Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Gap
Gap
Gap
Arquero Ambiguity tolerance’s (a) The study conducted (a) Can studied
et. Al. relationship with by Arquero et. Al. (2017) focusing on the
(2017) communication involves the use of two reluctances a person
apprehension is questionnaire mainly to communicate in
measured using formal categorized between ambiguous situations
and informal subscales. formal setting and informal and/or a its reasons.
setting.
*Study is conducted in a
relational manner focusing (b) People perceive
on the learning styles and interview and conversation (b)Talking about
the need of its setting as a place where communication and
improvement while results unexpected and the conceptual
apprehension of a person ambiguous situations to meaning of
in communicating in happen where you are communication
ambiguous situations. prompted to give an apprehension, a study
Further view on related immediate response pertaining what is the
literature pertaining the (Arquero et. Al., 2017) relation of level of a
latter is necessary person’s intolerance
for ambiguity or
otherwise to the
anxiety a person.
Chen and The study focused on the Individuals with high Study pertaining to a
Lovibond intolerance of uncertainty intolerance for uncertainty person’s flexibility in
(2016) while considering are more likely to overthink relation to the persons
intolerance for ambiguity negative outcomes in tolerance for
as an associated times of ambiguous ambiguity can be
construct. Ambiguity of situation… One group conducted.
the situation is considered shows difference in longer
a powerful trigger Biased decision latencies when
threat appraisal faced with ambiguous
tasks…A person’s level of
*The study used a intolerance for uncertainty
person’s tolerance for affects their capability in
ambiguity as an important dealing with ambiguous
factor in conceptualizing threat (Chen & Lovibond ,
the research though the 2016).
main study is focused to
intolerance of uncertainty
as a construct under
generalized anxiety
disorder.
Chu et. Al. (a) The intolerance of (a)The level of ambiguity (a) as a context by
(2015) ambiguity as a variable tolerance in one context context construct as
should be put into a cannot be seen as a level mentioned by the
context by context of ambiguity tolerance into researcher’s
application. another context. The intolerance for
impact of ambiguity ambiguity can
tolerance into another correlated to the
variable can be mitigated language
by the context it is applied comprehension of a
to (Chu et. Al., 2015). person, while also
having comparisons
to what type of
situation or dialogue
the comprehension is
applied to.
(b) The significance of (b) Chu et. Al. (2015) (b) As Chinese culture
Chinese culture mentioned that a serves as a significant
immersion of the person significant limitation of the mediating variable in
as a significant mediating research is the lack of determining the
variable. control to the cultural and persons tolerance for
educational background of ambiguity in the
*As by context to context the participants. study. Comparisons
view of intolerance for between the
ambiguity comparisons of collectivist and
its application can further individualistic
the study on the said field. perspective in level of
The study relates tolerance can be
tolerance for ambiguity to conducted.
different learning
strategies, this can be
seen as a context by
context application of the
construct.
Heydari (a) Link between (a) Ambiguity tolerance (a) Relation between
et. Al. entrepreneurship and self-esteem have a self-efficacy and
(2013) orientation and many meaningful positive intolerance for
different variables is relationship (Heydari et. ambiguity and
established. Al., 2013). uncertain situations
can be studied.
*mentions of relation
between tolerance of
ambiguity and self-
efficacy is not established. (b) A persons
The focused of the study (b) it is found that there is innovative and/or
directs between a skewing between creative quality can
entrepreneurship and the correlation between be directly studied as
other variables. entrepreneurship it is correlated to
orientation and creative intolerance of
(b) Entrepreneurship as a and innovative ambiguity.
variable is linked to characteristics of a person
creativity and innovation (Heydari et. Al., 2013).
Common themes observe in the studies is the use (university) students as participants to
the study, other demographic is not considered or is more less likely used. Common gaps
involve the level of how flexible a person’s thinking is, though some studies mentioned flexibility
in ambiguous situations it is not directly studied if the said persons level of intolerance for
ambiguity is a predictor of it or is related to it. Another common theme found involves the need
for the use of constructs that are used for communication (e.g. language comprehension &
anxiety level when communicating). This common theme observed can be used as guide for
directions for future research. It must also be noted that further reading of journal articles related
to the said observed themes is necessary and a must to establish the variables that will be used
in the study.