Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2 3 Full Factorial Array (Similar To The Taguchi L8 Orthogonal Array)
2 3 Full Factorial Array (Similar To The Taguchi L8 Orthogonal Array)
G=ABC
E=AC
D=AB
F=BC
Run#
Signal- to-
A B C R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 Ave. Std.Dev. Noise (S/N)
1 - - - + + + - - - -
2 + - - - - + + - - -
3 - + - - + - + - - -
4 + + - + - - - - - -
5 - - + + - - + - - -
6 + - + - + - - - - -
7 - + + - - + - - - -
8 + + + + + + + - - -
Calc. the Sig. of 2nd Order Interaction Effects or Aliased Effects (Solving for Means)
Factor D (AB) Runs Where D is + : - + - + - + - = 0 / 4 = Ave= 0
Runs Where D is - : - + - + - + - = 0 / 4 = Ave= 0.00
Total Effect = Difference = 0.00
Calc. the Sig. of 2nd Order Interaction Effects or Aliased Effects (Solving for Std Dev.)
Calc. the Sig. of 2nd Order Interaction Effects or Aliased Effects (Solving for Sig-to-Noise)
Calc. the Sig. of 3rd Order Interaction Effects, Error, or Aliased Effects (Solving for Means)
Factor G (ABC) Runs Where G is + : - + - + - + - = 0 / 4 = Ave= 0
Runs Where G is - : - + - + - + - = 0 / 4 = Ave= 0.00
Total Effect = Difference = 0.00
Calc. the Sig. of 3rd Order Interaction Effects, Error, or Aliased Effects (Solving for Std.Dev.)
10/28/2021 18:19:12 552832405.xlsx 2^3 KN
Factor G (ABC) Runs Where G is + : - + - + - + - = 0 / 4 = Ave= 0
Runs Where G is - : - + - + - + - = 0 / 4 = Ave= 0.00
Total Effect = Difference = 0.00
Calc. the Sig. of 3rd Order Interaction Effects, Error, or Aliased Effects (Solving for Sig.-to-Noise)
Factor G (ABC) Runs Where G is + : - + - + - + - = 0 / 4 = Ave= 0
Runs Where G is - : - + - + - + - = 0 / 4 = Ave= 0.00
Total Effect = Difference = 0.00
Calculating Confidence
ANOVA analysis is used to compare "within variation" with "between variation".
Hypotheses: Ho= All means are equal; HA= They are not equal
Linear contrasts is a method used to test any two levels or combinations of two levels against each other.
Degrees of freedom is always 1 for testing two items.
ANOVA Table
Is there a statistically significant difference between factors, rows, and error?
Df = Degrees of freedom MS = Mean Sum of Squares
SS = Sum of Squares F = F-test characteristic
Alpha = F-test probability
SS Df MS F Alpha Conf.
Factor A 0.0 1 0.00 - - - @ confidence that this is significant
Factor B 0.0 1 0.00 - - - @ confidence that this is significant
Factor C 0.0 1 0.00 - - - @ confidence that this is significant
Factor D (AB) 0.0 1 0.00 - - - @ confidence that this is significant
Factor E (AC) 0.0 1 0.00 - - - @ confidence that this is significant
Factor F (BC) 0.0 1 0.00 - - - @ confidence that this is significant
Factor G (ABC) 0.0 1 0.00
Total 0.0 7
Additional Comments
Note #1: If the data is known to be normally distributed, analyzing the within run data as design replicates yields
higher confidence in the results. Unfortunately this matrix is not set up to do that.
Note #2: Error in the results increases as columns contain greater amounts of partial data. For example, if two reps
are taken for each run, then columns R1 and R2 should be fully filled out.
ABC
BC
AB
Response
C
A
B
1 + + + + + + Sample Data
2 + + - + - - Sample Data
3 + - + - - - Sample Data
4 + - - - + + Sample Data
5 - + + - + - Sample Data
6 - + - - - + Sample Data
7 - - + + - + Sample Data
8 - - - + + - Sample Data