Research Proposal on the Game Theory of Competitive Bidding

BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Third world thoughts have evolved since historic times, people have to make decisions and
during this process they take premises of many factors that the other part can take and this is
considered the basis of game theory of competitive bidding. Moreover, most of the time we don’t
have sufficient information regarding the methods, techniques that can be used by opposite party.
The main factors for the bidding process are politics, lobbying established by the styles of
operation, work strategy built for the test, and promotion style itself. For instance, we can bring
an example from the construction sphere, the game theory of competitive bidding has long been
a method used for work selection, because the ideal cost of production is unknown until the
completion of the project in question, adverse practice ia now the order of the day. Winning in
Economic forsight leads to Looking deeper in selection is a condition when winner of the game
has unken the true cost of company work far beforehand to the general regular situation of
competition available in market today for lobby. Thus, this winning contractor will now most
sadly earn negative or at least below normal profits. The smart bid and is thus left to being
selected to undertake the project with an underestimated billing. In the multistage situational
bidding environment, where poor Labourers now hired by a a title contractor, the ordeal may
be looked upon. In prospect, human knowledge from the game theory of competitive bidding
generally explains that all world wide contractors suffer from an ordeal and loss for a variety of
reasons including Illegal estimation of the project bills; new competitive prospecting postulates
entering the Labor force daily, which can affect the behavior of bidding contractors; and the
intention to win the project and then remedy the losses through all manners of careful change
pattern and actions. Using the concept of the single-stage bidding and multistage bidding,
which presents famous Nash equilibrium as a F function; then developing simulation models for
single and multistage construction bidding processes as I have assumed uncontroversial for my
research here; thus analyzing the results of the effects of game theory of competitive bidding on
prior subject contractors.

PURPOSE OF STUDY
Economists compare cases for options of evaluation on this, axioms for enahncing the world
economic thought sector . To this end, and through defining the relationship between the game
theory operational in labor market bidding and some ability made thoughts for any level of
choice decision making which are need full for success and excellent in general economic
battles.. Fundamentally of thought pattern one says presumably using the game theory of
competitive bidding approach, my research aims clearly to generally build premises and possibly
reduce industry partnering company Forsight to the overall effects of anchors in the game theory
of bidding as in the example case of construction bidding as I have illustrated above. To expand
on my study, I will identify the game theory of competitive bidding to the ordeal of the winner in
two common bidding companies which I will analyze in my research here.

SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY

My new inward uncontrovertial research submissions will demonstrate that the majority of
prospect labour active contractors and senior contractors face from the result of the game theory
of competitive bidding in both single-stage and multistage bidding Ablities. Sadly, an opponents
handle mechanism perspective, the multistage bidding Firm thoughts incurs more losses than the
single-stage Prospect axiom. To this essense, through learning from past experiences, the
multistage bidding environment provides all contractors with a better opportunity to avoid the
effect of the game theory of competitive bidding

PROPOSED RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

METHOD 1
Take Karl and Brad both competing on building for a construction site. Business karl is
considering building with average money indicies of point near the building in order to be more
successful. My expense thought expense of the pit is now known to all firms. There is also an
optional, undisclosed expense Attribute factor that is known just instead of karl. Brad is unsure
if Y = 0 or Y = x is the base expense. Brad then takes is already looking to work for this task, but
must now consider to either buy the cemetery. Karl loses games of some function, not having a
complete insight prior knowledge on any company labor market, thus not knowing karl had high
sixth sense informations, now has to decide if to bid for the job. We 've got two payout equations
in this game theory of competitive bidding effect, one for the extra cost Y = 0, and the other one
for Y= x1 If the probability of karl bidding for this project can then be measured via a belief
network through inductive intelligence knowledge, the best strategy tact for can thus be simply
determined. In my thoughts, because of insufficient Sixth sense, this approach calls for shifting
tactics into a game of imperfect information due to the mental game tact playing off. This is thus
achieved by introducing an additional Capture or model node which, with these probability P,
specifies the additional expense, for this problem. Then, the add up to this game depends on the
progress exhibit of "W." The game is then solved strategy.

METHOD 2

Now let’s take that both of the opponents are in a battle field then the result will then depend
whether the truth of the opponents participating are one is either “strong” or “weak”. So
inferentially, there will be a conflicting different outcome. Also I place More of assume that both
opponents who know if first test opponent is in the ability to be strong or weak. Then, if the all
things being equal we could pick one opponent as strong, his dominant strategy of fighting is
welly intuitive. Hence, the second player will not prefer to fight and Nash Equilibrium will be
two axioms If the first player is weaker, consequently Nash equilibrum. So, universal
fundamental assumption is that the second player does not have any insight about what the first
player is going to be. Then we assign a likelihood W first opponent of decison is strong and
Prospects first player is weak. Second player expected outcome when he fight, expected outcome
when he does not fight. Hence, second player should. Game became clear that in the case of not
sufficient information for the second player to make the best decision would have to collect
significant insight that would ease him/her to estimate the probability of first player’s state.
These kinds of circumstances are common when taking into the consideration the construction
labor market which I have chosen as a case study example for explaining effect of game theory
bidding within two labourer companies. I was concerned with one typical bias situation, bidding
for a construction project.
 Choice 1 Choice 2 Not
Laborer opponent 1 Allow Positive 2 -1
negative
Disallow Negativs 0 0
positive
Labourer Opponent 2 Maybe Allow Not
allow
Positive 2 -1
Allow
-1 2 0 0
Not

ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION

In my deepest thoughts for my research I hav utmostly demonstrated how the tools of game
theory is always used to test to select Nash basic strategies while in labor market bidding; I also
made clear approaches for Game theory market analysis which are needed daily for planning in
game theory of market value bidding. While I clearly presented for a case projection project as
exemplified case study. Knowing that the game of competitive bidding is continually being
employed in every context of contract and decision making it is imperative in my framework. I
fully did attempted full review of all sides to use to win in bidding one sided general solution to
most economic problem i have gave two methodologies to help Foreign further researchers
completely ken. These social activity selection in methodological frameworks that could be
employed to optimize strategies in the bidding process I explained are basics and fundamental to
approach bidding events on this. In particular, I have showed how the problems of mistakenly
steps of action could be dealt with by transforming them to the ones of imperfect bidding in
world labor market force. Finally, I can now recommend that whenever inward self chance of
any occasion of choice, market choices are of importance in all every day life decision making, a
combination of my review of conceptual game theory might be an effective Axiom for Creating
new decision making situations and Pursuit Of excellence but still practical solutions.

REFERENCES

Grzyl, B. (2014). The risk of building contractors in public procurement.

Apollo, M., B Grzyl, Construction contract in the aspect of the risk division between the
parties, Inżynieria Morska i Geotechnika, (vol. 6, pp. 838-843, 2015).
Miszewska-Urbańska. Modern Management Challenges of Floating Housing
Development, Real Estate Management and Valuation (24.1), (pp. 31-40, 2016).
Apollo, E. Miszewska-Urbańska, Analysis of the increase of construction costs in urban
regeneration projects, Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal (9.28), ( 2015).
Grzyl, The distribution of risk in the contract for construction works in the area of public
procurement, Logistyka, ( vol. 3)., (pp. 1711-1715, 2015).
Harsanyi, Games with Incomplete Information Played by Bayesian Players, (I-III).,
Management Science 14 (3): 159-183 (Part I), 14 (5): 320-334 (Part II), 14 (7): 486-502 (Part
III). Fudenberg, J. Tirole, Game Theory, (MIT Press, 1991).
Levin, Dynamic Games with Incomplete Information, (February 2002).