Supplier Control Plan: Audit Summary

MY/Program:
Name of Component, Sub-System or System:
Part Number(s):
Responsible Supplier:
Responsible Supplier Quality Specialist:
Name of Auditor:
Date Reviewed:
Original ASQP Specialist Opinion in Powerway.com (line through one): Green Yellow Red None
Original Supplier Opinion in Powerway.com (line through one): Green Yellow Red None
Date of Control Plan (Original or Rev. Level):

Overall Rating: "X"

Header "Yes" overall and no more than three
Header Overall: "Yes"______ "No"______ sections "E/I" overall = "Green"
Neither "Green" nor "Red" criteria met =
Number of non-Header sections (2 through 4) not ok:______ "Yellow"
Two or more non-Header sections "No" overall =
"Red"

1 Does the Header Contain Adequate Information ? Yes E/I No N/A Auditor Comments
1a Control Plan identifed correctly for gate (Prototype, Pre-Launch, Production)?
1b Control Plan Number identified?
1c Part Number, Engineering Change Level included? (NIK level correct or reference
given to other controlled document if generically defined?)
1d Part Name/Description included?
1e Supplier/Plant identified?
1f Supplier Code identified?
1g Key Contact with Phone number included?
1h Core Team identified with department and telephone numbers?
1i Original Revision date identified?
1j Control Plan Revision date within past 60 days? Note: "N/A" if "(Orig)" date is with
60 days. Note: Also "N/A" unless a known update should have been made.
1k All else ok (no other issues)?
If all answers "Yes," check "Yes." If one or more "No," check "No." Otherwise, "E/I."

Note 1: "E/I" = only minor "E"xceptions or requirement "I"nconsistently applied (approx. 25% or less) and correction still required.
Note 2: Do not have a given issues that negatively affect more than one question.

Operational Flow
2 (Part/Process Number; Process Name/Operation Description; Machine, Yes E/I No N/A Auditor Comments
Device, Jig, Tools for Manufacturing)
All process steps are included within the Part/Process Number column (and in
agreement with Production Flow Diagram (PFD) and Process Failure Mode &
2a
Effects Analysis (PFMEA) if available) and it makes sense for the process?
(Control Plan addresses incoming through final packaging and dock audits)
2b Is the Process Name/Operation Description clearly stated?
Are the Machine, Device, Jig, Tools for mfg. listed correctly with ID's for the
2c individual processes (Are the DCX Supplier Tool Record numbers defined
for DCX owned tooling where applicable?)
2d All else ok (no other issues)?
If all answers "Yes," check "Yes." If one or more "No," check "No." Otherwise, "E/I."

Characteristics
3 (No., Product, Process, Special Characteristic Class, Yes E/I No N/A Auditor Comments
Product/Process Specification Tolerance)
Are there uniquely identified Characteristics from Released Design Documents
3a (DCX Released Models identifying Special Characteristics by number)
identified in the Characteristic No. column?
Are there features or properties of the part, component or assembly described on
released drawings or other primary documents defined in the Product Column?
3b
(Examples: Surface Finish, Paint Appearance, Meter Accuracy,
Presence of 4 holes, etc.)
3c Are there unique Processes identified within the Process Column which are
being controlled to reduce variation in assembly characteristics?
Are Special Characterists identified (agree with PFD and PFMEA if available for
3d review) which indicate the level of importance to DaimlerChrysler? (Ex. <S> Safety, <H>
Homologation, <D> Diamond, other supplier unique)

2/12/2007
S. Kissonergis
ASQP EE Manager Control Plan Audit Form Dist 122006.xls 1
 Supplier Control Plan: Audit Summary
MY/Program:
Name of Component, Sub-System or System:
Part Number(s):
Responsible Supplier:
Responsible Supplier Quality Specialist:
Name of Auditor:
Date Reviewed:
Original ASQP Specialist Opinion in Powerway.com (line through one): Green Yellow Red None
Original Supplier Opinion in Powerway.com (line through one): Green Yellow Red None
Date of Control Plan (Original or Rev. Level):

Characteristics (continued)
3 (No., Product, Process, Special Characteristic Class, Yes E/I No N/A Auditor Comments
Product/Process Specification Tolerance)
Is the Product/Process Specification defined with the proper units of measure
3e included? (Note: Preferred to have specifics defined herein but it is acceptable
to reference a controlled document which has those specifics)
3f All else ok (no other issues)?
If all answers "Yes," check "Yes." If one or more "No," check "No." Otherwise, "E/I."

Control Methods:
4 Evaluation Measurement Technique, Sample Size and Frequency, Control Yes E/I No N/A Auditor Comments
Method, Reaction Plan
Are the proper systems/equipment with ID's (if applicable) listed in the Evaluation
4a Measurement Technique column to measure a specific product and process
characteristic?
Is the Sample Size and Frequency defined and does it make sense for the type of
4b sampling (Start up verification, part change, in process sampling, SPC, Lot Sampling per
PSO Manual, other)?
Does the Control Plan define the verification of Error/Mistake Proofing at Start
4c up/per shift by running the Verification/Confidence (Golden) Samples and
documentation thereof? (Golden Sample unique ID's are ideally identified.)
Is there an adequate Reaction Plan specified for each Process? (Does it define
4d
the proper actions to Contain, Control, and initiate Corrective actions?)
4e All else ok (no other issues)?
If all answers "Yes," check "Yes." If one or more "No," check "No." Otherwise, "E/I."

2/12/2007
S. Kissonergis
ASQP EE Manager Control Plan Audit Form Dist 122006.xls 2