The document discusses the Pacto de Sangre or blood compact that took place in 1565 between Datu Sikatuna of Bohol and Spanish Captain General Miguel Lopez de Legazpi. The blood compact was a ritual where each made small cuts on their arms and drank wine mixed with their blood, signifying peace and friendship between their nations. However, the blood compact ultimately led to the Spanish conquest of the Philippines as Sikatuna was misled by Spanish promises to treat Filipinos as equals when in reality they imposed inferiority. Nationalist figures like Marcelo H. del Pilar and Andres Bonifacio later cited the deceit around the blood compact as stirring Filipino nationalism against Spanish colonial rule.
The document discusses the Pacto de Sangre or blood compact that took place in 1565 between Datu Sikatuna of Bohol and Spanish Captain General Miguel Lopez de Legazpi. The blood compact was a ritual where each made small cuts on their arms and drank wine mixed with their blood, signifying peace and friendship between their nations. However, the blood compact ultimately led to the Spanish conquest of the Philippines as Sikatuna was misled by Spanish promises to treat Filipinos as equals when in reality they imposed inferiority. Nationalist figures like Marcelo H. del Pilar and Andres Bonifacio later cited the deceit around the blood compact as stirring Filipino nationalism against Spanish colonial rule.
The document discusses the Pacto de Sangre or blood compact that took place in 1565 between Datu Sikatuna of Bohol and Spanish Captain General Miguel Lopez de Legazpi. The blood compact was a ritual where each made small cuts on their arms and drank wine mixed with their blood, signifying peace and friendship between their nations. However, the blood compact ultimately led to the Spanish conquest of the Philippines as Sikatuna was misled by Spanish promises to treat Filipinos as equals when in reality they imposed inferiority. Nationalist figures like Marcelo H. del Pilar and Andres Bonifacio later cited the deceit around the blood compact as stirring Filipino nationalism against Spanish colonial rule.
In 1565, a compact was sealed in blood-Pacto de Sangre-between the datu of
Bohol, Datu Sikatuna, and the Spanish Captain General Miguel Lopez de Legazpi to ensure peace and friendship between the two nations that they represented. Each made a small cut on his arm and let two or three drops of blood drip onto a cup of wine, and they both drank from it. The blood compact between Legazpi and Sikatuna has often been among the starting points in discussing the history of Spanish colonization in the Philippines. However, minimal interpretations and significance have been attributed to it. According to Aguilar (2010), the blood compact served as a solemn ritual and agreement between two equals, constituting a pledge of eternal fraternity and alliance. It is a symbolic transfusion that wedded Filipinos to Spanish culture and civilization. Moreover, the blood compact also became the reason the Philippines was conquered. As an ancient tradition in the Philippine archipelago, it was usually done by parties who were former enemies and wished to reconcile or those who wanted to avoid being enemies. In the case of Legazpi and Sikatuna, the blood compact was initiated for the second reason. In an article that appeared in La Solidaridad on September 30 1889, Marcelo H. del Pilar stated that the blood compact was a political treaty the Philippines and Spain engaged in good faith through their representatives. The treaty, according to del Pilar, was valid but subject to the fulfillment of its terms, that that Spain would annex the Philippines and in return the Philippines could be assimilated. The Philippines satisfactorily complied with such terms but Spain reduced the Filipino race to an inherent position of inferiority. It was the same point that Andres Bonifacio insisted-the blood compact was a valid agreement but Sikatuna was misled by the Spaniards in their promise of enlightenment and prosperity. Bonifacio, in Ang Dapat Mabatid ng mga Tagalog (1896), emphasized that before the Spaniards came, the Filipinos were living in complete abundance and were able to trade with other countries. However, the Spaniards deceived Sikatuna and made him believe that they would treat Filipinos as equals. It was recognizing this deceit that stirred nationalism among the Filipinos towards the end of the Spanish rule in the Philippines. Historically, the Pacto de Sangre between Sikatuna and Legazpi was integrated in the founding of Filipino nationhood. It was also the same Pacto de Sangre that the ilustrados used in demanding reforms from the Spanish colonial government, a desire for change fueled by what has been called nationalism.