Dredging S9A S9B - Stanley-Flood Mitigation Options Report

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

OPTION

CLIENT Study Number Date Item No.


City of Cedar Rapids
21493.02 9/10/08
Sasaki Associates Inc. Structural
S9A
Study Cedar Rapids River Corridor Redevelopment
Title: Flood Control Study

TITLE: Increase Cedar River Channel Cross Section by Dredging


DESCRIPTION:
Dredge Cedar River channel to provide an increased section to allow a higher flow rate. Based on dredging the
river from the Five in One Dam (cross section T) to the south side of the landfill (cross section F). The typical
cross section uses a minimum bottom width of 300 feet sloping from an invert elevation of 699.0 feet to 692.0
feet. Approximately 183,000 cubic yards of material removed from the channel, which includes rock excavation.

ADVANTAGES:
Increased flow would reduce flood crest in Cedar Rapids.

DISADVANTAGES:
Dredging likely to need permitting from several agencies.
Spoil may include hazardous wastes (may contain phosphates, high pesticide levels and other farm runoff
chemicals) which will need remediation or special waste disposal.
Only small dredges can be used in river due to the available water depths (versus large dredges in Mississippi)
which will cause high costs.
High cost to remove/transport dredge material out of river floodway and floodplain.
Short term option unless continuing maintenance dredging is performed.
Although crest is reduced in Cedar Rapids, crests remain the same downstream.

Potential Reduction in 100-year Flood Crest: 0 ft to 0.4 ft.


Potential Reduction in 500-year Flood Crest: 0 ft to 0.3 ft.
Potential Reduction in 2008 Flood Crest: 0 ft to 0.2 ft.

Likely Timeline Before Benefits Occur: 10 to 20 years

ROM Cost Estimate: $26,000,000

OPTION RO 7/21/08
COST DEVELOPMENT
CLIENT Study Number Date Item
City of Cedar Rapids
21493.02 9/9/2008
Sasaki Associates Inc.
Study Cedar Rapids River Corridor Redevelopment
S9A
Title Flood Control Study
Item Quantity Unit Labor and Total
Materials
Project Length (15,730 ft/3 +/- miles)

Excavation (182,749 CY)

Dredging 24,540 CY $38 $932,520

Rock 158,209 CY $114 $18,035,826

Disposal

Wet 24,540 CY $38 $932,520

Rock 158,209 CY $38 $6,011,942

Permitting 1 LS $350,000 $350,000

Total $26,262,808

Use $26,000,000

jlk:mjh:fs2:mp3:21493:06:04:Options_Forms:AppA_att2_Cost_mjhR1_MK.xls ______
T

R
Q

I
M

J
L

Legend
Cross Section Line
F
Flood Control Option

City of Cedar Rapids


0 750 1,500 3,000 4,500 S9A - Increase Cedar River Channel
Feet Cross Section by Dredging
OPTION
CLIENT Study Number Date Item No.
City of Cedar Rapids
21493.02 9/10/08
Sasaki Associates Inc. Structural
S9B
Study Cedar Rapids River Corridor Redevelopment
Title: Flood Control Study

TITLE: Increase Cedar River Channel Cross Section by Widening Channel


DESCRIPTION:
Dredge/widen Cedar River channel to provide an increased cross section area to allow a higher flow rate.

Based on widening the river channel from the Five in One Dam (cross section T) to the south side of the landfill
(cross section F). The typical cross section uses a minimum bottom width of 700 feet sloping from an invert
elevation of 699.0 feet to 692.0 feet. Approximately 1,644,000 cubic yards of material removed from the channel,
which includes rock excavation and 1,150,000 cubic yards of material removed form the banks. See figure for
Option S9A.

ADVANTAGES:
Increased cross section area to convey flow would reduce flood crest in Cedar Rapids.

DISADVANTAGES:
Dredging/excavation likely to need permitting from several agencies.
Spoil may include hazardous wastes (may contain phosphates and other farm runoff chemicals) which will need
remediation or special waste disposal.
High cost to remove/transport dredge material out of river floodway and floodplain.
Short term option unless continuing maintenance dredging is performed.
Although crest is reduced in Cedar Rapids, crests remain the same downstream.

Potential Reduction in 100-year Flood Crest: 0 ft to 3.8 ft.


Potential Reduction in 500-year Flood Crest: 0 ft to 3.3 ft.
Potential Reduction in 2008 Flood Crest: 0 ft to 3.2 ft.

Likely Timeline Before Benefits Occur: 10 to 20 years

ROM Cost Estimate: $333,000,000

OPTION RO 7/21/08
COST DEVELOPMENT
CLIENT Study Number Date Item
City of Cedar Rapids
21493.02 9/9/2008
Sasaki Associates Inc.
Study Cedar Rapids River Corridor Redevelopment
S9B
Title Flood Control Study
Item Quantity Unit Labor and Total
Materials
Project Length - (15,730 ft/3 Miles)

Excavation

Side Embankment 652,463 CY $19 $12,396,797

Dredging

Earth - Wet 992,665 CY $38 $37,721,270

Rock 1,148,926 CY $114 $130,977,564

Disposal

Earth

Dry 652,463 CY $38 $24,793,594

Wet 992,665 CY $38 $37,721,270

Rock 1,148,926 CY $38 $43,659,188

Clearing & Grubbing 50 AC $17,267 $863,350

Structure Removal

Private 3 EA $14,232 $42,696

Commercial 8 EA $189,750 $1,518,000

Industrial 3 EA $1,900,000 $5,700,000

Infrastructure

Utilities 3 Miles $3,795,000 $11,385,000

jlk:mjh:fs2:mp3:21493:06:04:Options_Forms:AppA_att2_Cost_mjhR1_MK.xls ______
COST DEVELOPMENT
CLIENT Study Number Date Item
City of Cedar Rapids
21493.02 9/9/2008
Sasaki Associates Inc.
Study Cedar Rapids River Corridor Redevelopment
S9B
Title Flood Control Study
Item Quantity Unit Labor and Total
Materials
Roads 2 Miles $2,846,250 $5,692,500

Bridges

Highway 3 EA $5,692,500 $17,077,500

Railway 1 EA $2,846,250 $2,846,250

Permitting 1 LS $500,000 $500,000

Total $332,894,979

Use $333,000,000

jlk:mjh:fs2:mp3:21493:06:04:Options_Forms:AppA_att2_Cost_mjhR1_MK.xls ______

You might also like