Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hum 395 Food Desert Dossier
Hum 395 Food Desert Dossier
Merced County in California provides an interesting case study of the detrimental effects
of food deserts on public health and methods used to try and combat the lack of resources in a
more rural community. Through the assortment of sources below, it is clear that low-income
and communities of color are at a greater risk of living in a food desert which poses a great
risk to their health. In the efforts to combat the lack of nutritionally adequate foods to the
programs must all work together in order to bring healthier food choices to the city and
improve the health outcomes of these underserved communities. My first source was from
the USDA Characteristics and Influential Factors of Food Deserts and it outlined the official
definition of a food desert which I thought was important to give context on what is officially
considered a food desert by the government. Source 2 is a census report of Merced County. The
percentage of the population that is in poverty, according to this census report, is 21.2% which is
above the 20% threshold that is set for what is considered a low-income area. I also included the
race and Hispanic origin chart to show how there is a large Hispanic/Latinx community that lives
in Merced and how food deserts tend to disproportionately affect communities of color. The third
source is a survey that was given to the citizens of Merced County regarding their top health
issues. I included this survey because although access to healthy food was not a top concern for
many residents, many of the issues that are included in the survey are largely related back to food
choices and the prevention of disease through dietary means. The fourth source is a scorecard
that is used by the city of Merced to ‘grade’ stores on a variety of factors such as walkability,
selection of fruits and vegetables, and if they are able to accept governmental programs such as
WIC or SNAP. This is mostly used as a way for the local government to assess the state of the
convenience and grocery stores in town rather than residents using it to evaluate grocery stores to
decide where to shop. Source 5 provides statistics regarding places people get their food such as
grocery stores, fast food restaurants, farmer’s markets, etc. This highlights the lack of grocery
stores and the abundance of convenience stores and fast food places. Not only is the lack of
grocery stores concerning but also the lack of accessibility even if there are grocery stores is
troublesome and shows how more than just placing a grocery store in a town is a solution to the
lack of healthy foods. Source 6 is a picture that depicts the new community garden that was
created in Merced. This is a good example of how the efforts from outside groups, the local
government, and community involvement led to a great project to help combat the inaccessibility
to healthy foods. Source 7 depicts another local program called Produce on the Go which
provides a selection of fresh fruits and vegetables to residents. Source 8 is a sample of a flyer
that was made by the local health department to bring awareness to health issues in the city and
tips on how to combat them. Source 9 is a study that was done to evaluate the effectiveness of
the Produce on the Go (POTG) program that was mentioned before. This highlights that despite
efforts by these local organizations, they lacked the community involvement that is necessary to
make these programs effective. It was found that these POTG sites were largely inaccessible by
public transportation and often lacked some of the more regional produce that is used by
different ethnic groups in the city. This contrasts with the community garden approach because
in the creation of the community garden, community members were consulted over what types of
produce they wanted to have in the garden, making residents more likely to use the garden. The
last source shows the link between the RFEI value (explained in the source but in simple terms
the ratio of grocery stores to fast food places) and the prevalence of diabetes and obesity. This
source shows that the lack of availability of produce directly increases the prevalence of obesity
and diabetes which is why food deserts are so concerning. By studying the case of Merced
county, hopefully public health officials and local groups can learn which methods are most
1. “Low-income tracts are characterized by a poverty rate equal to or greater than 20%
[...]Low access is characterized as by at least 500 people and or/ 33 percent of the tract
population residing more than a mile from a supermarket or large grocery in urban
areas, and more than 10 miles in rural areas” -USDA Characteristics and Influential
Factors of Food Deserts
https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/45014/30940_err140.pdf
2.
https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/mercedcountycalifornia
3.
https://www.co.merced.ca.us/DocumentCenter/View/12852/Community-Health-
Improvement-Plan?bidId=
4.
https://www.co.merced.ca.us/DocumentCenter/View/4111/CX3-Community-
Profile-Rpt_Merced-County--092310?bidId=
5.
https://www.co.merced.ca.us/DocumentCenter/View/4111/CX3-Community-
Profile-Rpt_Merced-County--092310?bidId=
https://youtu.be/hHtG1HKfzo4
6. https://youtu.be/hHtG1HKfzo4
7.
“ Produce on the Go, the new provider that comes to campus every Wednesday, intends to
provide each student with the opportunity to access fresh local produce at an affordable
price. The workers provided free samples of healthy snacks, a raffle for students to win
prizes, free buttons, and free tote bags.”
http://blogs.ucmerced.edu/prodigy/2015/04/01/produce-on-the-go/
8.
9.