Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 20

DOI 10.

1515/revce-2013-0003      Rev Chem Eng 2013; 29(3): 169–188

Emad Sadeghinezhad*, Salim Newaz Kazi, Ahmad Badarudin, Mohd Nashrul M. Zubair,
Babak Lotfizadeh Dehkordi and Cheen Sean Oon

A review of milk fouling on heat exchanger


surfaces
Abstract: Formation of deposits on heat exchanger sur- of heat exchanger fouling is a serious matter as it retards
faces during operation rapidly increases the thermal heat transfer, enhances pressure drop and diminishes the
resistance and reduces the operating service life. Product efficiency of the heat exchanger drop down, which ulti-
quality is deteriorated by fouling, which causes reduc- mately affects the economy of the process plant (Muller-
tion of proper heating. The chemistry of fouling from Steinhagen 1993, Toyoda et al. 1994, Gillham et al. 2000,
milk fluids is qualitatively understood, and mathemati- Hinrichs and Atamer 2011).
cal models for fouling at low temperatures exist, but the In the dairy industry, the costs due to interruption in
behavior of systems at ultrahigh temperature processing production can be dominating compared to the cost due
is still not clearly understood. The effect of whey protein to reduction in performance efficiency (Georgiadis et al.
fouling on heat transfer performance and pressure drop in 1998a,b). Quality issues are also as equally important as
heat exchangers was investigated by many researchers in the cost, and in fact shutdown is required regularly con-
diversified fields. Among them, adding additives, electro- cerning product quality instead of performance of the heat
magnetic means, treating of heat exchanger surfaces and exchangers (Georgiadis et al. 1998b).
changing of heat exchanger configurations are notable. Milk constituents are water, solids, fat, lactose, pro-
The present review highlighted information about previ- teins (casein, β-Lg, α-La), minerals and small quantities
ous work on fouling, parameters influencing fouling and of other miscellaneous constituents (Lyster 1970, Lalande
its mitigation approach. et al. 1985, Gotham et al. 1992, Delplace et al. 1994, Bylund
1995). Microbial growth prevents uninterrupted opera-
Keywords: dissolved salts; heat exchanger; milk fouling; tion of heat exchanging equipment due to enhancement
mitigation. of fouling, which causes forced shutdown (Lyster 1970,
Lalande et al. 1985, Bylund 1995).
Denaturation of protein in heat exchangers starts
*Corresponding author: Emad Sadeghinezhad, Faculty of
Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of
above 70–74°C and the first deposit layer is mostly
Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, (usually < 5 μm) mineral (Fryer and Belmar-Beiny 1991).
e-mail: esn802001@yahoo.com Many research interests highlighted the study of the
Salim Newaz Kazi, Ahmad Badarudin, Mohd Nashrul M. Zubair, mechanism (de Jong 1997, Delplace et al. 1997), deposi-
Babak Lotfizadeh Dehkordi and Cheen Sean Oon: Faculty of tion, modeling and comparison of deposition on different
Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of
surfaces to accumulate information for future reference
Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
(de Jong et al. 1992, Toyoda et al. 1994, Chen et al. 2001).
Thus, the present paper attempts to accumulate informa-
tion on milk composition, fouling phenomena and mecha-
nism of fouling along with modeling approach (Elofsson
1 Introduction et al. 1996, Visser and Jeurnink 1997, de Jong et al. 1998).

Deposition of undesired materials on heat transfer sur-


faces are recognized as fouling. At present, milk fluid
fouling chemistry is qualitatively understood, and math- 2 Basic principles of fouling
ematical models for fouling at low temperatures exist,
but the behavior of systems at ultrahigh temperature The effect of bulk temperatures of hot and cold streams of
(UHT) processing is not clearly understood yet (Fryer et al. liquid under turbulent flow is extended in the boundary
1996b, Prakash et al. 2010). In the dairy industry, thermal layer and generates good mixing (Bell and Mueller 2001).
processing is an energy intensive-event, as every product Heat transfer equipment is often limited by fouling (Bott
is heated there at least once (de Jong 1997). The problem 1995). The effect of fouling on the heat transfer surface is

Brought to you by | Lulea University of Technology


Authenticated | 130.240.43.43
Download Date | 8/13/13 9:11 AM
170      E. Sadeghinezhad et al.: Milk fouling on heat exchanger surfaces

accounted for in the design by overall fouling resistance thermally induced whey protein gelation. They also
Rf, as presented by the following basic heat transfer equa- reported that the major components in the fouling deposit
tion (Eq. [1]): are calcium phosphate and whey protein. An investiga-
tion of fouling for a long period showed a higher propor-
1 1 tion of minerals in the deposits near the surface caused
− + Rf (1)
U U0 by the diffusion of minerals through the earlier formed
deposits rather than minerals formed on the surface at
where U0 and U are the clean and fouled overall heat
the beginning (Belmar-Beiny et al. 1993). Bulk and surface
transfer coefficients, respectively (Bott 1995).
processes govern fouling in a heat exchanger. A number
Figure 1 shows the ways in which the fouling resist-
of stages guide the deposition, such as (Belmar-Beiny and
ance may change. In heat exchangers used for food pro-
Fryer 1993, Schreier and Fryer 1995, Jeurnink et al. 1996a):
cessing, falling rate or linear fouling is usual. Constant-
1. aggregation and denaturation of proteins into the
rate fouling represents a linear enhancement of fouling
bulk fluid,
thickness with time, and the falling-rate fouling presents
2. migration of the aggregated proteins to the surface,
fouling initiation similar to constant-rate fouling. It rep-
3. incorporation of proteins into the deposit layer due
resents a linear progress up to a significant interval and
to surface reactions and possible re-entrainment or
it also picks up a curved shape. Asymptotic fouling rep-
removal of deposits.
resents a general model of fouling progress, which could
be fitted by the equations for the curves. The three curves
Buildup of minerals, protein aggregates and calcium
(Figure 1) have initiation periods (induction), and these
phosphate in the fouling deposit layer may not proceed
periods are short and difficult to model so most math-
independently. Delsing and Hiddink (1983) experimen-
ematical models ignore them (Bott 1995, Changani et al.
tally found that the presence of calcium ions is essential
1997, I. Tubman unpublished manuscript).
for the growth of protein deposit layers.

2.1 Mechanism of milk fouling


2.1.1 Adsorption mechanism

Calcium phosphate and whey protein are major components


Adsorption equilibrium can be reached when the concen-
in milk fouling deposit. Due to their heat sensitivity, both of
tration of the adsorbate in the bulk solution is in dynamic
the components form insoluble aggregates in bulk solution.
balance with that of the interface (Changani et al. 1997,
The final deposit contains concentrated calcium phosphate
Mahdi et al. 2009). The adsorption equilibrium analysis
at the deposit and metal layer interface. There is induction
is the most important fundamental information used to
time in fouling phenomena at the initial stage after which
determine the capacity of adsorbent (Lalande et al. 1984,
the fouling commences and a noticeable change is observed
Georgiadis and Macchietto 2000). Both the adsorption
(Belmar-Beiny and Fryer 1993, Visser and Jeurnink 1997).
capacity and the kinetic behavior of the adsorbent are of
Visser and Jeurnink (1997) observed that the whey
great importance for the lab-scale and industrial-scale
protein fouling deposit proceeds in the same way as
applications (Mahdi et al. 2009). Kinetic analysis is a
useful tool to get the time required to reach the equilib-
Constant-rate fouling
rium regarding the completion of adsorption. The kinetic
Falling-rate fouling
process of adsorption is explained by several mathemati-
Fouling resistance

cal models where more than one mechanism may be


Possible Fouling
induction period
responsible for the rate-determining step (Polat 2009). The
period Asymptotic fouling interaction between the adsorbent-adsorbate is responsi-
ble for the nature of the equilibrium between them, and
the interaction is affected due to the resistances to mass
transfer in the boundary layer adjacent to the surface in
the establishment of equilibrium (Polat 2009).
Time
The interaction between proteins and adsorbents
Figure 1 Possible ways in which the fouling resistance can evolve
do not occur instantaneously. Heat and mass transfer is
with time (Bott 1995, Changani et al. 1997). Reproduced with per- controlled by the adsorption rate. The controlling mecha-
mission from © Elsevier. nisms of adsorption rate are explained by mathematical

Brought to you by | Lulea University of Technology


Authenticated | 130.240.43.43
Download Date | 8/13/13 9:11 AM
E. Sadeghinezhad et al.: Milk fouling on heat exchanger surfaces      171

models. These models describing the adsorption data products and is used to modify functional properties
have been explained by adsorption reaction models and with the goal of ensuring the safety of the food products.
adsorption diffusion models (Polat 2009). The rate at which whey proteins aggregate is controlled
The forces that play a role in the attachment of the by process conditions like protein concentration, pH and
calcium phosphate to a heated metal surface are the Lif- temperature and the presence of other components (Polat
shitz-van der Waals (LW) interaction forces, the electro- 2009).
static double-layer interaction forces (EL), the Lewis acid/ The kinetics of deposition, different physical and
base interaction forces (AB) and the Brownian motion chemical parameters, quantitative analysis of deposi-
(Br). Van Oss divided the total surface energy of a surface tion and fouling resistance are yet to be fully understood
into four components, among them the electron donor (Lalande and Reno 1988, Visser and Jeurnink 1997, Mahdi
component (γ −) being the most often used for character- et al. 2009).
izing components of solid surfaces (VanOss 1994; VanOss
et al. 1997, Wu and Nancollas 1998, Rosmaninho et al. 2001).
After formation of the initial layer on the solid surface,
other particles move from the bulk liquid and adhere on
3 Mineral deposition
the top of the initial layer and develop a more or less struc-
In addition to the protein fouling, deposition of calcium
tured and compact layer of deposits. The structure of the
phosphate also takes place, which represents an inverse
formed layer depends on the first layer of construction,
solubility relation with temperature. During the preheat-
which depends mainly on the surface properties of the
ing process, the ionic product becomes high, following
particles and ions present in the solution that contribute
the inverse solubility concentration limits. Jeurnink and
to the growth of the deposition (precipitation/crystalliza-
Brinkman (1994) stated that salts dissolved in milk deposit
tion kinetics). The interactions of these factors also deter-
in the form of crystals on the surface of the heat exchanger.
mine the resistance to removal of fouling deposits (Krause
Calcium phosphate may also precipitate in the core flow.
1993, Bott 1994, Jeurnink et al. 1996a,b, Amjad 1998, Visser
Ultimately, in all the cases deposition was formed on the
1999, Santos et al. 2004, Rosmaninho and Melo 2006).
tested stainless steel wall of the heat exchanger plates as
shown in Figure 2 (Mahdi et al. 2009).
In milk fouling, the constituents of deposition proceed
2.1.2 Causes of protein aggregation
though a complex process in which both whey protein
aggregation and calcium phosphate formation in the bulk
The β-Lg protein has a global structure that is held
fluid are to be accounted for.
together by S S bonds and one non-exposed internal free
Details of the fouling mechanism can be described in
SH group. The β-Lg starts to unfold with the rise in tem-
the following steps (Mahdi et al. 2009):
perature. The free thiol group is therefore liberated from
1. Straight adsorption of a protein monolayer occurs on
the β-Lg and the bulk solution, and then the molecule
the heat exchanger surface even at room temperature.
enters into an activated state, making it possible to react
2. Formation of activated β-Lg molecules in the bulk
with another β-Lg molecule. Thus, a radical chain grows
solution at temperatures higher than 65°C. The β-Lg
to form an aggregate that is able to deposit on the heat
aggregates (tenths of nanometers) and calcium
transfer surface. The rate of deposition was found related
phosphate particles are formed.
to the concentration of activated molecules in the solu-
tion, which could be calculated by using the model of Reaction
denaturation and aggregation of the β-Lg (Lalande and N D A
Bulk fluid
Reno 1988, Delplace et al. 1994). Mass
Research showed that the two major whey proteins, Transfer Thermal
α-La and β-Lg, become unstable at temperatures above N* D* A*
Adhesion boundary δT
layer
65°C. When heated above this temperature, protein dena-
turation occurs, resulting in protein aggregation and pre-
cipitation. The response to thermal treatment varies with
Wall
the types of protein. They precipitate in different propor-
tions and make the separation possible. Therefore, heat- Figure 2 Model of protein and salt deposition on the heat
induced aggregation and precipitation is an important exchanger surface (Georgiadis and Macchietto 2000, Youcef et al.
treatment in the manufacturing process of many dairy 2009). Reproduced with permission from © Elsevier.

Brought to you by | Lulea University of Technology


Authenticated | 130.240.43.43
Download Date | 8/13/13 9:11 AM
172      E. Sadeghinezhad et al.: Milk fouling on heat exchanger surfaces

3. These foulant particles formed in the bulk are con- Additives (minerals, vitamins, enzymes and synthe-
tinuously transported to the heated surface. However, sis additives) (Burton 1968, Changani et al. 1997, de Jong
some activated molecules could be deactivated during 1997, Guo et al. 2010) may retard fouling by enhancing the
this phase due to some reactions with other molecules heat stability of milk, but addition of any ingredient in
in the bulk that transform the particles to an active milk may not be permitted in many countries (Lyster 1970,
state insufficient to create fouling. Skudder et al. 1981, Changani et al. 1997).
4. Deposition of activated molecules by adsorption on Reduction of fouling in the heat exchangers can be
the heat exchanger surface. Calcium ions entrapped achieved by preheating of milk in rising tubes, which
in the protein deposit may help to stabilize these causes denaturation and aggregation of proteins before
structures. transferring to the heating section (Bell and Sanders 1944,
5. At relatively high temperatures (above 85°C), the main Burton 1968, Mottar and Moermans 1988, Foster et al.
deposit component is calcium phosphate, which 1989). Reconstituted milk generates much less fouling,
offers an open network structure where small protein approximately 25%, when β-Lg is denatured during the
aggregates can be entrapped. production of milk powders (Changani et al. 1997, Visser
and Jeurnink 1997). Changani et al. (1997) reported that
the reconstituted milk contains 9% less calcium, which
3.1 Dairy material deposition would have resulted in less fouling. In contrast, Newstead
and coworkers observed increase of UHT fouling rates of
The composition and structure of fouling (Peny and Green the recombined milk with the increase of preheating treat-
1985) vary greatly with the processing conditions, which ment (preheating temperature × preheating time) (Fryer
significantly affect their removal processes as well (Xin et al. 1996a,b, Fung et al. 1998, Newstead et al. 1998, Xin
2003). 2003, Riera et al. 2013, Boxler et al. in press).
Figure 3 indicates that more deposit is initially formed
on surfaces having higher γ− (Modler 2000, Rosmaninho
3.1.1 Milk composition et al. 2005). The composition of whey is considerably more
variable than that of milk and is highly dependent on the
Milk composition is dependent on its source and hence type of cheese being manufactured, seasonality, culture
may not be possible to change (Table 1). Variations in milk and rennet selection, manufacturing procedures and type
fouling are also dependent on differences in its composi- of equipment used. These differences in composition and
tion (Burton 1967, Belmar-Beiny et al. 1993, de Jong 1997, functionality are a challenge to the manufacturers (Regester
Bansal and Chen 2006). Fouling is enhanced with the and Smithers 1991, Mahdi et al. 2009, Modler 2009).
increase in protein concentration (Toyoda et al. 1994, Caseins of protein precipitate upon acidification and
Changani et al. 1997). Some researchers reported that the generate resistance to thermal processing (Visser and
heat stability of milk proteins decreases with the reduc- Jeurnink 1997). The native proteins (β-Lg) first denature
tion in pH (Foster et al. 1989, Gotham 1990, Xiong 1992, (unfold) and expose the core containing reactive sulfhy-
Corredig and Dalgleish 1996, de Jong et al. 1998). The dryl groups with the heating of milk. In the denatured
chemistry of the protein reaction in fouling is further dis- state, protein molecules react with similar or other types
cussed by some authors (Changani et al. 1997, Visser and of protein molecules like casein and α-La and form aggre-
Jeurnink 1997, Christian et al. 2002). Roefs and deKruif gates (Treybal 1981, Dalgleish 1990, Changani et al. 1997,
(1994) reported that the increase or decrease in the milk Chen 2000, Modler 2009, Espina et al. 2010).
calcium content lowers the heat stability and causes more The extreme variability (Toyoda et al. 1994) of the
fouling in comparison to normal milk. Milk fat has little composition of fouling layers published in the literature is
effect on fouling (Nicorescu et al. 2009). highlighted by the selection in Table 2.

Table 1 Types of milk deposits formed at different processing temperature ranges (Xin 2003).

Classification Temperature (°C) Process Composition (wt%)

Protein Mineral Fat

Type A 75–110 Pasteurization 50–70 30–50 4–8


Type B 110–140 UHT treatment 15–20 70–80 4–8

Brought to you by | Lulea University of Technology


Authenticated | 130.240.43.43
Download Date | 8/13/13 9:11 AM
E. Sadeghinezhad et al.: Milk fouling on heat exchanger surfaces      173

2.5 70°C
temperature range, Lyster (1965) and Burton (1968) classi-
44°C fied milk deposits as type A and type B. The typical com-
2.0 positions of type A and B fouling are summarized in Table
3 (Lyster 1965, Burton 1968).
Deposit (mg)

1.5 There are significant differences noticed between the


deposits and the raw milk. Detailed information can be
1.0 obtained from the reported compositional analysis of milk
deposits (Tissier et al. 1984, Lalande et al. 1985, Jeurnink
0.5
and Brinkman 1994). Lyster (1965) reported that although
calcium and phosphate are only 30% by weight of the
0.0
TiN14 TiN12 TiN15 TiN13 TiN11 TiN10 mineral content in raw milk, they typically formed 90% by
weight of the mineral content of milk fouling deposits. The
Figure 3 Deposit mass formed after 15 min of deposition, which is
mass ratio of calcium to phosphate is found to be 1.5–1.6,
the first mass detected at 44°C and 70°C. Surfaces are placed from
left to right in an increasing order of their surface energy, more
indicating the presence of hydroxyapatite [Ca5OH(PO4)3],
precisely their γ- parameter (Rosmaninho et al. 2005). the least soluble calcium phosphate complex (Lyster 1965,
Lalande et al. 1985). Proteinaceous deposits (type A) are
the dominant factor in most food processing plants, and
3.1.2 Classification of milk fouling deposits they are normally more difficult to remove compared to
mineral deposits (van Asselt et al. 2005). The low density
The formation of fouling and the extent and nature of depo- of proteinaceous deposit can induce a high pressure drop
sits in dairy fluid processing is influenced by many factors, and a high thermal resistance across processing equip-
such as the processing temperature, seasonal changes, age, ment (Lyster 1965, Fickak et al. 2011).
pH, air content and pretreatment as well as heat exchanger
geometry (Burton 1968, Lalande and René 1988, Yoon and
Lund 1989, Changani et al. 1997, Visser and Jeurnink 1997). 3.2 Factors affecting milk fouling
Milk deposits are classified in different ways depend-
ing on the chosen criteria. From the cleaning point of Milk fouling in heat exchangers is affected by several
view, it is useful to classify typical soils according to factors, which can be broadly classified into different
their nature and structure. On the basis of the processing major categories. Table 4 summarizes important aspects

Table 2 Basic research on aspects of fouling mechanisms (Bansal and Chen 2006).

Observation References

Protein unfolding or denaturation step is de Wit and Swinkles (1980), Anema and McKenna (1996), Changani et al. (1997),
reversible Chen et al. (1998a), Polat (2009)
Protein denaturation is irreversible Ruegg et al. (1977), Lalande et al. (1985), Arnebrant et al. (1987), Gotham et al.
(1992), Roefs and deKruif (1994), Karlsson et al. (1996), Polat (2009)
Protein aggregation is irreversible Mulvihill and Donovan (1987), Anema and McKenna (1996), Changani et al. (1997),
Chen et al. (1998a)
Protein denaturation is the governing reaction Lalande et al. (1985), Hege and Kessler (1986), Arnebrant et al. (1987), Kessler and
Beyer (1991), de Jong et al. (1992)
Protein aggregation is the governing reaction Lalande and René (1988), Gotham et al. (1992), Delplace et al. (1997)
Formation of protein aggregates enable fouling de Jong et al. (1992), Delplace et al. (1997), van Asselt et al. (2005)
reduction
Only protein aggregates cause fouling (modeled Toyoda et al. (1994)
the milk fouling process based on the assumption
that only aggregated proteins resulted in fouling)
Fouling is considered to depend on protein de Jong and van der Linden (1992), de Jong et al. (1992), Belmar-Beiny et al. (1993),
reactions only Delplace et al. (1994, 1997), Schreier and Fryer (1995), Grijspeerdt et al. (2004),
Nema and Datta (2005), Sahoo et al. (2005)
Fouling is dependent on mass transfer as well as Toyoda et al. (1994), Chen et al. (1998a, 2000, 2001), Georgiadis et al. (1998a,b),
bulk and surface reactions Georgiadis and Macchietto (2000), Bansal and Chen (2005), Bansal and Chen
(2005), Bansal and Chen (2006)

Brought to you by | Lulea University of Technology


Authenticated | 130.240.43.43
Download Date | 8/13/13 9:11 AM
174      E. Sadeghinezhad et al.: Milk fouling on heat exchanger surfaces

Table 3 Average composition of milk (Bansal and Chen 2006). temperature (Mulvihill et al. 1990, Langton and Hermans-
son 1992, Verheul and Roefs 1998). Some researchers
Constituents Average concentration (wt%) (Fryer et al. 1996a, Visser 1997, Wilson et al. 1999, 2002,
Water 87.5 Chen et al. 2004, Fickak et al. 2011) have concluded that
Total solids 13 the high protein concentration can greatly influence the
 Proteins 3.4 formation mechanisms of whey protein gels; however, the
 Lactose 4.8
effect of protein concentration on the fouling and clean-
 Minerals 0.8
 Fat 3.9 ing of dairy heat exchanger surface has not been dem-
Proteins 3.4 onstrated quantitatively by them (Bird and Fryer 1991,
 Casein 2.6 Gillham et al. 1999, Gillham et al. 2000, Puyol et al. 2001,
 β-Lg 0.32 Xin et al. 2002b, Mercadé-Prieto and Chen 2006, Fickak
 α-La 0.12
et al. 2011, Ndoye et al. 2013).
In fact, aggregated whey protein molecules dominate
the basic structure of the fouling deposits. Because of
of the fouling investigation and also shows the composi- this and also the complex nature of milk deposits, many
tion of fouling layers in different occasions (Bansal and researchers (Belmar-Beiny and Fryer 1993, Belmar-Beiny
Chen 2005, Bansal and Chen 2006). et al. 1993, Schreier et al. 1994, Davies et al. 1997, Xin et al.
2002a,b, Fickak et al. 2011) found HIWPGs to be a reliable
model system for investigating milk fouling and cleaning.
3.2.1 Low-temperature milk deposits HIWPGs also contain a small quantity of minerals and
have been found to have the same nature of type A milk
In dairy processing plants, the soil also forms on cooled deposits as described by Lyster (1965) and Burton (1968),
surfaces. Formation of low-temperature soil is quite dif- where proteins represent more than 60 wt% of the deposit
ferent from that of the heat-induced fouling deposit. Kane mass. Formation of the HIWPG deposits results from the
and Middlemiss (1985) found that a soil with a much more aggregation of whey proteins upon heating. Furthermore,
open structure and much larger fat content is formed at a study by Puyol et al. (2001) found that WPI gels with
low temperature, and its forming process is also different. high protein concentration tend to form at lower tempera-
ture. Some researchers presented dissolution or “clean-
ing” mechanisms based on the breakdown of protein
3.2.2 Effect of whey protein concentration aggregates, diffusion of small oligomers throughout the
swollen layer, and disentanglement of large aggregates
An important functional property of whey proteins is next to the gel-solvent boundary layer. However, little is
their ability, under appropriate conditions, to form heat- known about the effect of protein concentration within
induced gel structures capable of immobilizing large fouling and heat-induced whey protein gel on their dis-
quantities of water and other food components (Kuhn solution (Fickak et al. 2011).
and Foegeding 1991). During formation of heat-induced Fickak et al. (2011) studied the effect of whey protein
whey protein gels (HIWPGs) only a fraction of the whey concentration on the fouling and cleaning behaviors of a
proteins are aggregated (Lyster 1965, Burton 1968, Verheul pilot-scale heat exchanger. They assessed the influence of
and Roefs 1998a,b, Fickak et al. 2011). HIWPG with high the properties of surfaces (based on stainless steel) on the
protein concentration (Belmar-Beiny et al. 1993, Schreier fouling behavior of different milk components (calcium
et al. 1994, Delplace and Leutiet 1995, Fryer et al. 1996, phosphate and whey proteins), complex milk systems
Davies et al. 1997, Gillham et al. 1999, Chen 2000, Xin [fouling model fluid (FMF)] and milk-related bacteria. The
et al. 2002a,b) tends to form faster due to the increasing formation and dissolution rate of HIWPG is influenced
rate of aggregation and the decreasing coagulation time by the whey protein concentration. It was found that
(Sharma and Hill 1983, Mleko 1999, Ndoye et al. 2013). It the structure of HIWPG became more rigid with increas-
has also been reported that increasing the protein concen- ing protein concentration. The dissolution rate of HIWPG
tration increases the firmness and the aggregate size of decreased almost linearly with the increase in protein
whey protein concentrate (WPC) gels, which accelerates concentration (Fickak et al. 2011). In all cases the surface
the gelation process (Mleko 1999). Furthermore, Puyol material practically influenced the fouling behavior,
et al. (2001) have found that whey protein isolate (WPI) although in different ways they influenced the deposition
gels with high protein concentration tend to form at lower and the cleaning phases (Rosmaninho et al. 2007b).

Brought to you by | Lulea University of Technology


Authenticated | 130.240.43.43
Download Date | 8/13/13 9:11 AM
E. Sadeghinezhad et al.: Milk fouling on heat exchanger surfaces      175

Table 4 Composition of fouling layers from a selection of studies (Bennett 2007).

References Milk type Milk temperature (°C) Equipment Composition


(% dry basis)

Lyster (1965) Whole 85 Plate heat exchanger (regenerative section) Protein: 60


Mineral: 25
Fat: 12
Lalande et al. (1984) Whole 65–70 Plate heat exchanger (regenerative section) Protein: 50
Mineral: 40
Fat: 1
Whole 120–138 Plate heat exchanger (regenerative section) Protein: 15
Mineral: 75
Fat: 3
Fung et al. (1998) Whole 4–90 Tubular heat exchanger Protein: 32
Mineral: 5
Fat: 50
Whole (damaged) 4–90 Tubular heat exchanger Protein: 32
Mineral: 4
Fat: 49
Tissier et al. (1984) Whole 72 Pasteurizer Protein: 50
Mineral: 15
Fat: 25
Whole 90 Sterilizer Protein: 50
Mineral: 40
Fat: 1
Whole 138 Sterilizer Protein: 12
Mineral: 75
Fat: 3
Yoon and Lund (1989) Whole 88 Plate heat exchanger (preheat) Protein: 43
Mineral: 45
Fat: ND
Whole 120 Plate heat exchanger (sterilizer) Protein: 45
Mineral: 40
Fat: ND
Calvo and Rafael (1995) Whole 80 Plate heat exchanger (heating) Protein: 52
Mineral: 9
Fat: 23
Grandison (1988) Whole 110–140 Plate heat exchanger (regenerative and heating) Protein: 19–44
Mineral: 57–20
Fat: 1–28
Jeurnink et al. (1989) Whole 85 Tubular heat exchanger Protein: 64
Mineral: 18
Fat: 15
Whole 120 Tubular heat exchanger Protein: 43
Mineral: 49
Fat: 3
Delsing and Hiddink (1983) Skim 76 Tubular heat exchanger Protein: 78
Mineral: 17
Fat: –
Jeurnink and de Kruif (1995) Skim 85 Plate heat exchanger Protein: 44
Mineral: 45
Fat: –
Skudder et al. (1986) Whole 80–110 Plate heat exchanger (regenerative) Protein: 51
Mineral: 20
Fat: 6
Whole 110–140 Plate heat exchanger (heating) Protein: 22
Mineral: 53
Fat: 5

Brought to you by | Lulea University of Technology


Authenticated | 130.240.43.43
Download Date | 8/13/13 9:11 AM
176      E. Sadeghinezhad et al.: Milk fouling on heat exchanger surfaces

(Table 4 Continued)

References Milk type Milk temperature (°C) Equipment Composition


(% dry basis)

Ma et al. (1998) Whole 85 Tubular heat exchanger Protein: 20


Mineral: 4
Fat: 45
Skim 85 Tubular heat exchanger Protein: 64
Mineral: 13
Fat: –
Johnson and Roland (1940) Whole 82 Tubular heat exchanger Protein: 35
Mineral: 5
Fat: 52
Truong (2001) Whole 110 Downstream from direct steam injector (rig) Protein: 39
Mineral: 8
Fat: 39
Whole 105 Downstream from direct steam injector (plant) Protein: 63
Mineral: 20
Fat: 3

3.3 Heat exchanger characteristics de Jong et al. 1992, Delplace et al. 1994, Toyoda et al. 1994,
and operating conditions Changani et al. 1997, Chen et al. 1998a, 2001, van Asselt
et al. 2005).
Some significant operating parameters, such as air In a heat exchanger, the temperature of milk is proba-
content, velocity or turbulence and temperature, could bly the most important factor that is controlling the fouling
be varied in a heat exchanger of a milk processing plant (Burton 1968, Kessler and Beyer 1991, Belmar-Beiny et al.
(Lalande et al. 1985, Hege and Kessler 1986, Arnebrant 1993, Toyoda et al. 1994, Corredig and Dalgleish 1996,
et al. 1987, Lalande and Reno 1988, Kessler and Beyer 1991, Elofsson et al. 1996, Jeurnink et al. 1996a, Santos et al.
Gotham et al. 1992, Belmar-Beiny and Fryer 1993, Belmar- 2003). Higher fouling results from increase of milk tem-
Beiny et al. 1993, Schreier and Fryer 1995). The presence perature. Milk fouling can be classified into two catego-
of air in milk enhances fouling (Burton 1968, de Jong 1997, ries: type A and type B (Burton 1968, Lund and Bixby 1975,
de Jong et al. 1998). It is reported that fouling is enhanced Changani et al. 1997, Visser and Jeurnink 1997). The nature
when air bubbles are formed on heat transfer surfaces, of fouling changes from type A to type B (Table 1) at tem-
which then become a nuclei for deposit formation (Burton peratures exceeding 110°C (Burton 1968).
1968, de Jong 1997). Heating of milk decreases its dis- Bulk temperature (average of the inlet and outlet
solved air content, resulting in reduction of the pressure temperatures of the milk) and the temperature dif-
of the flowing process liquid (de Jong 1997, de Jong et al. ference between bulk and surface are both important
1998, Muthukumaran et al. 2011). for fouling. Chen and Bala (1998) studied the effect of
Enhanced turbulence in flow retards fouling deposi- surface and bulk temperatures on the fouling of whole
tion (Belmar-Beiny and Fryer 1993, Belmar-Beiny et al. milk, skim milk and whey protein. They observed that
1993, Santos et al. 2001, 2003). Paterson and Fryer (1988) on initiating fouling, the surface temperature was the
and Changani et al. (1997) reported that the thickness and most important factor. They also noticed no fouling at
subsequently the volume of laminar sublayer decreases the surface temperature of < 68°C, even when the bulk
with the increasing velocity of flowing milk, which retards temperature was up to 84°C (Chen and Bala 1998, Chen
the depositions of foulant on heat transfer surfaces. Other et al. 2001). Chen et al. (2001) predicted that mixing
researchers (Rakes et al. 1986, Paterson and Fryer 1988, caused by inline mixers can reduce fouling substan-
Changani et al. 1997) also have informed that the higher tially, but no information was provided about precipita-
flow velocities also promote deposit re-entrainment due tion in bulk (precipitate of calcium phosphate coming
to enhanced fluid shear stresses. out from the solution).
Belmar-Beiny et al. (1993) concluded that higher tur- In dairy and other food processing industries, plate
bulence and different flow characteristics in fact generate heat exchangers are extensively used. Delplace et al.
a shorter induction period in plate heat exchangers com- (1994) informed that plate heat exchangers are prone
pared to tubular heat exchangers (Bradley and Fryer 1992, to fouling due to their narrow flow channels and high

Brought to you by | Lulea University of Technology


Authenticated | 130.240.43.43
Download Date | 8/13/13 9:11 AM
E. Sadeghinezhad et al.: Milk fouling on heat exchanger surfaces      177

surface temperature. Complete mitigation of milk fouling 4 Effect of surface material on


in a heat exchanger is difficult, as the temperature of the
heat transfer surface needs to be considerably higher than milk fouling
the bulk temperature for efficient heat transfer (Zaida
It has been found that the deposit growth appears to be
et al. 1987, Metaxas and Meredith 1988, Thompson and
dependent mainly on the interactions between the fluid
Thompson 1990, Kindle et al. 1996, Sieber et al. 1996,
and the surface, and the nature of the surface becomes
Villamiel et al. 1996, de Jong 1997, Delplace et al. 1997, de
unimportant once the first layer is formed (Dupeyrat
Jong et al. 1998).
et al. 1987, Yoon and Lund 1989). Different coatings on the
Direct resistance heating (ohmic heating) is a novel
surface had no effect on the amount of deposit formed,
heat treatment process where electrical current is passed
but they had an effect on the strength of adhesion (Boxler
through the milk to generate heat, which pasteurizes or
et al. in press, Britten et al. 1988). The magnitude of the
sterilizes milk (deAlwis and Fryer 1990, Quarini 1995). In
soil-substrate adhesion force, hence the cleaning pro-
recent years this technology has been in use after being
cesses, may be altered by changing the nature and condi-
abandoned for a major part of the 20th century. APV Inter-
tions of the surface by surface modification methods, such
national Ltd. (England) developed commercial ohmic
as coating, electrochemical polishing, chemical treatment
heating units for continuous sterilization of food prod-
and magnetic field (Kittaka 1974, Koopal 1985, Nassauer
ucts (Skudder and Biss 1987, Fryer et al. 1993, Ayadi et al.
1985, Britten et al. 1988, Petermeier et al. 2002, Xin 2003,
2003a,b, 2004).
Premathilaka et al. 2006).

3.4 Effect of microorganisms


4.1 Ferrous and nonferrous surfaces
The adhesion of microorganisms to the surface is
enhanced by the formation of fouling layer resulting in The most common types among the materials used in
biofouling. The deposits become nutrients for microor- process equipment in the food industry are different
ganisms, ensuring their growth. Most of the processes in grades of stainless steel. Several techniques have been
industry are carried out at temperatures below 100°C. For applied to modify its surface properties with the aim of
instance, pasteurization is commonly achieved by heating reducing the buildup of unwanted deposits (fouling).
milk at 72°C for 15 s in a continuous flow system. Just the The characteristics of some of those techniques were
pathogenic bacteria along with some vegetative cells are published (Santos et al. 2004), where the description of
killed at this temperature. A higher temperature of 85°C is their role on fouling caused by several milk components
required to kill the remaining vegetative cells. Spores are and dairy products are incorporated (Rosmaninho et al.
resistant to large amounts of heat and remain active well 2001, 2003, 2005). Surface energy is one among several
beyond this temperature (Bott 1993). surface parameters affecting and controlling the fouling
Biofouling develops in a heat exchanger, either by process. Reactive sputtering technique was used to obtain
microorganism deposition or biofilm formation, which a number of stainless steel materials with similar surface
raises serious quality concerns. The effect of biofouling composition and morphology having variable surface
in dairy plants has been investigated by Flint and cow- energy values for conducting performance investigation
orkers (Bott 1993, Flint and Hartley 1996, Flint et al. 1997, of those materials. The objective of some studies was to
1999, 2000). They informed that biofouling occurs in two estimate the calcium phosphate component in the main
different mechanisms: accumulation of microorganisms mineral constituent of deposits from milk (Jeurnink et al.
on the heat transfer surfaces and attachment of microor- 1996a, Visser 1999) and the role of the surface energy on
ganisms on the deposit layer formed on the heat transfer fouling buildup and its cleaning along with finding out a
surfaces. better way of characterization of fouling caused by milk
The deposit layer of microorganisms not only affects (Rosmaninho et al. 2005, Kukulka and Leising 2010).
the product quality but also influences the fouling process The mechanism of deposition can be separated into
(Yoo et al. 2006). Hydrodynamic forces drive the bacteria several steps (Ruegg et al. 1977, Lalande et al. 1985, Hege
and release them to the process fluid, which increases and Kessler 1986, Arnebrant et al. 1987, Mulvihill and
the bacterial concentration at the downstream. This may Donovan 1987, Lalande and René 1988, Kessler and Beyer
cause bacterial growth in areas not conducive to biofoul- 1991, Gotham et al. 1992, Roefs and deKruif 1994, Toyoda
ing (Chen et al. 1998b, Yoo and Chen 2002). et al. 1994, Anema and McKenna 1996, Karlsson et al.

Brought to you by | Lulea University of Technology


Authenticated | 130.240.43.43
Download Date | 8/13/13 9:11 AM
178      E. Sadeghinezhad et al.: Milk fouling on heat exchanger surfaces

1996, Changani et al. 1997). In the initial stage, calcium With reference to Table 5, the most distinguishing
phosphate particles form in the bulk due to heating. On factor among the surfaces is the electron-donor com-
arrival at the vicinity of the heated surface, these particles ponent (γ−), and therefore this could be the characteri-
could be attached to the surface depending on the forces zing parameter for the surfaces considered in the work
established between the foulants and the surface. Depo- (Rosmaninho et al. 2007a).
sition on the surface depends on the interaction forces The mass of calcium phosphate deposits on different
between the particles and the surface and surface proper- surfaces at two temperatures (44°C and 70°C) after 15-,
ties of the particles and of the metal support (Rosmaninho 30-, 45-, 60-, 120- and 240-min time intervals are evalu-
et al. 2005). ated. The deposition trend of calcium phosphate was
qualitatively very similar for all the surfaces, and in all
individual cases it was similar to an overall linear growth
4.1.1 TiN surfaces (Rosmaninho et al. 2007a).
The residual deposit mass after cleaning (with water
Fouling depends on several surface properties like rough- at the same temperature of the deposit formation) gen-
ness, surface composition and surface energy (Mullin erally increased with the γ− value of the surface (Britten
1993, 2001). Different stainless-steel-based surfaces with a et al. 1988, Changani et al. 1997). More deposit remains
wide range of surface energy values, having similar rough- at the higher-energy surfaces except at the highest-energy
ness and qualitative chemical compositions, were used to surface (not yet explainable), where a small decrease
investigate the influence of the surface energy on the dep- was detected (Zhao et al. 2005, Rosmaninho et al. 2007a,
osition process (Mullin 1993, Bott 1994, Rosmaninho et al. Kananeh et al. 2010).
2002, Rosmaninho and Melo 2006). The investigated sur- The trends presented by the researchers indicate that
faces were 316 2R (bright annealed) based and prepared the more deposit is initially formed on surfaces having
by the technique of reactive sputtering coating (with higher γ− (Figure 3). This dependency was informed in
different proportions of titanium (Ti) and N in an argon previous research with an indication of relation between
atmosphere). In this technique, reactive sputtering of Ti affinities of the surfaces to nucleation of fouling depos-
(99.7% purity) with an unbalanced magnetron cathode its. Furthermore the combination of size and number of
was used for coating on the stainless steel surfaces. Nitro- the first aggregates of the foulant from calcium phosphate
gen (99.998% N2 by volume) was used as the reaction gas formed on the surface is dependent on the surface energy
(Rosmaninho et al. 2007a). values (γ−component) (Rosmaninho et al. 2005, 2007a,b).
In their work, Rosmaninho et al. (2007a) tested all The effect of whey protein (β-Lg) on the fouling
the surfaces under varying operational parameters in the pattern of calcium phosphate of a simulated solution
same modification technique. Consequently, the differ- (milk) was studied and evaluated by Rosmaninho and
ent TiN-sputtered surfaces had similar morphology and Melo (2007). They mainly considered fouling depend-
surface composition, although with varying proportions ence on the surface energy of different modified surfaces
of Ti and N and different surface energy properties. The used for the study of deposition of materials. The depo-
surface used for investigation could be distinguished and sition curves obtained in the presence and absence of
characterized on the basis of their surface energy values protein were considerably different. The investigators also
as shown in Table 5. observed two growth periods at different time spans in
the presence of the whey protein. The appearance of the
second growth period after the delay time was dependent
Table 5 Surface energy components of the TiN sputtered surfaces
on the type of surface where fouling developed, more pre-
(Rosmaninho et al. 2007a).
cisely on its roughness, surface composition and surface
Surfacea γLW (mJ/m2) γ+ (mJ/m2) γ- (mJ/m2) γTOT (mJ/m2)
energy values (Rosmaninho and Melo 2007).

TiN 1 43.2 (0.1) 0.7 (0.0) 55.3 (0.0) 55.70 (0.1)


TiN 2 43.6 (0.2) 1.3 (0.0) 23.0 (1.8) 54.3 (0.2)
TiN 3 43.4 (0.1) 1.0 (0.2) 46.2 (4.6) 56.7 (0.4)
4.2 Surface treatment of heat exchangers
TiN 4 43.4 (0.1) 1.3 (0.1) 18.3 (2.7) 53.2 (0.4) in the dairy industry
TiN 5 42.80 (0.9) 1.0 (0.9) 26.0 (2.2) 53.0 (0.6)
a
All the surfaces became covered by a similar layer of TiN, which
Antifouling coatings based on nanocomposites (Table 6)
makes them different on the basis of their surface energy, and as have been used to decrease fouling on plate and frame
such the surfaces were named TiN 1, TiN 2, TiN 3, TiN 4 and TiN 5. heat exchangers used in a food processing plant (Kananeh

Brought to you by | Lulea University of Technology


Authenticated | 130.240.43.43
Download Date | 8/13/13 9:11 AM
E. Sadeghinezhad et al.: Milk fouling on heat exchanger surfaces      179

Table 6 Fouling surface sample specifications used in the experi- To minimize milk fouling effects, Ni-P-PTFE coating is not
ments conducted by Kananeh et al. (2009). the most appropriate surface treatment against fouling,
but ion implantation is preferable, as proven by many
Substrate Material Thickness (μm)
researchers. This remark is supported by the character-
SS Stainless steel – istics provided by the Ni-P-PTFE surface modification
EP Electrically polished stainless steel – method, which is systematically different from the other
A2 Epoxy resin-based coating of INM 83.7
methods as reported by previous authors (Santos et al.
A9 Polyurethane-based coating of INM 53.0
A10 Polyurethane-based coating of INM 85.2 2004, Rosmaninho et al. 2007b).
A67 Polyurethane-based coating of INM 27.6 Rosmaninho et al. (2007b) found that the Ni-P-PTFE
PTFE Teflon 22.5 coating is the only modification method that could clearly
change the topography of unmodified steel surfaces. On
masking the grain boundaries at the surface, these types
et al. 2009). The low-energy surfaces led to a hydropho- of coatings create the thickest layer on the stainless steel
bic and an oleophobic effect. In the heating section of a surface (10 μm, against 0.2–2.5 μm for all the other sur-
pasteurizer, four different coated plates were equipped faces). They have also reported that the thickness of the
in order to study fouling. The pasteurizer was operated Ni-P-PTFE layer is small, which did not create a significant
with a 10% whey protein solution, which was heated up effect on the thermal resistance of the heat transfer wall
to 85°C. Three coated samples of stainless steel accu- (Rosmaninho and Melo 2008).
mulated a reduced fouling amount in comparison to the Kananeh et al. (2010) reported that the fouling of gas-
uncoated stainless steel plates. The electropolished plates keted plate heat exchangers in milk production has been
showed about 64% of each deposited surface cleaned by reduced by the use of nanocomposite coatings. However,
cleaning in place (CIP) at a time interval in comparison to an antifouling coating with low surface energy (low wet-
the standard SS plates, whereas the coated plates showed tability) led to a hydrophobic and oleophobic effect. They
approximately 30% cleaned at that time span (Kananeh et have also investigated the performance of a number of
al. 2009, Dowling et al. 2010). coatings and surface treatments of heat exchangers used
The influence of the surface energy on the stainless in milk processing. Certain polyurethane-coated plates
steel substratum at similar roughness was studied by and tubes received thinner deposit layer compared to that
Rosmaninho and Melo (2007) to investigate the deposi- of standard uncoated stainless steel plates and tubes.
tion process. In order to change their surface energy, the They achieved 70% reduction in cleaning time of coated
stainless steel 316 2R-based materials were subjected to plates in comparison to that of the standard stainless steel
three types of surface modification processes such as ion one. Plates coated with different nanocomposites as well
implantation (Santos et al. 2004, Rosmaninho and Melo as electropolishing were installed in the heating section
2006), plasma chemical vapor deposition coating, nickel- of the pasteurizer. Polyurethane-coated plates exhibited
phosphor-polytetrafluorethylene (Ni-P-PTFE) coating and the thinnest deposit layer due to the lowest total surface
nanocomposite coating (Beuf et al. 2003a,b, Rosmaninho energy (Kananeh et al. 2010, Barish and Goddard 2013).
and Melo 2006, 2007, 2008, Augustin et al. 2007, Kück Electropolished plates also present a reduced deposit
et al. 2007, Rosmaninho et al. 2007a,b, Kananeh et al. buildup in comparison to the standard stainless steel
2009, 2010, Ozden and Puri 2010). plates and were almost similar to the coated plates.
1. Ni-P-PTFE surface was the most promising one for Kananeh et al. (2010) observed 30% reduction in CIP time
nonmicrobiological deposits (calcium phosphate, of electropolished plates in comparison to standard stain-
β-Lg and FMF milk-based product). It generally less steel plates.
accumulates less deposit buildup and in all cases was The results from an investigation in a pilot plant
the easiest to clean. reveal that the coatings must be further developed so that
2. Considering food contamination, on the basis of the they can withstand the thermal and mechanical stresses
data obtained from adhesion the ion implanted (TiC) that arise in industrial operation (Kananeh et al. 2010).
surface appeared to be the most suitable surface,
which also carries less spores after the cleaning
process. Looking only at the number of adhered 5 Milk fouling removal
spores, the Ni-P-PTFE and the xylan surfaces did
not appear to be as good as previously obtained TiC Xin (2003) reported that the cleaning of the milk process-
surfaces (Rosmaninho et al. 2007b). ing surfaces is an essential stage to remove the undesired

Brought to you by | Lulea University of Technology


Authenticated | 130.240.43.43
Download Date | 8/13/13 9:11 AM
180      E. Sadeghinezhad et al.: Milk fouling on heat exchanger surfaces

materials. The cost of the cleaning process is very high Many monitoring methods have been developed for
due to the high frequency of cleaning, hygienic require- cleaning research. There is still lack of accurate online
ment, chemicals, energy, water, product losses, labor and methods for suitable cleaning kinetics of fouling. Explora-
downtime. Pritchard et al. (1988) estimated that up to 42% tion of the fundamental cleaning mechanisms and opti-
of the production time is spent in the cleaning process mization of the cleaning process are still a big challenge
of the dairy industry. Standard cleaning procedures for for researchers in this field (Bell and Sanders 1944, Burton
fouling deposits are well used in the CIP system. The pro- 1968, Arnebrant et al. 1987, Foster et al. 1989, de Jong
cedure is based on a controlled automatic circulation of et al. 1992, de Jong 1997, Petermeier et al. 2002, Xin 2003,
formulated detergents in a certain section of a plant. An Grijspeerdt et al. 2004, van Asselt et al. 2005, Bansal and
optimized CIP process can reduce the costs of cleaning as Chen 2006, Jun et al. 2008, Dowling et al. 2010, Espina
well as the negative environmental impacts. The CIP time et al. 2010).
of all coated plates was reduced. Xin (2003) emphasized
an investigation for developing a mathematical model to
optimize cleaning processes.
At operation temperature lower than 100°C during 6 Model for milk fouling
pasteurization, protein is the main constituent of milk
fouling deposits as a result of the heat-induced protein Mathematical models for fouling at low temperatures
denaturation and aggregation reaction (Lalande et al. exist, but the behavior of systems at UHT is still unclear.
1985, deWit et al. 1986, Grasshoff 1989). Due to the high Heat transfer coefficients and pressure drops were meas-
heat transfer resistance and the difficulty of removal, pro- ured during fouling in all sections of the heat exchanger
teinaceous fouling is a major concern for cleaning pro- (Fryer et al. 1996b, Jun and Puri 2005a, De Bonis and
cesses (Xin 2003, Nigam et al. 2008, Fickak et al. 2011). Ruocco 2009, Mahdi et al. 2009).
In a typical cleaning study, a test setup may be Nema amd Datta (2005) developed a model that can
installed to develop fouling deposits and then it could be used to control steam temperature or pressure in a
be cleaned by selected cleaning solutions. Concentrated helical triple-tube heat exchanger to overcome the reduc-
whey protein was used to study fouling formation but the tion in milk outlet temperature due to fouling. They raised
preparation was not precisely controlled, which triggered the temperature of the wall gradually to counter heat
variable solutions. In a similar fouling procedure, signifi- losses due to fouling (Chen and Bala 1998, Chen et al.
cant variations of water content and amount of fouling 2001, Balsubramanian et al. 2008). It is reported that the
have been reported (Gotham 1990, Gillham 1997), which major contribution to the overall cost due to interruption
makes the comparison of cleaning results very difficult of production comes from cleaning. Thus, the duration
due to the sensitivity of the cleaning rate on the composi- of the heating cycle tends to be maximum at the optimal
tion and properties of fouling (Xin 2003, Zulewska et al. solution (Toyoda et al. 1994). Their proposed model may
2009, Li et al. 2013). be useful for predicting the steam temperature or increase
The fouled heat exchanger surfaces were cleaned by of pressure required for compensating for the reduction in
three-stage cleaning method. In the first stage, the whey milk outlet temperature as affected by fouling in a tubular
protein solution was drained and the system was washed heat exchanger. It could be implemented for commercial
with water at a velocity of 10.423 cm/s (for approx. 10 min) UHT milk sterilizers with suitable modifications (Nema
until there were no protein traces left in the stream and Datta 2005, Hooper et al. 2006, Boxler et al. 2013).
water. The rinsing efficiency was estimated using infor- Georgiadis and Macchietto (2000) used a fouling
mation on the turbidity of flowing stream. The rinsing model that relies on the β-Lg reaction scheme as shown in
process was stopped at 0.5–1 NTU (number of transfer Figure 3. The model was adapted from the work of Toyoda
units) turbidity of cleaning water (USEPA 2001, Fickak and Fryer (1997) and was first proposed by de Jong et al.
et al. 2011). (1992). Above 65°C, β-Lg of milk becomes thermally unsta-
Then, a cleaning solution (50 L of NaOH at 0.5 wt%) ble and (i) undergoes molecular denaturation and exposes
was used to clean the remaining deposits. During clean- the reactive sulfhydryl (-SH) groups and (ii) polymerizes
ing, the temperature of the cleaning solution was main- irreversibly to produce insoluble particles in aggregated
tained constant at 60 ± 0.5°C. In the process of CIP, the form (de Jong et al. 1992, Toyoda and Fryer 1997, Georgi-
cleaning solution was recirculated through the system adis and Macchietto 2000). In the study of fouling, the
(Fickak et al. 2011). The CIP solution was drained after the key step is to understand the interrelationship between
complete removal of the fouling layer (Fickak et al. 2011). the chemical reactions that give rise to deposition and the

Brought to you by | Lulea University of Technology


Authenticated | 130.240.43.43
Download Date | 8/13/13 9:11 AM
E. Sadeghinezhad et al.: Milk fouling on heat exchanger surfaces      181

fluid mechanics associated with the heat transfer equip- the Reynolds number and is inversely proportional to the
ment. The reaction scheme is described as follows (Geor- velocity (Jun and Puri 2005a,b, COMSOL Multiphysics
giadis and Macchietto 2000, Wallhäußer et al. 2012): 2007, De Bonis and Ruocco 2009, Choi et al. 2012).
1. In both the bulk and the thermal boundary layers in
the milk, the proteins in a first-order reaction and
the native protein N are transformed to denatured
protein D. The denatured protein is then reacts to form
7 Summary
aggregated protein A in a second-order reaction.
In the dairy industry, thermal processing is an energy-
2. From each protein, the mass transfer between the
intensive act. Heat exchanger fouling diminishes heat
bulk and the thermal boundary layer takes place.
transfer, enhances pressure drop and reduces efficiency,
3. The aggregated protein is specifically deposited on
which ultimately affects the economy of a processing
the wall. The concentration of aggregated protein
plant. Product quality could be deteriorated due to fouling
in the thermal boundary layer is proportional to the
and lack of proper heating. The chemistry of milk fouling
deposition rate.
fluids is qualitatively understood but still needs intensive
4. The fouling resistance to heat transfer is proportional
research to gather quantitative information. Heat trans-
to the thickness of the deposit (Fryer et al. 1996b,
fer coefficient and pressure drop studies through fouling
Georgiadis et al. 1998a, Robbins et al. 1999, Georgiadis
were conducted by many researchers for most types of
and Macchietto 2000, Grijspeerdt et al. 2003, 2004,
heat exchangers. Many research works were conducted
Jun and Puri 2005a,b, Bansal and Chen 2006, Mahdi
to explore the mitigation of fouling on heated surfaces.
et al. 2009, Wallhäußer et al. 2012).
Among them, electromagnetic means, surface modifi-
cations and changing of heat exchanger configurations
The reaction rate constants are expressed in the common
are notable. The present review highlighted information
form as:
about previous work on fouling and influencing param-
K = Ko exp(-E/RT) (2) eters of the fouling factor including mitigation approach.
Extended research on fouling will enable researchers to
For the two reactions the preexponential factors Ko and
find ways to mitigate fouling in heat exchangers of milk
the activation energies E are taken from de Jong et al.
and food processing industries. However, it is found that
(1992) and presented in Table 7 (Georgiadis and Macchi-
surface modification toward low total surface energy is an
etto 2000) and Table 8 (Mahdi et al. 2009).
appropriate approach of fouling mitigation.
Mahdi et al. (2009) showed that fouling is highly
dependent on the various process operating conditions.
The different parameters seem to affect the phenomenon
more specifically in the flow direction rather than in the Nomenclature
width direction. The mass of deposit depends mainly on
milk temperature and time of processing. Moreover, it AB Acid/base interaction forces
is observed that the fouling extent is strongly related to Br Brownian motion
CFD Computational fluid dynamics
CIP Cleaning in place
Table 7 Kinetic data for the reactions of β-Lg (de Jong et al. 1992, EL Electrostatic double-layer interaction forces
Georgiadis and Macchietto 2000). FMF Fouling model fluid
HIWPG Heat-induced whey protein gels
EN (kJ/mol) KNo (1/s) ED (kJ/mol) KDo (m3/kg s) LW Lifshitz-van der Waals interaction forces
Ni-P-PTFE Nickel-phosphor-polytetrafluorethylene
261 312 3.37 × 1037 1.36 × 1043 NTU Number of transfer units
R Ideal gas constant (kJ/mol °C)
Rf Fouling resistance
Table 8 Kinetic parameters for the fouling reaction scheme (Mahdi SMUF Simulated milk ultra filtrate
et al. 2009). UHT Ultrahigh temperature
WPC Whey protein concentrate
T (°C) E (J/mol) ln (Ko) WPI Whey protein isolate
E Activation energy (kJ/mol)
Native 70–90 2.614 × 105 86.41
KNo Interchange coefficient (1/s)
Denatured 70–90 3.37 × 1037 89.40
KDo Effective reaction rate constant in the fluidized state
Aggregation 70–90 2.885 × 105 91.32
(m3/kg s)

Brought to you by | Lulea University of Technology


Authenticated | 130.240.43.43
Download Date | 8/13/13 9:11 AM
182      E. Sadeghinezhad et al.: Milk fouling on heat exchanger surfaces

α-La α-Lactalbumin Acknowledgments: The authors gratefully acknowledge


β-Lg β-Lactoglobulin High Impact Research Grant UM.C/HIR/MOHE/ENG/45
γ Surface energy (mJ/m2)
and University of Malaya, Malaysia, for support to con-
γLW Lifshitz-van der Waals component (mJ/m2)
γAB Acid-base component (mJ/m2)
duct this research work.
γ- Electron donor (mJ/m2)
γ+ Electron acceptor (mJ/m2) Received January 23, 2013; accepted March 7, 2013

References
Amjad Z. Calcium phosphate in biological and industrial systems. Bennett HAE. Whole milk fouling of heated surfaces. Masters Thesis.
In: The BF Goodrich Company, editors. Boston, Dordrecht, Palmerston North, New Zealand: Massey University, 2000.
London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998. Beuf M, Rizzo G, Leuliet JC, Müller-Steinhagen H, Yiantsios S,
Anema SG, McKenna AB. Reaction kinetics of thermal denaturation Karabelas A, Benezech T. Fouling and cleaning of modified
of whey proteins in heated reconstituted whole milk. J Agric stainless steel plate heat exchangers processing milk
Food Chem 1996; 44: 422–428. products. 2003 ECI Conference on Heat Exchanger Fouling
Arnebrant T, Barton K, Nylander T. Adsorption of α-lactalbumin and and Cleaning: Fundamentals and Applications. Santa Fe, New
β-lactoglobulin on metal surfaces versus temperature. J Colloid Mexico, USA, 2003a; ECI RP1: Article 14: 99–106.
Interface Sci 1987; 119: 383–390. Beuf M, Rizzo G, Leuliet JC, Müller-Steinhagen H, Yiantsios S,
Augustin W, Geddert T, Scholl S. Surface treatment for the mitigation Karabelas A, Benezech T. Potency of stainless steel modifi-
of whey protein fouling. In: Proceedings of the 7th International cations in reducing fouling and in improving cleaning of plate
Conference on Heat Exchanger Fouling and Cleaning: heat exchangers processing dairy products. Proceedings
Challenges and Opportunities. Tomar, Portugal, 2007. of Heat Exchanger Fouling and Cleaning: Fundamentals and
Ayadi MA, Bouvier L, Chopard F, Berthou M, Fillaudeau L, Leuliet Applications. Santa Fe, USA, 2003b.
JC. Heat treatment improvement of dairy products via ohmic Bird MR, Fryer PJ. An experimental study of the cleaning of surface
heating processes: thermal and hydrodynamic effect on fouling. fouled by whey proteins. Food Bioprod Process 1991; 69: 13–21.
In: Proceedings of Heat Exchanger Fouling and Cleaning: Bott TR. Aspects of biofilm formation and destruction. Corros Rev
Fundamentals and Applications, Santa Fe, USA, 2003a. 1993; 11: 1–24.
Ayadi MA, Chopard F, Berthou M, Leuliet JC. Ohmic heating unit Bott TR. Fouling of heat exchangers. The Netherlands: Elsevier
performance under whey proteins fouling. In: Proceedings of Science BV, 1994.
International Conference Engineering and Food (ICEF9), 2003b. Bott TR. Fouling of heat exchangers. The Netherlands: Elsevier
Ayadi MA, Leuliet JC, Chopard F, Berthou M, Lebouche M. Science BV, 1995.
Continuous ohmic heating unit under whey protein fouling. Boxler C, Augustin W, Scholl S. Fouling of milk components on DLC
Innovative Food Sci Emerg Technol 2004; 5: 465–473. coated surfaces at pasteurization and UHT temperatures. Food
Balsubramanian S, Puri VM, Jun S. 9 Fouling models for heat Bioprod Process.
exchangers. Food Process Operat Model 2008; 107: 235. Boxler C, Augustin W, Scholl S. Cleaning of whey protein and milk
Bansal B, Chen XD. Fouling of heat exchangers by dairy fluids – a salts soiled on DLC coated surfaces at high-temperature. J Food
review. In: Müller-Steinhagen H, Malayeri MR, Watkinson Eng 2013; 114: 29–38.
AP, editors. Proceedings of 6th International Conference Bradley SE, Fryer PJ. A comparison of two fouling-resistant heat
on Heat Exchanger Fouling and Cleaning: Challenges exchangers. Biofouling 1992; 5: 295–314.
and Opportunities. Kloster Irsee, Germany, Engineering Britten M, Green ML, Boulet M, Paquin P. Deposit formation on
Conferences International, 2005, RP2: 149–157. heated surfaces: effect of interface energetics. J Dairy Res
Bansal B, Chen XD. A critical review of milk fouling in heat 1988; 55: 551–562.
exchangers. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 2006; 5: 27–33. Burton H. Seasonal variation in deposit formation from whole milk
Barish JA, Goddard JM. Anti-fouling surface modified stainless steel on a heated surface. J Dairy Res 1967; 34: 137–143.
for food processing. Food Bioprod Process 2013. Burton H. Deposits from whole milk in heat treatment plant – a
Bell RW, Sanders CF. Prevention of milkstone formation in a review and discussion. J Dairy Res 1968; 35: 317–330.
high-temperature-short-time heater by preheating milk, skim Bylund G. Dairy processing handbook. Sweden: Tetra Pak
milk and whey. J Dairy Sci 1944; 27: 499–504. Processing Systems AB, 1995.
Bell KJ, Mueller AC. Wolverine heat transfer data book II, 2001. Calvo MM, Rafael Dd. Deposit formation in a heat exchanger during
Retrieved from http://www.wlv.com/products/databook/ pasteurization of CO2-acidified milk. J Dairy Res 1995; 62:
databook.pdf. Accessed on March 17, 2010. 641–644.
Belmar-Beiny MT, Fryer PJ. Preliminary stages of fouling from whey Changani S, Belmar-Beiny M, Fryer P. Engineering and chemical
protein solutions. J Dairy Res 1993; 60: 467–483. factors associated with fouling and cleaning in milk
Belmar-Beiny MT, Gotham SM, Paterson WR, Fryer PJ, Pritchard AM. processing. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 1997; 14: 392–406.
The effect of Reynolds number and fluid temperature in whey Chen J. Computer simulation of whey protein based milk fouling.
protein fouling. J Food Eng 1993; 19: 119–139. Auckland, New Zealand: The University of Auckland, 2000.

Brought to you by | Lulea University of Technology


Authenticated | 130.240.43.43
Download Date | 8/13/13 9:11 AM
E. Sadeghinezhad et al.: Milk fouling on heat exchanger surfaces      183

Chen XD, Bala P. Investigation of the influences of surface and de Jong P, van der Horst HC, Waalewijn R. Reduction of protein and
bulk temperatures upon fouling of milk components onto a mineral fouling. In: Proceedings of Fouling and Cleaning in Food
stainless steel probe. Proceedings of Fouling and Cleaning in Processing ’98, Jesus College, Cambridge, UK, 1998: 39–46.
Food Processing. Jesus College, Cambridge, England, 1998: de Wit JN, Swinkles GAM. A differential scanning calorimetric study
25–32. of the thermal denaturation of bovine β-lactoglobulin – thermal
Chen XD, Chen ZD, Nguang SK, Anema S. Exploring the reaction behaviours at temperatures up to 100°C. Biochim Biophys Acta
kinetics of whey protein denaturation/aggregation by 1980; 64: 40–50.
assuming the denaturation step is reversible. Biochem Eng J Delplace F, Leutiet JC. Modeling fouling of a plate heat exchanger
1998a; 2: 63–69. with different flow arrangements by whey protein solutions.
Chen XD, Yoo J, Benjamin A, Turner M. Study of bacteria Trans IChemE Part C Food Bioprod Process 1995; 73: 112–120.
‘transportation’ in model milk foulant and bacteria emission Delplace F, Leuliet JC, Tissier JP. Fouling experiments of a plate heat
from milk fouling layer into streams of rinse water, milk and exchanger by whey proteins solutions. Trans IChemE Part C
cleaning chemical solutions. Proceedings of Conference on Food Bioprod Process 1994; 72: 163–169.
Fouling and Cleaning in Food Processing ’98. Cambridge, Delplace F, Leuliet JC, Levieux D. Reaction engineering approach to
England, Jesus College, 1998b. the analysis of fouling by whey proteins of a six-channel-per-
Chen XD, Chen J, Farid MM. A computational investigation of whey pass plate heat exchanger. J Food Eng 1997; 34: 91–108.
protein based fouling of heat exchanger and holding tube. 8th Delsing BMA, Hiddink J. Fouling of heat transfer surfaces by dairy
Intl. Congress on Engineering and Food (ICEF8); Puebla City, liquids. Neth Milk Dairy J 1983; 37: 139–148.
Mexico; April 10–13. International Association of Engineering deWit JN, Klarenbeek G, Adamse M. Evaluation of functional
and Food, 2000: 1821–1826. properties of whey protein concentrates and whey protein
Chen XD, Chen J, Wilson DI. Modelling whey protein based fouling isolates. 2. Effects of processing history and composition. Neth
of heat exchangers – further examining the deposition Milk Dairy J 1986; 40: 41–56.
mechanisms. Proceedings of Heat Exchanger Fouling: Dowling DP, Nwankire CE, Riihimäki M, Keiski R, Nylén U. Evaluation
Fundamental Approaches and Technical Solutions. Davos, of the anti-fouling properties of nm thick atmospheric plasma
Switzerland, 2001. deposited coatings. Surf Coat Technol 2010; 205: 1544–1551.
Chen XD, Li DXY, Lin SXD, Özkan N. On-line fouling/cleaning Dupeyrat M, Labbe JP, Michel F, Billoudet F, Daufin G. Wettability and
detection by measuring electric resistance-equipment solidfiquia interaction during fouling of several materials by
development and application to milk fouling detection and whey and milk. Le Lait 1987; 67: 465–486.
chemical cleaning monitoring. J Food Eng 2004; 61: 181–189. Elofsson UM, Paulsson MA, Sellers P, Arnebrant T. Adsorption during
Choi W, Jun S, Nguyen L, Rungraeng N, Yi H, Balasubramanian heat treatment related to the thermal unfolding/aggregation
S, Puri V, Lee J. 3-D milk fouling modeling of plate heat of β-lactoglobulin A and B. J Colloid Interface Sci 1996; 183:
exchangers with different surface finishes using computational 408–415.
fluid dynamics codes. J Food Process Eng 2012. Espina V, Jaffrin MY, Paullier P, Ding L. Comparison of permeate flux
Christian GK, Changani SD, Fryer PJ. The effect of adding minerals and whey protein transmission during successive microfil-
on fouling from whey protein concentrate – development of a tration and ultrafiltration of UHT and pasteurized milks.
model fouling fluid for a plate heat exchanger. Food Bioprod Desalination 2010; 264: 151–159.
Process 2002; 90: 231–239. Fickak A, Al-Raisi A, Chen XD. Effect of whey protein concentration
COMSOL Multiphysics. Module, CMHT. COMSOL Multiphysics User’s on the fouling and cleaning of a heat transfer surface. J Food
Guide. Version: COMSOL Multiphysics, 2007: 3. Eng 2011; 104: 323–331.
Corredig M, Dalgleish DG. Temperature and pH on the interactions Flint S, Hartley N. A modified selective medium for the detection of
of whey proteins with casein micelles in skim milk. Food Res pseudomonas species that cause spoilage of milk and dairy
Int 1996; 29: 49–55. products. Int Dairy J 1996; 6: 223–230.
Dalgleish DG. Denaturation and aggregation of serum proteins Flint SH, Brook JD, vandenElzen H, Bremer PJ. Biofilms in dairy
and caseins in heated milk. J Agric Food Chem 1990; 38: manufacturing plant – a threat to product quality. Food Technol
1995–1999. (New Zealand) 1997; 27: 61–64.
Davies TJ, Henstridge SC, Gillham CR, Wilson DI. Investigation of Flint SH, vanden Elzen H, Brooks JD, Bremer PJ. Removal and
whey protein deposit properties using heat flux sensors. Food inactivation of thermo-resistant streptococci colonising
Bioprod Process 1997; 75: 106–110. stainless steel. Int Dairy J 1999; 9: 429–436.
deAlwis AAP, Fryer P. The use of direct resistance heating in the food Flint SH, Brooks JD, Bremer PJ. Properties of the stainless steel
industry. J Food Eng 1990; 11: 3–27. substrate influencing the adhesion of thermo-resistant
De Bonis MV, Ruocco G. Conjugate fluid flow and kinetics modeling streptococci. J Food Eng 2000; 43: 235–242.
for heat exchanger fouling simulation. Int J Therm Sci 2009; 48: Foster CL, Britten M, Green ML. Model heat-exchange apparatus for
2006–2012. the investigation of fouling of stainless steel surfaces by milk I.
de Jong P. Impact and control of fouling in milk processing. Trends Deposit formation at 100°C. J Dairy Res 1989; 56: 201–209.
Food Sci Technol 1997; 8: 401–405. Fryer PJ, Belmar-Beiny MT. Fouling of heat exchangers in the food
de Jong P, van der Linden HJLJ. Design and operation of reactors in industry: a chemical engineering perspective. Trends Food Sci
the dairy industry. Chem Eng Sci 1992; 47(13/14): 3761–3768. Technol 1991; 33–37.
de Jong P, Bouman S, van der Linden HJLJ. Fouling of heat transfer Fryer PJ, deAlwis AAP, Koury E, Stapley AGF, Zhang L. Ohmic
equipment in relation to the denaturation of β-lactoglobulin. processing of solid-liquid mixtures: heat generation and
J Soc Dairy Technol 1992; 45: 3–8. convection effects. J Food Eng 1993; 18: 101–125.

Brought to you by | Lulea University of Technology


Authenticated | 130.240.43.43
Download Date | 8/13/13 9:11 AM
184      E. Sadeghinezhad et al.: Milk fouling on heat exchanger surfaces

Fryer PJ, Hasting APM, Jeurnink TJM. Fouling, cleaning and Jeurnink T, Brinkman DW. The cleaning of heat exchangers and
disinfection in food processing. Fouling and Cleaning in Food evaporators after processing milk or whey. Int Dairy J 1994; 4:
Processing, EUR 16894, 1996a: 248. 347–368.
Fryer PJ, Robbins PT, Green C, Schreier PJR, Pritchard AM, Hasting Jeurnink TJM, de Kruif KG. Calcium concentration in milk in relation
APM, Royston DG, Richardson JF. A statistical model for to heat stability and fouling. Netherlands Milk Dairy J 1995; 49:
fouling of a plate heat exchanger by whey protein solution 151–165.
at UHT conditions. Food Bioprod Process Part C 1996b; 74: Jeurnink TJM, Brinkman DW, Stemerdink AD. Distribution and
189–199. composition of deposit in heat exchangers. In Proceeding of
Fung L, McCarthy OJ, Tuoc TK. Effect of fat globule membrane damage the Third International Conference on Fouling and Cleaning
on fouling of whole milk. In: Fouling and Cleaning in Food in Food Processing (25–35). Munich, Germany: University of
Processing ’98, Jesus College, Cambridge, UK, 1998: 33–38. Munich, 1989.
Georgiadis MC, Macchietto S. Dynamic modeling and simulation of Jeurnink T, Verheul M, Stuart MC, deKruif C. Deposition of heated
plate heat exchangers under milk fouling. Chem Eng Sci 2000; whey proteins on a chromium oxide surface. Colloids Surf B
55: 1065–1619. 1996; 6: 291–307.
Georgiadis MC, Rotstein GE, Macchietto S. Modelling and Jeurnink TJM, Walstra P, deKruif CG. Mechanism of fouling in dairy
simulation of complex plate heat exchanger arrangements processing. Neth Milk Dairy J 1996; 50: 407–426.
under milk fouling. Comput Chem Eng 1998a; 22(Suppl 1): Johnson JJ, Roland CT. Study of dairy cleaning problems. I. Films
S331–S338. and deposits on hot milk equipment. J Dairy Sci 1940; 23:
Georgiadis MC, Rotstein GE, Macchietto S. Optimal design and 457–461.
operation of heat exchangers under milk fouling. AIChE J Jun S, Puri V. Fouling models for heat exchangers in dairy
1998b; 44: 2099–2111. processing: A review. J Food Process Eng 2005a; 28: 1–34.
Gillham CR. Enhanced cleaning of surfaces fouled by whey proleins. Jun S, Puri VM. 3-D milk fouling model of plate heat exchangers
UK: University of Cambridge, 1997. using computational fluid dynamics. Int J Dairy Technol 2005b;
Gillham CR, Fryer PJ, Hasting APM, Wilson DI. Cleaning-in-place 58: 214–224.
of whey protein fouling deposits: mechanisms controlling Jun Y, Lee K, Ko S. Effect of particle ingestion on the fouling
cleaning. Food Bioprod Process Part C 1999; 77: 127–136. reduction and heat transfer enhancement of a no-distributor-
Gillham CR, Fryer PJ, Hasting APM. Enhanced cleaning of whey fluidized heat exchanger. J Mech Sci Technol 2008; 22:
protein soils using pulsed flows. J Food Eng 2000; 46: 199–209. 965–972.
Gotham SM. Mechanism of protein fouling of heat exchangers. UK: Kananeh AB, Scharnbeck E, Hartmann D. Application of antifouling
University of Cambridge, 1990. surfaces in plate heat exchanger for food production. In:
Gotham SM, Fryer PJ, Pritchard AM. β-lactoglobulin denaturation Proceedings of International Conference on Heat Exchanger
and aggregation reactions and fouling deposit formation: a Fouling and Cleaning VIII – 2009 (peer-reviewed), 14–19 June
DSC study. Int J Food Sci Technol 1992; 27: 313–327. 2009, Schladming, Austria.
Grandison AS. Effects of natural (or seasonal) variation in concen- Kananeh AB, Scharnbeck E, Kück UD, Räbigerb N. Reduction of
tration of components of milk and addition of divalent cations milk fouling inside gasketed plate heat exchanger using
on ultra-high temperature processing characteristics. J Soc nano-coatings. Food Bioprod Process 2010; 8: 349–356.
Dairy Technol 1988; 41: 117–119. Kane DR, Middlemiss NE. Cleaning chemicals-state of the
Grasshoff A. Environmental aspects of the use of alkaline cleaning knowledge in 1985. Paper presented at the Fouling and
solutions. In: Kessler HG, Lund DB, editors. Fouling and Cleaning in Food Processing, 1985.
cleaning in food processing. Munich, Germany: Munich Karlsson CAC, Wahlgren MC, Trägårdh AC. β-Lactoglobulin fouling
University, 1989. and its removal upon rinsing and by SDS as influenced by
Grijspeerdt K, Hazarika B, Vucinic D. Application of computational surface characteristics, temperature and adsorption time.
fluid dynamics to model the hydrodynamics of plate heat J Food Eng 1996; 30: 43–60.
exchangers for milk processing. J Food Eng 2003; 57: 237–242. Kessler HG, Beyer HJ. Thermal denaturation of whey proteins and
Grijspeerdt K, Mortier L, De Block J, Van Renterghem R. its effect in dairy technology. Int J Biol Macromol 1991; 13:
Applications of modelling to optimise ultra high temperature 165–173.
milk heat exchangers with respect to fouling. Food Control Kindle G, Busse A, Kampa D, Meyer-Konig U, Daschner FD. Killing
2004; 15: 117–130. activity of microwaves in milk. J Hosp Infect 1996; 33: 273–278.
Guo W, Zhu X, Liu H, Yue R, Wang S. Effects of milk concentration Kittaka S. Isoelectric point of Al2O3, Cr2O3 and Fe2O3. I. Effect of heat
and freshness on microwave dielectric properties. J Food Eng treatment. J Colloid Interface Sci 1974; 48: 327–333.
2010; 99: 344–350. Koopal LK. Physico-chemical aspects of hard surface cleaning 1.soil
Hege WU, Kessler HG. Deposit formation of protein containing dairy removal mechanisms. Milk Dairy J 1985; 39: 127–154.
liquids. Milchwissenschaft 1986; 41: 356–360. Krause S. Fouling of heat-transfer surfaces by crystallization and
Hinrichs J, Atamer Z. Heat treatment of milk: sterilization of milk and sedimentation. Int Chem Eng 1993; 3: 355–401.
other products. In: Fuquay JW, editor-in-chief. Encyclopedia Kück UD, Hartmann D, Manske S, Kück A, Räbiger N. Entwicklung
of dairy sciences, 2nd ed. San Diego: Academic Press, 2011: neuer Verarbeitungsprozesse für die Lebensmittelherstellung
714–724. durch Anwendung von neuartigen funktionalen Materialober-
Hooper RJ, Paterson WR, Wilson DI. Comparison of whey protein flächen. AiFAbschlußbericht (AiF-Nr. 14228N/1), Bremen, 2007.
model foulants for studying cleaning of milk fouling deposits. Kuhn PR, Foegeding EA. Mineral salt effects on whey protein
Food Bioprod Process Part C 2006; 84: 329–337. gelation. J Agric Food Chem 1991; 39: 1013–1016.

Brought to you by | Lulea University of Technology


Authenticated | 130.240.43.43
Download Date | 8/13/13 9:11 AM
E. Sadeghinezhad et al.: Milk fouling on heat exchanger surfaces      185

Kukulka DJ, Leising P. Evaluation of heat exchanger surface thermally induced b-lactoglobulin gels. Food Hydrocolloids
coatings. Appl Therm Eng 2010; 30: 2333–2338. 1990; 4: 267–276.
Lalande M, René F. Fouling by milk and dairy product and cleaning of Muthukumaran S, Kentish SE, Stevens GW, Ashokkumar M.
heat exchanger surfaces. In: Fouling Science and Technology, Application of ultrasound in membrane separation processes:
Amsterdam, Netherlands: Kluwer, 1988. a review. Rev Chem Eng 2011; 22: 155–194.
Lalande M, Reno F. Fouling by milk and dairy product and cleaning Nassauer J. Adsorption und haftung an oberflachen und membranen.
of heat exchange surfaces. In: Melo LF, Bott TR, Bernardo CA, Institut fur Milchwirtschaft und Lebensmittelverfahrenstechnik,
editors. Fouling Science and Technology, NATO ASI Series E. Technische Universitat Munchen, 1985: 115–117.
Amsterdam, Netherland: Kluwer, 1988: 557–573. Ndoye FT, Erabit N, Flick D, Alvarez G. In-line characterization of
Lalande M, Tissier JP, Corrieu G. Fouling of a plate exchanger used in a whey protein aggregation process: aggregates size and
ultra-high-temperature sterilisation of milk. J Dairy Res 1984; rheological measurements. J Food Eng 2013; 115: 73–82.
51: 557–568. Nema PK, Datta AK. A computer based solution to check the drop
Lalande M, Tissier JP, Corrieu G. Fouling of heat transfer surfaces in milk outlet temperature due to fouling in a tubular heat
related to β-lactoglobulin denaturation during heat processing exchanger. J Food Eng 2005; 71: 133–142.
of milk. Biotechnol Prog 1985; 1: 131–139. Newstead DF, Groube GF, Smith AF, Eiger RN. Fouling of UHT plants
Langton M, Hermansson AM. Fine-stranded and particulate gels by recombined and fresh milk: some effects of preheat
of blactoglobulin and whey protein at varying pH. Food treatment. In: Fouling and Cleaning in Food Processing ’98,
Hydrocolloids 1992; 5: 523–539. Jesus College, Cambridge, UK, 1998: 17–24.
Li L, Che L, Liang Q, Mercadé-Prieto R, Wu X, Chen XD. Study on the Nicorescu I, Loisel C, Riaublanc A, Vial C, Djelveh G, Cuvelier G,
dissolution of heat-induced ovalbumin gel in alkaline solutions Legrand J. Effect of dynamic heat treatment on the physical
relevant to the removal of fouling deposits. J Food Eng 2013; properties of whey protein foams. Food Hydrocolloids 2009;
114: 550–557. 23: 1209–1219.
Lund DB, Bixby B. Fouling of heat exchanger surfaces by milk. Nigam MO, Bansal B, Chen XD. Fouling and cleaning of whey protein
Process Biochem 1975; 10: 52–55. concentrate fouled ultrafiltration membranes. Desalination
Lyster RLJ. The composition of milk deposits in UHT plan. J Dairy Res 2008; 218: 313–322.
1965; 32: 203–205. Ozden HO, Puri VM. Computational analysis of fouling by low energy
Lyster RLJ. The denaturation of α-lactalbumin and β-lactoglobulin in surfaces. J Food Eng 2010; 99: 250–256.
heated milk. J Dairy Res 1970; 37: 233–243. Paterson WR, Fryer PJ. A reaction engineering approach to the
Ma CHC, Trinh KT, Brooks JD, Maddox IS. Effect of fat content on analysis of fouling. Chem Eng Sci 1988; 43: 1714–1717.
the rate of fouling on heated surfaces by milk. In 5th Annual Peny RH, Green D. Chemical engineers’ handbook. New York: Mac
New Zealand Engineering and Technology Postgraduate Graw-Hill Inc., 1985.
Conference. Palmerston North, New Zealand, 1998. Petermeier H, Benning R, Delgado A, Kulozik U, Hinrichs J, Becker T.
Mahdi Y, Mouheb A, Oufer L. A dynamic model for milk fouling in a Hybrid model of the fouling process in tubular heat exchangers
plate heat exchanger. Appl Math Modell 2009; 33: 648–662. for the dairy industry. J Food Eng 2002; 55: 9–17.
Mercadé-Prieto R, Chen XD. Dissolution of whey protein concentrate Polat Z. Integrated approach to whey utilization through natural
gels in alkali. AIChE J 2006; 52: 792–803. zeolite adsorption/desorption and fermentation, PhD Thesis,
Metaxas AC, Meredith RJ. Industrial microwave heating. London, UK: Izmir University, Turkey, 2009.
Peter Peregrinus Ltd., 1988: 296–321. Prakash S, Huppertz T, Karvchuk O, Deeth H. Ultra-high-temperature
Mleko S. Effect of protein concentration on whey protein gels processing of chocolate flavoured milk. J Food Eng 2010; 96:
obtained by a two-stage heating process. Eur Food Res Technol 179–184.
1999; 209: 389–392. Premathilaka S, Hyland M, Chen X, Bansal B. A study of the
Modler HW. Milk processing. Paper presented at the Food Proteins effects of surface chemistry on the initial deposition
– Processing Applications, New York, NY, 2000. mechanisms of dairy fouling. Trans IChemE Part C
Modler W. Pioneer paper: value-added components derived from 2006; 84: 265–273.
whey. American Dairy Science Association®, 2009. Pritchard AM, deGoederen G, Hasting APM. The removal of milk
Mottar J, Moermans R. Optimization of the forewarming process deposits from heated surfaces by improved cleaning process.
with respect to deposit formation in indirect ultra high In: Pritchard AM, editor. Fouling in process plant. London:
temperature plants and the quality of milk. J. Dairy Res 1988 lnstitute of Corrosion Science and Technology, 1988: 467–475.
5: 563–568. Puyol P, Perez MD, Horne DS. Heat-induced gelation of whey protein
Muller-Steinhagen H. Fouling: the ultimate challenge for heat isolates (WPI): effect of NaCl and protein concentration. Food
exchanger design. Paper presented at the The Sixth Hydrocolloids 2001; 15: 233–237.
International Symposium on Transport Phenomena in Thermal Quarini GL. Thermalhydraulic aspects of the ohmic heating process.
Engineering, 1993. J Food Eng 1995; 24: 561–574.
Mullin JW. Crystallization, 3rd ed. London: Butterworths, 1993. Rakes PA, Swartzel KR, Jones VA. Deposition of dairy protein-
Mullin JW. Crystallization, 4th ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, containing fluids on heat exchanger surface. Biotechnol Prog
2001. 1986; 2: 210–217.
Mulvihill DM, Donovan M. Whey proteins and their thermal Regester GO, Smithers GW. Seasonal changes in the
denaturation – a review. J Food Sci Technol 1987; 11: 43–75. β-lactoglobulin, α-lactalbumin, glycomacropeptide, and casein
Mulvihill DM, Rector D, Kinsella JE. Effects of structuring and content of whey protein concentrate. J Dairy Sci 1991; 74:
destructuring anionic ions on the rheological properties of 796–802.

Brought to you by | Lulea University of Technology


Authenticated | 130.240.43.43
Download Date | 8/13/13 9:11 AM
186      E. Sadeghinezhad et al.: Milk fouling on heat exchanger surfaces

Riera FA, Suárez A, Muro C. Nanofiltration of UHT flash cooler – Fundamental Approaches and Technical Solutions, Davos,
condensates from a dairy factory: characterisation and water Switzerland, 2001.
reuse potential. Desalination 2013; 309: 52–63. Santos O, Nylander T, Rizzo G, Müller-Steinhagen H, Trägårdh C,
Robbins P, Elliott B, Fryer P, Belmar M, Hasting A. A comparison of Paulsson M. Study of whey protein adsorption under turbulent
milk and whey fouling in a pilot scale plate heat exchanger: flow rate. In: Proceedings of Heat Exchanger Fouling and
implications for modelling and mechanistic studies. Food Cleaning: Fundamentals and Applications, Santa Fe, USA, 2003.
Bioprod Process 1999; 77: 97–106. Santos O, Nylander T, Rosmaninho R, Rizzo G, Yiantsios S, Andritsos
Roefs SPFM, deKruif KG. A model for the denaturation and aggregation N, Paulsson M, Beuf M, Benezech T, Karabelas A, Müller-
of β-lactoglobulin. Eur J Biochem 1994; 226: 883–889. Steinhagen, Melo LF. Modified stainless steel surfaces targeted
Rosmaninho R, Melo LF. Calcium phosphate deposition from to reduce fouling – surface characterization. J Food Eng 2004;
simulated milk ultrafiltrate on different stainless steel-based 64: 63–79.
surfaces. Int Dairy J 2006; 16: 81–87. Schreier P, Green C, Pritchard A, Fryer P. Fouling experiments of a
Rosmaninho R, Melo LF. Effect of proteins on calcium phosphate plate heat exchanger by whey proteins solutions. In: Fouling
deposition in turbulent flow as a function of surface properties. and cleaning in food processing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge
Exp Therm Fluid Sci 2007; 32: 357–386. University, 1994: 9–16.
Rosmaninho R, Melo LF. Protein-calcium phosphate interactions in Schreier PJR, Fryer PJ. Heat exchanger fouling: a model study of
fouling of modified stainless-steel surfaces by simulated milk. the scaleup of laboratory data. Chem Eng Sci 1995; 50:
Int Dairy J 2008; 18: 72–80. 1311–1321.
Rosmaninho R, Visser H, Melo LF. The influence of stainless Sharma SK, Hill AR. Effect of milk concentration, pH and temperature
steel characteristics on calcium phosphate and milk on aggregation kinetics and coagulation properties of
proteins fouling. In: Proceedings of Heat Exchanger Fouling ultrafiltered (UF) milk. Food Res Int 1983; 26: 81–87.
Fundamentals Approaches and Technical Solutions, Davos, Sieber R, Eberhard P, Gallmann PU. Heat treatment of milk in
Switzerland, 2001. domestic microwave ovens. Int Dairy J 1996; 6: 231–246.
Rosmaninho R, Visser H, Melo LF. The role of calcium phosphate in Skudder P, Biss C. Aseptic processing of food products using ohmic
milk protein fouling at moderate and elevated temperatures. heating. Chem Eng 1987; 26–28.
Paper presented at the Proceedings of the conference on Heat Skudder PJ, Thomas EL, Pavey JA, Perkin AG. Effects of adding
Exchanger Fouling Fundamental Approaches and Technical potassium iodate to milk before UHT treatment. I. Reduction in
Solutions, Essen, Germany, 2002. the amount of deposit on the heated surfaces. J Dairy Res 1981;
Rosmaninho R, Rizzo G, Muller-Steinhagen H, Melo LF. Study 48: 99–113.
of the influence of bulk properties and surface tension on Skudder PJ, Brooker BE, Bonsey AD, Alvarezguerrero NR. Effect of pH
the deposition process of calcium phosphate on modified on the formation of deposit from milk on heated surfaces during
stainless steel. In: Proceedings of the 2003 ECI Conference ultra high-temperature processing. J Dairy Res 1986; 53: 75–87.
on Heat Exchanger Fouling and Cleaning: Fundamentals and Thompson JS, Thompson A. In-home pasteurization of raw goat’s milk
Applications, Santa Fe, USA, 2003. by microwave treatment. Int J Food Microbiol 1990; 10: 59–64.
Rosmaninho R, Rizzo G, Muller-Steinhagen H, Melo LF. Anti-fouling Tissier J, Lalande M, Corrieu G. A study of milk deposit on a heat
stainless steel based surfaces for milk heating processes. exchange surface during ultra-high-temperature treatment.
In: Müller-Steinhagen H, Malayeri MR, Watkinson AP, In: McKenna BM, editor. Engineering and Food, 1: Engineering
editors. ECI Symposium Series, Volume RP2: Proceedings Sciences in the Food Industry. Applied Science Publishers,
of 6th International Conference on Heat Exchanger Fouling 1984.
and Cleaning: Challenges and Opportunities, Engineering Toyoda I, Fryer PJ. A computational model for reaction and mass
Conferences International, Kloster Irsee, Germany, June 5–10, transfer in fouling from whey protein solutions. Fouling
2005. mitigation of industrial heat exchange equipment. New York:
Rosmaninho R, Rochab F, Rizzoc G, Müller-Steinhagenc H, Meloa Begell House, 1997.
LF. Calcium phosphate fouling on TiN-coated stainless steel Toyoda I, Schreier PJR, Fryer PJ. Computational model for reaction
surfaces: Role of ions and particles. Chem Eng Sci 2007a; 62: fouling from whey protein solutions. In: Proceedings of Fouling
3821–3831. Cleaning in Food Processing, 1994.
Rosmaninho R, Santos O, Nylander T, Paulsson M, Beuf M, Treybal RE. Mass-transfer operations, vol. 3. New York: McGraw-Hill
Benezech T, Yiantsiose S, Andritsose N, Karabelase A, New York.
Rizzof G, Müller-Steinhagenf H, Meloa LF. Modified stainless Truong HT. Fouling of stainless steel surface by heated whole milk.
steel surfaces targeted to reduce fouling – evaluation Palmesrston, New Zealand: Massey University, 2001.
of fouling by milk components. J Food Eng 2007b; 80: USEPA. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of
1176–1187. Water (4606), EPA 816-F-01-011, 2001.
Ruegg M, Moor U, Blanc B. A calorimetric study of the thermal van Asselt AJ, Vissers MMM, Smit F, de Jong P. In-line control of foul-
denaturation of whey proteins in simulated milk ultrafiltrates. ing. In: Proceedings of Heat Exchanger Fouling and Cleaning:
J Dairy Res 1977; 44: 509–520. Challenges and Opportunities. Paper presented at the Engineer-
Sahoo P, Ansari I, Datta A. Milk fouling simulation in helical triple ing Conferences International, Kloster Irsee, Germany, 2005.
tube heat exchanger. J Food Eng 2005; 69: 235–244. VanOss CJ. Interfacial forces in aqueous media. New York: Marcel
Santos O, Nylander T, Paulsson M, Trägårdh C. Adsorption Dekker, Inc, 1994.
behaviour of β-Lactoglobulin on different types of stainless VanOss CJ, Giese RF, Wu W. On the predominant electron-donicity of
steel surfaces. In: Proceedings of Heat Exchanger Fouling polar solid surfaces. J Adhes 1997; 63: 71–88.

Brought to you by | Lulea University of Technology


Authenticated | 130.240.43.43
Download Date | 8/13/13 9:11 AM
E. Sadeghinezhad et al.: Milk fouling on heat exchanger surfaces      187

Verheul M, Roefs SPM. Structure of particulate whey protein gels. concentrate gel). Auckland, New Zealand: The University of
Effect of NaCl concentration, pH, heating temperature, and Auckland, 2003.
protein concentration. J Agric Food Chem 1998a; 46: 4909–4916. Xin H, Chen XD, Ozkan N. Cleaning rate in the uniform cleaning
Verheul M, Roefs SPM. Structure of whey protein gels, studied by stage for whey protein gel deposits. Food Bioprod Process
permeability, scanning electron microscopy and rheology. Food 2002a; 80: 240–246.
Hydrocolloids 1998b; 12: 17–24. Xin H, Chen XD, Ozkan N. Whey protein based gel as a model
Villamiel M, Corzo N, Martinez-Castro I, Olano A. Chemical changes material for studying the initial cleaning mechanisms of milk
during microwave treatment of milk. Food Chem 1996; 56: fouling. J Food Sci 2002b; 67: 2702–2711.
385–388. Xiong YL. Influence of pH and ionic environment on thermal
Visser H. Fouling and cleaning of heat treatment equipment. aggregation of whey proteins. J Agric Food Chem 1992; 40:
Brussels: International Dairy Federation, 1997. 380–384.
Visser J. Reducing fouling of heat exchangers in the dairy industry Yoo J, Chen XD. An emission pattern of a thermophilic bacteria
by process optimization. In: Wilson DI, Fryer PJ, Hasting attached to or imbedded in porous catalyst. Int J Food
APM, editors. Proceedings of Fouling and Cleaning in Food Microbiol 2002; 72: 11–21.
Processing ’98, European Commission, 1999. Yoo J, Hardin MT, Chen XD. The influence of milk composition on the
Visser J, Jeurnink TJM. Fouling of heat exchangers in the dairy growth of Bacillus stearothermophilus. J Food Eng 2006; 77:
industry. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 1997; 14: 407–424. 96–102.
Wallhäußer E, Hussein MA, Becker T. Detection methods of fouling Yoon J, Lund DB. Effect of operating conditions, surface coating
in heat exchangers in the food industry. Food Control 2012; and pretreatment on milk fouling in aplater heat exchange. In:
27: 1–10. Fouling and cleaning in food processing, 1989.
Wilson DI, Fryer PJ, Hasting APM. Fouling, cleaning and disinfection Youcef M, Abdelkader M, Lounes O. A dynamic model for milk
in food processing 98, EUR 18804. Jesus College, Cambridge, fouling in a plate heat exchanger. Appl Math Model 2009; 33:
UK, 1999. 648–662.
Wilson DI, Fryer PJ, Hastings APM, editors. Fouling, Cleaning Zaida AH, Sarma SC, Grover PD, Heldman DR. Milk concentration
and Disinfection in Food Processing. Cambridge, England: by direct contact heat exchange. J Food Process Eng 1987; 9:
University of Cambridge, Department of Chemical Engineering, 63–79.
2002. ISBN 0-9542483-0-9. Available at: http://publications. Zhao Q, Liu Y, Wang C, Wang S, Müller-Steinhagen H. Surface free
ceb.cam.ac.uk/1405/. energy on the adhesion of biofouling and crystalline fouling.
Wu W, Nancollas GH. Kinetics of heterogeneous nucleation of Chem Eng Sci 2005; 60: 4858–4865.
calcium phosphate on Anatase and Rutile Surfaces. J Colloids Zulewska J, Newbold M, Barbano DM. Efficiency of serum
Interface Sci 1998; 199: 206–211. protein removal from skim milk with ceramic and
Xin H. A study of the mechanism of chemical cleanings of milk polymeric membranes at 50°C. J Dairy Sci 2009; 92:
protein fouling deposits using a model material (whey protein 1361–1377.

Mr. E. Sadeghinezhad received his Bachelor of Engineering degree Dr. S.N. Kazi has 18 years of engineering service experience in
from University of Shahid Bahonr, Kerman, and Master of Engi- petrochemical industries. His academic background includes a BSc
neering Science from University of Malaya, Malaysia. He is now in Mechanical Engineering, Masters in Mechanical Engineering and
pursuing his PhD in the field of heat transfer, fouling and thermo- PhD in Chemical and Materials Engineering. He has 49 technical
dynamics from the University of Malaya. His major interests are papers published in national and international journals and confer-
heat transfer fluids, numerical and experimental multiphase flow, ence proceedings. He has worked as a consultant for Crown Agents
fouling and its mitigation and heat-exchanging devices. Services Ltd. At present he is working as an academic in the Depart-
ment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University
of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Brought to you by | Lulea University of Technology


Authenticated | 130.240.43.43
Download Date | 8/13/13 9:11 AM
188      E. Sadeghinezhad et al.: Milk fouling on heat exchanger surfaces

Babak Lotfizadeh Dehkordi received his BSc in Mechanical Engi-


Dr. Ahmad Badaruddin received his MEng from the University of
neering from the Shahrekod University, Iran, in 2009. He studied
London, UK, and PhD from Cranfield University, UK, in turbulence
thermophysical properties of nanofluids, which is a bridge between
modeling. His area of expertise includes computational fluid dynam-
heat transfer and nanotechnology (material), and finished his
ics (hybrid flow solver development, large eddy simulation, synthetic
master’s at the University of Malaya in 2011. At present, he is con-
turbulence, heat transfer with nanofluids, multiphase flow with phase
ducting research on developing nanofluids, augmentation of heat
change, building and environment). At present he is working as an
transfer and renewable energy.
academic staff at the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty
of Engineering, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Mr. Oon Cheen Sean graduated from the University Malaysia Perlis
with a major in mechanical engineering in 2010. He received the
Mr. M. Nashrul received his Bachelor of Engineering degree from Graduate Engineer award from the Board of Engineering Malaysia
University of Malaya, Malaysia, and Master of Engineering Science in 2011. He received the Fellowship Award for further studies and
(Research) from Monash University, Australia. He is now pursu- obtained his MEng in Mechanical Engineering from University of
ing his PhD in the field of heat transfer and thermodynamics from Malaya. He has published more than six technical papers on heat
University of Malaya. His major interests are heat transfer fluids, transfer research.
numerical and experimental multiphase flow, fouling and its mitiga-
tion and heat-exchanging devices.

Brought to you by | Lulea University of Technology


Authenticated | 130.240.43.43
Download Date | 8/13/13 9:11 AM

You might also like