Republic of the Philippines

TECHNICAL EDUCATION AND SKILLS DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

ISO 9001: 2015 Certified

RE: Administrative Case for

SIMPLE NEGLECT OF DUTY
Docket No.: ADM-2020-45

SHARON I. CIPRIANO,
Senior TESD Specialist,
TESDA Pasay-Makati District Office,
National Capital Region
Respondent.

x----------------------------------------------x

FORMAL OFFER OF EVIDENCE

BY THE PROSECUTION

The Prosecution, through the Legal Compliance Division, most

respectfully offers the following documentary evidence:

Exhibi Documents Purpose

t
“A” Service Record of  To prove that the Respondent
the Respondent was the Senior TESD Specialist
and Scholarship Focal of TESDA
Pasay-Makati (PasMak).
“B” National  To prove that the NISP inspected
Inspectorate for the implementation of training
Scholarship program of Kirkland Skills Center
Programs (NISP) Corporation (Kirkland).
Reports dated 09  To prove that Kirkland committed
February 2020 violations as per reports of the
NISP.
“C to Sinumpaang  To corroborate the NISP Report
C-1” Salaysay of the dated 09 February 2020.
Scholars  To prove that the scholars stated
that they did not attend the
training.
 To prove that the scholars stated
that Kirkland illegally exacted
unauthorized fees from them.
“D” Memorandum to  To prove that the Respondent
Explain dated 19 was ordered to submit an
May 2020 from the explanation regarding the alleged
Director General violation of Kirkland.
“E” Hold Payment  To prove that payment of the
East Service Road, South Luzon Expressway (SLEX), Fort Bonifacio, Taguig City 1630
Land Line: (+632) 8888-5641 to 46; CP Number: (+63)917-4794370 (text only) Telefax No.: (+632)8893-2454
www.tesda.gov.ph , contactcenter@tesda.gov.ph
 Order dated 08 training costs was released to
June 2020 from the Kirkland
NCR Regional
Director.
“F” Memorandum  To prove that Kirkland violated
dated 30 July 2020 TESDA Circular No. 023, Series
from the Director of 20191 and TESDA Circular No.
General 15, Series of 20152 and its
Certificate of TVET Program
Registration and Accreditation as
Assessment Center were
revoked.
“G” Formal Charge for  To prove that the Respondent
Simple Neglect of was properly informed of the
Duty charge against her for Simple
Neglect of Duty.
“H” Memorandum  To prove that Respondent was
dated 25 August able to explain her side after
2020 of the having been formally charged.
Respondent

Aforesaid exhibits are being offered to prove that the offense

was committed by the Respondent.

WHEREFORE, in view of the foregoing, it is most respectfully

prayed that the above FORMAL OFFER of DOCUMENTARY
EVIDENCE be ADMITTED for the purposes for which they are
offered and be CONSIDERED in deciding the instant case.

Taguig City, 12 August 2021.

ATTY. JAN MICHAEL P. JARO

Officer-in-Charge, Legal Compliance Division
TESDA – Interim Internal Affairs Service
Roll of Attorney Number 65681
IBP Life Member Roll No. 016091, Pasig, 27 April 2017
MCLE No. V1-0002457

Copy Furnished:

SHARON I. CIPRIANO,
TESDA Pasay-Makati, National Capital Region

1
Amendment of Section XVII – Sanctions and Penalties of the Amended Omnibus Guidelines on Program
Registration under the Unified TVET Program Registration and Accreditation System (UTPRAS)
2
Guidelines on Assessment and Certification under the Philippine TVET Competency Assessment and
Certification System (PTCACS)
Page 2 of 2