This document is a bibliography or daftar pustaka containing 65 sources used in a thesis about developing a learning program called "GenDerAng" to increase interest and understanding of physics concepts among female students. The sources cover topics related to gender differences in STEM fields, teaching methods, and interest in science subjects. The bibliography lists the authors, titles, publication details for each source used in the thesis.
This document is a bibliography or daftar pustaka containing 65 sources used in a thesis about developing a learning program called "GenDerAng" to increase interest and understanding of physics concepts among female students. The sources cover topics related to gender differences in STEM fields, teaching methods, and interest in science subjects. The bibliography lists the authors, titles, publication details for each source used in the thesis.
This document is a bibliography or daftar pustaka containing 65 sources used in a thesis about developing a learning program called "GenDerAng" to increase interest and understanding of physics concepts among female students. The sources cover topics related to gender differences in STEM fields, teaching methods, and interest in science subjects. The bibliography lists the authors, titles, publication details for each source used in the thesis.
Arikunto, S. (2004). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek, Jakarta: PT.
Rineka Cipta. Amien, M. (1987). Mengajarkan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (IPA) Dengan Menggunakan Metode Discovery dan Inquiry. Jakarta: Depdikbud. Ash, S. L. & Clayton, P. H. (2004). The Articulated Learning: An Approach to Guided Reflection and Assessment. Innovative Higher Education, Vol. 29, No. 2, Winter 2004 ( C_ 2004) Bandura, A. Barbaranelli, C., Vittorio, C. G., & Pastorelli, C. (1997). Self-efficacy beliefs as shapers of children's aspirations and career trajectories. Child Development. 72, 1 Bernstein, B. (1977) Class, Codes and Control Vol. 3. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Barton, A. C. (1997). Liberatory science education: Weaving connections between feminist theory and science education. Curriculum Inquiry, 27(2), 141–163. Betz, N. E., & Hackett, G. (1986). Applications of Self-efficacy Theory to Career Development. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4, 279-289 Bonham, S. (2008). Reliability, compliance, and security in web-based course assessments. Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research. Vol. 4. 010106. Borg,W.R. & Gall, M.D. (1979). Educational Research an Introduction Fifth Edition, Longman Brickhouse, N. W., and Potter, J. T., (2001). Young Women’s Scientific Identity Formation in an Urban Context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 38, pp. 965-980. Brizendine, L. (2010). Female Brain “mengungkap misteri otak perempuan…” Penerjemah: Ati Cahyani, PT Ufuk Publishing House. Bussey, K. & Bandura, A. (1999). Social Cognitive Theory of Gender Development and Differentiation. Psychological Review 106, 4, pp.676-703 Bystydzienski, J. M. & Bird, S. R. (eds) (2006) Removing Barriers: Women in Academic Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics. IN: Indiana University Press
Acep Musliman, 2015
Pengembangan PROGRAM PEMBELAJARAN “GenDerAng” untuk Meningkatkan MINAT DAN Pemahaman Konsep Siswa Perempuan pada Pelajaran Fisika Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu Carlone, H. B., (2004). The Cultural Production of Science in Reform-Based Physics: Girls’ Access, Participation and Resistance, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), pp. 392-414. Carr, M. (2014). “Review of ‘Feminist Cyberspaces: Pedagogies in Transition’” International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, Vol.6, No.1 Churches A, (2007). Edorigami, blooms taxonomy and digital approaches http://edorigami. wikispaces.com/Bloom%27s+and+ICT+tools Clark D. & Holt, J. (2001). Philosophy: a key to open the door to critical thinking. Nurse Education Today. 21, 1, 71-78. Dahar, R. W. (2006). Dari Keterampilan Proses ke Keterampilan Generik. Fasilitator. Edisi3. Desoete, A. (2007) “Students with mathematical disabilities in Belgium: from definition, classification and assessment to STICORDI devices” in Scruggs, T.E. & Mastropieri, M.A. (eds) Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities, Amsterdam & Oxford, Elsevier Press. Elsevier Foundation. (2012). National Assessments on Gender Equality in the Knowledge Society Gender in science , technology and innovation. Ontario, Canada. Gallivan, M.J. (2004). Examining IT Professionals’ Adaptation to Technological Change: The Influence of Gender and Personal Atributes. The DATABASE for Advances in Information Sistems-Summer 2004 (Vol. 35, No. 3) : 28-49. Garvin-Doxas & Barker, L.J. (2004). Communication in Computer Science Classrooms: Understanding Defensive Climates as a Means of Creating Supportive Behaviors. ACM Journal of Educational Resources in Computing Vol. 4 No. 1 March 2004 Article 1 : 1 – 18. Hake, R.R. (1998). Interactive-engagement vs traditional methods: A six-thousand- student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. Am. J. Phys., 66: 64-74. Hartman,H. (2009), Do Gender Differences in Undergraduate Engineering Orientations Persist when Major is Controlled? : International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, Vol.1, No.1
Acep Musliman, 2015
Pengembangan PROGRAM PEMBELAJARAN “GenDerAng” untuk Meningkatkan MINAT DAN Pemahaman Konsep Siswa Perempuan pada Pelajaran Fisika Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu Hazari, Z and Potvin G,(2005). “Views on Female Under-Representation in Physics: Retraining Women or Reinventing Physucs?” Electronic Journal of Science Education, Vol.10, No. 1, September 2005 Hermawati, W. (2006). “Penghapusan Kesenjangan Gender Dalam Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi Komitmen Abad XXI” Berita IPTEK Tahun ke-45 Nomor 1, 76- 92. Hughes,R. (2011). Are the Predictors of Women’s Persistence in STEM Painting the Full Picture? A Series of Comparative Case Studies : International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, Vol.3, No.3 Hyde, J.S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S.J. (1990). “Gender differences in mathematics performance - a metaanalysis”, Psychological Bulletin, vol. 107, pp. 139-155 Krapp, A., & Prenzel, M. (2011). Research on Interest in Science: Theories, methods, and findings. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 27-50. Krinzinger, H. (2012). Gender Differences in the Development of Numerical Skills in Four European Countries.: International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, Vol.4, No.1 Laura E. Hirshfield, (2010). “She Won’t Make Me Feel Dumb”: Identity Threat in a Male-Dominated Discipline: International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, Vol.4, No.1 Laura McCullough, (2004). “Gender, Context, and Physics Assessment” Journal of International Women’s Studies Vol 5 : 4 may 2004 Leggon, C. B., (2006). Women in Science: Racial and Ethnic Differences and the Differences They Make, Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, pp. 325-333. Lincoln, A. E., Pincus, S., Bandows Koster, J. & Leboy, P. S. (2012). The Matilda Effect in science: Awards and prizes in the US, 1990s and 2000s. Social Studies of Science, 42(2), 307–320. Long, J.S., and Fox, M.F. (1995). Scientific careers universalism and particularism. Annual Review of Sociology, 21: 45-71 Mark J. Lattery, (2005). “Student Understanding of the Primitive Spring Concept: Effects of Prior Clasroom Instruction and Gender” Electronic Journal of Science Education, Vol.9, No.3, March 2005 Maynard, M. (2013). Science and the Construction of Women. (M. Maynard, Ed.). New York: Routledge. Acep Musliman, 2015 Pengembangan PROGRAM PEMBELAJARAN “GenDerAng” untuk Meningkatkan MINAT DAN Pemahaman Konsep Siswa Perempuan pada Pelajaran Fisika Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu McGrayne, S. B., (2005). Nobel Prize Women in Science: Their Lives, Struggles, and Momentous Discoveries (2nd ed.), Washington DC: Joseph Henry Press. Musliman, A.(2013). ”Pengaruh Gender Terhadap Minat dan Rencana Karir Bidang Fisika atau Teknik dan Korelasinya terhadap Pemahaman Konsep-konsep Fisika” Seminar Nasional Fisika Jurusan Fisika UNESA 2013 National Science Foundation, (2007). Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering (NSF07-315). Arlington, VA: Author National Science Foundation. (2011). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2011. Arlington. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/ Ong, M., (2005). Body Projects of Young Women of Color in Physics: Intersections of Gender, Race, and Science, Social Problems, 52, pp. 593-617. Raven, S. (2014). “Wanted: The Intersection of Feminist Pedagogy and Science Education” International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, Vol.6, No.2 Richard W., and Vicki S., (2010). Discover!ng Women in STEM: Girls into Science, Technology, Engineering and Maths.: International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, Vol.4, No.1 Shen, H. (2013). Mind the Gender Gap. Nature, 495, 21–4. Slavin, Robert E. (2000). Educational Psychology Theory and Practice. Sixth Edition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon Publisher. Steinke, J. (2007). Assessing media influences on middle school-aged children’s perceptions of women in science using the draw-a-scientist test (DAST). Science Communication, 29(1), 35–64. Sugiyono, (2008). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D), Bandung : Alfabeta, CV Taasoobshirazi, G. (2007) “Gender differences in physics: A focus on motivation” Jounal of Physic Teacher Education Online, 4(3), Summer 2007 UNESCO, (2004). Comparative Study on Gender Dimension of Policies Related to the Development and Application of Science and Technology for Sustainable Development. Regional Secretariat for Gender Equity in Science and Technology. UNESCO office, Jakarta.
Acep Musliman, 2015
Pengembangan PROGRAM PEMBELAJARAN “GenDerAng” untuk Meningkatkan MINAT DAN Pemahaman Konsep Siswa Perempuan pada Pelajaran Fisika Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu UNESCO, (2006). Report on gender, science and technology five asian countries. Regional Secretariat for Gender Equity in Science and Technology. UNESCO office, Jakarta Wachs, F. L. & Nemiro, J. (2007). Speaking out on Gender: Reflection on Women’s Advancement in the STEM Disciplines. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 13(1), 77–94. Wahono, (2009). Model Pembelajaran “MiKir” pada Perkuliahan Fisika Dasar Calon Guru SMK Program Keahlian Tata Boga. Disertasi SPS-UPI Weir, P. (2014). “Twenty-First Century Minerva: Are there career impacts for women who receive a “Women in Science” Fellowship?” International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, Vol.6, No.2 Williams, W. M., and Ceci, S. J., (2007). Introduction: Striving for Perspective in the Debate on Women in Science, In S. J. Ceci and W. M. Williams, Eds., Why Aren’t More Women in Science? Top Researchers Debate the Evidence, Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Acep Musliman, 2015
Pengembangan PROGRAM PEMBELAJARAN “GenDerAng” untuk Meningkatkan MINAT DAN Pemahaman Konsep Siswa Perempuan pada Pelajaran Fisika Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu