Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 91 views

    X Photos: Problem Description

    Uploaded by

    production
    The document summarizes an issue with an RUPD bracket having the wrong orientation on vehicle parts. The problem was observed on 2 out of 100 parts during a visual inspection. Containment actions included segregating non-conforming parts. A root cause analysis found the direct cause was a lack of error proofing in the sub-assembly fixture, while the root cause was operators not being aware or being negligent due to a lack of error proofing. Corrective actions included adding error proofing to the fixture to prevent incorrect assembly.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    X Photos: Problem Description

    Uploaded by

    production
    91 views3 pages
    The document summarizes an issue with an RUPD bracket having the wrong orientation on vehicle parts. The problem was observed on 2 out of 100 parts during a visual inspection. Containment actions included segregating non-conforming parts. A root cause analysis found the direct cause was a lack of error proofing in the sub-assembly fixture, while the root cause was operators not being aware or being negligent due to a lack of error proofing. Corrective actions included adding error proofing to the fixture to prevent incorrect assembly.

    Original Description:

    8D Report format

    Original Title

    8d report format

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document summarizes an issue with an RUPD bracket having the wrong orientation on vehicle parts. The problem was observed on 2 out of 100 parts during a visual inspection. Containment actions included segregating non-conforming parts. A root cause analysis found the direct cause was a lack of error proofing in the sub-assembly fixture, while the root cause was operators not being aware or being negligent due to a lack of error proofing. Corrective actions included adding error proofing to the fixture to prevent incorrect assembly.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as xls, pdf, or txt
    91 views3 pages

    X Photos: Problem Description

    Uploaded by

    production
    The document summarizes an issue with an RUPD bracket having the wrong orientation on vehicle parts. The problem was observed on 2 out of 100 parts during a visual inspection. Containment actions included segregating non-conforming parts. A root cause analysis found the direct cause was a lack of error proofing in the sub-assembly fixture, while the root cause was operators not being aware or being negligent due to a lack of error proofing. Corrective actions included adding error proofing to the fixture to prevent incorrect assembly.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as xls, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    Team Lead

    Sponsor Team Members A3 PROBLEM SOLVING SHEET


    DATE: 24.04.13
    D.Vijay Mahesh 1. Bala
    Krishna 2. Ilayaraja Ref no: 02/04.13
    3. Sridhar

    Problem Description Cause Investigation 5 Why Investigation

    RUPD bracket wrong orientation WHY?


    WHAT - Item How Checked Result
    Because: RUPD bracket wrong orientation
    Part No.
    A400 5200311 Vehicle - 9T 100 %
    1 Verified
    visual
    inspection PDI WHY?
    done by all report. Bracket subassembly done by
    Because: wrong position.
    Defect Class - Procedure defect 2 Nos parts.
    How many - Verified
    PDI report.
    No WHY? Operator not awareness /
    observation Negligence
    Who Observed - Because:
    23.04.13

    Sketch
    WHY? Error proofing not available in
    the sub assembly fixture.
    Because:

    X PHOTOS

    Direct Cause Root Cause

    Error proofing not available. Error proofing not available in the sub
    assembly fixture.
    Containment Action
    What Who When Status
    Implementation Plan
    1. Part segregated at customer. Bala 19.04.13 Completed What Who When Status
    Total =82 nos,Ok = 80 nos & Not ok = 2no s. 2.
    Part segregated at in house. 18.04.13
    Total = 23 nos, Ok =23 nos & Not ok = 0 nos.
    Bala Error proofing to be provided in the sub Mahesh 20.04.13 Comple
    assembly fixture ted
    Cause Analysis
    After : X PHOTOS
    Man Machine Environment

    New Operator Less Space


    Monitoring Effectiveness & Standardisation
    Wrong Bad lighting
    Operator not assembly Fool proof pins implemented in the sub assy fixtures.
    awareness
    bracket wrong
    bracket wrong
    orientation
    Material mixup Ok & Sampling inspection only
    Not ok done

    Error proofing not Material defect.


    available in the
    welding fixture

    Method Material
    COMPANY NAME
    DOC NO:
    PROBLEM SOLVING SHEET (8D REPORT)
    REV NO & DATE:

    Part Name : Part No : Customer: Date:

    1D. Team Formation


    Sponser Team Leaders Team Members

    2D. Problem Description


    Before Photo
    Nature of Defect

    Defect Qty

    Who Observed

    Occurred Date

    3D. Interim Containment Actions Target Date

    4D. Root Cause Analysis

    Man Machine / Tool / Fixture Method Why Why Analysis:

    Why

    Why

    Why

    Why

    Material Measurement Environtment

    5D. Corrective Actions Target Date

    After Photo

    6D. Effectiveness of Corrective Actions


    12 Target Date
    10
    8
    6 Dispatch Qty Accepted Qty Rejected Qty
    4
    2
    0

    7D. Identify & Implement Deployment Actions


    Target Date

    8D. Team & Individual Recognition


    Thanks & Congratulation to team

    Prepared By : Approved By:

    You might also like