Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2013-14 - Multan 25112019
2013-14 - Multan 25112019
S.# Para/DP Name of Tax Amount Compliance by the department Audit Remarks DAC Directives
No. taxpayer Year Involved
1 4.4.1 Marghoob 2012 0.820 13.02.2017 05.12.2016 DAC Directive dated 19.12.2016
14496/03 Ahmad C/o Order u/s 122 (5A) has been RTO has contested. DAC directed the RTO to get
Mn Zone Sunshine passed on 10.02.2017 minimum As per return for tax year its contention verified from audit and submit
Traders 2012 the taxpayer showing final compliance by 30.12.2016.
1938594-3 tax u/s 113 amounting to Rs.
trading business of petrol DAC Directives dated 14.02.2017
Availed facility 820150/- charged. products. No evidence of RTO informed that tax amounting to
of 80% tax deductions of
reduction in tax
Rs.820,150/- u/s 113 has been charged on
08.03.2017 petroleum commission by
rate any company was
10.02.2017. DAC directed the RTO to enforce
Demand notice served on
provided. The contention recovery and report compliance at earliest.
22.02.2017. Recovery proceeding DAC Directives dated 20.03.2017
of the department may
will be initiated after expiry of 30 RTO informed that recovery proceedings are
please be revisited.
days. 30.03.2017: in hand. DAC directed the RTO to enforce
Taxpayer in appeal recovery and submit final compliance by
27.03.2017 CIR(A).Recovery awaited. 27.03.2017 after verification from audit.
Taxpayer has filed appeal against
DAC Directive dated 25.11.2019
the order passed u/s 122 (5A) 06.11.2019 RTO informed that the case is subjudice before
before the CIR (A) Multan. SUBJUDICE ATIR since 31.07.2017. DAC directed the RTO to
18.04.2017
request for out of turn hearing and pursue the
CIR(A) Multan has annulled the
case for early disposal.
order on 07.04.2017.Demand of
Rs.820,150/- taken into minus
account.
20.02.2019
2ND appeal before ATIR has been
filed on 31.07.2017.
Still Subjudice.
05.11.2019
6 14418 KHAWAJA 2007 Rs The taxpayer is a director in various corporate entities i.eKhawaja Bashir 27.12.2016 DAC Directive dated
Corporate Ahmad and Company, Khawaja Bashir and Sons Pvt Ltd, M/S Khawaja Reconciliation of 19.12.2016
MAHMOOD TO 73,324,26
income from different RTO has contested.
UR 2012 6 Feeds Pvt Ltd, M/S MahmoodMahboob Brothers Pvt Ltd, M/S Chamman
business as pointed DAC directed the
REHMAN- Sultana Fabric and M/S Ghareeb Nawaz Flour Mills. Detail of share
out by audit may be RTO to get its
capital invested as well as increase in share capital over the years is as contention verified
provided.
01011693 under: from audit and
30.03.2017:
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Tax Year 2009 report compliance
Share 230,451,05 362,390,55 402,206,07 481,297,08 481,297,08 Demand created by 30.12.2016.
Capital 6 6 0 3 3 u/s.122(5A)
invested amounting to DAC Directives dated
The
Accretio - 131,939,50 39,845,000 79,091,013 - Rs.32,153,590/- 13.02.2017
taxpayer which is recoverable. RTO informed that
declared n in 0 case is under process.
Tax Year 2010:
loss or capital Proceedings filed. DAC directed the RTO to
invested finalize proceedings by
marginal Contention of the
20.02.2017 and report
profit. On Less - 3,868,006 41,095,347 Proceeding - Department is final compliance
the other declared s u/s accepted. thereafter.
sources 122(5A) Tax Year 2011: DAC Directive dated
hand,the (Under
of are in 20.03.2017
capital Process)Proceeding
accretio process RTO has contested.
employed s are in hand. DAC directed the RTO to
has been n Department to get its stance verified
increased in expedite
from audit and
all tax years. Proceedings for the tax year 2009 have already been completed u/s proceedings and
7 14418 KHAWAJA 2007 Rs The taxpayer is a director in various corporate entities i.eKhawaja 27.12.2016 DAC Directive dated
Corporat Bashir Ahmad and Company, Khawaja Bashir and Sons Pvt Ltd, M/S Reconciliation of 19.12.2016
MAHBOOB TO 73,324,26
e income from different RTO has
UR 2012 6 Khawaja Feeds Pvt Ltd, M/S MahmoodMahboob Brothers Pvt Ltd, M/S
business as pointed contested. DAC
REHMAN- Chamman Sultana Fabric and M/S Ghareeb Nawaz Flour Mills. Detail
out by audit may be directed the RTO
of share capital invested as well as increase in share capital over the to get its
8 14418 Ahmad Ind(pvt)Ltd. 2010 3,649,276 Contested: 27.12.2016 DAC Directive dated 19.12.2016
TAX YEAR 2009 Department to reconcile the RTO has contested. DAC directed the RTO to get its
3224780 2012 20,794,07
As per tax profile, the stance verified from audit and report compliance by
Sales declared in 7 sales of taxpayer as per 26.12.2016.
company was registered Income Tax and sales tax
sales tax and for Income Tax purposes
income tax did not returns for all years. Sales DAC Directives dated 14.02.2017
on 18-11-2008. The
tally. figures of sales mentioned
tax profile of Ahmad RTO has contested. Audit has already verified
in audit observation have Industries Pvt Ltd departmental contention for the tax year 2009 for amount of
reconsidered during Rs.27.051 million. DAC recommended the case for
been reflected in the settlement to this extent. For rest of the years, DAC
return of the company’s reconciliation. directed the RTO to get their stance verified from audit and
directorMr.MuhammadZak submit final compliance by 20.02.2017.
i who filed income tax 01.02.2017 (Tax Year
return for the tax year 2009) DAC Directive dated 20.03.2017
2009 under the name and RTO informed that for tax Departmental contention accepted and verified by audit for
style as M/S Ahmad tax year 2009 and 2011. DAC recommended the case to
year 2009 the taxpayer M/s this extent and directed the RTO to expedite finalization of
Traders and disclosed
sales at Rs.79,430,736/- Ahmad Traders got proceedings in tax years 2010 and 2012 and report final
registration as PVT LTD compliance by 27.03.2017.
whereas the company M/S
Ahmad Ind filed its return Company under the name DAC Directive dated 25.11.2019
for the year 2009 ahmad industries Pvt Ltd. The Tax year 2009 (27.051 million)& 2011 (Rs.13.027
disclosing sales at taxpayer has consolidated the million)
Rs.2,140,000/-. Therefore sales of both status i.e. Departmental contention accepted and verified by
Difference in sales in
income tax return and 01.02.2017 (Tax Year
sales tax returns has been 2012)
communicated at Tax year 2012 may be
Rs.38,079,601/-. . The revisited as taxpayer has not
taxpayer inadvertently in claimed tax adjustments on
the sales tax return for the
electricity consumption. (AO
month of April, 2011,
disclosed supplies at No.52)
Rs.42,310,667/- instead of
Rs.42,31,066/- as digit-7
was mistakenly added.
The Officer vide ONO
01/2013 dated 3.5.2013
accepted the contention of
the registered person.
Para may be considered
as settled.
11 14164 ZafarIqbal C/o 2010 Rs Oder u/s 122(5A) has been 05.12.2016 DAC Directive dated 19.12.2016
Zainab Ghee & 25,988,475 passed by creating a demand Charged. Recovery RTO informed that recovery proceedings are in
of Rs 43,080,689/- copy of awaited hand. DAC directed the RTO to enforce recovery and
General
order is enclosed. submit final compliance by 30.12.2016 after
MillsPvtltd 31.01.2017 verification from audit.
01.02.2017
Capital The taxpayer being aggrieved DAC Directives dated 14.02.2017
Now CIT(A) annulled the
employed preferred appeal before RTO informed that CIR(A) has annulled the
CIR(A) who annulled the assessment order. RTO is
remained original order, and proceedings under law are in
assessment vide order No. requested to file second hand. DAC directed the RTO to finalize the
unexplained.
375 dated 22.12.2016. appeal. proceedings under the law and report final
05.11.2019 06.11.2019 compliance thereafter.
subjudice SUBJUDICE DAC Directive dated 20.03.2017
RTO informed that 2nd appeal has been filed
before ATIR which is subjudice. DAC directed
the RTO to pursue the case for early disposal.
DAC Directive dated 25.11.2019
RTO informed that the case is subjudice before ATIR
since January, 2017. DAC directed the RTO to request
for out of turn hearing and pursue the case for early
disposal.
4.SheikhZafar Ahmad
1656104-0
Rs. 1,000,000
5.others
0000005-1
Rs. 2,000,000
TOTAL 5,000,000
Recoverable Income
Tax @25%=
1,250,000
16 13959/07 M/s. 2012 21.972 Order u/s 161/205 has been 17.11.2016 DAC Directive dated 19.12.2016
Corporate Shujaabad passed vide DCR No. 2/61 Please expedite the Govt RTO informed that case is subjudice before ATIR
Zone Oil Mills dated: 15.11.2016 and created Dues under intimation to since June, 2016. Request for early hearing
(Pvt) Ltd a demand of Rs 21.972 M. audit. has already been made.
WHT copy of order is enclosed. DAC Directive dated 13.02.2017.
05.12.2016 RTO informed that case is
subjudice before
02.12.2016 The department charged Rs. ATIR since August, 2016. DAC directed the
Order and demand notice has 2,834,013/- which was RTO to pursue the case for early hearing.
been served upon the deleted in appeal CIR(A)
taxpayer. The taxpayer has dated: 17.06.2016. the DAC Directive dated 20.03.2017
filed application contending department has filed 2nd RTO informed that an amount of Rs.2,834,013/- was
that order u/s 161/205 has appeal before ATIR. charged as compared to amount pointed out by audit,
balance was not leviable. The original demand was
already been passed creating 06.11.2019 deleted by CIR(A) through its order dated 17.06.2016, the
a demand of Rs. 2,834,013/- . Subjudice case is subjudice before ATIR. DAC directed the RTO to
The said order has been pursue the case for early disposal.
deleted by worthyCIR(A) DAC Directive dated 25.11.2019
multan vide AO No. 770 dated:
RTO informed that the case is subjudice before ATIR
17.06.2016. The order u/s
161/205 dated: 15.11.2016 is since Jan., 2017. DAC directed the RTO to submit the
hereby rectified u/s 221 and updated status regarding case being subjudice /
demand of Rs. 21,971,544 is deletion of demand in this case and report final
hereby taken into minus compliance by 06.12.2019.
account.
05.11.2019
17 13959/07 M/s.AAADo 2010 0.740 Orders u/s 161/205 for the DAC Directive dated 19.12.2016
06.11.2019
RTO informed that recovery proceedings are in hand. DAC
Corporate ublers (Pvt) 2011 tax years 2010 and 2011 have Department to expedite the directed the RTO to enforce recovery and submit final
Zone Ltd been passed (copies recovery. compliance by 30.12.2016 after verification from audit.
enclosed). Para may be
treated as settled. DAC Directives dated 14.02.2017
RTO informed that reassessment has been finalized
30.01.2017 by raising tax demand of Rs.11538/- and Rs.2310
CIR(A) annulled the orders for the tax year 2010 and 2011 respectively as
for both the years with compared to amount pointed out by audit, balance
is not leviable. DAC directed the RTO to enforce
certain directions. Order u/s recovery and report final compliance by 20.02.2017
124/161/205 for the tax year after verification from audit.
2010 and 2011 was passed DAC Directives dated 20.03.2017
on 09.01.2017 creating tax RTO informed thatrecovery proceedings are in
payable u/s 205 at Rs. hand. DAC directed the RTO to enforce recovery
11538/- and Rs. 2310/- and submit final compliance by
respectively. 27.03.2017 after verification from audit.
11.04.2017
Tax payer company made
DAC Directive dated 25.11.2019
payment of (Rs. 11538 plus
2310/-)= 13848/- for the tax RTO informed that tax demand has been raised
year 2010 and 2011 which is under recovery. DAC directed the RTO
respectively on 04.04.2017 to enforce recovery and report final compliance
05.11.2019 by 06.12.2019.
Recovery effort are being
made.
18 14492/27 Multan Rice Mills 2011 0.818 09.02.2017 08.03.2017 DAC Directive dated 19.12.2016
MN Zone 2478053-7: Assessment Recovery may be RTO informed that case
is under process. DAC directed
u/s.122(5A)has been expedited. the RTO to finalize the proceedings and report
compliance by 30.12.2016.
Concealment of completed on 31/01/2017 06.11.2019
export creating tax demand of subjudice DAC Directives dated 14.02.2017
RTO informed that reassessment has been finalized
Rs.3.907(M).Copy of order by raising tax demand of Rs.3.907 million, as
Loss of revenue for non-treating the tax collected or deducted as final tax u/s 169
19 4.4.10 M/s. Qadir Ghee 2010 5.078 Cases have been fixed for 17.11.2016 DAC Directive dated 19.12.2016
14497 Industries 2011 hearing for 17-11-2016. Demand for tax year 2011 has RTO informed that recovery proceedings are in hand.
Corporate 2012 Proceedings for the tax year been created but remaining DAC directed the RTO to enforce recovery and submit
2011 has been finalized creating two tax years 2010 & 2012 still final compliance by 30.12.2016 after verification
demand of Rs.3,028,381/-.. pending. Expedite the from audit.
Proceedings initiated u/s recovery. DAC Directives dated 14.02.2017
122(5A) for the tax years 2010 Tax Year 2011
and 2012 have been concluded 05.12.2016 RTO informed that case is under process after the
creating demand of Charged. Recovery is awaited. original order was annulled by CIR(A).
Rs.1,305,272/- and Rs.134,722/- Tax Year 2010 and 2012
respectively. 01.02.2017 RTO informed that recovery proceedings are in hand.
T.Y. 2011 DAC directed the RTO to enforce recovery and submit
22 14501 CENTRE DEGREE 2012 Rs Show cause notice has DAC Directive dated 19.12.2016
COLLEGE 1,017,094 been issued for compliance 06.11.2019 RTO informed thatcase is under process. DAC
2574568-9 by 22.12.2016. Expedite the proceedings directed the RTO to finalize the proceedings and
report compliance by 30.12.2016.
03.03.2017
DAC Directives dated 14.02.2017
The taxpayer has moved RTO informed that case is under process. DAC directed
an application seeking the RTO to finalize proceedings by 20.02.2017 and report
23 13980 A & Z OILS 2010 Rs Contested: 27.12.2016 DAC Directive dated 19.12.2016
3283968-5 38,898,92 the taxpayer is Department replied that RTO has contested. DAC directed the RTO to get
manufacturer therefore taxpayer is a manufacturer its contention verified from audit by
5
but reply of the department 30.12.2016 and report compliance.
Unlawful Refund for the tax year
issuance of 2011 amounting to is not tenable as there is
Rs.38.898 was issued in no local purchase declared DAC Directives dated 14.02.2017
refund. RTO contested that refund of adjustable
Taxpayer was to accordance with relevant by the taxpayer. There is
provisions of law after import of Rs. 1,399.343 taxes deducted u/s 148 (taxpayer being
be assessed manufacturer) and u/s 235 was rightly
proper verification of the Million for the tax year
under PTR issued. DAC directed the RTO to get their
tax deduction/payments 2010. Further cost of
because the electricity as worked out by stance verified from audit by 20.02.2017
under various heads.
taxpayer were 05.11.2019 audit was Rs. 1,028,750 and report final compliance.
not engaged in Taxpayer company is and monthly bill comes to DAC Directive dated 20.03.2017
any manufacturing concern and Rs 85,729 which could not RTO has contested that refund was
manufacturer running a solvent plant. justified to run a solvent lawfully issued, as tax deducted u/s 148
activities. Copy of audited accounts, plant. Department to revisit was adjustable because the taxpayer is a
income tax return is the case and reply to audit. manufacturer. DAC directed the RTO to
enclosed for want of 06.11.2019 provide all documents including returns,
verification Department to provide the exemption certificates and other
ofmanufacturring activity. supporting document in evidences which established that
26 13980 RAB NAWAZ 2008 Rs Contested 27.12.2016 DAC Directive dated 19.12.2016
RTO has contested. DAC directed the RTO to get its
28 13980 KHAWAJA BASHIR & 2010 Rs Contested: 27.12.2016 DAC Directive dated 19.12.2016
Corporate CO 5,834,083 the taxpayer is Department to revisit the RTO has contested. DAC directed the RTO to get
3179817-7 manufacturer therefore case on the ground that its contention verified from audit by
Unlawful issuance tax deducted by cotton 30.12.2016 and report compliance.
Refund for the tax year
of refund. Taxpayer
2010 amounting to ginners u/s 153 was final DAC Directives dated 14.02.2017
was to be assessed
Rs.5.834 was issued in discharge and could not be RTO contested that refund of adjustable
under PTR because taxes deducted u/s 148 (taxpayer being
the taxpayer were accordance with relevant refunded.
not engaged in any provisions of law after 06.11.2019 manufacturer) and u/s 235 was rightly
manufacturer proper verification of the Department to provide the issued. DAC directed the RTO to get their
activities. tax deduction/payments supporting document in stance verified from audit by 20.02.2017
under various heads. support of contention and report final compliance.
DAC Directive dated 20.03.2017
05.11.2019
Taxpayer company is RTO has contested that refund was
manufacturing concern and lawfully issued, as tax deducted u/s 148
running a solvent plant. was adjustable because the taxpayer is a
Copy of audited accounts, manufacturer. DAC directed the RTO to
income tax return is provide all documents including returns,
30 13983 AL HILAL 2011 Rs Proceedings u/s 122(5A) for Charged but recovery is DAC Directive dated 19.12.2016
INDUSTRIES PVT 49,863,20 the tax year 2011 have been awaited. RTO informed that case is subjudice before
Corporate 06.11.2019 ATIR since 30.06.2016 after CIR(A) has
LTD 7 concluded creating tax
Request for early hearing annulled the tax demand. DAC directed the
demand at Rs.96,575,096/-. may be made to ATIR. RTO to pursue the case for early disposal.
DAC Directive dated 14.02.2017.
The taxpayer preferred RTO informed that case is subjudice before
appeal before learned CIR(A) ATIR since 30.06.2016. DAC directed the
who annulled the order RTO to pursue the case for early hearing.
passed u/s 122(5A) and DAC Directive dated 20.03.2017
RTO informed that case is subjudice before ATIR since
department filed 2nd appeal 30.06.2016. DAC directed the RTO to pursue the case
before ATIR on 30.06.2016. for early disposal.
05.11.2019 DAC Directive dated 25.11.2019
still subjudice before ATIR RTO informed that the case is subjudice before
22.11.2019 ATIR since 30.06.2016. DAC directed the RTO to
Letter for early hearing to request for out of turn hearing and pursue the
assistant Registrar ATIR vide case for early disposal.
No.1993 dated 20.11.2019
has been send.
31 13983 THAL 2008 Rs Contested: 01.02.2017 DAC Directive dated 19.12.2016
Corporate Tax liability u/s 113 was at Rs RTO is requested to provide RTO has contested. DAC directed the RTO to get
INDUSTRIES 6,329,396
8,618,453/- for the tax year challans of payments u/s 137, 147 its stance verified from audit and report
Minimum tax 2008. Thereafter order u/s 221 and 148 compliance by 30.12.2016.
u/s 113 was passed giving effect of
payment of Rs. 14,947,849/-.
Which resulted into balance DAC Directives dated 14.02.2017
refund of Rs. 6,329,396/-..The RTO informed that tax was charged and recovered
refund of Rs. 6,329,396/- has through adjustment of refund. DAC directed the
rightly been adjusted u/s 147 for RTO to get their stance verified from audit by
the tax year 2011. 20.02.2017.
DAC Directive dated 20.03.2017
30.01.2017 RTO has contested. DAC recommended the case
Copy of order u/s221 (10 of the for settlement subject to verification of
32 13981 STANDARD 2006 Rs 2,475,408 Issue Involved 08.03.2017 DAC Directive dated 19.12.2016
Corporate EDIBLE OIL Refund issued but refund had Department to revisit the RTO informed thatcase is under process. DAC
Zone already been adjusted directed the RTO to finalize the proceedings and
case as there is no refund
against the other tax liability report compliance by 30.12.2016.
available for tax year 2005. DAC Directives dated 14.02.2017
of the taxpayer
RTO Lahore RTO informed that case is under process. DAC directed the
RTO to finalize proceedings by 20.02.2017 and report final
compliance thereafter.
03.03.2017 DAC Directive dated 20.03.2017
Contested DAC directed the RTO to revisit the case in view of their
Refund of Rs. 1,601,091/- for departmental explanation, get the same verified from
the tax year 2006 was audit and report final compliance by 27.03.2017.
created vide order u/s 170(3) DAC Directive dated 25.11.2019
dated: 20.04.2011. An RTO informed that demand has been adjusted against
amount of Rs. 1,407,757/- refund. DAC directed the RTO to provide proof of tax
was adjusted out of created payment to audit for verification and report final
refund leaving balance refund compliance by 06.12.2019.
of Rs. 193,334/-. Nofurther
refund was issued.
33 13981 AL HALAL 2003 Rs4,166,167 Issue Involved 06.11.2019 DAC Directive dated 19.12.2016
Corporate VEGETABLE Refund issued but refund had Department to provide the RTO informed thatcase is under process. DAC
Zone already been adjusted directed the RTO to finalize the proceedings and
GHEE MILLSPvt supporting documents
against the other tax liability report compliance by 30.12.2016.
Ltd DAC Directives dated 14.02.2017
of the taxpayer
RTO informed that case is under process. DAC directed the
RTO to finalize proceedings by 20.02.2017 and report final
05.11.2019 compliance thereafter.
34 13982 ROOMI FABRICS 2010 Rs30,168,035 Order u/s 122 (5A) passed 27.12.2016 DAC Directive dated 19.12.2016
PVT LTD and minimum tax of Rs Department has charged tax RTO has contested. DAC directed the RTO to
5,468,283/-.charged as under u/s 113 for the tax year 2010 get its stance verified from audit and report
Total sales declared at Rs. 5,468,283. Recovery is compliance by 30.12.2016.
4,268,686,883/- awaited. Moreover,
Less export sales department not provide the DAC Directives dated 14.02.2017
3,175,030,309/- proof of tax deductions RTO informed that leviable tax amount to
Local turnover from all claimed u/s 154 (on export). Rs.5,468,283/- has been charged and balance
sources 1,093,656,574/- 30.03.2017 was not leviable. DAC directed the RTO to
Tax leviable u/s 113@ .5% Proofs of tax deductions u/s recover tax demand and provide evidence of
Rs.5,468,283/- have been provided. tax deduction u/s 154 to Audit for verification
Balance Rs. 23,699,752/- is by 20.02.2017 and report final compliance.
not leviable being export Recovery of Rs. 5,468,283/- is
still awaited. Since DAC Directives dated 20.03.2017
sales and cover under FTR.
05.11.2019 29.06.2015 order u/s 122 RTO informed that tax has been recovered. DAC
Recovery of minimum tax u/s (5A). directed the RTO to provide proof of recovery to
113 is under process. 06.11.2019 audit by 27.03.2017 and report final compliance
Proof of tax payments may be DAC Directive dated 25.11.2019
DAC reiterated its earlier directive dated 14.02.2017 and
provided. 20.03.2017 and observed with concern that despite lapse
of more than two years time, RTO could not provide
documentary evidence regarding tax payment. DAC
directed the CCIR to provide tax payment for verification
to Audit and report final compliance by 06.12.2019.
Reconciliation of the
payments is under process
36 13982 AHMAD HASAN 2010 Rs27,937,147 Order u/s 122 (5A) passed and 27.12.2016 DAC Directive dated 19.12.2016
minimum tax of Rs Department has charged tax u/s RTO has contested. DAC directed the RTO to get its
TEXTILE MILLS 5,468,283/-.charged as under 113 @Rs. 6,752,930. Recovery is stance verified from audit and report compliance by
Total sales declared awaited . 30.12.2016.
3,340,960,164/- Balance Rs. 21,184,217 is not DAC Directives dated 14.02.2017
Less export sales leviable. Moreover department to RTO informed that leviable tax amount to Rs.6,752,930/-
1,990,374,217 /- provide the proof of tax has been charged and balance was not leviable. DAC
Local turnover f0rom all sources deductions claimed u/s 154 directed the RTO to recover tax demand and provide
1,350,585,947 /- evidence of tax deduction u/s 154 to Audit for verification
Tax leviable u/s 113@ .5% by 20.02.2017 and report final compliance.
6,752,930 /- 30.03.2017
Balance Rs 21,184,217/- is not
DAC Directives dated 20.03.2017
Recovery of Rs. 6,752,930/- is
leviable.. RTO informed that tax has been recovered. DAC
05.11.2019
still awaited since 29.06.2015
directed the RTO to provide proof of recovery to
Loss of revenue
pointed out at
Rs. 2,595,488/- and
Rs.
3,981,274/-.
Flood surcharge 2011 450,299 Flood Surcharge @15% is 30.03.2017 DAC Directive dated 25.11.2019
@15% not charged by passing order Charge Rs. 131,337/-. RTO informed that as against amount pointed out by audit,
charged amounting to Recovery awaited. Balance an amount of Rs.131,337/- has been charged which is under
recovery while balance was not leviable. Position verified by
(3001995x3.5/12x15%)Rs.13 Rs. 318,962 /- is not leviable. audit. DA C re co mmen d ed th e ca se f o r se t t le me n t to the
04.04.2017
Assessment order was sent
2011 1,063,976 Flood surcharge @ 15% has 30.03.2017 DAC Directive dated 25.11.2019
already been charged vide order Charged &Recovery RTO informed that tax demand has been raised
dated 26.01.2012 DCR no. 21/I awaited. which is under recovery. DAC directed the RTO to
creating demand of Rs. 06.11.2019 enforce recovery and report final compliance by
1,063,976/-.
Department to recover the tax 06.12.2019.
05.11.2019
Recovery effort are being made/
2012 3,925,041 Order u/s.161/205 for the tax 30.03.2017 DAC Directive dated 25.11.2019
year 2012 has already been Charged &Recovery RTO informed that tax demand has been raised
passed vide DCRno.I/51 dated awaited. which is under recovery. DAC directed the RTO to
13.07.2012 creating demand 06.11.2019 enforce recovery and report final compliance by
of Rs. 3,925,041/-. Department to recover the tax 06.12.2019.
47 13443 UmerFarooq&
Multan Company..
Zone. Assessment
order not
finalized or
placed in file.
Loss of revenue
pointed out at
Rs2,544,601/-.
Flood surcharge 2011 83,734 Flood Surcharge @15% is 30.03.2017 DAC Directive dated 25.11.2019
@15% not 2011 188,126 charged by passing Charge Rs. 80474/-. RTO informed that as against amount pointed out by audit,