Professional Documents
Culture Documents
So So Is: E GHZ GHZ
So So Is: E GHZ GHZ
TABLE I
BeamwidthGain Bandwidth
dB N3 Experiment
Theory 1 dB E H Sidelobes
41.5 dB 13.5
14.5 dB GHz 550 MHz 35" 3 7; -8 dB
8 17.7 dB 17 dB 1.5 GHz 700 MHz 3 2' 16 -9 dB
21 16 dB 20.3 dB 1.5 GHz 600 MHz 15' 15" -12 dB
64 dB 27 24.3 dB 1.4 GHz MHz
650 8" 8" -12 dB
This formula may be used to find the element width so the radia- bandwidth of microstrip antennas reported so far by othersis less
tion resistance will be 200 n. It should be noted that the inte- than 20 percent.
grand for PR is the radiationpatternof a single element.The
radiation pattern for an array will be given by the product of this EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
integrand by the array factor. Thiswas used in the computersim- The antennas are shown in Fig. 1. All the relevant dimensions
ulation to find the optimum distance between elements. in terms of guide wavelength are indicated in Fig. 1. The micro-
The same expression with a different current distribution was strip patches were etched on perspex dielectric substrates. The
also used to estimate the radiation loss from the feed network in
the array. -7-/ A
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We thank Professor S. Shtrikman forvery helpful discussions.
REFERENCES
[I] R . J. Mailloux, J. F. McIlvenna, and N. P. Kernweis. "Microstrip
array technology," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat.. vol. AP-29, no.
I , pp. 25-37. Jan. 1981.
[ 2 ] J . Ashkenazy, P. Perlmutter, S. Shtrikman. and D. Treves in Proc. F i r s
MediterraneanElectrotech. Conf.. IEEE Melecon '81. Tel Aviv.
Israel, Antennas 3 . 3 .I .
[3] N. K . C'zunoglu, N. G . Alexopoulus. and .I. G. Fikioris, "Radiation
properties of microstrip dipoles." IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagar.,
vol. AP-27. no. 6 . pp. 853-858, Nov. 1979.
,- Microstrip patch
INTRODUCTION Dielectric
Microstrip resonators of rectangular, circular, and other shapes substrate
have been investigated in many works [ l ]-[5] because of their (b)
various advantages, such as ease of fabrication and compatibility
with solid-state microwave devices. The main drawback of micro-
strip resonators is their narrow bandwidth. Various attempts have
been made t o improve the bandwidthof microstrip resonators like
using parasites [6] and increasing the thicknessof substrates [7] by
various planar and multilayered structures [ 8 ] . The present work
is concerned with the measurement of the(1 :2) voltage standing-
wave ratio (VSWR) bandwidth of some microstrip resonators on
steppedandwedgeshapeddielectric-substrates.Thesemeasure-
ments indicate that the fractional bandwidth in percentage ob-
tainable by these structures ranges from 25 percent, whereas the
(C)
Manuscript received March 22, 1982; revised June 11, 1982. Fig. 1. Proposedmicrostripstructures.(a)Steppedmicrostripresonator.
The authors are with the Department of Electronics and Telecorhmuni- @) Rectangular
microstripresonator.(c) Wedge-shaped microstrip
cation Engineering, Jadavpur Unviersity, Calcutta-700 032, India. resonator.
Cylindrical-RectangularMicrostrip Antenna
CLIFFORD M.KROWNE
Authorized licensed use limited to: VIT University- Chennai Campus. Downloaded on April 09,2021 at 10:39:25 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.