Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lab1 MEE30004 - Lab1 - 2021 Sem2 - Raw Data
Lab1 MEE30004 - Lab1 - 2021 Sem2 - Raw Data
Strain is measured at a number of locations (see Fig. 2, page 3) using strain gauges bonded to the
top surface of the thin aluminium plate. Readings from these strain gauges are monitored on an FL
151 Data Logger directly as microstrain (10 -6 m/m or μm/m).
IMPORTANT NOTES: 1) RETAIN a COPY of your Results for use with the FEM Assignment.
Page 1 of of 5
PROCEDURE and RESULTS – DEFLECTION :
Vertical upwards plate deflection (‘Z’ direction) is measured using the dial gauge (4) – in Fig. 1,
which has units of 0.01 mm. The dial gauge is mounted on a calibrated slide (5) and secured with a
thumb screw, Tighten thumb screw prior to taking each measurement, record results in TABLE 1,
start measurements in centre. Pressure is applied to bottom surface of plate by rotating the oil
reservoir knob (2).
1. Move dial gauge to centre and initially zero by rotating the face - subsequently do not change.
Set starting pressure to ZERO and measure vertical ‘Z’ deflection at all noted locations.
(This starting profile will be used as a Reference.)
2. Increase pressure to 0.2 and 0.4 Bar and repeat measurements of vertical ‘Z’ deflection at all
locations noted for each pressure These readings are the raw deflection measurements.
3. From raw deflection measurements taken in Step 2, subtract dial gauge readings at starting
ZERO pressure (Step 1), at corresponding locations. This will produce a set of corrected
deflection readings for pressure steps Δ p of 0.2 and 0.4 Bar. Use these corrected
experimental deflection readings when comparing with theory.
p = 0.2 3.0 10.8 21.3 30.9 35.2 31.4 21.8 11.0 3.4
Bar
∆p = 0.2 1.8 17.8 38 55.4 62.2 56.2 38.4 18.6 5.1
Bar ۞
p = 0.4 4.6 17.8 38.0 55.4 62.2 56.2 38.4 18.6 5.1
Bar
∆p = 0.4 3.4 14.7 33.2 48.3 53 48.6 33.4 15.2 3.5
Bar ۞
DATA : 1. The circular plate is made from aluminium; take E = 70 GPa, = 0.3.
2. Equivalent diameter of clamped plate is 220 mm.
3. Thickness of plate is 3.0 mm.
Page 2 of of 5
PROCEDURE and RESULTS – STRAIN :
[ DEMONSTRATOR : - Turn on FL 151 Data Logger approx. 30 minutes prior to start of test.]
1. Set starting pressure to ZERO and use FL 151 Data Logger to record all measured strain
gauge readings in TABLE 2. (Allow readings time to “settle”.)
2. Increase pressure to 0.2 and 0.4 Bar and repeat Strain readings as above for each pressure.
3. From raw strain readings (Step 2), subtract corresponding strain readings at Zero Press.
(Step 1) to produce a set of Corrected Strain values (take care with +/- signs) – use these
Corrected values in further calculations. (This procedure allows for “drift” in Strain Gauges.)
4. De-pressurise equipment. Note that FL 120 equipment takes an average value of the two strain
gauges located at the same radius and orientation.
5. Convert Corrected Strain into experimental Radial and Tangential Stress at radii noted below
[See Appendix for further details.] Compare experimental and theoretical values for Stress.
(ii) For deflection - Plot a scale Graph of corrected experimental and theoretical values for
Δ p = 0.2, 0.4 Bar. Vertical axis of graph should be ‘Z’ deflection and horizontal axis
diametral location. Use Eq. (16.26) from Textbook by Benham and etc. for Theoretical
Deflection curve, w. Take Effective Value for Max. Radius, a = 110 mm. (2 Mark)
(iii) For Stress - two scale Graphs (one for Radial, one for Tangential) comparing
experimental and theoretical stress values for Δ p = 0.2, 0.4 Bar. Vertical axis of graph
should be stress and horizontal axis radial location. (2 Mark)
(a) Convert Measured Radial and Tangential Strain at three radial locations corres-
ponding to Strain Gauges 1 through 6, to Radial and Tangential Experimental Stress
according to Eqs. (4.1) and (4.2) in GUNT 120.pdf document. Thus, three separate
calculations are required at r = 25, 72 and 97.5 mm.
(b) Calculate Theoretical Radial and Tangential Stress according to Eqs. (4.8) and (4.9)
in GUNT 120.pdf document. Take Effective Value for Max. Radius, R = 110 mm.
(c) Plot Graphs of Experimental Stress results versus Radius as noted in LAB. 1 Handout
and draw in curve for Theoretical Stress. Two Graphs required – one for Radial Stress
and one for Tangential Stress.
(v) Sample Calculations should be included in an Appendix, attached at the end. Only this
part can be hand-written neatly (1 mark).
Total - 7 Marks
APPENDIX :
For a flat thin circular plate subject to uniform pressure with a clamped periphery (as shown Fig. 1),
it is expected that deflected profile will be a smooth ‘bell shaped’ curve according to the following
equation : (Ref.: Chapt.16 in “Mech. of Eng’ng Mat’ls” by Benham, Crawford and Armstrong)
Page 4 of of 5
p 2
w= ( a2 − r 2 )
Deflection curve : 64 D ….…………………………….. eq.
[16.26]
where : w = vertical deflection (m) ; a = fixed max. radius (m); r = variable radius (m);
p = pressure (Pa) ;
E⋅h3
D=
Flexural Rigidity: 12 ( 1- ν 2 )
where : E = Young’s Modulus (Pa) ; h = plate thickness (m) ; ν = Poisson’s ratio.
σr νσ θ
εr = −
Generalized Hooke’s Law: E E
σθ νσ r
εθ= −
E E
REFERENCES :
Page 5 of of 5
Discussion and Conclusion
Page 6 of of 5
The findings of the experiment reveal that, in most cases, the experimental data closely resembles the
theoretical data. The plate deflection at p = 0.2 had significantly aberrant behavior, diverging much more than
the graph at p = 0.4. It also revealed that the observed deflection was negative closer to the plate's periphery
where it was clamped. The explanation for this could be that the plate was deflected in a negative direction as
a result of being clamped, and the force supplied by the pressure was insufficient to deflect it considerably
because it was so close to the clamped area. This demonstrates that maximal deflection occurs closer to the
plate's center than the margins.
The stress calculations demonstrate that the actual values are fairly close to the theoretical ones. It's worth
noting, though, that all of the numbers closer to the plate's center are slightly higher than the theoretically
projected values. This could be due to the plates not being as strong as they should be, resulting in increased
stress for a given pressure.
The use of corrected pressure values created an initial deflection of the plate, making the plate deflection more
uniform and reducing the risks of experimental error due to odd stresses and deflections for both the deflection
and stress results. The preload values were deducted from the values derived from the stresses applied since
absolute values were necessary for our computations.
The findings of the experiment indicate that the deflection of a flat plate is parabolic, with the highest
occurring in the middle and no deflection occurring when it is clamped. Maximum stress is likewise found in
the center of the plate, according to the stress graphs. As a result, it can be shown that the largest stress occurs
where the maximum deflection occurs.
Page 7 of of 5