Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 12 views

    Hoiquytuyentinh

    Uploaded by

    Phạm Thùy Trang
    The document describes a regression analysis with QDM as the dependent variable and CLSP, GC, DD, HDCT, and NTK as predictor variables. The regression model was statistically significant and the predictors together explained 78.7% of the variance in QDM. HDCT and NTK were statistically significant predictors while CLSP, GC, and DD were not significant predictors of QDM.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Hoiquytuyentinh

    Uploaded by

    Phạm Thùy Trang
    12 views6 pages
    The document describes a regression analysis with QDM as the dependent variable and CLSP, GC, DD, HDCT, and NTK as predictor variables. The regression model was statistically significant and the predictors together explained 78.7% of the variance in QDM. HDCT and NTK were statistically significant predictors while CLSP, GC, and DD were not significant predictors of QDM.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    hoiquytuyentinh

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    RTF, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document describes a regression analysis with QDM as the dependent variable and CLSP, GC, DD, HDCT, and NTK as predictor variables. The regression model was statistically significant and the predictors together explained 78.7% of the variance in QDM. HDCT and NTK were statistically significant predictors while CLSP, GC, and DD were not significant predictors of QDM.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as rtf, pdf, or txt
    12 views6 pages

    Hoiquytuyentinh

    Uploaded by

    Phạm Thùy Trang
    The document describes a regression analysis with QDM as the dependent variable and CLSP, GC, DD, HDCT, and NTK as predictor variables. The regression model was statistically significant and the predictors together explained 78.7% of the variance in QDM. HDCT and NTK were statistically significant predictors while CLSP, GC, and DD were not significant predictors of QDM.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as rtf, pdf, or txt
    of 6

    REGRESSION

    /MISSING LISTWISE
    /STATISTICS COEFF OUTS R ANOVA
    /CRITERIA=PIN(.05) POUT(.10)
    /NOORIGIN
    /DEPENDENT QDM
    /METHOD=ENTER CLSP GC DD HDCT NTK
    /SCATTERPLOT=(*ZRESID ,*ZPRED)
    /RESIDUALS DURBIN HISTOGRAM(ZRESID) NORMPROB(ZRESID).

    Regression

    Notes

    Output Created 19-OCT-2021 10:36:49


    Comments
    C:\Users\ADMIN\Desktop\fina
    Data
    ldata.sav
    Active Dataset DataSet1
    Filter <none>
    Input
    Weight <none>
    Split File <none>
    N of Rows in Working Data
    209
    File
    User-defined missing values
    Definition of Missing
    are treated as missing.
    Missing Value Handling Statistics are based on cases
    Cases Used with no missing values for
    any variable used.
    REGRESSION
    /MISSING LISTWISE
    /STATISTICS COEFF OUTS
    R ANOVA
    /CRITERIA=PIN(.05)
    POUT(.10)
    /NOORIGIN
    Syntax /DEPENDENT QDM
    /METHOD=ENTER CLSP
    GC DD HDCT NTK
    /SCATTERPLOT=(*ZRESID
    ,*ZPRED)
    /RESIDUALS DURBIN
    HISTOGRAM(ZRESID)
    NORMPROB(ZRESID).
    Processor Time 00:00:01.16

    Elapsed Time 00:00:00.76


    Resources Memory Required 3188 bytes

    Additional Memory Required


    880 bytes
    for Residual Plots

    [DataSet1] C:\Users\ADMIN\Desktop\finaldata.sav

    Variables Entered/Removeda

    Model Variables Variables Method


    Entered Removed

    NTK, DD, GC,


    1 . Enter
    CLSP, HDCTb

    a. Dependent Variable: QDM


    b. All requested variables entered.

    Model Summaryb

    Model R R Square Adjusted R Std. Error of the Durbin-Watson


    Square Estimate
    1 .887a .787 .782 .45281 2.141

    a. Predictors: (Constant), NTK, DD, GC, CLSP, HDCT


    b. Dependent Variable: QDM

    ANOVAa

    Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

    Regression 153.329 5 30.666 149.563 .000b

    1 Residual 41.417 202 .205

    Total 194.747 207

    a. Dependent Variable: QDM


    b. Predictors: (Constant), NTK, DD, GC, CLSP, HDCT

    Coefficientsa

    Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized t Sig.


    Coefficients

    B Std. Error Beta

    (Constant) -1.258 .252 -4.996 .000

    CLSP .110 .069 .082 1.600 .111

    GC -.023 .045 -.020 -.520 .604


    1
    DD .072 .036 .067 1.964 .051

    HDCT .694 .073 .574 9.489 .000

    NTK .398 .055 .337 7.169 .000

    a. Dependent Variable: QDM

    Residuals Statisticsa

    Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation N

    Predicted Value 1.3960 4.5705 3.3165 .86065 208


    Residual -2.16345 1.46448 .00000 .44731 208
    Std. Predicted Value -2.231 1.457 .000 1.000 208
    Std. Residual -4.778 3.234 .000 .988 208
    a. Dependent Variable: QDM

    Charts

    You might also like