Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Aaaiajr: Onjine
Aaaiajr: Onjine
:,
,,,&
url
,~ " i i i : a
\1-acs!!a OnJine
I,' \ N D I SIJIEd .,._.. _, _·
ress. D
In a
" proces
s~w h o
m oderate
s the re
o aAa view se
ss ions?
n
- •~•
iAJr
3F
rs--
Which ofthe following I~ an l1nportsnt output ol kick-oil meeting?
I I I 11 l I I
I) 1 //
1
1\ I l I J I I
, '
1
, • ::I I J 1lu , " , 1
• M , un
I I .::
1
: w ::·,::i I!: I,
I, 111
,
11
,
1
I/
;:
1
' :':
1
:: , •111 , : , • , " , , ., ,
.
t:q.f!Revi~wers
O c~L!'~1
•h::/i,;; '\:,:' ., ,: · .
. ,., "
·i;:11
11
() I . Revf~:~" 11
,,, , ,i;:-t~r,ere·/s ~:g ~,~~4 at1;ofher ret1lew·
. 1 f~if'
( ) b D~~Gt,,. ~f, ,'i:'fl ·,
1 1~
, 11ili 1',111/11:lili" 1 , ,
,~,~.:,~~d·verified by•:te:Yiew.tJt11a)m,lesder,
l'iiil''' ,,
Phantom
Errors are
those e r
r ors
'
8J a
ihata
_~ thr e n e w and surfac
e prepara e during
h a _=~ the
tion time
the:-l}fep by the ind table review team
ividual tea m
m membe eeting which h::r1q rr
~
-
aration tim
\
C -
_-
C
e of table rs ,...J
- a o ov e revie w by -p
the individ
ual team m
~ aloove 0
01bi2r;
'
I
Online ac
I 05 of 25
Challeng
es for rev
i ews and QUESTION
testing are S
:
O a . Lack o
f domain
Q axpertise
b . Mono
tony o f t h e job
• c . Both and copin
{a _) g wi th requfreme
and (b.) nls ch
0 ~ None anges
o f t h e ab
ove
OuickA.ss Online ac
essment - U tiv·
ndersta ncing Rev
I 06 o f 25 -
iews
e. Yo
Kick-off s
tage is n1andated QUESTION
for _ _ S•
review
0 a. Code R
eview
0 b . Test R
esults
@ c . Des
ign R e \1iew
0 d . None o
f the abo
ve
0uick Assessment - Understanding Reviews
1
07 of 25
QUESTIONS
11
~) 1 s. Revie w Team Memb er Recorder or Rewew Team L_ea'der . ,
1
. .
\1 \ \ 1 C) ct
11
11 11 1
I
\1 '
l\1 1 I, I
·
Which o f th
e following QUESTIONS
procedure s are related ,,.
to reviews in
veloci-q?
0 a . P ropo s
al/C o n trac
t review
0 b . R e le as e
R e v ie w
0 c . R ev iew
@ ct . A \I of
th e ab ov e
: : ; ; ;~
I
tfe1
J
Online a.,.+
nn+,
OI N 09 o f 2 ress. D
o no t
5 ·
Mike f
agan of
\BM pub
li shed a p QUESTIO
aper in 1 N
976 , describ
0 ing a me
a_Peer thod ca ll
Review ed - for fo
~ b. T rma lizh
able RevieYI
Q C. Online
·freview
0 d_Paw
Review
- --- , • IIJirn
~
\ 10 o f 25
I I t •s
s. Don . , .. , -~ ..
Which of th
e foll owin g are QUESTION
objectives S ?
of a review?
O a . Verifying
tha
O b . Co ll ectin t specifications are met
1 ,6
~I
1
I I
c . \Identifyi
g data for im
ng deviatio
provemen
t
~
, 1;
,I ) d . ;All of t
I
n s fr om the s
II
~~\
,1
he above tandards a
nd specific
,\
' I
I,
\, \\
I '
I I a ti ons
I '
'
1
,' I'
:, I
I I
I' I I l
1 '
I
1\ \
I' I I
'Ii',',
,: '
... • - " ~
" '7
,~£ f ,
Quick Ass Online ac ·
essm ent - Understa ·
'1 0 1 11 of 25
nding Revie
ws ress. Do no
t dose t
Which of th
\he develo e following review
pment team type
and impr s is used fo r buildin
ovin g th e w g
ork item: code or documents by
dis ,
0 a. Table R
e~iew
0 b . Peer R
eview
0 c . \nsp ect
1
ion
i\ ll d. Wa
lk Thro ugh
12 of 25 ;:-Ji:,: • QUE~
@ d. AH of the above
I In.wh ich of the foll
f
ow ing rev iew sta ge s, tas ks an d sp eci fic foc us areas a1e ass ign ed
to fhf
o
1/'
a,. I tann(ng
111//111//1 /1 ,,
' ,,,
(:), ,. on
J 1/'
c·~ a R ~
r .J b v°' ,a~ ,•
( J «J f91{~
r,t (t d Vr;;tlu.;.atwa.111
- --n C
') il gParty
~.LM&utf : htt
p s . ~F~ 2fw,Hla,tt,~
. I
_]
Online a c ·
Quick Asses ·
smen t - \Jhdetstand ress. Do n9
t close tf!i~
ing Reft!WS ~ o..Y<.
) 15,ot 25 ~
0 a. Defect Log
C) b. Review Ta
sk Ust
( ) c . R e v ie
w Meeting
Min utes
' (f) d. Alt of th
e above
I
'
l 1,1,
I
\ I'
'
''
I
' I
'
•I
1'
'1 \
•11•d•1• !'"~•1"f,
lloi•!
1·•
r! '
11o1l1•1•!"'''"""
if:, ,1 , ,I ,) \
, ,,,
,~ '
Ii .
•;
I ., ,M11 l'
I
Ou1ck Ass'lssment .. U · ··rn:fin,91R
16 of 25
QUE snoN.s .,f .
nm basic building block in any phase of SOLC \Vhich fom1s the core of Wip
cult odthe ro·s R(1vi.owr.1 n,nfJ
II 'I '
\ I'
I'
I. :
I I, I :I ,,
1'1
I,
I
1, I
,.. _ stag,e ensures lhat revie w com,menCs have been incorporated during
rework
() a. Reviev,
( ) b. Causal Analys1ls
() c. Rework
(I) d. FoUow--up
I
11·
1
11
,,11
I '• I I, /· : /
,1 I
18 of 25 QUESnONS .,
I .
O a. Review l eader
Q b. Reader
O c. Author
••1 d. R~ 4Qfd er
t119,ii
1
i
I
1// I
,,
1/ ,,1
11 ,I!
I'' I
:, •I,, '
:,
1
'1.1 1'
I
I /1
',,
., •I' I
11
,I
1 I •I :1
I
I
I
•I I
,I,
I I,,,
I
I
1 ,
I I I I '
Ii' ' I• 1
1
I u ,, I '~ ' I / I+ I
19 of 25 QUESTIONS •
, ,. !!:} a. Walkthrough
(~'
0 b. Testing
-
0 c. Inspection
O d. None of the above
J f ,
f - 1
• \ i r
I
20 of 25 QUESnONS ..,.
I
f I
,, I
1
1 ', I I
1
t 11, I I
code/doc ument?
In a table review, wh o pa rap hrase s the
- - - - - - - - - -- - - - ~ - -- - -- -- -
------------
(1) a. Reader
f ) b. Autho r
() c. Re vie w Lea der
1.::) d. Recor der
2'2:ot25 QUESTIONS V
As the projept moves from require ments stage to compl etion stage, the cost of fixing defeds:
I
I I ,
I Ii'
The inputs to plann ing stage in a review process are:
@ a. Problem definition
0 b. List of roles
O c. Review process map -
O d. None of th~-a~o~~L~- _-_
Online activ·
' t • re• ss. . DI o• no• t clo• se
. . this
e~You ,
24 of 25
QUESTIONS ..
\mportance of Revi
ews suggests:
Q a . Emphasis on quality
1 throughout developm
', I
1 II
C'~ h . Ea"~ detection of de
I ,
ent
I' 1!! 1, l ·,!
..
l '
'\1 l \ fects
\ ,
11111 1
' (I) ', ~ t Botft , ~,a .) an1d (b.) \\·1 1h i
CJ d ..~()n~\o,f:\he ap ove !
' \ ., I '
1
,, ,, ':r ,"' ·,11t,' I
I
I h
'
I •
·\ \,:
' \\;1:'
\~·
' ' i ' :~i . 'I \\\\;
'\ t
. I
\!
I
\
\ l
1
-. .
Which of the fotlowing is/are recomn1ended for largelcrltfo11/ w,,rk' /t,1urt1/1/?
C) a. Peer review
@ b . Table review
Q c.. Walkt hrough
Q d . AU of the above
I '1,1
I I' I
I I I 111 ' I ii /11 ,/ I 1, i' I I
1~!:1:1~1fII!dl~ i,~'IkTul'l~il1
1
1)1 1
bmi'l;~1il11s Eld,wil;h aa%
1
11 ,,
1e !d
/1' .
22
,ftj/a1llly oorrect O
, 1i/ j,
,ct/ried 3
1 t r11.ff'.empted a