Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Research Proposal On A Comparative Study Between The Railway Transport System in Bangladesh and Japan
Research Proposal On A Comparative Study Between The Railway Transport System in Bangladesh and Japan
Submitted to
Submitted By
Sadman Bin Safayet
Roll: 125
3rd year, 5th Semester
Department of Public Administration
University of Dhaka
Date: 31st August, 2020
A comparative study on the railway transport
system in Bangladesh and Japan
Abstract:
This study will focus on identifying the problems plaguing the Bangladesh Railway and how
these problems can be solved by taking lessons from the highly efficient railway transport system
in Japan. The study will be of exploratory nature and will follow both quantitative and qualitative
designs. Through this study we will learn how Japan was able to create such a highly efficient
rail system and how we can replicate the same results.
Introduction:
Railway is a safer and also faster mode of transport than road. Moreover, railway has the merit of
one-seventh of the CO2 emissions and one-tenth of the energy consumption of trucks and buses.
Bangladesh Railway is a government run organization. It had a total of 2,877.10 route-km which
is divided across two zones (east and west) by the Jamuna river (Railway Master Plan, 2019).
Bureaucratic structure persists in the Bangladesh Railway. Because of this many decisions taken
in this organization are politically influenced. This organization is expected to serve both as a
commercial enterprise and as a public utility service. This duality of role is hampering
Bangladesh Railway’s progress. As the role of this organization is not clearly defined so it is
struggling to identify its purpose. Run in an inefficient way this organization’s revenue is always
in the negative. Bangladesh Railway has been subsidized through deficit financing and Public
Service Obligation (PSO) (Islam, 2015). Bangladesh railway has an inventory of Tk 250 crore.
This huge inventory of almost 33,000 parts needs an appropriate amount of human resource for
maintenance. Overstocking of inventory is currently costing the government huge maintenance
fees. While Bangladesh is struggling with its railway sector, Japan has built a railway sector
currently considered the most efficient in the world. Japanese railway sector was revolutionized
by the Japanese National Railway Reform in 1987. Before this reform Japan’s railway was also
running in deficit and debt. Through this reform Japan fully privatized its railway sector.
Japanese National Railways (JNR) was split and transferred to six passenger companies. These
companies were able to operate their rail transport while retaining the infrastructure. Through the
privatization of their railway Japan was able to introduce corporate structure in their railway
management. This meant that their railway system was no longer politicized and decisions were
taken in the best interest of the organization. This reform also introduced competition to the
railway sector which our country currently lacks. Because of competition companies were urged
to improve their product otherwise they won’t be able to earn revenue. This study will mainly
focus on analyzing Japan’s railway reform and how Bangladesh can improve its railway sector
by taking lessons from Japan.
• How can Bangladesh improve its railway system by following Japan’s example?
Objectives:
This study has three main objectives. These are:
Literature Review:
A number of studies have been conducted on Bangladesh railway. These studies have mainly
focused on customer satisfaction, identifying problems persisting in our railways management,
exploring problems in Bangladesh Railways parts procurement system, exploring the possibility
of sustainable railway development and integration of railway with other modes of transport.
Belayet Hossain has identified six factors which influence the level of customer satisfaction in
our country. These are: staff behavior, security, refreshment, lighting, information and basic
facilities. To attract more passengers he concludes that the above mentioned services are to be
improved (Hossain & Islam, 2013).
Through privatization Japan was able to adopt various strategies to enhance their rail
infrastructure. Increasing the number of stations and the frequency and speed of trains,
improving the design of the trains, operating sightseeing trains and giving ownership of
infrastructure to train operating organizations on long term lease were some of these strategies.
Japan was able to operate its trains at relatively lower prices and also earn a profit because of its
high population density (Ishii & Ram, 2019). Bangladesh can aim to reinvigorate its ailing
railway sector by developing strategies centered around its high population density.
Research Methodology:
Design
This study will be of exploratory nature and both qualitative and quantitative designs will be
followed. Because of this data will be collected through two different strategies. The quantitative
design will focus on identifying the problems persisting in our railway sector while the
qualitative study will aim to improve our railway sector by drafting a viable development plan.
Sampling
The population for collecting the quantitative and qualitative data will be different. Unit of
analysis for this study will be government officials and public respondents. For a more in-depth
insight into the research problem I will be selecting government officials in the railway transport
sector as sample for qualitative data. For quantitative data, people who have been to Japan will
be my sample. I will be using purposive sampling for both units of analysis which falls under
non-probability sampling. I am using purposive sampling for collecting quantitative data as I
already have some predefined characteristics which the sample group must fulfill. The
population for quantitative study can’t be randomly sampled and they are also hard to reach. By
using purposive sampling I will be able to collect data from my desired sample group. The
sample size for my quantitative study will be 25. As there are many government officials
working in the railway sector so it is quite impossible to interview all of them in such limited
time and short notice. Through purposive sampling I will select 10 government officials who are
working in the railway sector from whom I will collect the necessary information.
Methods
For collecting quantitative data I will use survey method by utilizing close-ended questions. The
questions will be multi-chotomous in nature. First few questions will be introductory i.e. age,
gender etc. Then there will be questions comparing our railway sector with that of Japan’s. The
questions will try to identify the problems persisting in our railway sector.
Qualitative data will be collected through interview method. Interviews will be taken on the
phone and also through email. Secondary data will be collected through document analysis.
Various journals and articles will be evaluated and expressed.
Outcome:
After collecting the data I will be able to identify the major problems which are hindering our
railways progress. The findings from the questions will be represented graphically. Secondary
data collection will help me analyze Japan’s railway reform. By interviewing government
officials working in the railway sector I will be able to gain practical insight into our railway
sector and also learn about future plans for this sector’s development. Recommendations from
these government officials will help me to draft a more viable plan to improve our railway
sector.
Ishii, Y., Ram, S., & Xu, K. (2019, May). Messages for railway systems
based on 30 years’ experience of Japanese national railway privatization.
Asian Development Bank Institute.
Van De Velde, D.M. (2017, March). Learning from the Japanese railways:
Experience in the Netherlands. Policy and Society.