e. the vertical axis was not truly
vertical). However, with the rotation, the instrument was still centred over the mark.
Hence it was assumed that the instrument's optical plummet was in good adjustment.
32
CHAPTER THREE
DATA ACQUISITION
1.30 PREAMBLE
This section explains the actual data collection process. On site, the observations
began with an in-situ check to determine the integrity of the boundary beacons used
for coordinating the subsidiary traverse, which was in turn used to coordinate the grid
points. This was followed by the grid line clearing and finally with the grid levelling
In situ checks were carried out on three perimeter beacons two of which were the end
points of the Baseline. The test was carried out to ensure that they were in position
and undisturbed. The checks comprised carrying out back computation of the beacon
coordinates to derive the distances and angle between them, carrying out field
measurements using a Total Station to obtain angles and distances between the
a. Field observations were carried out as follows; the instrument was set up on
SC/AK/C61362 and observed on Face Left. The Horizontal Circle Reading was
recorded along with the distance between the two stations. The telescope was
SC/AK/C59992. The horizontal circle reading and distance were recorded. The
telescope was transited and rotated through 180 degrees to Face Right and the
33
procedure was repeated. But this time, the fore station was first observed before
the telescope was rotated horizontally to observe the back station. Recorded
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Station SIGHT FACE Hz. Circ. R. ANGLES MEAN
Distance
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SC/AK/C1 L 000 00 00 144.096m
SC/AK/C3 L 274 52 07 274 52 07
SC/AK/C2 SC/AK/C3 R 94 52 08 274 52 07 274 52 07
SC/AK/C1 R 180 00 01 120.430
To derive the bearings/angles and distances between the stations from their
∆𝑁
Bearing = tan−1 - - - - - - - Eqn 1.5
∆𝐸
b. The algebraic signs and the quadrants of the respective partial coordinates were
noted accordingly.
Where;
c. The two data sets were compared and tabulated as shown in Table 1.4
34
Angular SC/AK/C61362 274 o 52’ 07 " 274 o 52’ 25 " -00 0’ 18” 00 0’ 30” Accepted
< SC/AK/C59991
SC/AK/C59992
From Table 1.3, the calculated angular difference of -0o 0’ 18” was within the
acceptable limit of 30” for a 3rd Order survey and the calculated linear differences of -
0.019m and 0.028m were insignificant. Thirdly the height differences obtained from
insitu check was quite encouraging, and it meant the vertical component can be relied
upon when making observations. Based on the above results it was concluded that the
SC/AK/C59992
SC/AK/C59991
SC/AK/C61362
Baseline clearing was carried out by chainmen using Ranging Poles. Line clearing
was approximately 1 meter wide. All undergrowth, shrubs and obstacles were cleared
using cutlasses, after which pegs were planted at 10 meter intervals. The pegs were
positioned in straight lines. Perpendicular offsets were set out from the pegs and
cleared of obstacles, obstructions and bushes until they intersected a boundary line.
The perpendicular offsets were also pegged at 10 meter intervals to establish a grid
Grid levelling was carried out from subsidiary traverse stations, to enable a precision
check of the contouring exercise. The following procedure for data collections was
adjustment (centering and levelling of instrument) was carried out and the total
station and back sight station SC/AK/C61362 coordinates with their respective
heights. Also keyed in were the instrument and reflector heights (which were
default.
36
To set the computed azimuth as the starting bearing. The reflector on the back
station was observed and its coordinates (N, E and Z) were recorded.
The telescope was then rotated horizontally to sight and take measurements to
the reflector on the forward station. The coordinates observed were recorded.
The instrument was then moved to the next station and the process was
repeated.
from the perimeter survey. A back sight observation was made to SC/AK/C 61362
while foresight was observed to P1, a subsidiary traverse station. The intermediate
pegs were observed and their coordinates and heights were recorded. The traverse
continued from point to point until all the grids were observed and their coordinates
were recorded. The traverse closed at its starting point. This gave room for an
The following precautions were taken during observations to ensure precise results;
Levelling distances were kept within 150 meters of the instrument to avoid
All observations were recorded in the Total Station's electronic field book to
Differences between observed and recorded back coordinates were noted and
During observation, the reflector was kept truly vertical by using its bubbles
38
CHAPTER FOUR
DATA PROCESSING
1. The Laptop Computer was powered on and the SOKKIA Software interface was
launched
3. “Comms” Port settings on the laptops were set to synchronise with “comms” port
4. The data was then downloaded from instrument to computer and stored as a
SDR33 file. Downloaded file was then copied and saved as an Excel file
Direct coordinates (N,E,Z) were obtained from the field observation. In Microsoft
Excel, the coordinates of each occupied point was arranged in cells Intermediate grid
points were not computed at this stage. The instrument Stations were selected for
adjustment, which would be applied to the grid points which were observed from each
station. Since the traverse commenced and closed at the same point, it was easy to
Data reduction was carried out to derive the partial coordinates, distances and bearings
To compute the partial coordinates the cell values were subtracted in excel,
As follows;
Where
K and L are the Column values in Excel, while n is the row number
The use of the Total Station gave rise to field finish coordinates, hence there was no
need to adjust bearings, only to apply correction values to the partial coordinates. The
equal to zero. However the summation of the traverses resulted in misclosures. The
⅀∆E = 𝜺𝑬 = 0.131
⅀∆N = 𝜺𝑵 = -0.153
Since the linear errors had negative and positive values, the corrections were added to
and subtracted from the partial coordinates respectively. The corrections due to a
particular instrument station was applied to all intermediate points observed from the
instrument station
Computation for the final coordinates commenced from the starting station. The
coordinates of the first Subsidiary Station P1 was obtained by the sum of the starting
coordinate, the Partial coordinate and the adjustment computed by Bowditch rule.
Where;
To check the precision of horizontal coordinates obtained during the survey, the linear
accuracy of the traverse was computed. The first step was to obtain the linear
Where;
Secondly, the linear accuracy of the traverse was computed using the formula
𝟏𝟐𝟖𝟖.𝟒𝟕𝟕
Where Total Length of Traverse was = 1288.4771: ( 0.201
)
= 1: = 1: 6395~ 1:6400
42
The project was mainly to determine the configuration of the terrain, and this required
determine if it met the required accuracy standards, a comparison was made. Recall
that the grid levelling exercise commenced and terminated at the same point.
The height of Beacon SC/AK/C59991 at start of grid levelling = 16.977 meters. The
This value was checked for its allowability using Eqn 1.2 (see Preanalysis)
Where;
The value 0.021m was less than the allowable value of 0.030m; hence the result was
accepted and the misclosure was distributed equally among the numbers of observed
points
The correction value was subtracted cumulatively from each observed height as
The Relative Precision of height measurements was computed by dividing the total
Length of Traverse
Relative Precision = ( ) - - - - - Eqn 1.17
Misclosure
1288.477
( )
0.021
CHAPTER FIVE
RESULTS AND ANALYSIS
The final results obtained in this project, included the height of boundary beacons and
the height of grid points. The aim was to determine the configuration of the terrain
within third order accuracy standards. Hence the Linear accuracies in heights and
horizontal coordinates are also presented. The Final coordinates resulting from
computations and adjustments of field data are presented. Table 1.5 shows the
points are listed in Table 1.6. This is followed by the coordinates of grid points Table
1.7.
These values form the basis for the production of plans and maps required for design,
In numerical analysis, accuracy is also the nearness of a calculation to the true value;
in this project, the accuracy standard was third order, which implied that the linear
accuracy must not be less than 1:3000. Table 1.8 shows the height misclosure and
The Linear accuracy showed that the traverse and leveling exercises met the accuracy
Informed planning is made possible by the availability of facts and data. This project
generated height information that shows by way of visual representation, the terrain of
the site. From the data, an elevation range could be readily computed. The
lowest point is 15.005m, while the highest is 49.789m. This showed a range of 34.784
meters. This range is considered large enough to support high speed storm water
discharge that could enhance erosion. Therefore, the Engineer, Architect, Town
55
Planner or decision maker is provided with the necessary facts to help in arriving at an
advantageous design or decision. This project also densified the height framework,
which could guide during earth works, design/setting out of roads and drainages
To plot the survey, AutoCAD Civil 3d 2018 and Surfer were employed. The contour
and spot heights were plotted and overlaid on the 2D plot of the previously surveyed
boundary points. The following procedures were used for the plotting:
A point file (Tab delimited), containing the grid coordinates and heights
AutoCAD Civil 3D was launched, and the Unit settings were made
Layers were created for each of the drawing items. On the Layer Properties
tab different layers were created for spot heights, contour lines, plan border,
Grids etc.
Next, a Surface was created in AutoCAD Civil 3D with the point intervals
set to 25 meters.
The Point file containing the grid points was imported into the Surface.
In Surfer 7, a grid was created using the point file containing the grid point
coordinates.
A Contour map and Wireframe (DTM) were created in Surfer and exported
to AutoCAD as a .dxf
56
The contour lines were overlaid on the perimeter drawing to derive the
contour plan.
components of the drawing i.e. Contour, Spot heights were overlaid to form
a topographic map.
The height range on the contour map was 34.784 meters therefore a contour interval
(vertical interval) of 0.5 meters was chosen. Finally the contour and spot heights plan
were produced at a scale of 1:2000 while the DTM was not drawn to scale. See
Appendices 1D and 1F
57
CHAPTER SIX
PROJECT COSTING
The cost of the project was based on Consultancy Cost Part 1 Scale of Fees (2008)
Table 29 and Direct Field Cost Part 2 of Scale of Fees (2008) Page 14
[A] = N 172,750
Reimbursables/Contingencies and
(One Million, One Hundred and Forty One Thousand, Three Hundred and
CHAPTER SEVEN
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Minimal problems were encountered on site because the client had given ample
information to the community leaders in whose domain the project site was situate.
Persons who were still using the land for cultivation were given prior notice to harvest
Rainfall was a major challenge as it hampered smooth flow of work from time to
time. This challenge was met by provision of safety and rain kit to the personnel
No injury of any kind was reported on site. Furthermore, safety pep talks were given
1.72 RECOMMENDATION
1. SURCON and policy makers in the Geoinformatics and survey sector should
push for the implementation of the building code in all government and private
sector developments
them to be tied to future surveys, rather than being lost, removed arbitrarily or
covered.
60
required to present all the horizontal and vertical survey control needed, duly
1.73 CONCLUSION
The project was aimed at producing a topographic plan of the proposed Dove
International School. The Grid Contouring method yielded highly precise terrain data
of the present relief configuration of the site. There was no man-hour loss due to
accident or incidents resulting from the field operations, only by natural causes. The
project was executed in strict compliance with survey rules and regulations.
1.74 SUBMISSIONS
BIBLIOGRAPHY
- Allan, A. L., Hollwey, J. R., Mayner, J. H. B. (1980) Practical Field Surveying and
Computations. William Heinemman Ltd, London.
- Anderson James M. & Mikhail Edward M. (1998): “Surveying Theory and
Practice” 7th Ed. WCB/McGraw Hill USA.
- Bannister, A., Raymond, S., and Baker, R. (1998). Surveying. Seventh Edition,
Harlow, England: Longman, Pearson Education Ltd., Edinburgh
Gate, Harlow, Essex, CM20 22JE.
- Ekpete B. O. (2014): “Choosing Projects and Folio Preparation for SURCON
Professional Examinations”, workshop organized by SURCON at University
of Nigeria, Enugu Campus 7th and 8th March
- Leatherdale, J. 1992. Prospects for Mapping and Spatial, Information
Management in Developing Countries. ITC Journal , 1992-4,343-347.
- Meine, K. H. 1972. Considerations on the State of Development with regard to
Topographical Maps of the Different Countries of the Earth,
International Yearbook of Cartography, Vol. XII, pp. 182-195.
- Olorunfemi, J. F. 1992. The Topographic map. A Neglected Tool in Population
Estimation, in Balogun, O.Y.(ed.) Census and Census Mapping in Nigeria,
Spe. Publ. NCAP-2, Nig. Carto. Asso., Lagos, pp. 43-50.
- Surveyors Council of Nigeria (SURCON) (1989): Specification for Large Scale
Cadastral and Engineering Survey in Nigeria.
- Ufuah, M. E. 2000. Revision of the Nigeria 1:50,000 Topographic Maps with
SPOT Remotely Sensed Date, Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Ambrose Alli
University, Ekpoma, Nigeria.
- USACE (2007): Engineering and Design Control and Topographic Surveying.
Manual No. 1110-1-1005. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY US Army
Corps of Engineers, Washington, DC 20314-1000
- Wolf, P. R. and Ghilani, C. D. 2006. Elementary Surveying, 11th ed,. Prentice
Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
62
APPENDICES
1) RECCE Diagram of site (Appendix 1A)
389528.215 554477.575
0.007 -0.008
P4 128 13 59 65.91465 51.78 -40.79 389528.21 554477.58 P5
389538.295 554484.966
0.001 -0.001
P5 53 47 31 12.50003 10.09 7.38 389538.29 554484.97 P6
389486.147 554529.682
0.007 -0.008
P6 310 36 49 68.70361 -52.15 44.72 389486.14 554529.69 P7
389494.888 554538.618
0.001 -0.001
P7 44 24 36 12.49948 8.75 8.93 389494.89 554538.62 P8
389549.212 554493.460
0.007 -0.008
P8 129 44 4 70.63326 54.32 -45.15 389549.21 554493.47 P9
389559.394 554500.709
0.001 -0.001
P9 54 35 36 12.49968 10.19 7.24 389559.39 554500.71 P10
389505.904 554548.730
0.007 -0.009
P10 311 55 4 71.89302 -53.50 48.03 389505.90 554548.74 P11
389514.778 554557.535
0.001 -0.001
P11 45 16 8 12.49966 8.88 8.80 389514.78 554557.54 P12
389571.935 554509.022
0.008 -0.009
P12 130 19 20 74.95904 57.15 -48.51 389571.93 554509.03 P13
389581.571 554516.984
0.001 -0.001
P13 50 28 57 12.50014 9.64 7.95 389581.57 554516.99 P14
73
389529.821 554562.600
0.007 -0.008
P14 311 23 46 68.99378 -51.76 45.62 389529.81 554562.61 P15
389538.770 554571.328
0.001 -0.001
P15 45 45 30 12.49991 8.95 8.72 389538.77 554571.33 P16
389595.589 554526.435
0.007 -0.009
P16 128 18 38 72.40428 56.81 -44.89 389595.58 554526.44 P17
389605.342 554534.253
0.001 -0.001
P17 51 19 49 12.49937 9.76 7.81 389605.34 554534.25 P18
389551.794 554583.452
0.007 -0.009
P18 312 34 40 72.72798 -53.55 49.21 389551.79 554583.46 P19
389561.399 554591.453
0.001 -0.001
P19 50 15 5 12.50037 9.61 7.99 389561.40 554591.45 P20
389618.482 554544.505
0.008 -0.009
P20 129 26 3 73.8988 57.08 -46.94 389618.47 554544.51 P21
389626.722 554549.806
0.001 -0.001
P21 57 18 26 9.799432 8.25 5.29 389626.72 554549.81 P22
389572.574 554606.000
0.008 -0.009
P22 316 3 46 78.04761 -54.16 56.20 389572.57 554606.01 P23
389581.832 554614.400
0.001 -0.001
P23 47 49 50 12.50064 9.27 8.39 389581.83 554614.40 P24
74
389599.998 554606.374
0.002 -0.002
P24 113 50 6 19.8587 18.16 -8.02 389599.996 554606.376 SC/AK/C60013
389664.319 554516.521
0.011 -0.013
SC/AK/C60013 144 24 13 110.4881 64.31 -89.84 389664.31 554516.53 SC/AK/C61362
1288.477 0.151 -0.131
75