G.R. No.

182754               June 29, 2015

SPOUSES CRISPIN AQUINO and TERESA V. AQUINO, herein represented by their Attorney-
in-Fact, AMADOR D. LEDESMA, Petitioners, 
vs.
SPOUSES EUSEBIO AGUILAR and JOSEFINA V. AGUILAR, Respondents.

As builder in bad faith he lost the improvement made by him consisting of the reconstructed house to
the owners of the land without right to indemnity, pursuant to Article 449 of the Civil Code, which
provides:

  ART. 449. He who builds, plants or sows in bad faith on the land of another, loses what is
built, planted or sown without right to indemnity.

  The Allanigue brothers and sisters therefore become owners of the improvement consisting of the
house built in bad faith by Leonardo Santos if they chose to appropriate the accession. (Articles 445
and 449, Civil Code.) However, said owners could choose instead the demolition of the improvement
or building at the expense of the builder, pursuant to Article 450 of the Civil Code, which, in part,
provides:

  ART. 450. The owner of the land on which anything has been built, planted or sown in bad
faith may demand the demolition of the work, or that the planting or sowing be removed, in
order to replace things in their former condition at the expense of the person who built,
planted or sowed....

  It is of record in Civil Case No. 217-R that the owners of the land chose to have the house or
improvement demolished pursuant to their motion for demolition which was granted by respondent
Judge Mojica on December 9, 1965.

If Improvement on Land added by Builder in Bad Faith

(1) Rights of Landowner - three options:

o becomes owner of improvement by virtue of the "principle of accession" without paying

indemnity, PLUS damages (art. 449 and art. 451)
o demolish/remove the improvement at the expense of the builder PLUS damages
o compel the builder to buy land w/n the value of land is considerably more than value of
improvement PLUS damages (art. 450 and art. 451)

(2) Rights of Builder/Planter/Sower - no right of retention (art. 449), only to

reimbursement for expenses necessary for preservation of land (art. 452)