Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Kami Export - S&R Answers - Market Structure - H2 Final
Kami Export - S&R Answers - Market Structure - H2 Final
Week 2)
4. Define external diseconomies of scale and explain how it may arise. [4]
1. Explain how do firms, in theory, determine price and output level. [8]
5. Evaluate if firms still can earn supernormal profits when they practise profit-
satisficing. [6]
6. Explain the strategies a firm may undertake to deter the entry of new firms. [6]
7. With the aid of a diagram, explain how a firm achieves the objective of market
share dominance. [5]
Advantages Disadvantages
4. Explain the adjustment process for a perfectly competitive firm earning supernormal
profits to long run equilibrium [4]
(d) Monopoly
4. Explain clearly the conditions for successful and profitable price discrimination. [6]
Advantages Disadvantages
6. Explain why the monopoly is able to continue earning supernormal profits in the long
run. [2]
Advantages Disadvantages
6. Explain the conditions in order for the formation of cartel to be successful. [4]
1. Draw and explain the shape of the demand curve for a perfectly competitive firm, a
monopolistic firm, a monopolistic competitive firm and an oligopolistic firm
Perfectly
competitive firm
Monopolistic firm
Oligopolistic firm
2. Explain the type of market structure in which a 5-star luxury hotel is likely to operate
in Singapore. [3]
3. Explain how the following strategies can help a firm to increase its profits:
Fixed costs are costs which do not vary with the level of output produced. It occurs
when fixed factors i.e. land to build the factory or initial machines used in this case
which cannot be easily varied within a period of time. Variable costs, on the other
hand, vary directly with output. Examples are labour costs whereas the firm
increases the size of production, the firm will hire more labour and hence incur an
increase in variable costs. Other examples are like costs of raw materials (inputs)
and costs of utilities (electricity/water used to power up the factory production etc).
Fixed costs are constant and independent of changes in the level of output. In fact,
even when output is zero, fixed costs will still be incurred. An example can be
advertising costs that a firm may have undertaken to highlight the high quality
assurance in their products. However, as for variable costs, the firm only incurs them
as production starts.
Fixed costs is only present in the short run, where fixed factor exists. In the long run,
there is no fixed factor hence a firm incurs zero fixed costs. However, variable costs
are present in both short and long run periods.
Introduction
EOS can be divided into internal and external EOS.
[Comparing Definitions] A firm experiences internal economies of scale if
its average cost per unit of output falls due to the scale of production
increasing.
On the other hand, a firm experiences external economies of scale if its
average cost at a particular output falls due to expansion of the industry.
Development
[Comparing Diagrammatically] Internal economies of scale are
represented by the movement along the falling portion of the U-shaped LRAC
Figure 1
On the other hand, external Economies of scale may be due to the geographical
concentration of firms resulting in benefits such as development of industrial
amenities and a better transport system.
For example, the petrochemicals companies such as ExxonMobil, Shell and BP
operate in a concentrated geographical area on Jurong Island, they are able to
enjoy cost savings from the development of industrial amenities and
infrastructure such as better transport system.
[example 3] As the industry expands Supporting firms catering to the needs
of the industry will be set up such as water and power supplies access these
utilities cheaply lower unit cost for the whole industry.
[example 4] As the industry expands a transportation system will be set up
by the government ↓transport cost of goods and raw materials lower unit
cost for the whole industry
Cost
LRAC2
LRAC1
C3
C2
C1
C3
C3
O
C3
Figure 2 Output
Q1 Q2
[Comparing Definitions]
A firm experiences internal diseconomies of scale if its average cost per unit
of output rises due to the scale of production increasing.
On the other hand, a firm experiences external diseconomies of scale if its
average cost at a particular output rises due to expansion of the industry.
[Comparing Diagrammatically]
Internal diseconomies of scale are represented by the movement along the
rising portion of the U-shaped LRAC curve. As output increases from Q1 to Q2,
average costs rise from C1 to C2, as shown in Figure 2.
However, external diseconomies of scale are represented not by a
movement along, but instead by a upward shift of LRAC curve from LRAC1 to
LRAC2 as shown in Figure 2. This means that at every output level, the
average costs of the firm have risen. For example, a firm producing at output
Q1 may now face a higher average cost of C3 instead of C1 due to the
expansion of the industry as seen in Figure 2.
Financial Diseconomies
This occurs when big firms become too large and borrow too heavily (as it requires
a lot of capital to finance expansion). It may be possible for the firm to obtain such
finance only from sources which charge higher rates of interest, thereby increasing
average cost of production.
5. Define external diseconomies of scale and explain how it may arise. [5]
1. Explain how do firms, in theory, determine price and output level. [8]
Introduction:
A firm is a basic decision-making unit. A firm will seek to achieve as high a level of
profit as possible. Profit is the difference between the total revenue received from
selling the good and the total cost of producing the good. Profit is maximised i.e.
the greatest positive difference between total revenue and total costs is derived
when Marginal Cost (MC) = Marginal Revenue (MR)
Here, MC or marginal cost refers to the additional cost incurred from producing one
more unit of output while MR or marginal revenue refers to the additional revenue
gained from selling that extra unit.
Figure 2
Cost/Revenue ($)
AC
MC
Tampines Meridian Junior College
Economics Department – JC1 Stretch and Reach Programme Page 8
a
D=AR
MR
b c
From the diagram, the firm would determine the price and output to maximize
profits by equating MC=MR, where MC cuts the MR from below.
At output 0Q1 where MC < MR, the firm can increase its profits by expanding
production, since MC < MR, then producing one more unit of output adds more to
revenue (aQ1) than to cost (bQ1). Total profit will increase by ab if production of
the Q1th unit is undertaken. Hence by the marginalist principle: the addition to
revenue will be higher than the addition to costs when the firm produces from Q1
Q levels of output as seen from the diagram above.
At output 0Q2, MC>MR, then producing one more unit of output adds more to cost
(cQ2) than to revenue(dQ2). Hence, the firm should not undertake the production
of Q2th unit in order to increase total profits. By the marginalist principle, the
addition to revenue will be lower than the addition to costs when the firm produces
from Q Q2 level of output as seen from the diagram above.
Thus, the profit maximizing output will be up to Q units of output where addition
to revenue = addition to costs when undertaking Qth unit of production. Profits
cannot be increased further by changing its output level and the firm has achieved
maximum profits.
Figure 3
Cost/Revenue ($)
AC
MC
P X
Z Y
D=AR
MR
Tampines Meridian Junior College
Economics Department – JC1 Stretch and Reach Programme Output Page 9
0 Q
At the profit maximizing output, Q, the price is ‘P’ level of price consumers are
willing and able to pay as obtained from the demand (AR) curve. The profit made
by the firm is maximized at PXYZ at the given AC curve.
Conclusion:
In reality, most of the firms do not have perfect information to identify the profit
maximizing price and output and thus are not able to focus on profit maximisation.
This is because they lack the ability to determine their demand curve as conditions
affecting demand and supply are continuously changing in reality due to many other
factors and also, how competitors may behave in response to their actions.
Therefore, due to lack of accurate information on cost and revenue curves, some
firm would instead practice cost plus pricing where firms would simply estimate
their long run average cost and then add a profit margin. This is especially true for
smaller firms who may not be able to afford expensive market research.
[Evaluation 2: avoid unwanted attention from the government] Firms may also
choose not to maximize profits to avoid unwanted attention from the government
and business rivals. High profits attract unwanted attention from the government,
concerned that the firm may be exploiting consumers, or from other firms keen to
acquire profitable assets.
Figure 4
Sales volume maximisation is achieved when total revenue = total cost. In other
words, a firm is selling as much as it can without making a loss. At the sales
maximisation output, there are normal profits only and no supernormal profits/loss.
Figure 5
Price/Cost/Revenue
AC
P3
O Q3
Qty
Sales volume maximisation, profit maximization and the interests of managers and
shareholders may conflict, especially in the short run.
However, in the long run the two objectives may be compatible and both
shareholders and managers may be happy if the actions taken in pursuit of sales
maximisation increase market share and raise long-run profits.
5. Evaluate if firms still can earn supernormal profits when they practise profit-
satisficing. [6]
Rather than trying to maximize profits, managers aim for a profit level that will
keep stakeholders happy.
For example, The Body Shop has objectives which are based on their beliefs
that their beauty and cosmetics products are ethically produced and were not
tested on animals. In this case, the managers of The Body Shop are aiming for
a profit level that keep shareholder happy rather than trying to maximize profits.
The managers are reluctant to accept the increased risks and pressures
associated with fiercely competitive policies, or because they are seeking to
Evaluation
This objective may appear to conflict with profit maximization in the short run but
may be compatible in the long run.
For example, showing concern for the environment, e.g. by not selling genetically
modified food or diverting a pipeline away from an area of natural beauty, is likely
to raise a firm’s costs.
However, it may also provide it with good publicity and may increase demand for
its products long run revenue may rise by more than costs profit increase.
Conclusion
Profit satisficing, far from conflicting with profit maximization, can contribute to it.
[Similarly, raising workers’ wages will increase costs in the short run but may
reduce labour costs in the long run if the higher wages increases labour
productivity and reduce labour turnover.]
6. Explain the strategies a firm may undertake to deter the entry of new firms. [4]
Figure 6
7. With the aid of a diagram, explain how a firm achieves the objective of market
share dominance. [4]
In an attempt to increase the firm’s market share and hence market power, decisions
could be made with the aim of driving rival firms out of the market. For example, the
firm could engage in predatory pricing, which involves the firm temporarily pricing
its product below its average cost (C1) at P1 (Fig. 7) in order to drive new entrants
out of business. The firm will make a loss of area C1P1ba now. Once the predator’s
rivals drop out of the market, the firm’s demand rises to AR2. It can then restrict
output and charges a monopoly price (P2), well above its production cost (C2). It
makes supernormal profit of area P2C2dc. This will be a profitable strategy if the
firm can charge the monopoly price for a long period to offset the losses it
experienced while driving its rivals out of business.
Explain impact of features (no of firms & type of product) on the firm’s demand
curve (shape), hence pricing & output behaviour (3m)
Explain impact of feature (type of BTE) on the long-run profits that the firm can
earn (2m)
Figure 6
Price and output are determined by the profit maximising condition of MC=MR. If
MC<MR, producing 1 more unit adds more to revenue than to cost, firm should
continue production to gain additional profits (briefly explain profit max condition).
For the PC firm, AR=MR=P. From Figure 6, output is determined where MC cuts
MR, when MC is rising, and the equilibrium output level is Q and equilibrium price
P.
In the short run, in the agricultural market such as onions, free entry and exit is
possible as long as farmers have available land to grow onions for sale in the market.
Exit is easy with farmers diverting resources away from onion production to other
uses.
Due to the absence of barriers to entry, when the farmers earn supernormal profits
(area PCDE as seen in figure 6), new farmers will being attracted to the supernormal
profits earned can easily enter the industry. As new farmers enter the industry, the
industry SS curve of onions will shift to the right from S to S1 causing price of onions
to fall until AR = LRAC where only normal profit is made. There is no incentive for
new farmers to enter the market. Long run equilibrium is attained where the firm will
be producing at output Q1 and charging a price of P1, as illustrated by In Figure 7
below. The price charged is just enough to cover AC. Hence the farmer can only
earn normal profits in the long run.
Advantages Disadvantages
Allocatively Efficient efficient Lack of BTE unable to retain
allocation of resources right goods supernormal profits to carry out
produced at the right amounts. product and process R&D Not
dyanamically efficient.
Supernormal profits serve as incentives for entry of new firms. Lack of barriers to
entry permits new firms to enter the industry, resources move in and the industry‘s
supply increases. The market supply curve shifts from S to S1 and the market price
falls from OP to OP1.
The firm’s demand curve falls to D1=AR1=MR1 since the firm is a price taker. The
new equilibrium price and quantity is OP1 and OQ1 respectively. Profit falls from
the shaded area (supernormal profits) to zero economic profits (normal profits). The
supernormal profit is competed away.
As long as the firm is making supernormal profit, changes continue until all firms in
the industry earns normal profits. There is no incentive for new firms to enter
industry. The firm is in long run equilibrium.
Figure 8
(d) Monopoly
A monopoly is where a single firm controls the whole supply of a product which has
no close substitutes.
Explain impact of features (no of firms & type of product) on the firm’s demand
curve (shape), hence pricing & output behaviour (3m)
Explain impact of feature (type of BTE) on the long-run profits that the firm can
earn (2m)
Taking the context of a monopoly, where there is only 1 single firm producing a
unique product for the entire market. For instance, FIFA, who is the sole organiser
and distributor of world cup broadcasting rights. There are formidable barriers to
entry due to its specialised expertise and knowledge in organising the world cup
matches.
Due to the lack of alternative suppliers, a monopolistic firm has very strong market
power and as such, is a price setter and is able to raise price by restricting output.
Such a firm would therefore face a downward sloping demand curve that is relatively
price inelastic given the lack of substitutes available.
As seen from the figure below, output is determined at the profit maximising level,
where MC=MR, when MC is rising. As monopolists are able to raise price by
restricting output, they are able to charge a high price at P1 and quantity at Q1.
Existence of strong barrier of entry enables FIFA to earn supernormal profits (Area
P1EGC) even in the long run as strong barriers to entry deter new firms from entering
the market and competing away the supernormal profits.
Price discrimination refers to the practice of selling the same product to different
customers at different prices even though costs are the same.
The price elasticity of demand may differ between consumers who are very loyal
fans of the band. To them, it is like a necessity to be up close and personal with their
idols in the band. Such fans would probably have a demand that is price inelastic for
front row seats.
On the other hand, there are some consumers who are watching the concert as
merely a form of leisure/entertainment and therefore, it is not as necessary for them
to obtain front row seats. Such fans would probably have a demand that is price
elastic for front row seats.
Here, the markets can generally be regarded as separable because consumers who
pay for the relatively cheaper tickets of seats in poor locations will not be able to sell
their tickets as more expensive tickets in good locations. Printing of seat number
and simple colour coding of tickets ensure this.
Holders of cheaper ticket can be prevented from changing their seats to the more
expensive locations. Different entrance for different areas, zoning in the venue with
security guards checking tickets, the fact that the venue would be full with few empty
seats for seat switching, can all ensure that the markets are kept separated.
Note:
However, there can be exceptions. For example, certain area (like the VIP section)
might have better seats and facilities than the normal areas thus it makes sense for
the price of those special areas to be more expensive due to the higher cost incurred.
In this case, it may not be PD if the cost differences are significant enough to justify
for the price differences.
Advantages Disadvantages
Presence of strong BTE able to P>MC at the level of output produced
retain supernormal profits to carry out Allocatively Inefficient inefficient
product and process R&D allocation of resources right goods
Dynamically efficient. not produced at the right amounts.
In the short run when the monopolist earns supernormal profits, new firms are
attracted to enter, however, they are unable to enter due to the significant barriers
to entry. For example, DeBeers was a monopoly in the diamond industry for a long
time because DeBeers controlled most of the diamond mines. As a result, new firms
cannot enter the diamond industry because new firms cannot obtain the raw
diamonds for processing and polishing. Since the new firms cannot enter, the
demand curve and the MR curve will not be affected and supernormal profits can
persist in the long run.
This is the opposite of perfect competition when firms can enter in the long run and
erode away the profits of existing firms. Supernormal profits of the monopoly will
persist and not be competed away.
In the short run, the monopoly may seek to strengthen the barriers to entry. For
example, the diamond monopoly may see to increase the amount of diamond mines
they own. By doing so, new firms cannot enter the industry. In the long run, firms
can then ensure that supernormal profits persist in the long run.
Apart from strengthening barriers to entry, monopolies may also choose not to
maximise profits. Many governments or regulators view firms with more than 25% of
market share as monopolies. Due to the monopolies earning excessive profits, the
government often seek to control or regulate the monopolies as they view it as an
inequity issue.
The governments also may want to regulate because the monopoly is allocatively
inefficient selling an output where the monopoly price is above marginal cost. The
price is the value which consumers place on the last unit of good and the marginal
cost is the cost of producing the last unit. When the consumers value the last unit
more than the cost of producing it, the good is under-producing. The government
may seek to regulate it such as nationalise it which is to take control of the firm so
that they reduce the underproduction. Hence, the monopoly may want to produce at
a lower price and higher quantity so that the underproduction is not as severe and
avoid the authorities’ attention.
By producing at a lower price than Pp, quantity will increase, the profits which is total
revenue minus total cost is also smaller. Hence profit is not as excessive.
The quantity is also higher and price is closer to marginal cost and hence the
monopoly is less inefficient. Since profit is not as excessive and the allocative
inefficiency may not be large, monopoly will be able to avoid being regulated by the
government and therefore they can preserve their supernormal profits in the long
run.
(e) Oligopoly
Five* firm concentration ratio means the market share held by the five* largest firms
in the industry, i.e. a five* firm concentration ratio of more than 50% means the five*
largest firms in the industry have more than 50% of the market share.
However, in an oligopolistic market, there are substantial BTE (e.g. the need to
obtain licences in order to produce goods and services in the telecommunication
industry.) Licenses are exclusive permits to produce that firms own.) Few large
firms with significant market power (E.g. 3 large firms providing mobile phone
services in Singapore; Singtel, M1 and Starhub) such firms are also rival
conscious and are mutually interdependent price setter downward sloping
demand curve
A telecommunication firm is reluctant to raise its price above P1, as it expects its
rivals will not follow suit as they could gain customers from the firm. Hence, the
increase in price will bring about a more than proportionate fall in quantity
demanded. On the other hand, should the firm lower its price below P1, he would
expect his rivals to follow suit so as not to lose customers to the firm. Thus, a fall in
price would bring about a less than proportionate increase in quantity demanded.
Figure 12
This gives rise to the kinked demand curve where the demand curve is relatively
price inelastic below the existing price level P1 and relatively price elastic above the
existing price level.
[optional] However, prices remain rigid at P1 if costs vary between MC1 and MC2. For
example, given an increase in MC from MC1 to MC2, firm’s price and output would
remain at P1 and Q1 respectively.
Or
A cartel is a formal collusive agreement whereby firms will work together and act like
a profit maximising monopoly. In Figure 13, profits are maximised at output OQ1
where Industry MR = Industry MC. The corresponding price is OP1.
A cartel may decide to fix its prices or set output quotas. OPEC, an example of cartel
ensures the stability of oil prices by controlling oil supply through the setting of
production quotas. Each member will be allocated an output quota to supply. The
sum of the quotas of all the members in the cartel must add up to OQ1 so that
industry profits are maximised.
Figure 13
Advantages Disadvantages
Presence of strong BTE able to P>MC at the level of output
retain supernormal profits to carry out produced Allocatively Inefficient
product and process R&D inefficient allocation of resources
Dynamically efficient. right goods not produced at the right
amounts.
A cartel is a formal collusive agreement. All firms in a cartel will coordinate their
activities so as to maximise industry profits, behaving as if they were a monopoly.
Since cartel members explicitly agree to work together and behave like a monopoly,
the model used to analyse the price and output decisions of a collusive oligopoly is
the same as that used to analyse monopoly. This is illustrated in Figure 1.
If the cartel decides to fix prices, it should fix the price at OP1 so that industry profits
are maximised. Alternatively, if the cartel decides to control production through the
setting of quotas, each member will be allocated an output quota to supply. The sum
of the quotas of all the members in the cartel must add up to OQ 1 so that industry
profits are maximised.
The firms in a cartel may decide to either fix prices or set output quotas. A quota set
by a cartel is the output that a given member of a cartel is allowed to produce under
a production quota or sell under a sales quota. An example of a cartel is OPEC, the
Organization for Petroleum Exporting Countries, which was set up in 1960 and
currently consists of 14 oil-producing countries. Its objective is to ensure the stability
of oil prices by controlling oil supply through the setting of production quotas.
7. Explain the conditions in order for the formation of cartel to be successful. [4]
1. Draw and explain the shape of the demand curve for a perfectly competitive firm, a
monopolistic firm, a monopolistic competitive firm and an oligopolistic firm
Firm produces
on the elastic
portion of the
inelastic
demand curve.
2. Explain the type of market structure in which a 5-star luxury hotel is likely to
operate in Singapore. [3]
[impact on firm’s demand] The demand for Starhub’s services would increase due
to a change in taste and preference (AR1 to AR2 in Figure 14(above part b)).
Demand will also become relatively less price elastic as product development seeks
to reduce the degree of substitutability.
[impact on firm’s profits] As such, this leads to an increase in the firm's profits (from
a situation of normal profits to a situation of supernormal profits of P2ABC at the new
profit maximising output level at Q2 where MC=MR2), assuming total costs remain
unchanged as shown in Figure 14. This makes product development an effective
strategy for Starhub.
However, product development tends to increase the costs of production for firms.
The effectiveness of this strategy would be dependent on the extent of increase in
cost relative to the increase in TR. Should TR increase less than the increase in TC,
this may reduce the effectiveness of the strategy as the extent of increase in
profits may be limited.
Large supermarket firms have been adopting the use of automation and technology
to reduce labour costs. For instance, the use of self-service paying kiosks would
create a more efficient method of payment. This reduces the need for as many
cashiers to scan and receive payments, which can be prone to human error. They
are also able to adopt such technology as these large firms have accumulated past
supernormal profits to fund for such purposes.
Therefore, this can help to reduce unit cost of production as the fall in variable costs
in the form of labour costs (wages) will lead to a fall in AC and MC (from AC1 to AC2
and MC1 to MC2 in figure 15 below), causing a rise in supernormal profits from
P1abc to P2def at the new profit maximizing output level Q2 (where MC2=MR).
Thus, this cost-reduction strategy is effective in raising the supermarket firm’s profits,
assuming TR remains constant.
Figure 15
[Explain how well it works] However, how effective this strategy is in reducing
cost and increasing profits depends on the proportion of total cost that is
contributed by labour costs (wages). If wages take up a large proportion of total
costs faced by the firm, then the strategy will be very effective in reducing total cost
to a greater extent, hence leading to larger increase in profits, ceteris paribus.