Professional Documents
Culture Documents
109 Inequalities From AMSP
109 Inequalities From AMSP
109 Inequalities From AMSP
Preface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1 An Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2 The Arithmetic-Geometric Mean Inequality . . . . . . . . . . . 13
3 The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
4 Hölder’s Inequality for Sums . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
5 Nesbitt’s Inequality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
6 The Rearrangement and Chebyshev Inequalities . . . . . . . . . 91
7 Introductory problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
8 Advanced problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113
9 Solutions to introductory problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121
10 Solutions to advanced problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157
11 Other Books from XYZ Press . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201
Contents 1
Preface
We conclude with 109 problems that allow the reader to practice the skills
honed in the subchapters, of which 54 are introductory and 55 are advanced.
Complete solutions to all of these problems are provided. For many problems
we offer multiple solutions as well as the motivation behind them.
1 An Introduction
We start with the Trivial Inequality,
x2 ≥ 0,
which holds for all real numbers x. While this seems obvious, numerous (tech-
nically, all) inequalities can be derived using only this fact. When trying to
prove that a quantity is nonnegative, we will often seek to write the expression
as the square of another expression, or the sum of a number of squares. We
turn to some examples to show how this works in practice.
a2 + b2 + c2 ≥ ab + bc + ca.
1
[(a − b)2 + (b − c)2 + (c − a)2 ] ≥ 0.
2
This is a basic, but important inequality that we will rely on throughout this
book. The equivalent inequality (a + b + c)2 ≥ 3(ab + bc + ca) is also used very
often. Equality occurs if and only if a = b = c.
Example 1.2. Let a, b, c be positive real numbers. Prove that
1 b 1 c 1 a
max + , + , + ≥ 1.
a 4 b 4 c 4
1 x
Solution. Observe that for all positive real numbers x, we have x + 4 ≥ 1,
since this reduces to the obvious (x − 2)2 ≥ 0. Thus,
1 b 1 c 1 a
+ + + + +
a 4 b 4 c 4
1 a 1 b 1 c
= + + + + + ≥ 1 + 1 + 1 = 3.
a 4 b 4 c 4
The desired result now follows. Equality holds if and only if a = b = c = 2.
Example 1.3. Let a and b be positive real numbers. Prove that
8 9
− ≤ 1.
a + b a + b + ab
4 An Introduction
Solution. Let s = a + b and p = ab. It follows that s2 ≥ 4p, since this reduces
to (a − b)2 ≥ 0. After some algebraic manipulations, the desired inequality
reduces to
8p ≤ s2 + s(p + 1).
√ √
Note that p + 1 ≥ 2 p, since this reduces to ( p − 1)2 ≥ 0. The desired
√ √
inequality follows from s2 ≥ 4p and s(p + 1) ≥ (2 p)(2 p) = 4p.
Example 1.4. Let a, b, c be distinct real numbers. Prove that
a2 b2 c2
+ + ≥ 2.
(b − c)2 (c − a)2 (a − b)2
Applying this identity to simplify the left side of the desired inequality,
X a 2 X a 2 X a
+1 =3+ +2
cyc
a−b cyc
a−b cyc
a−b
" #
X a 2 X a b
=3+ +2 1+ ·
cyc
a − b cyc
a − b b−c
!2
X a
=5+ ≥ 5.
cyc
a − b
3 2 6
≥ 2 − b; ≥ 4 − c; ≥6−a
a b c
is true.
Solution. Suppose for sake of contradiction that
But 0 < a(6 − a) ≤ 9, 0 < b(2 − b) ≤ 1, and 0 < c(4 − c) ≤ 4, since these
reduce to the obvious inequalities (a − 3)2 ≥ 0, (b − 1)2 ≥ 0, and (c − 2)2 ≥ 0.
Hence abc(2 − b)(4 − c)(6 − a) ≤ 36, which is a contradiction. The conclusion
now follows.
Example 1.7. (Vasile Cı̂rtoaje, Mircea Lascu, Romania Junior TST 2003)
Let a, b, c be positive real numbers such that abc = 1. Prove that
3 6
1+ ≥ .
a+b+c ab + ac + bc
6 An Introduction
3 6
1+ ≥ .
xy + yz + zx x+y+z
From Example 1.1, we have that (x + y + z)2 ≥ 3(xy + yz + zx), which implies
that
3 9
1+ ≥1+ .
xy + yz + zx (x + y + z)2
2
3
Finally, the inequality 1 − x+y+z ≥ 0 implies
9 6
1+ ≥ .
(x + y + z)2 x+y+z
ab + ac + bc + a + b + c ≥ 3(abc + 1),
that is
ab + ac + bc + a + b + c ≥ 6.
The desired result follows from the fact that
1 1 1
ab + ac + bc + a + b + c − 6 =
+ + +a+b+c−6
c b a
√ 2 √ 2 √ 2
1 1 1
= √ − a + √ − b + √ − c ≥ 0.
a b c
Equality occurs if and only if a = b = c = 1.
Example 1.9. (Dorin Andrica, Mathematical Reflections) Let x, y, z be
positive real numbers such that x + y + z = 1. Find the maximum of
xy yz zx
E(x, y, z) = + + .
x+y y+z z+x
An Introduction 7
(x+y)2
Solution. Observe that 4 ≥ xy, since this reduces to (x − y)2 ≥ 0. Thus
Solution. First, square both of the given inequalities to obtain the results
1 1
a2 − 4ab + 4b2 ≤ and 4a2 − 4ab + b2 ≤ .
a b
It follows that
a3 + b3 ≤ 2.
(a + b)2
2 ≥ a3 + b3 = (a + b)(a2 − ab + b2 ) ≥ (a + b) ,
4
implying (a + b)3 ≤ 8, and the desired result follows. The equality case is
achieved if and only if a = b = 1.
Example 1.11. (Titu Andreescu) Let a be a positive real number. Prove
that
1 1
a + 2 + 3 ≥ 2.
a 4a
Solution. Clearing the denominators, observe that the inequality becomes
4a4 − 8a3 + 4a + 1 ≥ 0,
8 An Introduction
or, equivalently,
4a4 − 8a3 + 4a ≥ −1.
Now the expression on the left side is easy to factor. We obtain
and since plugging in a = 1 makes the left side vanish, we see that a − 1 must
divide 4a3 − 8a2 + 4. Indeed, after factoring, the inequality reduces to
= (a2 + a + 1)(b2 + b + 1) = a2 b2 + 3,
where we have used that a + b = 1 several times. Then, clearly,
49
3 < a2 b2 + 3 ≤ ,
16
An Introduction 9
because the right inequality reduces to the same ab ≤ 41 , proven earlier. Equal-
ity in the two upper bounds will occur if and only if a = b = 12 .
Example 1.13. Let a, b, c be positive real numbers such that a + b + c = 1.
Prove the inequality
a3 b3 c3 1
2 2
+ 2 2
+ 2 2
≥ .
a +b b +c c +a 2
ab
Solution. The obvious inequality (a − b)2 ≥ 0 implies that a2 +b2
≤ 12 .
Consequently,
a3 ab b
2 2
=a−b· 2 2
≥a− .
a +b a +b 2
By a similar argument, it follows that
b3 c c3 a
2 2
≥b− ; 2 2
≥c− .
b +c 2 c +a 2
Putting the above results together and using the given condition a + b + c = 1,
we conclude that
a3 b3 c3 a+b+c 1
2 2
+ 2 2
+ 2 2
≥a+b+c− = .
a +b b +c c +a 2 2
A short computation reveals that this inequality reduces to our old friend,
Example 1.1: a2 + b2 + c2 ≥ ab + bc + ca.
Example 1.15. Let x and y be positive real numbers in the interval (0, 1).
Prove that
2 1 1
≤ 2
+ .
1 − xy 1−x 1 − y2
10 An Introduction
Multiplying the inequality 4(a2 + ab + b2 ) ≥ 3(a + b)2 with its cyclic counter-
parts, we obtain
But from the inequality (a + b + c)2 ≥ 3(ab + bc + ca), we need only show that
which reduces to