Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2001-Computer-Generated Space-Variant Polarization Elements With Subwavelength Metal Stripes (OPL)
2001-Computer-Generated Space-Variant Polarization Elements With Subwavelength Metal Stripes (OPL)
1 / OPTICS LETTERS 33
Subwavelength metal wire gratings are usually used ings with various periods. We chose the direction of
as polarizers. When the period of the grating is much the grating vector so that c and Dc coincided. For
smaller than the incident wavelength, only light that this purpose was fabricated a chirped grating with a
is polarized perpendicular to the stripes is transmit- local period that varied from 2 to 5 mm along 7.5 mm,
ted through the grating. Metal-stripe gratings are with a width of 5 mm and duty cycle of 0.5. First a
usually linear uniform gratings, which form homoge- chrome mask of the grating was fabricated by use of
neous space-invariant polarizers.1,2 Sometimes, how- high-resolution laser lithography, and then the grating
ever, different polarization is required at each location. was realized on a 500-mm-thick semi-insulating GaAs
Such nonuniform space-variant polarization is useful wafer by use of a lift-off technique. The metal stripes
for polarization coding of data in optical communica- consisted of a 10-nm layer of Ti, coated by 60 nm of Au.
tion, optical computers3 and neural networks, optical An antiref lection coating was applied to the back side
encryption,4 tight focusing,5 imaging polarimetry,6 and of the wafer.
particle trapping and acceleration.7 We illuminated the gratings with circularly polar-
In this Letter we present a method of design- ized light at a wavelength of 10.6 mm from a CO2
ing, analyzing, and realizing computer-generated laser and made four measurements of the transmit-
space-variant metal-stripe polarization elements. We ted intensity. The first three measurements were
show that by determination of the local direction made after the light was passed through a polarizer
as well as the period of the metal grating by use of that was oriented horizontally, diagonally (45±), or
vectorial-optics calculations the desired polarization vertically. The fourth measurement involved passing
change can be obtained. Moreover, our method the light through a quarter-wave plate with its fast
ensures that the metal-stripe gratings are continu- axis at 0± and then through a polarizer at 45±. We
ous over the entire aperture of the two-dimensional computed the intensity measurements by imaging the
elements; therefore any diffraction arising from polar- grating through a lens onto a Spiricon PyrocamI pyro-
ization discontinuity is completely suppressed.4 We electric camera. From these four measurements the
demonstrate our method with a specif ic space-variant
polarization element.
Figure 1 illustrates the geometry of the polarization
ellipse of light transmitted through a subwavelength
grating. The grating vector, which is perpendicular
to the stripes, is
Stokes parameters 共S0 S3 兲 could be calculated8,9 for We can solve Eq. (4) analytically under the zero-
each point of the grating, and the ellipticity and azi- order approximation that Dc关K0 共x, y兲兴 苷 c1 , where c1
muthal angle could be calculated as tan共2c兲 苷 S2 兾S1 is a constant, to obtain
and sin共2x兲 苷 S3 兾S0 .
2p
The theoretical results were obtained by calculation K0 共x, y兲 苷 exp共ay兲 , (6)
of the transmitted vector fields by use of rigorous L0
coupled-wave analysis.10 We then calculated the where L0 is the grating period at x 苷 0.
coherence matrix9 for the transmitted f ield, from Finally, from Eqs. (3), (5), and (6) the grating func-
which the Stokes parameters were derived. Figure 2 tion is found to be
shows the measured and the calculated results for
the azimuthal angle and the ellipticity of the light 2p
transmitted through the chirped grating as a function f共x, y兲 苷 sin共ax 1 c0 2 c1 兲exp共ay兲 . (7)
aL0
of the local period. There is good agreement between
the measurement and the predicted results. In the We designed and realized a Lee-type binary grating
region in which the period is much smaller than described by Eq. (7). Figure 3 shows the magnified
the incident wavelength, Dc and tan共x兲 are close to geometry of the computer-generated element. We re-
zero, and the transmitted beam is linearly polarized alized an element for L0 苷 2 mm and a 苷 218±兾mm.
parallel to the grating vector. However, as the period The dimensions of the element were 5 mm 3 1 mm, so
becomes larger, the azimuthal angle and ellipticity 290± , b , 0±, 2 mm , L , 2.8 mm, and c0 苷 c1 苷 15±,
increase. When the period approaches l兾n, where which is Dc at 2 mm, corresponding to Fig. 2(a). The
l is the wavelength and n is the refractive index of element was fabricated as a metal-stripe grating with
the substrate (3.27 for GaAs), we observe a sharp a duty cycle of 0.5 on a 500-mm-thick GaAs wafer with
increase in azimuthal angle and in ellipticity. This an antiref lection coating on the back side. The metal
result seems to be connected to the Wood anomaly.1 stripes consisted of an adhesion layer of 10-nm Ti and
We conclude that, for incident circularly polarized a layer of 60-nm Au. The fabrication technique was
light, Dc varies with the period. Therefore, if we wish the same as that used for fabrication of the chirped
to design a grating for which the desired azimuthal grating.
angle is cdesired, then the direction of the grating must
be such that
References
1. M. Honkanen, V. Kettonen, M. Kuittinen, J. Lautanen,
J. Turunen, B. Schnabel, and F. Wyrowski, Appl. Phys.
B 68, 81 (1999).
2. S. Astilean, Ph. Lalanne, and M. Palamaru, Opt. Com-
mun. 175, 265 (2000).
3. N. Davidson, A. A. Friesem, and E. Hasman, Appl. Opt.
31, 1810 (1992).
4. U. D. Zeitner, B. Schnabel, E-B. Kley, and F.
Wyrowski, Appl. Opt. 38, 2177 (1999).
Fig. 5. Measured and calculated azimuthal angles, as 5. S. Quabis, R. Dorn, M. Eberler, O. Glöckl, and G.
a function of x locations of various y coordinates, of Leuchs, Opt. Commun. 179, 1 (2000).
the space-variant polarization element when it was 6. G. P. Nordin, J. T. Meier, P. C. Deguzman, and M. W.
rotated 30±. Jones, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 16, 1168 (1999).
7. Y. Liu, D. Cline, and P. He, Nucl. Instrum. Methods
Phys. Res. A 424, 296 (1999).
Figure 4 shows experimental measurements of the
8. E. Collet, Polarized Light (Marcel Dekker, New York,
azimuthal angle for light transmitted through the ele- 1993).
ment when it was illuminated with circularly polarized 9. T. Carozzi, R. Karlsson, and J. Bergman, Phys. Rev. E
light. The arrows indicate the direction of the large 61, 2024 (2000).
axis of the local polarization ellipse. The experimen- 10. M. G. Moharam and T. K. Gaylord, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A
tal results show that for a constant y the azimuthal 3, 1780 (1986).