Robots Can't Replace Human: Don't Know Where To Start With Your Assignment?

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Robots Can’t Replace Human

With the development of technology, more and more robots are used in various fields, especially in
some areas that dangerous for humans. Many people hold the opinion that robots will replace
humans in the future. On the other hand, other people have a conflicting view that robots can’t do
many of the jobs that humans do today because robots only repeat the same task all the time and
have no ability to think. I totally agree that robots can’t replace humans. This argument is worth
discussing again and again, and my opinion will be further strengthened in the following discussions.
As we know, robots have more advantages that over humans in many aspects. Many people like
Farhad Manjioo, who wrote an article “Will Robots Steal Your Job?”, state that robots have a
tendency to replace humans. Robots can perform jobs nonstop, which is good for a company to
reduce costs. Also, robots will never ask for health or retirement benefits, so hiring a robot is much
cheaper than hiring a human. Robots can learn something rapidly because they just depend on the
program in software.

Compared to robots, humans need to spend a long time to get some skills. For example, in the future,
robotic lawyers might be able to do jobs faster and cheaper; in contrast, people have to take more
than 3 years in law school, but eventually they might not do better than robots. It seems convincing
that because robots have more abilities than humans that they will do more jobs than human in the
future. However, for many jobs that are complex, robots are still not flexible enough to deal with the
real world. Even if robots can perform some jobs better than humans, those jobs are repetitive and
very simple tasks. Robots have no ability to think.

For example, Toyota, a famous car company, has embraced automation and replaced human with
robots for years. However, they have strong evidence that hiring human can reduce waste in
crankshaft production by 10%, which also helped shorten the production line. As we know, robots
only repeat the same task all the time, but for car makers, they need staff who have more skills that
can understand the whole production line. People have insight into process design and can hand on
all the process for a car, which is something robots can’t do. Facing some complex jobs, robots are
too limited to do tasks. In conclusion, I think humans will not be replaced by robots in the future. Most
jobs in the world like teaching depend on personal experience. It is difficult for robots to make
judgments. Humans have more skills that are not limited to a few areas.

Don't know where to start with your assignment?


HIRE VERIFIED EXPERT
Let our experts help you

You might also like