Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Q&A Group A Mebi Dik18C
Q&A Group A Mebi Dik18C
Q&A Group A Mebi Dik18C
MEBI
Study Program S1 English Education
Score:
QUESTIONS
Chapter 1:
School Leadership Studies: Beyond Education Management
Question:
1. What is the concern of a science policy approach and its relationship to educational
leadership?
Answer:
The concern of a policy science approach is to understand present phenomena (in
particular, present phenomena) in order to formulate a rational and scientific prescription
for action and future policy.
Their relation:
When applied to the study of education leadership, for instance, a policy science
approach tends to exclude consideration of wider contextual relations by its sharply
focused concern with the specifics of a particular set of leadership behaviours. This
approach is seductive in its concreteness, its apparently valuefree and objective scientific
stance and in its obvious relation to policy formation. Policy science research has a high
appeal to governments, state agencies and research foundations because it promises to
‘deliver the goods’ in a technical and usable form.
3. Why is the moral order in all schools considered closely related to the moral and
social order of the wider society?
Answer:
In nineteenth-and early twentieth-century England one of the most important
functions of schools at each social class level was to provide appropriate moral
socialization relevant to the class destinations of its pupils i.e., to understand the moral
consequences of ‘knowing one’s place’ in the social structure. Headteachers at all levels
of the schooling system had a particular responsibility to ensure that this was
accomplished effectively by the pedagogic arrangements of the school and by the
amplification of its moral and cultural codes. School leadership as moral leadership was
seen to be a bulwark against anarchy both within the school as an organization and in the
wider society.
4. What are the academic and research programs are derived for the study of school
leadership? Please explain them briefly!
Answer:
a) Examining the founding conceptions of school leadership in English provided
schooling and in independent schooling as manifested in the nineteenth century.
b) Clarifying the constitution of school leadership and school management as a
shared responsibility of governors and managers (class leadership) and of
headteachers (pedagogical leadership) in the nineteenth century.
c) Tracing the changing power relations between ‘the governors as leadership’ and
‘the headteacher as leadership’ related to wider social, ideological and political
developments in English society in the twentieth century.
d) With particular reference to English ‘state’ schooling, to analyze the modern
constitution of leadership in relation to some of its major regulative principles.
e) With particular reference to the role of the headteacher, to examine the ways in
which the salience of these principles has changed over time as a result of wider
cultural and ideological change in English society.
f) Understanding how those currently acting as headteachers in the state system are
responding to the radical changes in the nature of school leadership arising from
the education legislation of the 1980s.
g) Making explicit the implications of changes in school leadership in relation to
equal opportunities commitments, particularly questions to do with the
representation of women and of ethnic community groups in school leadership
positions.
Chapter 2
Leadership and Management; Locating the Concepts
Question:
6. What Watkins (1989) argued about leadership?
Answer :
Watkins (1989) has argued that leadership, power and management in education
settings ‘should be looked at as relational concepts developing over lengthy periods of
time’ (p. 30). It is necessary to trace this cultural history
8. Who is has drawn attention to the considerable symbolic power of ‘the Amateur
Ideal’ in English cultural life?
Answer :
He is Wilkinson (1964), in his study of leadership and the public school tradition
in England, has drawn attention to the considerable symbolic power of ‘the Amateur
Ideal’ in English cultural life
9. Why the relations between education and production where these relations are
viewed as categories of function?
Answer :
Because If the relation between these two categories is strongly classified, then
there is strong insulation between the categories, which creates a space in which each
category can differently specialize its generative principles and practices…the principles
are kept apart and are differently specialized.
10. What is a new concept both of knowledge and of its relation to those who create it ?
Answer :
There is a new concept both of knowledge and of its relation to those who create
it, a truly secular concept. Knowledge should flow like money to wherever it can create
advantage and profit. Indeed knowledge is not just like money, it is money. Knowledge is
divorced from persons, their commitment, their personal dedications, for these become
impediments, restrictions on flow and introduce deformations in the working of the
market. Moving knowledge about, or even creating it, should not be more difficult than
moving and regulating money. Knowledge, after nearly a thousand years, is divorced
from inwardness and is literally dehumanized.
Chapter 3:
Critical Perspectives on School Leadership
Question:
11. Why the principal in the English school has the power among the others? and how
does management education (EMS) respond to this?
Answer:
As we know that, headteachers in English schools have been powerful definers of
the culture, organization and ethos of schooling and It is no surprise therefore to find that
interest groups who wish to change the culture and ethos of schooling in various ways
realize the strategic importance of changing the consciousness, values and behaviour of
headteachers and, more fundamentally, of changing the nature of the headship role itself.
A significant contemporary struggle therefore exists in England to change the
consciousness of headteachers and to change the historically constituted nature of what it
is to be a headteacher.
So, because of that EMS Education Management Studies (EMS) reconstitutes the
position of headteacher as chief executive and market manager of ‘Education plc’. A
body of writings and discourse which has arisen in opposition to these tendencies and
which may be called Critical Leadership Studies (CLS) calls upon headteachers to give a
new kind of educative and democratic leadership for the future
12. From the perspective of Foster’s concept of leadership as a critical practice. What
are the characteristics of racism and sexism in educational practice?
Answer:
Closely related to Foster’s concept of leadership as critical practice is his notion of
leadership as transformative. From this perspective, the leader works with others to
obtain transformations of undesirable features of schooling culture and practice. These
features might be the existence of racism and sexism in educational practice.
- The existence of prejudice against particular religious or regional groups or
- against those with a range of disabilities and disadvantages.
15. According to Sergiovanni what is the desired goal for publicly available education in
America?
Answer:
For Sergiovanni the desired goal for publicly provided education in America is
the creation of the ‘virtuous school’ characterized by ‘a covenant of shared values’ and
by an ethos of caring and respect for persons. Leadership in such a school would be a
demonstration of stewardship and of a manifest serving of the critical perspectives on
school leadership in the virtuous school, the leader would be seen as a servant’.
Chapter 4
Fieldwork and Analytical Approaches
Question:
16. How many phases in this Fieldwork research activity? Explain them briefly!
Answer:
Phase 1: The Initial Interview Stage (1990)
A semi-structured interview schedule was designed to focus discussion of the changing
nature of English school headship in both primary and secondary schools. Questions
covered a range of issues including motivations for becoming a headteacher; reactions to
changes in pedagogical leadership, especially in relation to the national curriculum;
reactions to governor and parent empowerment; reactions to the introduction of local
management of schools (LMS) and reactions to a more salient market culture in
education.
Phase 2: The Focused Survey Stage (1993)
The research intention at this stage of the fieldwork was to submit ‘key issues’ of
leadership, as defined by the initial interview sample, to the evaluative judgment of other
headteachers in the region. This gave an opportunity for new participants in the inquiry to
make critical responses to key issues already defined or to suggest further items as key
issues in school leadership.
Phase 3: The Moral and Professional Dilemmas Survey (1994)
In this context, moral and professional dilemmas in schooling were defined as ‘situations
where two more sets of value judgments conflict and where a resolution of the conflict
must be made in the interests of the pupils, the teachers and the school’. However, the
document invited headteachers to ‘make your own judgment about what constitutes a
moral dilemma in schooling’.
Phase 4: The Catholic Headteachers Survey (1994)
The intention of this aspect of the fieldwork was to investigate any qualitative differences
which might exist between conceptions of educational leadership in Catholic schools
when compared with such conceptions in state schools.
Phase 5: Women Headteachers (1994)
School headship in the north-east of England still shows a strong pattern of male
dominance even in primary education.5 The four phases of research activity already
described had resulted in a data source consisting of sixty-four accounts from men and
twenty accounts from women. Attempts were made by a further targetted survey to
increase the representation of women school leaders and to sharpen the focus upon
gender issues in school leadership.
17. In this cumulative field-work process, how many headteacher were available for
analysis?
Answer:
Eighty-eight headteacher accounts.
18. What are the school level of those headteachers who participate in this analysis?
Answer:
These accounts represented the participation of headteachers differentiated in the
following ways:
• Sixty-four men headteachers: twenty-four women headteachers
• Forty-seven secondary school headteachers: forty-one primary school headteachers
• Fifty-four state school headteachers: thirty-four Catholic school headteachers
• Sixty-nine north-east region: nineteen other regions
Chapter 5:
The Power Relations of School Leadership : Change or Continuity ?
Question:
21. The power relations and the cultural symbolism of this form of manifest school
leadership were legitimated and sanctified by?
Answer:
The legacy of the public school ‘headmaster traditions’ and by later social democratic
notions of professional expertise and authority.
22. What concept that Nell keddie (1971) elucidated from ‘good pupil’ in her
ethnography class?
Answer:
She pointed out that good pupils were socially and morally acceptable to their teachers
and caused no trouble, either behaviourally or intellectually. When headteachers in this
inquiry used the concept of the ‘good governor’ they implied that good governors
similarly gave no trouble. Such governors were prepared to continue in a pre-reform
culture of governance and were not inclined to challenge the manifest school leadership
of the headteacher.
25. What among the various intentions the Conservative governments in the 1980s had
forthe re-empowerment of school governing bodies, the establishment of a stronger
agency for accountability to parent/consumers and to business interests was
prominent mean?
Answer:
In other words, a long established professional autonomy for headteachers to be manifest
school leaders was to be constrained in the name of greater efficiency, effectiveness and
responsiveness. Accompanying such changes in the nature of school leadership in
England was a discourse which celebrated parent power, reconstituted as ‘consumer
power’ and the school reconstituted in enterprise culture as an emergent business, with a
Board of Directors (The governors) and a Chief Executive (The headteacher). The most
politically effective strand in this discourse of legitimation for radical school change was
that the reassertion of governor power was in fact an assertion of democratic and
community control of state schooling over and against the insulated control of education
professionals.