Guidelines in Evaluating LDM 2 Course Outputs

Procedure
for Evaluating
Outputs of
School LAC Leaders in
LDM 2 Course
PROCEDURE FOR SUBMITTING
LDM2 EVALUATION FORMS OF SCHOOL LAC LEADERS
LAC
Instructional Coach - Evaluator SDO LDM PMT - Form Manager RO LDM PMT - Form Manager
Leaders
Collect all Monitor Create school

required outputs. Rate outputs Consolidate
Submission Get the link to Submit submission folders
Provide feedback; using Form 2, summaries of
Submit of Outputs the submission Download Form 2 to in LDM2 Folder of
return to guide questions, ratings (2B) per
Outputs by keeping a folder from Form 2 SDO LDM the SDO. Send links
participant for and rubric. school by filling
record of SDO LDM PMT. to Instructional
refinement, if out Form 4 (LAC
submission Form Manager Coaches concerned.
necessary. Leaders)
Receive Folder certificates
Set the system Validate and
Set system and and upload
and deadline of consolidate all
deadline of all Form 2
submission of Form 4 (LAC
submission of Submit Form 4 files in the
Form 4 (LAC Leaders) files
Form 2 files. (LAC Leaders) SDO Organize Form 4
Leaders) Files. from SDOs. Prepare for
to RO LDM folder. (LAC Leaders)
issuance of
PMT. Files in Regional
I. Roles and Responsibilities
Table 1. Roles and Responsibilities in the Evaluation of LAC Leaders’ Outputs
Role Personnel Concerned Responsibilities
1. Collect outputs of LAC Leaders
assigned to you
2. Evaluate the outputs following the
evaluation procedures (use of
evaluation rubric, use of electronic
Instructional Coach Division and District Supervisors forms, etc.)
3. Submit Form 2: Individual Report of
LDM2 Rating of LAC Leaders to the
LDM Focal Person in the SDO
4. Provide feedback to LAC Leaders’ LDM
2 outputs.
The roles and responsibilities of the concerned personnel in the evaluation of course
outputs are detailed in Table 1 below.
I. Roles and Responsibilities
Table 1. Roles and Responsibilities in the Evaluation of LAC Leaders’ Outputs
II.
Role Personnel Concerned Responsibilities In
1. Consolidate Form 2 results submitted by Instructional str
SDO LDM Program Coaches using Form 4: Division Summary of LDM2 uc
Management Team Completers tio
2. Create Google Drive school submission folders of
n
1. Coordinate with the LDM Program Management team
s t
regarding method of submission for LDM2 evaluation
forms for LAC Leaders o
Regional LDM Program
2. Validate, if needed, the LDM2 outputs of LAC Ev
Management Team
Leaders al
3. Issue certificate of participation signed by the NEAP
Director
ua
tor
s (Instructional Coaches)
1. Collect all the required module outputs from the participants as summarized in Table 2.
Electronic submission is preferred due to restrictions in travel and face-to-face
interaction. The suggested deadline of submission is three (3) days after the end of
each Module. It is recommended that participants keep their own copies of the outputs to
be organized into a portfolio at the end of the training period for future use and reference.
2. The required output for LAC Leaders is differentiated according to their school
roles. LAC Leaders will be evaluated based on the reflections they will send to the
Instructional Coach:
II. Instructions to Evaluators (Instructional Coaches)
a. Master Teachers/Head Teachers/Senior Teachers (Reflection A)
• In the LDM2 Course for Teachers, the Master Teachers and Head Teachers play
a vital role in ensuring that the teachers are guided as they do their modules. It is
vital that they understand what the teachers are working on in each module. For
MTs and HTs, the LDM 2 outputs are optional, but highly recommended so
they can fully grasp the context of each module. Instead, they will be required
to submit their reflection based on the reflection questions found in Table 2.
b. School Heads (Reflection B)
• In the event that a School Head was assigned as a LAC Leader due to a lack of
available MTs or HTs, LDM 2 Outputs are not required. Instead, they are
advised to answer the reflection questions found in Table 2. These reflections will
become part of their individual LDM 1 Practicum Portfolio.
II. Instructions to Evaluators (Instructional Coaches)
Table 2. Summary of Required Outputs from LAC Leaders
Modules Required Outputs Weight
PRE-IMPLEMENTATION (THEORETICAL PART) 100%
1 – Course Introduction/
No outputs for submission
Getting Started
2 – Planning for the • Individual / LAC Group Presentation on Unpacking of 15%
Implementation of LDM a Sample MELC
2 for Teachers A – Reflection Questions for MTs and HTs::
1. After answering an going through the outputs of your co-
teachers, what do you think are the adjustments that the
teachers need to make in lesson planning?
2. What are the steps that you and your department/subject
area teachers can do to assist/guide them through these
changes? What are the changes you need to make as a
Master Teacher/Head Teacher as you lead your group
through these changes?
3. Download LDM 2 Reflection A (MTs and HTs) and Reflection B (School Heads).

Send only the appropriate Reflection file to the respective LAC Leader. This document
will serve as their main output for the theoretical part of the course.
II. Instructions to Evaluators
Table 2. Summary of Required Outputs from LAC Leaders
II.
In
PRE-IMPLEMENTATION (THEORETICAL PART) 100% str
2 – Planning for the 3. If there is a curriculum initiative by your region or division,
uc
Implementation of LDM such as developing the Budget of Work per subject area tio
2 for Teachers that is based on the MELCS, how will you guide teachers n
in bridging the connection of MELCS and this sample
initiative?
s t
B – Reflection Questions for School Heads::
o
1. What are the concerns of our teachers concerning Ev
Unpacking of MELC and integrating MELC in our al
lessons?
2. How can MELC enrich the teachers’ daily lessons?
ua
3. How can you help or assist them? Why is it essential that tor
we all understand this process? s
PRE-IMPLEMENTATION (THEORETICAL PART)
PRE-IMPLEMENTATION (THEORETICAL PART) 100%
100% 100%
3A – Lesson Design and • (1) List of targeted learning interventions + Learning
3A – Lesson Design and • (3) Individual Learning Monitoring Plan for a student
B – Reflection
B – Reflection
Questions
Questions
for School
for School
Heads::Heads:: 15% 15%
Assessment in the
Assessment in the who lags behind in completing the learning tasks
tasks for DL + Assessment methods in DL
1. What 1.
are
As a
the School
uses of
Head,
these what are
lists of learning
the characteristics
interventions,of a good
Modalities
Modalities Weekly Home Learning Plan? How will you know if these
learning tasks and assessment methods to the teachers’
A – Reflection Questions
A – Reflection Questions for MTs for
and MTs
HTs::and HTs::
lesson? weekly plans are executed well? What do you need to do
1. As a Master Teacher / Head Teacher, how can you help
1. How can these lists of interventions help the teachers
if there are teachers who cannot execute their plans well?
2. What are your tasks as their school’s instructional leader
the teachers in assisting the students who are lagging
teach better in the new learning delivery?
so they can develop better lesson design and
2. What do you need to look for in the teachers’ lesson
behind?
2. What are the challenges in developing learning tasks in a
assessment?
plans/weekly home learning plans to know that they are
Distance all measures have been exhausted by the teachers and
2. If Learning environment? What key competencies
designed well? How can you help the teachers who finds
still a certain set of students are still not performing well
would you need to assist teachers in?
3A – Lesson Design and • (2) Weekly Home Learning Plan for 1 Subject
it difficult to develop well-designed lesson?
with the new learning modality, what are the steps you 15%
3. What is the difference in assessing students in between
Assessment in the A – Reflection shall take to guide teachers in addressing this matter?
Questions for MTs and HTs::
traditional and Distance Learning modalities? How can
Modalities 1. What makes the Weekly Home Learning Plan essential to
you guide teachers in bridging these gaps?
the process of Teaching and Learning in the new
1. How can I assist the teachers who have students who are
modality? lagging behind in their lessons?
2. What are the essential elements of the Weekly Home
2. What are the steps we need to do to help these students
Learning Plan will you need to look for?
learn their lessons better and ensure the quality of
learning?
LDM IMPLEMENTATION (PRACTICUM PART) 100%
100% 100%
3A – Lesson Design and
3B – Learning Resources • LAC 3 Teacher Engagement Report
B – Reflection Questions for School Heads:: (5%)
4 – PD and LAC Planning 1.) List of evidences based on Professional Standards.
5 – Practicum Module – • Finalized LDM Individual Development Plan TBA 20%
Assessment in the
Building My Technical 1. How can you build up our local learning resources for both
(Optional: if LAC was not conducted, use rating in Assessment
(produced after discussion during LAC)
Modalities
Assistance Provision for teachers and students?
Methods in DL)
A – Reflection Questions for MTs and HTs::
2. How can you ensure that these learning resources are
LDM Implementation
1. How can I help further assist/guide the development of
quality assured and are placed in protected drives which
Portfolio
3B – Learning Resources • Two (2) accomplished LR Rapid Assessment Tools 15%
competencies of the teachers in my department?
the teachers can easily access?
with reflections
A – Reflection Questions for MTs and HTs::
1. As the school’s instructional leader, how can I help my
1. Given the abrupt changes that happened to the learning
teachers have professional development activities that
situation in our country due to the pandemic, what can
can help them improve their competencies and also help
you do to help build the learning resources for both
them progress in their career as teachers?
teachers and students in your school?
II. I
nstructions to Evaluators
Note: The corresponding weight per output is based on the extent, difficulty and importance of the task/ouput, and PPSS
indicators it addresses.
4. Monitor submission of outputs by keeping a record of submission. You may do this
manually or use an online platform such as Google Classroom where participants can
submit their requirements. The LAC Leaders in the school will facilitate the collection of
outputs.
5. Download LDM 2 Form 2 through bit.ly/LDM2eval4lacleaders. Form 2 includes Sub-
forms 2A and 2B. A guide on how to use them is embedded in the form.
Annex 1 : LDM 2 Form 2A – Individual Report of LDM2 Rating for LAC Leaders and
Annex 2 : LDM 2 Form 2B – Summary of LDM 2 Rating for LAC Leaders
6. Rate each output using the rubric below. Record the ratings in Form 2.
Very
Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
Criteria Satisfactory
(5) (3) (2) (1)
(4)
Demonstration The outputs The outputs The outputs The outputs The outputs have
Understanding of demonstrate clear demonstrate clear demonstrate some demonstrate more than 3 serious
and complete understanding of the understanding of the minimal errors that reflect
the LDM Training understanding of the concepts, principles
Table 3. Evaluation Rubric for Outputs of Teachers
Materials/Inputs
concepts and understanding of the misunderstanding of
concepts, principles and tasks. principles with one concepts and the concepts,
and tasks. major principles with 2-3 principles, and
50% The outputs must
The outputs meet misunderstanding of major tasks.
three (3) out of four the concepts, misunderstanding of
also meet the
indicators. principles and tasks. the concepts, None of the
following indicators:
principles and tasks. indicators was met.
a. Convey
The outputs meet
excellent
two (2) of the four The outputs meet
understanding of
indicators. one (1) of the three
key concepts
indicators.
and processes
in each LDM
b. Show integration
of the LDM
inputs through
evidence-based
outputs
Very
(5) (3) (2) (1)
(4)
c. Demonstrate
novel
connections/idea
Table 3. Evaluation Rubric for Outputs of LAC Leaders
s/perspectives on
the LDMs
d. The information
required from
each output is
complete and
concisely
presented
Very
(5) (3) (2) (1)
(4)
Demonstration of The outputs The outputs The outputs The outputs The outputs do not
Understanding of demonstrate a clear demonstrate clear demonstrate fair demonstrate fair show any attempts
understanding of understanding of understanding of understanding of to use data, i.e. no
One’s Context
vis-à-vis LDM
school and school and school and school and consultation was
community context community context community context community context; made to understand
Implementation through careful with reference to with reference to reference to data I the school and
analysis and data in many parts data in some parts also minimal, i.e. community context
30% utilization of data in of the output/s, i.e. of the output, i.e. only teaching and in relation to LDM
most parts of the only teaching & non- only teaching & non- non-teaching implementation.
output, i.e. all teaching personnel, teaching personnel personnel were
stakeholders parents and along with the consulted.
(teaching and non- learners were learners were
teaching personnel, consulted. consulted.
parents, community
learners) were
consulted.
Very
(5) (3) (2) (1)
(4)
Language and The ideas are The ideas are The ideas are The ideas are The ideas are
Overall expressed in clear, expressed in clear expressed well but expressed using rumbled and difficult
coherent and language with very with incoherence in very basic words to understand;
Presentation of
the Output
appropriately- minimal errors in some areas as well and structure with Errors in structure
worded language structure and/or as a few errors in incoherence in and writing
with no errors in writing conventions. structure and/or many areas and conventions are
15% structures and/or writing conventions. several errors in almost everywhere
writing conventions. structure and/or in the output.
writing conventions.
Timeliness of The output/s is/are The output/s is/are The output/s is/are The output/s is/are The output/s is/are

submitted more than submitted 1 to 2 submitted on the submitted 1-3 days submitted more than
Submission 3 days ahead of days before the deadline. after the deadline. 3 days after the
schedule. schedule. deadline.
5%
7. To determine the rating of each output,
a. assign a rating from a scale of 1-5 – with 5 as the highest – for each criterion.
b. The automated form multiplies the indicated rating by the weight of the criterion.
c. The weighted ratings for all criteria are added to get the total rating for the output.
d. In determining the final rating for all outputs, the rating of each output is
multiplied to its assigned weight.
e. The weighted ratings for all outputs are added to get the participants’ final rating
Table 4. Sample Computation of Ratings
per part. Refer to Table 4 to see the sample computation of ratings.
f. Refer to Table 5 for the corresponding descriptive ratings.
Language
Understand
Understan and Overall Descriptive
ing of the Rating Weight
Out ding of the Presentatio Timeliness Weighted Rating
LDM per (sample
put Context n of the (5%) Rating (per
Materials Output only)
(30%) Output output)
(50%) (15%)
Out 4 x 50% = 2.0 4 x 30% = 1.2 5 x 15% = 0.75 5 x 5% = 0.25 4.20 40% 4.20 x 40% Very Sat
put = 1.68
1
Out 4 x 50% = 2.0 5 x 30% = 1.5 4 x 15% = 0.6 5 x 5% = 0.25 4.35 60% 4.35 x 60% Very Sat
put = 2.61
2
FINAL RATING 4.29 Very Sat
Table 5. Descriptive Rating
Rating Descriptive Rating
II. I
4.50 – 5.00 Outstanding nstr
ucti
3.50 – 4.499 Very Satisfactory
on
2.50 – 3.499 Satisfactory s t
o E
1.50 – 2.499 Unsatisfactory
val
1.00 – 1.499 Poor uat
ors
8. After the evaluation of outputs, provide constructive feedback on the outputs of LAC
Leaders. Depending on their rating and the nature of your feedback, you may return the
output to your participant for refinement, if necessary. The LDM2 Course for Teachers is
a space to improve the quality of their teaching in the modalities. You may use the
evaluation period as an opportunity to prepare teachers for the coming school year by
providing constructive feedback, correcting misconceptions, and providing for their
specific learning needs based on their individual rating results. You may indicate your
constructive comments to the participants in the “Remarks” portion of their individual
rating sheets.
9. Coordinate with the SDO LDM Program Management Team to provide you the Google

Drive link to the submission folder of LDM 2 Form 4 of schools assigned to you. You can
find their contact details using Contact Details of LDM Evaluation Form Managers of
your region (similar to Form 3 used in LDM 1).
Note: Instructional Coaches do not have access to the main Google Drive links (links found

in LDM 2 Form 5). You have to coordinate with the SDO Program Management Team to gain
access to your assigned school folders.
10. There will be an additional material that will cover the submission and evaluation of the
LDM implementation portfolio, and the assignment of NEAP PD credit units for each part
of the course. LAC Leaders are expected to provide technical assistance to school heads
as they build their LDM implementation portfolio throughout the school year.
Note: All evaluation forms are confidential. NO ENTRY in the LDM2 evaluation forms can be
divulged with anyone except the concerned participant and appropriate authorities for
purposes of evaluation, validation, and issuance of certificates.
III. Instructions to SDO LDM Program Management Team – Evaluation Form
Managers
1. SGOD and M&E Unit: Set the deadline and method of submission of LDM 2 Form 2
from Instructional Coaches in your SDO.
2. SGOD: Organize your Google Drive folder so that each school in your division has a
dedicated submission folder for LDM 2 From 2. Give Instructional Coaches access to
the Google Drive folder for their respective schools. Links to your main SDO folder can
be found in Contact Details of LDM Evaluation Form Managers of your region
(similar to Form 3 used in LDM 1).
3. M&E Unit: Consolidate all Form 2B/Summaries of Ratings using LDM 2 Form 4:
Division Summary of LDM 2 Completers (LAC Leaders). Submit this to QAD.
Coordinate with the Regional LDM PMT for the submission deadline.
IV. Instructions to Regional LDM Program Management Team – Evaluation Form
Managers
3
1. NEAP-R and QAD: Set the system and deadline of submission of Form 4 from SDOs.
Assist SDO LDM PMTs.
2. QAD: Validate and consolidate all Form 5 files from SDOs. Conduct validation in
coordination with SDO LDM Program Management Team and other Instructional
Coaches.
3. NEAP-R: Organize Form 5 files in the SDO folders. Organize the files in SDO folders.
Links to the SDO folders are in the Contact Details of LDM Evaluation Form
Managers (similar to Form 3 used in LDM 1).
4. NEAP-R: Prepare certificates for issuance based on the validated list from the QAD.
region/division. If your divi
sion has not assigned a for
m manager yet, you may a
ccess the link below to be
Contact Details of RO and SDO LDM Evaluation Form Managers
Provides the contact details of form managers who are given exclusive access to repositories of evaluation
forms. LDM2 will engage the same group of evaluation form managers as LDM1 in your
LDM2 RO/SDO
FORMS for
LDM
added to your respective drives:
PMTs -
bit.ly/ldm1form3
Form
Access this link and update the correct form if you are a designated form manager. Once added as co-editor,
Managers
you are not allowed to add other editors.
V. Issuance of Certificate
A. CERTIFICATE OF PARTICIPATION
1. A participant gets a Certificate of Participation when he or she gets an overall
descriptive rating of at least Satisfactory or a final rating equivalent to or higher than
2.500 for Part I / Theoretical Part (Module 1-4).
2. If a participant gets a rating below Satisfactory, the LDM 2 coach assigned to the
participant may conduct a validation. Validation may be done by looking at the outputs
or interviewing the participant and his or her colleagues, as may be deemed necessary.
3. Once validation and agreement have been made by the RO, CO and external partner
coaches, NEAP-R facilitates the issuance of the Certificate of Participation signed by
the Regional Director.
V. Issuance of Certificate
B. CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION
1. Certificate of Completion is awarded to a participant who gets an overall descriptive
rating of at least Satisfactory or a final rating equivalent to or higher than 2.500 for Part
II / LDM Implementation portfolio (practicum part).
2. If a participant gets a rating below Satisfactory, the LDM 2 coach assigned to the
participant may conduct a validation. Validation may be done by looking at the outputs
or interviewing the participant and his or her colleagues, as may be deemed necessary.
3. Once validation and agreement have been made by the RO, CO and external partner
coaches, NEAP-R facilitates the issuance of the Certificate of Completion signed by the
Regional Director.
Annex 1. LDM2 Form 2A – Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of LAC Leaders
Annex 2. LDM1 Form 2B – Summary of LDM2 Ratings of LAC Leaders
Annex 3. LDM1 Form 4 – Regional Summary of LDM2 Completers (LAC Leaders)
LDM2
Individual Report of Ratings of School LAC FORMS used
LDM2 Form 2A Leader by
Provides the partial and final numerical and descriptive ratings a School
LAC Leader-participant gets for the outputs he/she submitted
INSTR.
Summary of Ratings of School LAC Leaders
LDM2 Form 2B Provides the final numerical and descriptive ratings all School LAC Leader- COACHE
participants get for the outputs they submitted
S
bit.ly/LDM2eval4lacleaders
Evaluation Procedure
Annex 4. Reflection Paper Template B for LAC Leaders (School Heads)
Annex 4. Reflection Paper Template A for LAC Leaders (MTs/HTs)
PROCEDURE FOR ORGANIZING
LDM2 DIVISION SUBMISSION FOLDERS (for Form 1 and 2)
RO LDM PMT - Form Manager SDO LDM PMT - Form Manager Instructional Coach LAC Leaders

Form 2 Evaluator Form 1 Evaluator
Gain access to the regional LDM2 Gain access to the LDM2 Submission Folder for Use Form 3 to find the Coordinate with your

Folder. your Division. contact details of your SDO instructional Coach to
LDM Form Manager. provide the link to your
school’s submission folder.
Create one submission folder for each school in
Create folders for each of the Coordinate with the SDO
following forms (to be submitted by the division. You may divide your division according LDM Program Management Upload LDM2 Form 1 in
SDO LDM PMT) to Districts for ease of organization. Each school Team to gain access to the the Google Drive folder
folder must have the following folders: submission folders of provided by your Coach.
LDM2 Form 4 - Division Summaries schools assigned to you
of LDM2 Completers (Teachers) LDM2 Form 1 - Individual Ratings of Teachers
LDM2 Form 4 - Division Summary of (submitted by LAC Leaders)
LDM2 Completers (LAC Leaders) LDM2 Form 2 - Individual Ratings of LAC Leaders
(submitted by Instructional Coaches)
Give each LAC Leader
under your supervision the
Assist SDO Form Managers in Provide each instructional Coach the Google Drive link to their school folder.
getting access to their respective link to their respective school folder. Only share This is where they will
Division folders. links for the schools assigned to them. submit their LDM2 Form 1.

Guidelines in Evaluating LDM 2 Course Outputs

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Guidelines in Evaluating LDM 2 Course Outputs

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Procedure

Collect all Monitor Create school

3. Download LDM 2 Reflection A (MTs and HTs) and Reflection B (School Heads).

Timeliness of The output/s is/are The output/s is/are The output/s is/are The output/s is/are The output/s is/are

9. Coordinate with the SDO LDM Program Management Team to provide you the Google

Note: Instructional Coaches do not have access to the main Google Drive links (links found

RO LDM PMT - Form Manager SDO LDM PMT - Form Manager Instructional Coach LAC Leaders

Gain access to the regional LDM2 Gain access to the LDM2 Submission Folder for Use Form 3 to find the Coordinate with your

You might also like