be helping someone: “Do your duty though the heavens fall.” Immanuel Kant Kant was basically a really weird guy. He was born in a tiny village in Germany called Königsberg, and never travelled more than 10 miles outside of it during his entire life. Hehad a very strict routine – the story goes that local people in Königsberg used to set their watches by the time Kant went by on this daily walk! BUT he is perhaps the most influential philosopher of the past 300 years. Means acting in accordance with the CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE. Infact, as is well known as the supreme principle of MORALITY. An act is moral if it is done in accordance with the categorical imperative. Two Types of Imperative: Hypothetical is the one that expresses a conditional command. EX. If you want to become successful, then you have to work very hard.
Categorical is the one that expresses an absolute
command. Ex. Do not be late, this command does not pose a condition as it does not contain an if- then clause. The Good Will Is the one that facilitates a human act. The good will, therefore, is good without qualification. It is good without any condition. Ex. The will to help a friend. Duty and the Moral Worth of an Act Kant argues that duty should be the motive of any moral act. Inclination or self- interest can never be the motive of any moral act. Ex. Physician treats a patient, the motive should be “duty” not the interest of profiting from the patient herself. For Kant, only those actions that are done for the sake of duty have moral worth. Formulations of the Categorical Imperative “Act only on that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that is should become a universal law” It means the principle of universality commands that every maxim someone acts on must be such that others are willing to make when in a similar situation. E.g. The act of stealing the properties of the rich and distribute them to the poor. E.g the act of helping a friend in times of need.- universalizable We have to ask ourselves, “What if everybody did that?” E.g. murder cannot be universalized – if everybody murdered people who they did not like then there would be no people left! Lying cannot be universalized – if everybody lied then nobody would believe what anybody says, and lying would be pointless! “So act as to treat humanity whether in your own person or in that of another never as means but always as an end.” Any act that treats humanity as a means is not morally right. E.g. The act of cheating someone is absolutely immoral because this acts treats others as a means, that is, the other is treated as thing. If we cheat on others, then we are treating them as means to our own selfish end. What are our duties? Which of these acts follow principles that could be universalized, and which depend on people’s desire for certain consequences? 1. A shopkeeper gives a customer the right change because he likes the customer. 2. A shopkeeper gives a customer the right change because he thinks this is part of what all shopkeepers ought to do. 3. A shopkeeper gives a customer the right change because he wants to maintain a good reputation.