Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dredging S9A S9B - Stanley-Flood Mitigation Options Report
Dredging S9A S9B - Stanley-Flood Mitigation Options Report
Dredging S9A S9B - Stanley-Flood Mitigation Options Report
ADVANTAGES:
Increased flow would reduce flood crest in Cedar Rapids.
DISADVANTAGES:
Dredging likely to need permitting from several agencies.
Spoil may include hazardous wastes (may contain phosphates, high pesticide levels and other farm runoff
chemicals) which will need remediation or special waste disposal.
Only small dredges can be used in river due to the available water depths (versus large dredges in Mississippi)
which will cause high costs.
High cost to remove/transport dredge material out of river floodway and floodplain.
Short term option unless continuing maintenance dredging is performed.
Although crest is reduced in Cedar Rapids, crests remain the same downstream.
OPTION RO 7/21/08
COST DEVELOPMENT
CLIENT Study Number Date Item
City of Cedar Rapids
21493.02 9/9/2008
Sasaki Associates Inc.
Study Cedar Rapids River Corridor Redevelopment
S9A
Title Flood Control Study
Item Quantity Unit Labor and Total
Materials
Project Length (15,730 ft/3 +/- miles)
Disposal
Total $26,262,808
Use $26,000,000
jlk:mjh:fs2:mp3:21493:06:04:Options_Forms:AppA_att2_Cost_mjhR1_MK.xls ______
T
R
Q
I
M
J
L
Legend
Cross Section Line
F
Flood Control Option
Based on widening the river channel from the Five in One Dam (cross section T) to the south side of the landfill
(cross section F). The typical cross section uses a minimum bottom width of 700 feet sloping from an invert
elevation of 699.0 feet to 692.0 feet. Approximately 1,644,000 cubic yards of material removed from the channel,
which includes rock excavation and 1,150,000 cubic yards of material removed form the banks. See figure for
Option S9A.
ADVANTAGES:
Increased cross section area to convey flow would reduce flood crest in Cedar Rapids.
DISADVANTAGES:
Dredging/excavation likely to need permitting from several agencies.
Spoil may include hazardous wastes (may contain phosphates and other farm runoff chemicals) which will need
remediation or special waste disposal.
High cost to remove/transport dredge material out of river floodway and floodplain.
Short term option unless continuing maintenance dredging is performed.
Although crest is reduced in Cedar Rapids, crests remain the same downstream.
OPTION RO 7/21/08
COST DEVELOPMENT
CLIENT Study Number Date Item
City of Cedar Rapids
21493.02 9/9/2008
Sasaki Associates Inc.
Study Cedar Rapids River Corridor Redevelopment
S9B
Title Flood Control Study
Item Quantity Unit Labor and Total
Materials
Project Length - (15,730 ft/3 Miles)
Excavation
Dredging
Disposal
Earth
Structure Removal
Infrastructure
jlk:mjh:fs2:mp3:21493:06:04:Options_Forms:AppA_att2_Cost_mjhR1_MK.xls ______
COST DEVELOPMENT
CLIENT Study Number Date Item
City of Cedar Rapids
21493.02 9/9/2008
Sasaki Associates Inc.
Study Cedar Rapids River Corridor Redevelopment
S9B
Title Flood Control Study
Item Quantity Unit Labor and Total
Materials
Roads 2 Miles $2,846,250 $5,692,500
Bridges
Total $332,894,979
Use $333,000,000
jlk:mjh:fs2:mp3:21493:06:04:Options_Forms:AppA_att2_Cost_mjhR1_MK.xls ______