Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Community Screening Programs Identifying Undetected Refractive Error
Community Screening Programs Identifying Undetected Refractive Error
Community Screening Programs Identifying Undetected Refractive Error
2. Corneal Opacity
3. Glaucoma
4. Trachoma
5. Cataract
6. Diabetic Retinopathy
Results released on World Sight Day October 2017 indicating that refractive error has
become even larger a burden since WHOs 2010 assessment of global visual impairment.
Bourne, R., Resnikoff, S., & Ackland, P. (2017). Vision Atlas. IAPB. http://atlas.iapb.org/global-burden-vision-impairment/
GLOBAL CAUSES OF VISUAL IMPAIRMENT
Sankaridung, P., & Naidoo, K. (2017). The impact of Myopia throughout the developing world. IAPB.
Accessed on Nov 21 from http://atlas.iapb.org/vision-trends/myopia/
(Flaxman, et al. Lancet, 2017)
WHAT IS THE IMPACT OF REFRACTIVE ERROR
1. Financial burden
http://visionspring.org/why-eyeglasses/; https://www.theworldweekly.com/reader/view/magazine/2016-06-02/restoring-the-worlds-vision/8117
WHICH POPULATIONS SHOULD
WE TARGET IN SCREENING?
Presbyopes
Women
Children
PRESBYOPES
Bourne, R., Resnikoff, S., & Ackland, P. (2017). Vision Atlas. IAPB. http://atlas.iapb.org/global-burden-vision-impairment/
WOMEN
Bourne, R., Resnikoff, S., & Ackland, P. (2017). Vision Atlas. IAPB. http://atlas.iapb.org/global-burden-vision-impairment/
CHILDREN
Getting Syria's children back to school in Lebanon, DFID - UK Department for International Development; Creative Commons: commons.wikimedia.org
WHY DO WE NEED SCREENING IN COMMUNITIES
• Remote communites
– Limited access
– Limited transport options to city hospitals
COMMUNITY LEADERS
Lowest
High Income
incidence of
uncorrected
Central Europe,
refractive
Eastern Europe
error
& Central Asia
South Asia
Latin America
& Caribbean
Higher
South-East
incidenceAsia,
of
East Asia
uncorrected
& Oceania
refractive
North Africa
error
& Middle East
Sub-Saharan
Africa
Global
Global
0 50 100 150
http://atlas.iapb.org/global-action-plan/gap-implementation/gap-implementation-eye-health-workforce/
Number of Optometrists per million population
for the 128 countries for which data is available
Lowest
High Income
incidence of
uncorrected
Central Europe,
refractive error
Eastern Europe
& Central Asia
South Asia
Latin America
& Caribbean
Higher
incidence
South-East of
Asia,
uncorrected
East Asia
refractive
& Oceania
error
North Africa
& Middle East
Sub-Saharan
Africa
Global
Global
http://atlas.iapb.org/global-action-plan/gap-implementation/gap-implementation-eye-health-workforce/
Number of Allied Ophthalmic Personnel per million
population for the 95 countries for which data is available
High Lower
Income
incidence of
uncorrected
Central Europe,
refractive error
Eastern Europe
& Central Asia
South Asia
Latin America
& Caribbean
Higher
South-East
incidenceAsia,
of
East Asia
uncorrected
& Oceania
refractive
error
North Africa
& Middle East
Sub-Saharan
Africa
Global
Global
http://atlas.iapb.org/global-action-plan/gap-implementation/gap-implementation-eye-health-workforce/
NURSES VS LAY PEOPLE
• Vision In Preschoolers Study (VIP Study) Phase II (2009)
– Study compared trained nurses and trained lay people’s ability to
administer screening tools successfully in children
• Retinoscopy/Auto-refraction
• OTHER TESTS:
– Bruckner
– Stereopsis
– Color Vision
– Confrontation fields
– Pupil testing
EQUIPMENT NEEDED
1. Visual acuity chart
– tumbling E, ETDRS letters or LEA
– preferably logMAR
– tape measure to 10ft/5meters
2. Near visual acuity chart
3. Occluder
4. Diagnostic kit
– Retinoscope
• Retinoscopy racks
– Direct ophthalmoscope
– Transilluminator (or pen torch)
5. Auto refractor
WHERE DO WE START?
HISTORY QUESTIONS
• Disadvantages
– Limited ability to detect strabismus
– Difficult to accurately assess higher hyperopia
– Cost of instrument
– Require electricity or batteries
– May be less reliable in children = active accommodation and less stable fixation
Sensitivity and specificity will depend on the referral criteria. Whilst adjusting referral
criteria to be tighter may increase the number of patients correctly identified it will also
increase the number of unnecessary referrals (lower specificity).
AUTO REFRACTORS AVAILABLE
• Welch Allyn SureSight 140 Vision Screener
• Welch Allyn VS100S-B Spot Vision Screener
• Retinomax
1. -1.00D
2. -2.00D
3. <+2.00D
4. <+1.00D
REFERRAL BASED ON REFRACTIVE ERROR?
4 9 12 BY 4
1.5 YEARS 4-6 YEARS
MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS YEARS
Hyperopia Hyperopia Hyperopia Hyperopia Hyperopia Hyperopia
<3.50D <2.50D <2.25D <2.00D <1.50D <1.50D
REFRACTIVE
ERROR Anisometropia Anisometropia Anisometropia Anisometropia Anisometropia Anisometropia
<1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
Convergence Attentive to Tracks ball, Letter matching 3/6 to 3/4.8 6/9.5 – 6/6
good, near and far looks at picture by 2years (3.5 years)
VISION Fixates on in book
faces 3/7.5 - 3/6 6/12 (4 years)
(3years)
WHAT CONDITIONS DO WE IDENTIFY IN CHILDREN
IN REFRACTIVE ERROR SCREENING?
• Is this child at risk of amblyopia?
• LogMAR scaled
– Calibrated for 5ft (1.5meters) or 10ft (3meters)
3. Start at the top of the chart and ask the patient to identify the first
symbol. If easily identified, move to line below.
5. Continue moving down the chart until the patient reads 3 or more
optotypes incorrectly in one line – this is your end point.
• Test with the patient’s glasses first if they are wearing them
WHAT IS ACCEPTABLE VISUAL ACUITY FOR A
4 YEAR OLD?
• You can assume most adults over 50 will have difficulties at near
with the expectation of low mopes
2. Bruckner
3. Retinoscopy
PINHOLE OCCLUDER
BRUCKNER
• Type of reflex?
– Refractive error?
• Asymmetric?
– OD vs OS
– Opaque – strabismus? Media opacity?
optometrystudents.com
BRUCKNER
What type of refractive error is this?
1. Myopia
2. Emmetropia
3. Hyperopia
4. Other concern
http://www.ojoonline.org/article.asp?issn=0974-620X;year=2010;volume=3;issue=3;spage=131;epage=135;aulast=Amitava;
https://www.google.com/search?biw=1204&bih=706&tbm=isch&q=bruckner+test&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjf6ojzpe7WAhWsxYMKHddCB1sQhyYIJQ#imgrc=
BRUCKNER
What type of refractive error is this?
1. Myopia
2. Emmetropia
3. Hyperopia
4. Other concern
http://www.ojoonline.org/article.asp?issn=0974-620X;year=2010;volume=3;issue=3;spage=131;epage=135;aulast=Amitava;
https://www.google.com/search?biw=1204&bih=706&tbm=isch&q=bruckner+test&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjf6ojzpe7WAhWsxYMKHddCB1sQhyYIJQ#imgrc=
BRUCKNER
What type of refractive error is this?
1. Myopia
2. Emmetropia
3. Hyperopia
4. Other concern
http://www.ijo.in/viewimage.asp?img=IndianJOphthalmol_2013_61_10_608_121092_f2.jpg
BRUCKNER
What type of refractive error is this?
1. Myopia
2. Emmetropia
3. Hyperopia
4. Other concern
http://www.ijo.in/viewimage.asp?img=IndianJOphthalmol_2013_61_10_608_121092_f2.jpg
http://www.aafp.org/afp/2013/0815/p241.html
BRUCKNER
Childhood Eye Examination
What now?
1. Myopia
Figure 6. Figure 5.
Asymmetry in the red reflexes. Red reflex should be equal in both eyes when the red reflexes are viewed
Red reflex examination. (A) Normal, symmetric red reflex. (B) Norma
2. Emmetropia
simultaneously. An abnormality is exposed if one reflex appears more prominent than the other, or if one reflex is
of a different color or intensity, as in this patient.
abnormal, diminished red reflex in the patient's left eye, which is mos
between the eyes, but can also be caused by a more serious patholo
3. Hyperopia reflex in the patient's right eye and no reflex in the patient's left eye, w
Copyright © 2013 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may by
makean
oneopacity such
printout of the asandamay
material cataract.
use
4. Other concern
that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded,
copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as
authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact afpserv@aafp.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests. www.aafp.org
SCREENING FLOW AFTER VISUAL ACUITY
- NOT AN ABSOLUTE LIST, BUT A GOOD PLACE TO START IN CHILDREN
1. Hirschberg
2. Cover test
4. Excursions
www.sciencedirect.com
HIRSCHBERG
1. Exotropia
2. Exophoria
3. Esotropia http://www.dijetaizdravlje.com/zdravlje/razrokost/
4. Esophoria
https://entokey.com/diagnostic-evaluation-of-strabismus-and-torticollis/
HIRSCHBERG
1. Exotropia
2. Exophoria
3. Esotropia http://webeye.ophth.uiowa.edu/eyeforum/cases/124-infantile-esotropia.htm
4. Esophoria
https://entokey.com/diagnostic-evaluation-of-strabismus-and-torticollis/
COVER TEST
PHORIA:
• Alternating cover test
• Identify type and deviation of deviation
• Procedure – cover eye for at least 2-3 seconds
• Normal?
– Distance 1 esophoria - 3exophoria
– Near orthophoria to 6 exophoria
TROPIA
• Unilateral cover test
• Always a REFER
ESOPHORIA
• Eye not occluded will go into it’s
phoria position
• Cover one eye for 2-3 seconds
then the other
• Determines phoria direction &
magnitude
• Disrupting fusional vergence
• The eyes move to the same degree
under cover
• Good lighting!
www.aafp.org
NEAR POINT OF CONVERGENCE “NPC”
• With accommodative target
• Normal:
– Accomodative target 5cm/7cm
– Light target 7cm/10cm
OBSERVATIONS
• Nystagmus
• Head posture
• Tearing, discharge
• Corneal clouding, large cornea (glaucoma in child, with watery eye and photophobia)
• Red eye
• Lumps
• Refractive glasses
• Developmental milestones/behaviour?
• Squinting to see
PUPILS
WHAT ARE WE LOOKING FOR?
EXCURSIONS:
• Head straight
• Examiner ~ 50cm from patient at same
level
• Follow light with eyes keeping head still
• Move light/target in double H and X
pattern
• Record if
– smooth
– accurate
– extensive
http://www.tedmontgomery.com/the_eye/eom.html; https://www.slideshare.net/Rajkohila/extra-ocular-muscles-ppt
PROS AND CONS OF VISION SCREENING
• Benefits of screenings
– Early identification those requiring extensive vision care
– Improve learning of children
– Identify those with refractive error earlier rather than later
• Limitations of screenings
– Cost to parent and government
• time, transport, space, equipment, personal
– Language, culture
– False negatives
– False positives
LECTURE OBJECTIVES REVISITED
QUESTIONS?