Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Tok Exhibition Commentary: Prompt - Does All Knowledge Impose Ethical Obligations On Those Who Know It?
Tok Exhibition Commentary: Prompt - Does All Knowledge Impose Ethical Obligations On Those Who Know It?
Tok Exhibition Commentary: Prompt - Does All Knowledge Impose Ethical Obligations On Those Who Know It?
Prompt - Does all knowledge impose ethical obligations on those who know it?
Prompt Number - 27
TOK Exhibition -:
Does all knowledge impose ethical obligations on those who know it?
My object, the Enron shares show that whether it is the company or the stockbroker who consumes
the knowledge, withholding or concealing any knowledge which could hurt the public as a whole,
would be likely to be considered unethical on any grounds. Thus this object adds value by showing
the repercussions of mala-fide intentions and malpractices.
Being an environmental activist and seeing the earth slowly but gradually collapse makes me
definitely wonder, when it was first invented, would we have been able to imagine that it would
lead to impacting nature in such a horrific way? Would we be right in thinking that such an
invention was pre-decided to adversely affect our world, the way it has ? Obviously not. Whenever
any invention is made, it is done with the sole purpose of enhancing the quality of human life and
making it better. The Wright brothers, as knowers, could not have envisaged the damage that their
invention could have caused, hence ethical considerations could not be applied. From the inventors’
point of view, they were just doing what they thought would be the best for the world and the
future, little did they know what turn things could take years later and could not be guilty of it.
The Wright brothers, Orville and Wilbur, were two American aviation pioneers credited with
inventing, building, and flying the world's first successful motor-operated airplane.
Their invention was intended to launch the world into the aviation field, hoping to ease and quicken
transportation throughout the world.
Being a 21st century student, especially in the time of Covid 19 where all education systems have
become more and more technical, the question that arises is, should Charles Babbage be held
responsible for the unethical use of this knowledge? He should not as he had no idea that the simple
computer he created could be used for nefarious purposes like hacking, something that did not exist
then.
The reason for including this object in the exhibition is to show that creators of knowledge in
technological advancement , inventions and discoveries do not have the foresight to look into the
future. Therefore to conclude, I can safely state that Charles Babbage cannot be held ethically under
obligation for the knowledge he possessed, for the outcome and to blame him for ethical obligations
would be rather unjust as he was a knower who had knowledge about the processes and
commitment but not responsible for the devious misuse and malpractices carried out later.
Bibliography -:
https://www.econcrises.org/2016/12/07/enron-corporation-2001/
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wright_brothers
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Wright-brothers
https://www.wright-brothers.org/History_Wing/Wright_Story/
Wright_Story_Intro/Wright_Story_Intro.htm
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airplane
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Difference_engine
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Babbage