Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Nieto Calvache2020
Nieto Calvache2020
Nieto Calvache2020
Article views: 16
SHORT REPORT
12 months
500 IU heparin was administered in 35/41 patients. It was not administered in the first 4 patients in which the REBOA was used in our center (before this intervention was included in our protocol) and in 2 add-
GE: Gestational Age (weeks); US: Ultrasound guidance during arterial access; OT: Occlusion time (minutes); IO Bleed: Intraoperatory bleeding (mililiters); TCIA time of the catheter into the artery (minutes); OP: All
Follow-up
5 months
9 months
NA
this strategy was not applied to any of our three
patients (Table 1). Similarly, although ultrasound guid-
Thrombectomy ance was recommended for vascular access, in the
Thrombectomy
Treatment
Expectant
second case this resource was not used.
NA
In cases 1 and 3 placenta percreta was documented
with bleed of 1913 and 3372 mL respectively, and pro-
longed aortic OT (35 and 60 min respectively) were
Common femoral artery
Other 41 REBOA user patients during the study period, who did not present complications associated with REBOA. Seven of them did not require aortic occlusion.
eal pulses was documented at the end of the c-sec-
4 weeks postoperatively. intermittent
At the end of the surgery,absence of
claudication. Angiotomography
distal pulses. Ultrasonography
Arterial thrombosis diagnosis
500 IU of unfractionated heparin were administered in the arterial lumen at the time of removal of the femoral sheath.
Table 1. Patients with arterial thrombosis associated with Aortic Endovascular Occlusion Balloon use.
3372
1700
411
limitations.
Discussion
Accreta is ruled out
intraoperatively
uterine area
First insufflation of 25 min, with reperfusion period of 10 min and second occlusion for 10 min.
Sector 2e
Sector 2f
Percreta.
Percreta.
Affected
NA
No
No
185
118
72
22
0
11 Fr
11 Fr
NA
Yes
Yes
No
US
32
30
G4A1C2
G2C1
g
OP
g
h
e
a
f
THE JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE 3
complications even without inflating the balloon, justi- The use of multiple types of aortic balloons in PAS
fies thinking about an individualized REBOA use to has been reported, from those compatible with 5 Fr
balance risks and benefits, reserving it for cases with a sheath to series with 12 Fr sheath [14]. However, other
higher risk of bleeding and possibly deferring its authors have described that the use of smaller diam-
implantation, in some doubtful cases, until the diagno- eter devices (balloons compatible with 7 Fr sheath) is
sis is confirmed at laparotomy after dissecting the ves- related to fewer complications at the puncture site
icouterine space [12]. [17,18]. Our patients received an 8 Fr intra-aortic bal-
Few authors report the factors associated with the loon, compatible with an 11 Fr sheath and this may be
observed thrombotic events [7]. We tried to evaluate a factor related to the reported thrombotic events.
factors related to the appearance of thrombosis. The popularization of REBOA use for PAS motivates
Although all of our patients received heparin in the use of this device by groups with reduced experi-
the postoperative period, two out of three reported ence in endovascular techniques and minimal training
arterial thrombotic events occurring immediately after in the procedure, for this reason sharing our complica-
surgery. Therefore, it is likely that the thromboprophy- tions analysis can be useful to avoid them in other
laxis routinely administered postoperatively will not populations. Additionally, we consider that multicen-
affect its incidence. tric studies are crucial to adequately assess the useful-
A controversial procedure is heparin infusion in the ness of the strategy and the risks associated with
REBOA lumen and directly in the aorta during occlusion aortic occlusion during PAS surgeries.
periods. Although the use of anticoagulants in patients The analysis of these three cases of thrombosis
at risk of massive bleeding raises concern and their use associated with REBOA highlights the importance of
to prevent thrombosis of venous catheters has not
the surveillance of the multiple tasks that the interdis-
shown benefit over saline infusion [13] this strategy is
ciplinary team must carry out during the management
used by several authors during aortic occlusion [14–16]
of women with PAS [19], where involuntarily and des-
and was included in our PAS care protocol, but it was
pite enough experience, details can be forgotten dur-
not administered in any of the three cases with throm-
ing the performance of complex tasks. In this scenario,
bosis. The use of low doses of heparin (500 IU) directly
strategies such as pre-surgical meetings, intraoperative
in the occluded artery at the time of inflating the bal-
checklists use, and post-surgical debriefing are useful
loon, probably does not generate a systemic anticoagu-
[20]. The incorporation of REBOA use into an interdis-
lation, but a local effect in the column of blood that
ciplinary group, where it has not been used before,
stops its flow distal to the occlusion.
must be carried out within a clear management proto-
Heparin was administered in 85.4% (35 of 41 cases)
col, including monitoring complications and its effect-
of the patients without complications, but it was for-
gotten in all patients with thrombosis. In case one, iveness evaluation.
500 IU of unfractionated heparin were administered in
the arterial lumen at the time of removal of the fem-
oral sheath (when the thrombus was probably already Conclusion
formed during the period of absence of blood flow). REBOA use is not exempt from complications. We rec-
In the remaining two cases it was not administered ommend formal surveillance of the REBOA use in PAS
because the balloon was not inflated (case 2) or patients to ensure that femoral puncture follows the
because the team forgot it (Case 3). The usefulness of proposed rules in all cases.
this intervention should be evaluated in controlled
studies before establish a recommendation on its use
and special care should be taken in patients with
Disclosure statement
known coagulation defects
A widely accepted recommendation is the use of No potential conflict of interest was reported by
ultrasound guidance for vascular access [10]. With this the author(s).
measure, fewer punctures are made and the vascular
injury risk decrease. In case 2, no ultrasound guidance ORCID
was used, nor was aortic occlusion required, conse-
Albaro J. Nieto-Calvache http://orcid.org/0000-0001-
quently the additional arterial trauma (3 punctures 5639-9127
before vascular access) was considered a factor related Maria C. Lopez-Giron http://orcid.org/0000-0002-
to the occurrence of thrombosis. 7846-7300
4 A. J. NIETO-CALVACHE ET AL.
References [11] Whittington JR, Pagan ME, Nevil BD, et al. Risk of vas-
cular complications in prophylactic compared to
[1] Belfort MA, Shamshirsaz AA, Fox KA. The diagnosis emergent resuscitative endovascular balloon occlu-
and management of morbidly adherent placenta. sion of the aorta (REBOA) in the management of pla-
Semin Perinatol. 2018;42(1):49–58. centa accreta spectrum. J Matern Neonatal Med.
[2] Kaufman C, Tadros A. Endovascular interventions
2020:1–4.
for the morbidly adherent placenta. J Clin Med. 2018;
[12] Nieto A, Zambrano M, Herrera N, et al. Resective-
7(5):92.
reconstructive treatment of abnormally invasive
[3] Nieto AJ, Echavarrıa MP, Carvajal JA, et al. Placenta
placenta: inter Institutional Collaboration by telemedi-
accreta: importance of a multidisciplinary approach in
the Colombian hospital setting. J Matern-Fetal cine (eHealth). J Matern Neonatal Med. 2019:1–311.
Neonatal Med. 2018;33(8):1321–1329. [13] Randolph AG, Cook DJ, Gonzales CA, et al. Benefit of
[4] Eller AG, Porter TT, Soisson P, et al. Optimal manage- heparin in peripheral venous and arterial catheters:
ment strategies for placenta accreta. BJOG An Int J systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised
Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;116(5):648–654. controlled trials. Br Med J. 1998;316(7136):969–975.
[5] Manzano-Nunez R, Escobar-Vidarte MF, Naranjo MP, [14] Xie L, Wang Y, Luo FY, et al. Prophylactic use of an
et al. Expanding the field of acute care surgery: a sys- infrarenal abdominal aorta balloon catheter in preg-
tematic review of the use of resuscitative endovascu- nancies complicated by placenta accreta. J Obstet
lar balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in cases of Gynaecol. 2017;37(5):557–561.
morbidly adherent placenta. Eur J Trauma Emerg [15] Russo RM, Girda E, Kennedy V, et al. Two lives, one
Surg. 2018;44(4):519–526. REBOA: hemorrhage control for urgent cesarean hys-
[6] Wu Q, Liu Z, Zhao X, et al. Outcome of pregnancies terectomy in a Jehovah’s Witness with placenta per-
after balloon occlusion of the infrarenal abdominal creta. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;83(3):551–553.
aorta during caesarean in 230 patients with placenta [16] Chandraharan E, Hartopp R, Thilaganathan B, et al.
praevia accreta. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2016; How to set up a regional specialist referral service for
39(11):1573–1579. Placenta Accreta Spectrum (PAS) disorders? Best Pract
[7] Luo F, Wu Z, Mei J, et al. Thrombosis after aortic bal- Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020. http://www.science-
loon occlusion during cesarean delivery for abnor- direct.com/science/article/pii/S1521693420301140
mally invasive placenta. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2018;33: [17] Teeter WA, Matsumoto J, Idoguchi K, et al. Smaller
32–39. introducer sheaths for REBOA may be associated with
[8] Manzano-Nunez R, Escobar-Vidarte MF, Orlas CP, et al.
fewer complications. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;
Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the
81(6):1039–1044.
aorta deployed by acute care surgeons in patients
[18] Greer JW, Flanagan C, Bhavaraju A, et al. Right exter-
with morbidly adherent placenta: a feasible solution
nal iliac artery thrombus following the use of resusci-
for two lives in peril. World J Emerg Surg. 2018;13(1):
tative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta for
1–6.
[9] Manzano-Nunez R, Orlas CP, Herrera-Escobar JP, et al. placenta accreta. J Surg Case Reports. 2018;2018(11):
A meta-analysis of the incidence of complications rjy313.
associated with groin access after the use of resusci- [19] Shamshirsaz AA, Fox KA, Erfani H, et al. The role of
tative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in centers of excellence with multidisciplinary teams in
trauma patients. J Trauma Acute Care Sur. 2018;85: the management of abnormal invasive placenta. Clin
626–634. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;61(4):841–850.
[10] Davidson AJ, Russo RM, Reva VA, et al. The pitfalls of [20] Walker MG, Pollard L, Talati C, et al. Obstetric and
resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the anaesthesia checklists for the management of mor-
aorta: risk factors and mitigation strategies. J Trauma bidly adherent placenta. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2016;
Acute Care Surg. 2018;84(1):192–202. 38(11):1015–1023.