Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 4
Chapter 4
Threads
Operating Systems: Internals
and Design Principles
User Level
Thread (ULT)
Kernel level Thread
(KLT)
4.6a→4.6b
4.6a→4.6c
4.6a→4.6d
Figure 4.6 Examples of the Relationships between User-Level Thread States and Process States
Advantages of ULTs
ULTs can
Scheduling can be run on
application specific any OS
Jacketing
• converts a blocking system call
into a non-blocking system call
Writing an application
as multiple processes
rather than multiple
threads
Kernel-Level Threads (KLTs)
Thread management is
done by the kernel
(could call them KMT)
no thread
management is done
by the application
Windows is an
example of this
approach
Advantages of KLTs
•The kernel can simultaneously schedule
multiple threads from the same process on
multiple processors
•If one thread in a process is blocked, the
kernel can schedule another thread of the
same process
Disadvantage of KLTs
The transfer of control from one thread to another
within the same process requires a mode switch to
the kernel
Combined Approaches
• implemented as objects
• created as new process or a copy of an existing
• an executable process may contain one or
more threads
• both processes and thread objects have built-in
synchronization capabilities
Relationship Between Process and
Resource
Processes Threads
• an entity • a dispatchable
corresponding unit of work
to a user job or that executes
application that sequentially and
owns resources is interruptible
Windows Process and Thread
Objects
Windows Process Object Attributes
Achieves concurrency
without the overhead of
using multiple processes
Threads of any
process can run Soft Affinity Hard Affinity
on any processor
• the dispatcher tries • an application
to assign a ready restricts thread
thread to the same execution to certain
processor it last ran processors
on
• helps reuse data
still in that
processor’s
memory caches
from the previous
execution of the
thread
Solaris Process