Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sustainable Housing HS Lect 1
Sustainable Housing HS Lect 1
1.Sustainability................................................................................................................................ 2
2. Sustainable Housing................................................................................................................... 5
Sustainability is based on a simple principle:- Everything that we need for our survival and
feeling of comfort, either directly or indirectly, is in our natural environment, humans and nature
can exist in productive harmony, that permits fulfilling the social, economic and other
requirements of present and future generations. So Sustainable architecture uses research results
about the environment, the biology and human ecology and it tries to use these results in
the building technology.
The sustainability can be defined as meeting the needs of today without compromising the needs
of future generations.
Sustainable development “Development that meets the needs of the present without
compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.” (Brundtland,
1987)
Sustainable design “Creating buildings which are energy efficient, healthy,
comfortable, flexible in use and designed for long life.” (Foster and Partners, 1999)
Sustainable construction “The creation and management of healthy buildings based
upon resource efficient and ecological principles.” (BSRIA, Centre for Construction
Ecology, 1996)
Along these points, sustainability and the sustainable development itself have three important
pillars: Economy, Environment, and Society. Which together form a unit.
The following (Figure 1.1) illustrates the theory of sustainability along the three dimensions of
sustainability.
Social sustainability: - Technological innovations can be said to be sustainable only if they are
accepted by the users and are beneficial to their well-being. Proper awareness of the technology is
a factor which helps in making the technology acceptable.
The materials or technology, those requiring decentralized production can help in enabling the
users in self-building and result in local level employment and income generation.
Employment generation
Housing solution that is Affordable for those who can’t afford adequate house.
Acceptable by the user.
Decentralized production
Example, People with a low income do not want to live in houses that are labelled for low income
people, because then everybody would know those who live in these houses, are poor.
One should not only look at the price of the house, but other expenses associated with living in
that house, for example services, rates and taxes.
An assessment of the economic capability of the target group that will include looking at how well
they can afford all the expenses linked to the house should be done.
Low-cost technology
Labor intensive
Value addition
Creation of small scale industry for production of building materials
The reductions in waste, pollution, carbon emission, etc. are the main factors that need to be
considered for environmental sustainability.
Energy efficiency
Active design features
Water efficiency
Building maintenance
No society is balanced and in harmony with nature unless housing is sustainable. Housing, as
against individual houses, is central to perceptions of quality of life; attractive homes in well
managed estates are as important as education and job security to urban satisfaction. Professional
institutes have a duty to serve society in the provision of decent housing. This means housing that
is desirable, well maintained, and free of crime and of low energy design. It is also professionally
unacceptable to design housing that is energy inefficient, encourages crime, does not provide for
disabled access and ignores opportunities for recycling of waste or water.
Housing, employment, education and leisure should not be separately zoned activities but
integrated into attractive mixed use neighborhoods. Physical separation has to be replaced by
social integration.
As useful starting point is the Brundtland Commission definition of 1987 which describes
sustainable development as ‘development that meets the needs of the present without
compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. The Brundtland approach
is resource based, and this, because of the growing realization of global warming, has increasingly
been interpreted in the construction industry as a question of low energy design. However; energy
efficiency is not the only issue with regard to housing, and for many tenants of social housing
schemes, the priority is staying warm, living in safe neighborhoods and keeping water bills down.
One may, therefore, define sustainable housing as ‘housing that meets the perceived and real needs
of the present in a resource efficient fashion whilst providing attractive, safe and ecologically rich
neighborhoods’. Resource efficient is not the same as zero impact but it does imply the Brundtland
contract between current resource usage and future demand.
Sustainability is a process; sustainable development is the product. The process must, in the field
of housing, address five distinct fields:
A sustainable housing has remained difficult to define, yet it should be coherent to certain
characteristics of sustainable development:-
(1) Help for the very poor because they are left with no option other than to destroy their
environment,
(3) The idea of cost-effective development, meaning thereby that development should not degrade
environmental quality, nor should it reduce productivity in the long run,
(4) The issues of disease control, appropriate technologies, food security, clean water and shelter
for all,
(5) The notion that people-centered participatory initiatives are needed; human beings in other
words, are the resources in the concept.
From this perspective the sustainable housing policy should incorporate three objectives: - The
first of these is that future policies must provide the basis for household improvement. The second
objective of the policies which could result in sustainable housing improvement is concerned with
the empowerment of poor people. The third objective of such policies must be to psychologically
give the lower segment of the urban society a feeling of self-worth. Thus, in order to be sustainable,
housing initiatives must be economically viable, socially acceptable and affordable, technically
feasible and environmentally-friendly.
It is pertinent to note that housing sector can significantly contribute to sustainability because of
its close association with environmental aspects:
In 1950, developing nations accounted for less than 40% of the world’s urban population. By 2005
that figure reached 70%. It is projected that urban population in developing nations will continue
to grow reaching 80% by 2030. By 2050, 93% of the urban population growth will occur in
developing countries. One of the major challenges faced by cities today is the growing number of
urban dwellers living in slum conditions. About one third of the world urban population live in
these conditions and if populations continue to grow it is estimated that 889 million people will
live in slums by 2020.
Turner and other advocates of self-help argued self-help mechanisms as a possible alternative to
the failing government-driven low-income housing program. It is believed that turner was the most
influential person of the self-help concept.
5.2. Turner’s self-help concept
Turner (1976) raised three main issues concerning self-help concepts in housing. The first concept
was the concept of dweller control. He argued dwellers has to control the major decisions and has
to be free to make their own contribution to the design, construction and management of their
housing. If dwellers control major decision, both the process and the environment produced will
stimulate Individual and social well-being. When people have neither control over, nor
responsibility for key decisions in the process of housing, dwelling environments may instead
become a barrier to personal fulfillment and a burden on the economy.
The Second concept was the value of housing. Turner says the most important thing about housing
is not what it is, but what it does in people’s lives. Turner’s third concept says that deficiencies
The simplest way of doing this in housing is to divide the process of decision-making into three
easily recognizable sets of operations:
Even to provide a temporary home, a dwelling must gave its users access to institutions, and
amenities on which their livelihoods depend; it must provide a minimum shelter from climate and
neighbors; and the users must have tenure long enough (Turner, 1976).
Turner comes with idea of self-help housing with argument of value of housing, economy of
housing and authority over housing then he traces principles and practices from the arguments.
Value of housing: Turner argues what matters in housing is what it does for people rather than
what it is. “A house can be a home if and only if it is minimally accessible, provides minimum
shelter, and a minimum security of tenure” (Turner, 1976; 97). It is illogical to state housing
problem in terms of deficits of units to some material standard rather people’s housing needs must
always be stated in terms of priorities. By variable nature of three universal housing needs access,
shelter, and tenure, Turner says on the issue of value of housing the choice is between the values
of what procedures and products do for people and their environment, and the material values of
the things themselves. In other words, it is the issue of use value versus market-value (exchange
value) (Turner, 1976).
Economy of housing: Turner argued the economy of housing is a matter of resource of personal
rather than centrally controlled, and he says only if the people controls the material available and
locally accessible resources be effectively used (Turner, 1976).
Authority over housing: Turner argues housing and other services has to be autonomous rather
than heteronomous. He also argued that this autonomy is not being absolute. It depends on access
to essential resources. But the central issue is who decides, and who provides. The influences of
Turner’s idea of self-help were that: squatter settlements were seen as normal residents, self-help
Criticism of turner’s self-help: Burgess argues that because commercial products and labor are
invested in the production of self-help houses there is always market value. Turner wrongly
assumes that use value dominates over market value and fails to appreciate their interrelations.
Burgess says what usually makes self-help housing programs cheaper is not absence of profits, but
rather the labor contribution (sweat equity) of the future users (Burgess, 1978).
This alternative housing strategy was adopted as a major component of financing of the housing
programs in developing countries.
In this concept of self-help, the government became responsible to provide some of housing
elements or aspects to make the house affordable by allowing individual or collective initiatives
of households to house themselves .The role of the state is to support by providing land, tenure
and basic services. Out of this aided self-help housing can be seen from product and process
characteristics.
Process characteristics: Housing as process will include input of self-help and contractor during
the different design and construction phases; the degree of freedom and choice granted to
households, and the point at which households become involved; the types of financing packages
available to residents.
The simplest form of self-help construction is for an individual household to construct its own
house and the other is through cooperative. The basic reason for building through self-help
construction is to reduce costs of houses .When it becomes through cooperative form it further
reduces the cost of the house. Self-help housing cooperatives were considered useful instruments
which low-income households could get opportunity and improve the quality of their lives while
accessing affordable housing. Housing cooperatives adopt two methods they either construct
houses or they advance loans to individuals who in turn construct their houses (Ntema, 2011).
Advantages of self-help housing cooperatives:
The three advantages of self-help cooperative housing are: First, it gives participation of
beneficiaries in providing their own housing. In a direct way it provides them the opportunity to
participate in the housing development. It provides opportunities for marginalized groups to have
experience of participating in wider decision making and to take control of their own lives.
Secondly, it mobilizes the skills of the community and its financial resources. Thirdly, the
cooperative mobilize additional resources into the housing delivery system (UNCHS (Habitat),
1989).
Slum development: The polarization of growth towards metro cities and mega cities poses a
greater challenge to provide housing in urban areas, which are rapidly becoming areas of
crowded habitations without basic amenities.
The attainment of sustainable housing is a growing ambition for all in the construction industry.
No society is balanced and sustainable unless housing addresses difficult issues such as social
exclusion, crime and employment opportunities as well as the usual priorities of energy and
environmental performance. Along with job security and education, housing is central to the
public’s perception of quality of life.
However; since housing is multi-faceted, the attainment of sustainable housing requires teamwork
between the professions in the construction industry. Collaboration between architects and
planners, between the public and private sectors, between users and providers, designers and
contractors is essential if sustainable housing is to become a reality.
Lifestyle change cannot be imposed but it can be encouraged by good design. It is relatively easy
to evolve new ideas but too often in the construction industry old ideas get in the way of
implementing fresh thinking. Design holds the key to unlocking future potential and to presenting
new ideas in a way that breaks down barriers to change. There is no future for sustainable housing
without a culture change in society.
The DETR report Building a Sustainable Future: Homes for an Autonomous Community, reviews
some of the issues involved in sustainable housing. It argues that sustainable communities might
include measures such as:
• The interconnection of work, housing, community and leisure facilities
• The provision of opportunities for local employment new housing design compatible with
more sustainable lifestyles.
These measures have the potential to provide stable, self-reliant communities. As for the houses,
the report suggests that these are likely to be super-insulated, of high thermal mass, airtight in
construction and made from building materials based upon nontoxic, low embodied energy
principles. In addition, the sustainable house will (just as in the co-authors’ Robert and Brenda
Vale’s own house) feature water collection from the rain, sewage treatment on site using reed beds
and composting techniques, waste recycling and local energy generation.
The sustainable house is dependent upon integrated design and this is equally true of sustainable
communities where the principles underpinning the individual house are multiplied several times
over at the level of the housing estate, questions of land use policy, density of development,
integration of transport, social mix, ownership and tenure mix, all become important. Decisions
made at the planning level will inevitably affect construction decisions.
One thing is certain of sustainability and that is that lifestyles will need to change. At first, change
will be by persuasion, but later compulsion may be needed. Ultimately legislation will be the motor
The sustainable house offers enhanced comfort, lower energy or water bills, greater self-reliance,
improved health, and a more harmonious relationship with nature, seasons and daily cycles.
Utopian it may be, but the sustainable house of the future combines spiritual values with good
building science. Three factors in particular are emerging as essential construction requirements
of the sustainable house:
• Thickness of perimeter fabric
• Airtightness linked to high levels of insulation
• Efficient boiler systems.
They are related and need to be considered as aspects of integrated design for the low energy
house. The three factors represent key issues for the designer or developer and relate directly to
material choices, energy strategies and lifecycle upgrading of housing.
The Building Research Establishment (BRE) through its arm BRECSU has sought recently to
focus attention upon the three topics in order to demonstrate that via an integrated package of
fabric, heating and ventilation measures, low energy housing can be achieved at little or no
additional cost.