International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 7, Issue 12, December 2017
ISSN 2250-3153
Shareholder Activism Compulsory or Option in the
Corporate World?
Moonmoon Malik
Alliance School of Law, Alliance University
Abstract- The shareholders are an entity of the company and it
is a concern issue that the shareholders need to get their rights.
The companies need to keep in mind that setting up a company
not only to earn profit and to achieve the aim but also take other
issues into consideration.
Those late spates for crises afflicting those corporate
What's more financial sectors around the planet need triggered
another wave of corporate governance reforms, which call for
more stupendous strengthening about regulate more retail
shareholders. The require to such changes can't make more
amazing over in India, the place where there is regulating
shareholders, or promoters, overwhelm the corporate scene.
Reliable for changes clinched alongside a few nations that
try to give more amazing control in the hands about shareholders,
those later administrative developments over India mean a more
stupendous good fortune to shareholder investment in the type of
postal ballot, e-voting and the in. Those fast burgeoning from
claiming proxy advisory firms, a hitherto non-existent
phenomenon in India, bestows shareholders with the exhortation
necessary will practice their corporate establishment for an
informed manner. The presence of activist institutional
shareholders for example, private equity funds and hedge funds
has already caused an upheaval in some corporate boardrooms in
India.
The researcher in this article has tried to portrait the issues
involving the shareholders and the evolution of the Shareholders
activism surrounding various countries.
The researcher has included three chapters which will be
dressed in doctrinal research.
The five chapters namely the Introduction, second chapter
named as the issue concerned the shareholders, third chapter will
revolve around the shareholder’s importance in various countries,
the fourth chapter, consists of the steps taken by the government
in the concerned issue. In the last chapter the conclusion and
suggestion.
Index Terms- company, corporate governance, shareholders,
Shareholders activism
I. INTRODUCTION
T he Company is a separate legal entity which was established
by the famous case Solomon vs Solomon. So therefore, the
Company which include the Directors and Shareholders basically
the members of the company and separate legal entity. It can be
said that the individuals are surviving in the small world’s known
as The Company.
486
The Company as an entity has importance and a number of
legislatures has been made to protect the company’s rights and
duties under the Law. Same goes for the other members of the
company like the Directors and Shareholders. The Directors and
Shareholders are the ones who are real wheels of the company, in
absence, of which the Company will not function properly.
It is very important to protect the members to Company can
work properly without any obstacles. In the Corporate World, all
are working in a proper manner but a question arises when it is
seen from a Shareholder point of view, the Shareholder is also an
important entity. The protection of the rights in the Company of
every single entity is very concerned issue as only gaining profits
is not the only issue.
The Companies are formed for a particular reason and
which also consists of gaining profits for the particular business
for the purpose for which the Company was established. There
are many objectives which are mentioned in the Memorandum of
Association and Articles of Association of the Company but a
point of consideration that is the Shareholders also forms an
important part of the Company but they are always dominated by
the Directors.
The fact that the Directors are more powerful than the
Shareholders, the reason concerned is well versed with the
Corporate World that the Directors rule the Shareholders. The
Directors are the ones who take decision and run the Company
where as the Shareholders are the ones who are the investors and
they are not directly involves in the decision making process
which may lead to biased decision. The decisions are biased as
said before may be not be in the favours of the shareholders as
the shareholders are not present in the regular activities such as
day to day activities as they are huge in numbers which act as a
barrier in the current scenario.
In the globalisation world, there has been lacking of the
Corporate Sectors and other Financial Sectors in the area of the
Corporate Governance world which has activated the need of
development or in other words, there is a need of improvement in
the Shareholders Sectors.
The current corporate world sometimes only takes into
consideration the controlling of the Shareholders. The
Shareholders in this sector has been our dominated by the
Directors in the Company. it has been high time that the
Company needs to take a serious action in making the
legislatures which can favour the Shareholders. No doubt, a
number of legislations has been made regarding the Company.
But after much efforts the Directors still dominate the
Shareholders, The Legislatures have tried to put forward the
Shareholders in the following ways as Postal ballet, E-Voting,
etc. Meanwhile in this conservation in the Shareholder Activism
concept has tried to evolved in the Indian Corporate World. It is
www.ijsrp.org
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 7, Issue 12, December 2017
ISSN 2250-3153
generally, seen that the efforts made by the legal Indian Market
that the Shareholder Activism effects are not at all working the
way it was supposed to be.
The Indian Legal system are not willing to invest in the
entity of the Shareholders who are trying their level best to put
their voices before the court of law by the Shareholder in order to
receive justice. It is thus, observed that the remedies this
provided to the shareholders are cost effective which is actually
giving the flavour of injustice.
The researcher in this paper has tried to portrait one of the
protagonist of the Corporate Sector i.e., the Shareholders who
deserve to be the part of the system not just by the name or rules
but by the reality also.
The paper will observe different phases of the Shareholders
which actually revolve around the Shareholders Activism in the
Indian Market.
The Shareholders are the protagonist of the company and
focus is needed to protect the rights of the Shareholders. History
have witnessed a sudden importance towards the improved
corporate governance parameters in India. There are many
regulations which are brought into existence for the purpose of
governance ways of practices and the impression made on the
Indian Companies. The regulatory such as Securities and
Exchange Board of India (SEBI) have an involvement in the
Indian Companies.
SEBI has been regulated the public listed companies, so
that they are maintained in a well- manner and for the
governance structures such as the independent audit process,
discovery of the Independent Directors. Etc. All these structures
are made for the better processing the governance implement.
Meanwhile the history has witnessed that the after the
existence of the various legislations brought into existence for
the purpose of regulating the governance practices in the
Corporate Governance, but still there are many cases which
proved that the laws made are not sufficient to handle the
situation which arise in the Corporate Sector. The cases such as
the Satyam Case. To brief about the case, the scandal was
regarding the accounting sector. These situations give a view of
the lack of Shareholders Activism.
The activist Shareholders in the Corporate World which has
shown their need to regulate the laws in the legislature.
To explain further, the researcher was to provide a brief
explanation about the concept Shareholder Activism.
II. SHAREHOLDER ACTIVISM
An individual who endeavours to utilize his or her rights as
an investor of a traded on a publicly-traded corporation to
achieve social change. A portion of the issues frequently tended
to by investor activists are identified with nature, interests in
politically important phases of the world and workers' rights. In
other words, sweatshops.
The term can likewise allude to speculators who trust that
an organization's management is making an awful showing with
regards to and who endeavour to pick up control of the
organization and trade management for the benefit of the
investors.
487
III. SHAREHOLDERS AGREEMENT
The Shareholders Agreement is expected to ensure that
investors are dealt with decently and that their rights are secured.
The understanding incorporates segments sketching out the
reasonable and genuine valuing of offers (especially when sold).
It likewise enables investors to settle on choices about what
outside gatherings may end up plainly future investors and gives
shields to minority positions.
Shareholder activism likewise assumes a part in
well‐functioning Public markets. For instance, while Shareholder
activists much of the time do the truly difficult work, the
advantages of activism for the most part accumulate to all
investors. Moreover, the dread of turning into the objective of an
activist adds to the general effectiveness of capital markets by
considering management teams responsible for the persistent
stewardship of corporate resources. Progressively, activists
display well‐conceived capital portion and marketable strategies
to management guaranteeing that a wide assortment of
significant worth making procedures are investigated. Once in a
while do the more shared activists lead with a request to offer the
organization. Be that as it may, if management neglects to seek
after clear‐cut esteem making procedures, activists can and will
push for a potential offer of the organization on the off chance
that they trust it is to the greatest advantage of investors.
Ultimately, Shareholder activism gives the esteem situated
financial specialist extra levers to pull by proactively seeking
after identifiable organization impetuses. This occasion driven
optionality can be helpful to financial specialists over a wide
assortment of market situations.
IV. HISTORY OF SHAREHOLDER ACTIVISM
Since its initial origin in the 1920s, investor activism has
transformed from a check against oblivious obedience in the
meeting room into what numerous specialists are presently
calling a noteworthy emergency.
Rise of Institutional Investors: As demonstrated prior,
possessions have expanded altogether; have turned out to be
more self-assured in advancing interests of their members.
a. Have substantial pieces of stock so difficult to offer if
end up plainly disappointed, in this way solid
motivation to work to change management strategy
b. Council of Institutional Investors
c. Represents organizations and pension funds with
ventures on the whole surpassing $3 trillion in
possessions
d. Developed a Shareholder Bill of Rights
e. Research demonstrates association of institutional
investors can enhance organization execution
Social investment: Refers to the utilization of stock
ownership as a technique for advancing social objectives;
additionally, called social responsibility investment
a. Social screening of stock: Some stock buyers pick
stocks in view of social or natural criteria, called social
screens
b. In 2007, $2.7 trillion invested into socially obligation
funds; roughly 1 of every 9 investment dollars
www.ijsrp.org
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 7, Issue 12, December 2017
ISSN 2250-3153
c. Rapid development in comparable supports in Europe
and past
Social responsibility investor resolutions: A determination
on an issue of corporate social responsibility set before a
stockholders or investors for a vote at the annual meeting which
is held in a Company
a. Has been a huge ascent in social duty investor
resolutions lately – around 650 were supported in 2007
• Sponsorship is frequently from a coalition of
gatherings, as Interfaith Centre on Corporate
Responsibility
b. Resolutions can be about social issues, not customary
business of a Company
c. Only collect around 15% of votes, yet their impact is
more grounded as managers of the Company react in
front of annual meetings so they will be retained.
Shareholder Activism – Shareholder Lawsuits
a. If proprietors think they or their organization have been
harmed by activities of Company officers or directors,
they have appropriate to bring claims
b. Can be started to check manhandle, for instance insider
trading, insufficient stock buyout cost, or lavish
Executive Pensions
c. Some companies have guaranteed were focus of paltry
Shareholder’s claims
1) As result Congress passed enactment making it
more troublesome for speculators to sue
Company for extortion.
V. DEFINITION AND ORIGINS OF SHAREHOLDER
ACTIVISM
The term Shareholder activism has turned out to be
universal for what as a general rule is a to a great degree wide
range of financial specialist action. The inceptions of
Shareholder activism lay in the 1980s amid the period of
corporate thieves and hostile takeovers. The mass selection of
Shareholder’s rights designs, otherwise called the "poison pill"
which is conveyed a conclusion to the antagonistic takeover
period and introduced the main extremist assets amid the 1990s.
By the mid‐2000s, the system turned out to be considerably more
standard. There are investors who mark themselves "Shareholder
activists" that seek after an assorted exhibit of motivation,
including:
• Share value underperformance/undervaluation
• Corporate Governance in the area of the Shareholder rights
• ESG ‐ Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance
• Executive pay, among different causes
As the monetary media normally alludes it to, be that as it
may, Shareholder activism is a venture system whereby minority
Shareholder instead of controlling Shareholders practice and
their proprietorship rights with the goal of enhancing investor
esteem. Simultaneously, dissident activist investors proactively
recognize venture openings in which the usage of activism can
open an incentive by filling in as the impetus for change. Where
other active investors recognize value‐appreciating impetus
occasions and afterward seek after that occasion to happen,
488
activate investors supplant trust with activity by practicing their
rights as Shareholders to impact change.
Some of the key conceptual issues that this gives rise to 1:
A portion of the key applied issues that this offers ascend to:
1. The primary issue identifies with who pays the remuneration
to the institutional Nominee Directors. The present pattern
appears to recommend that the pay is paid by the nominator
or the Investor instead of the Company itself, which would
limit the impact of the standard issues relating to Executive
remuneration on the off chance that it was to be paid by the
Company itself.
2. These arrangements could make groups on the board, i.e.
between within Directors or the Executive and the alleged
outsiders or nominee, along these lines potentially checking
productive, if not successful on the basic leadership. A
contrarian way to deal with this would propose that such
varying perspectives and points of view may really be
gainful to the general prosperity of the Company and the
enthusiasm of the Shareholders.
3. There could be questions with respect to the adequacy of the
chosen one executives. For illustration, given that they are
Non-Executive Directors, they may have troubles in getting
to data with respect to the matter of the organization or to
different officers similarly as an official executive can.
4. It is misty if the candidate Nominee Director might will to
go for broke of confronting risk since they may have
obligations without the going with power or control inside
the Company.
5. As these Directors are assigned by the institutional investors,
who may have a noteworthy holding in the organization), it
is far-fetched that these executives would be dealt with as
Independent Directors. Their arrangement on the board may
tilt the adjust of Independent and Non-Independent Directors
which may make it hard to conform to the imperative board
freedom prerequisites under the Corporate Governance
standards without delegating more autonomous executives
keep up the fitting parity.
6. Since the chosen Nominee Directors would owe guardian
obligations to the organization, they are in an unenviable
position whereby they may need to incline toward the
interests of the organization over those of their nominating
investor if there should be an occurrence of a contention
between those interests.
VI. TYPES OF SHAREHOLDER ACTIVISM
The Shareholder Activism has a few parts to play in the
organization. There are sorts of Shareholder activism to suit the
company’s circumstance. The accompanying are the sorts which
are there to mix with the Company’s circumstance:
1. The Investor Focused on Optimizing Yield
The financial specialist concentrated on improving yield,
sort of activist deals with the present capital conveyance, and
how unique methodologies may better advance Shareholder’s
1
https://indiacorplaw.in/2013/05/shareholder-activism-enters-
boardroo.html (last accessed on 24-11-2017)
www.ijsrp.org
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 7, Issue 12, December 2017
ISSN 2250-3153
yield, which implies they look to re-design the accounting report
to build Shareholder’s yield, over the briefest measure of time
conceivable, which regularly runs between six to a year.
Illustration: Jolly Incorporation is a best performing S&P
500 Listed Companies whose two-year add up to return beat the
market by more than 60%. Regardless of measurements
indicating noteworthy general Company’s execution, the
Company's capital arrangement procedure was not amplifying
Shareholders profits and buybacks. Jolly Incorporation,
additionally constantly exchanged at a various forward-looking
PEGY, that slacked the S&P 500. Every Public indicator
suggested management stayed content with keeping up vast
measure of overabundance money and liked to remain generally
under-levered. In this way, the contention could be influenced
Shareholder to yield was not as high as it could be. The dissident
for this situation would persuade senior administration to issue
obligation and reallocate free money towards a higher or
exceptional profit and a huge offer repurchase.
2. The Investor Who Combines Closely Tied
Competitors
Now and then it doesn't bode well for organizations
working in a similar space to ceaselessly contend. Particularly
inside unpredictable divisions, for example, Industrials and
Materials, this can be counterproductive. Activists hope to check
whether adversaries could be consolidated to shape a more
gainful single substance, one that can profit by economies of
scale and consume a given area.
Illustration: Acme Industries and Widget Co. work in an
amazingly Competitive or in other words, Borderline
oligopolistic sector. The two firms offer basically
indistinguishable administrations, keep up comparative customer
bases, and seek after practically identical prospects. As of late,
the two Companies, displayed in the compacted edges, level
income development, and slacking returns. Notwithstanding, free
income per share stayed noteworthy at the two Companies, and
settled cost proportions remained to some degree in place.
Unmistakably, consolidating the two firms would be significantly
more useful to general investor esteem. The activist in this
circumstance connected with Acme Industries to reconfigure the
Board, change the calculation of their capital structure, and
converge with Widget Co.
3. The Investor Who Separates Different Divisions
At the point when a Company’s works in non-
complimentary divisions, it can be hard to keep up a solitary
balance sheet report that streamlines general Shareholder’s
return. Regardless of whether the two divisions are gainful, the
capital necessities of one might be totally unique in relation to
the next. So an activist would look to part the divisions with the
goal that they have singular capital structures that would enable
each to streamline execution.
Case: Happy Co. was a main supplier of both capital-
serious apparatus and customer based services. Income got from
the apparatus business was exceptionally repetitive, though the
shopper based administrations income was repeating and more
steady. Large scale monetary factors likewise influenced every
division in an unexpected way. The capital prerequisites of the
two Companies were different to the point that the accounting
489
report would never be organized in a way that most appropriate
both. Subsequently, the activist's technique is cut out the
customer based services to shape its own element, with the goal
that it could be promoted in a way that streamlines execution.
With two separate asset reports, management could design
around the hazard factors such as income structure, monetary
elements, more effectively.
4. The Investor Who Gets Rid of Dead Weight
Normally, Activist’s pinpoints battling specialty units that
debilitate the execution of the general firm and seek after turn
offs to dispense with dead weight from the Company.
Case: MineMe Inc. worked in a focused industry that had been
persistently dense, basically through mergers, as of late.
Inevitably the firm was keeping up two unmistakable
complimentary business units, yet while one was showing above
market middle levels of development, the other was getting to be
noticeably outdated. It showed a 10% lessening in income
development while the other unit displayed deals development of
75%. The slacking unit likewise required a prominent measure of
capital uses while the developing unit was greatly versatile and
capital venture was negligible. So a dissident drew in the
Company to auction the slacking unit. Alongside continues of the
sale, the recently authorized assets could be reallocated to help
the organization's general development.
Shareholder’s target Companies with the accompanying
issues
Activist’s investors have been setting their sights on
organizations with the accompanying issues:
1. Underperformance issues which has been identified
even in the case of great stock execution and it does not
make a Company resistant.
2. Poor Governance and board practices in the Company.
3. "Zombie" Directors, are those directors who did not get
lion's shareholder’s bolster, but rather some way or
another stay on the board.
4. Combined Chairman or the Chief Executive Officer
5. Non-Independent Directors
6. Lack of Shareholder’s rights. For e.g., ideal to assemble
a special meeting, composed assent, proxy access.
7. Executive Compensation issues
8. Ongoing concerns with respect to official pay –
commonly prodded as a substitute consultant proposals
and additionally media examination
9. Shareholder proposition got greater part bolster and
your board did not execute it
10. Significant media feedback of late mergers,
acquisitions, item dispatches
11. Identified as an exception in natural or social practices
Amid the previous years the shareholder activism and
corporate management has been thought about as it has been
worried in the Company’s zone, together and in addition alone.
Shareholder activism is portrayed by purchasing partakes in
Company with a specific end goal to put weight on the board or
management of the Company. Done productively, it is a nearly
cheap method for picking up impact and hence having the
capacity to recreate organizations both from a money related and
www.ijsrp.org
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 7, Issue 12, December 2017
ISSN 2250-3153
a temperate viewpoint. This is in examination with common
private value purchase outs where the firm ordinarily purchases
the whole enterprise. Corporate Governance looks at the way
organizations are coordinated, administrated and controlled
through various arrangements of procedures, conventions,
strategies and laws.
Corporate Governance takes a wide range of structures yet
one focal and vital concern is to ensure the responsibility of the
people in an association by limiting the vital specialist issue.
Another part of corporate governance is management's effect on
financial proficiency, regardless of whether solid investor
activism can make a powerful management component keeping
in mind the end goal to make better working Companies.
Through time, Shareholder activists have utilized a wide range of
ways to deal with weight corporate boards and administrators to
enhance firm esteem. Customarily, activists have included
individuals, pension funds, and mutual funds. As of the current
years, hedge funds have come to assume an undeniably critical
part. There is much difference on the subject whether shareholder
activism can make genuine changes in the esteem, income, and
governance structure of target firms.
Along these lines, the researcher has made sense of the
accompanying goals of the Shareholder Activism:
• There are various credits that are probably going to
draw in activism, for example, relative
underperformance, alter in vital course, capital
designation, accounting reports and returns approaches,
and corporate governance.
• Governance-related crusades frequently give a false
representation of some other thought process the
specific activist investor may have in pursuing a battle
against a Company's board
• In accordance with the pattern found in the United State
of America (U.S.A) around a fraction of the time,
activists commonly get what they set out to accomplish.
Be that as it may, this isn't a pointer of whether their
drives or crusades have prompted esteem creation
• Only a set number of activists will target operational
issues, and ordinarily just where they have specific bits
of knowledge or industry encounter
VII. CASE STUDY RELATING TO SHAREHOLDER
ACTIVISM
Contextual analysis relating to shareholder activism:
Commonwealth Bank of Australia's Annual General
Meeting a year ago hurled an intriguing contextual analysis
including Shareholder activism that merits remembering.
Preceding the Commonwealth Bank, annual general
meeting the Australian centre for corporate responsibility
(ACCR), speaking to more than 100 Commonwealth Bank
investors, pulled out of proposed resolutions to be considered at
the annual general meeting. The corporations act gives that a 5%
or more investor or 100 investors in total are qualified for require
the consideration of a determination at a meeting of the
organization.
The target of Australian centre for corporate responsibility
was to attract thoughtfulness regarding ozone harming substance
490
emanations caused by Commonwealth Bank. The three
resolutions were as per the following:
• That Commonwealth Bank 's yearly report furnishes
investors with a report of its directors on the ozone
depleting substance discharges that Commonwealth
Bank is in charge of, the present level and nature of
dangers to Commonwealth Bank from unburnable
carbon and current methodologies embraced by
Commonwealth Bank to moderate those dangers;
• That the investors express their worry at the
nonattendance of these issues in the yearly report;
• To revise the constitution by unique determination to
require that the directors report in the yearly give an
account of these issues.
Commonwealth Bank exhorted the Australian centre for
corporate responsibility that it would exclude the initial two
resolutions in its notice of meeting yet would incorporate the
third determination, on the premise that the initial two resolutions
were matters inside the restrictive energy of the board and were
thusly not legitimate and equipped for having lawful impact. In
the annual general meeting notice of meeting the board exhorted
investors not to vote for the third determination as it didn't view
the determination as in light of a legitimate concern for
Commonwealth Bank and that it was not clear to the directors
how as a pragmatic issue Commonwealth Bank could conform to
the determination. The extraordinary determination was crushed
at the annual general meeting. The Australian centre for
corporate responsibility initiated Court procedures looking for an
assertion that each of the three resolutions could be put at a
yearly broad meeting. The Federal Court dismissed the
application, setting out a genuinely standard investigation of the
lawful rule that apply around there.
On the off chance that an organization has a run of the mill
constitution that gives that the management and issues of the
organization are vested in the directors, any determination of
individuals that tries to guide the executives to practice those
forces especially will be void and of no impact. Therefore, the
initial two resolutions proposed by the centre were unmistakably
of no lawful impact and Commonwealth Bank was not required
to put the resolutions for thought by investors at the annual
general meeting.
The third determination was the main in fact redress path in
which the activist motivation could have been sought after – a
change to the constitution that looked to expressly shackle the
general forces of management vested in the board. Obviously,
the trouble for an extremist in seeking after this system is that an
extraordinary determination is required to revise the constitution
along these lines.
The Australian centre for corporate responsibility
additionally looked to contend that the suggestion made by the
executives that investors vote against the third determination
surpassed the forces of the directors. That contention was
likewise dismissed by the federal court on the premise that the
energy of the directors to make proposals of that nature gets from
the constitution and the obligations of the directors.
www.ijsrp.org
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 7, Issue 12, December 2017 491
ISSN 2250-3153

VIII. CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
[2]
Shareholder activism assumes a fundamental part in
well‐functioning capital markets, in our view, by considering
organizations more responsible to Shareholder. It is the [1]
Shareholder after all who claim the Company. Regardless of
whether you put straightforwardly in a focused on extremist [2]
technique, possess a common store or claim offers of regular
stock in a traded on a publicly traded organization, it is winding [3]
up progressively likely that you will be touched by some type of
[4]
Shareholder activism amid your contributing lifetime. As we
would like to think, when an activist rings the doorbell, it is by [5]
and large a smart thought to answer it. [6]
Companies, Circular CIR/CFD/DIL/6/2012 (Jul. 13, 2012).
S.E.B.I. Amendments, Circular No. CIR/CFD/POLICY CELL/7/2014,
15th September, 2014.
Articles
A.C. Fernando, Satyam- Anything but Satyam, Loyola Institute of Business
Administration.
http://www.publishingindia.com/uploads/samplearticles/mm-sample-
article.pdf (last accessed 23rd March, 2016).
Adolf Berle& Gardiner Means, The Modern Corporation & Private
Property, 125 (Transaction Publishers, 1932).
Ajit Singh, Corporate Financial Patterns and Industrializing Economies: A
Comparative International Study,
Technical Paper, International Finance Corporation (1995).
Bernard Black, Shareholder Activism and Corporate Governance in the
United States, The New Palgrave

REFERENCES
Statutes AUTHORS
[1] Companies Act, 1956
First Author – Moonmoon Malik, Alliance School of Law,
[2] Companies Act, 2013
Alliance University
Circulars/Notifications
[1] S.E.B.I. Amendment to the Equity Listing Agreement – Platform for E-
Voting by Shareholders of Listed

www.ijsrp.org